Nope, I have been refreshing my email every 5 minutes though.Choose89 wrote:Any news on this fin aid business that was brought up?
Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle) Forum
-
katthegreat11

- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:16 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
-
LHS17

- Posts: 121
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:29 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
Anyone know what % of students receive a need-based grant? Their website cites an 80% figure for aid, but I assume that is distorted by loans.katthegreat11 wrote:Nope, I have been refreshing my email every 5 minutes though.Choose89 wrote:Any news on this fin aid business that was brought up?
Berkeley told me their true figure is 10% which has me concerned about others.
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
You should compare Stanford with Harvard / Yale and not Berkeley.LHS17 wrote:Anyone know what % of students receive a need-based grant? Their website cites an 80% figure for aid, but I assume that is distorted by loans.katthegreat11 wrote:Nope, I have been refreshing my email every 5 minutes though.Choose89 wrote:Any news on this fin aid business that was brought up?
Berkeley told me their true figure is 10% which has me concerned about others.
Stanford is known for being the most generous. Still worried though
-
LHS17

- Posts: 121
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:29 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
I disregarded Harvard because they have a pretty damning write-up about probable lack of eligibility given x income thresholds.ood's_brother wrote:You should compare Stanford with Harvard / Yale and not Berkeley.LHS17 wrote:Anyone know what % of students receive a need-based grant? Their website cites an 80% figure for aid, but I assume that is distorted by loans.katthegreat11 wrote:Nope, I have been refreshing my email every 5 minutes though.Choose89 wrote:Any news on this fin aid business that was brought up?
Berkeley told me their true figure is 10% which has me concerned about others.
Stanford is known for being the most generous. Still worried though
Agree Stanford's financial aid doc makes it seem one might qualify even with modest to decent income / savings.
-
HamlinMcgill

- Posts: 44
- Joined: Tue May 17, 2016 7:04 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
According to their 509 report, 45.3% of students receive a need-based grant and the median amount is $24,163.LHS17 wrote:Anyone know what % of students receive a need-based grant? Their website cites an 80% figure for aid, but I assume that is distorted by loans.katthegreat11 wrote:Nope, I have been refreshing my email every 5 minutes though.Choose89 wrote:Any news on this fin aid business that was brought up?
Berkeley told me their true figure is 10% which has me concerned about others.
https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-con ... -17-56.pdf
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Choose89

- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2017 1:10 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
Stanford (along with HY) operates on a need analysis system for financial aid. Berkeley is generally merit based, with additional allowances made for need (like basically every non S/Y/H School).
You may be inclined to compare them due to geographic location, but when assessing or comparing likely aid amounts, Berkeley and Stanford are fundamentally different.
There are some various numerical analyses online but few resources other than each school's official website or the scant workups created by related professional organizations are reliable and verifiable.
Maybe it would help a few of people if someone did some fancy linking to a variety of such things to paint a more comprehensive picture?
You may be inclined to compare them due to geographic location, but when assessing or comparing likely aid amounts, Berkeley and Stanford are fundamentally different.
There are some various numerical analyses online but few resources other than each school's official website or the scant workups created by related professional organizations are reliable and verifiable.
Maybe it would help a few of people if someone did some fancy linking to a variety of such things to paint a more comprehensive picture?
-
katthegreat11

- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:16 pm
- futureellewoods123

- Posts: 166
- Joined: Wed Jan 25, 2017 4:38 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
Is this real or speculation??katthegreat11 wrote:Hey Harvard, what's good?![]()
http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2017-u ... re-here-2/
-
katthegreat11

- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:16 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
Real. Spivey is reliable.futureellewoods123 wrote:Is this real or speculation??katthegreat11 wrote:Hey Harvard, what's good?![]()
http://blog.spiveyconsulting.com/2017-u ... re-here-2/
- dietcoke1

- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
please Stanford keep accepting relatively normal people. don't let USWNR turn you into Y and start seeking out nobel peace prize winners
- Assasindowntheavenue

- Posts: 818
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2016 6:45 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
Lmao @ UC Berkeley
-
LHS17

- Posts: 121
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:29 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
Reading this comment in the Nobel Peace Centre in Norway as we speak...dietcoke1 wrote:please Stanford keep accepting relatively normal people. don't let USWNR turn you into Y and start seeking out nobel peace prize winners
- poptart123

- Posts: 1157
- Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 5:31 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
Hei, hei, der.LHS17 wrote:Reading this comment in the Nobel Peace Centre in Norway as we speak...dietcoke1 wrote:please Stanford keep accepting relatively normal people. don't let USWNR turn you into Y and start seeking out nobel peace prize winners
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
katthegreat11

- Posts: 324
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:16 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
.
Last edited by katthegreat11 on Wed Jan 24, 2018 8:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
FTFYdietcoke1 wrote:please Stanford keep accepting relatively normal people. don't let USWNR turn you into H and start seeking out gunners
I really hope people who are prestige inclined still end up going to H over S. :/
-
Monday

- Posts: 784
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
.
Last edited by Monday on Thu May 11, 2017 12:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
- ood's_brother

- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2017 1:23 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
Nah, it's just that the H forum is always popping.Monday wrote:Aren't you gunning for H, though?ood's_brother wrote:FTFYdietcoke1 wrote:please Stanford keep accepting relatively normal people. don't let USWNR turn you into H and start seeking out gunners
I really hope people who are prestige inclined still end up going to H over S. :/
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
STANFORD,
Call me beep me if you wanna reach me
When you wanna page me it's okay
I just can't wait til I hear my cell phone ring
Call me beep me if you wanna reach me
When you wanna page me it's okay
I just can't wait til I hear my cell phone ring
-
SmallK

- Posts: 186
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2016 10:09 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
+infinityRigo wrote:STANFORD,
Call me beep me if you wanna reach me
When you wanna page me it's okay
I just can't wait til I hear my cell phone ring
- Baby Gaga

- Posts: 432
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 1:07 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
the Kim Possible text tone is my text tone and is very popular with all my friends of a very narrow age groupRigo wrote:STANFORD,
Call me beep me if you wanna reach me
When you wanna page me it's okay
I just can't wait til I hear my cell phone ring
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
I'm getting a 404 error message for the status check page.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
I think we should be friends.Baby Gaga wrote:the Kim Possible text tone is my text tone and is very popular with all my friends of a very narrow age groupRigo wrote:STANFORD,
Call me beep me if you wanna reach me
When you wanna page me it's okay
I just can't wait til I hear my cell phone ring
- Assasindowntheavenue

- Posts: 818
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2016 6:45 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
Same. Must mean we're in.Rigo wrote:I'm getting a 404 error message for the status check page.
- bartlettadmin

- Posts: 104
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:16 pm
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
As if though I needed more stress now they won't let me repeatedly check my status? Rude.Assasindowntheavenue wrote:Same. Must mean we're in.Rigo wrote:I'm getting a 404 error message for the status check page.
-
BobBoblaw

- Posts: 222
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:43 am
Re: Stanford C/O 2020 Applicants (2016-2017 Cycle)
bartlettadmin wrote:As if though I needed more stress now they won't let me repeatedly check my status? Rude.Assasindowntheavenue wrote:Same. Must mean we're in.Rigo wrote:I'm getting a 404 error message for the status check page.
I just noticed this, poked around a bit, and found a page with a working link to the status checker
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login