you can find me at www.top-law-schools.com! Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
User avatar
HorseThief

Silver
Posts: 713
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 1:45 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by HorseThief » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:05 pm

jimmymac wrote:Any estimate on how many JS1s have been given out yet? Around 100? 150?
At least 100. Someone could probably go back through the thread just to be sure.

"Edit": Okay, I was curious, so I looked it up.
  • Week 1 (11/3): 25
  • Week 2 (11/10): 27
  • Week 3 (11/17): 48
That puts us at 100 JS1's so far (going entirely by slots available).

User avatar
antiworldly

Bronze
Posts: 388
Joined: Wed Oct 01, 2014 8:18 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by antiworldly » Tue Nov 11, 2014 7:10 pm

HorseThief wrote:
jimmymac wrote:Any estimate on how many JS1s have been given out yet? Around 100? 150?
At least 100. Someone could probably go back through the thread just to be sure.

"Edit": Okay, I was curious, so I looked it up.
  • Week 1 (11/3): 25
  • Week 2 (11/10): 27
  • Week 3 (11/17): 48
That puts us at 100 JS1's so far (going entirely by slots available).
So for those of us who are stressing about not getting one, only ~10%, so there's still a chance!

User avatar
LawBron James

Bronze
Posts: 378
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 7:13 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by LawBron James » Tue Nov 11, 2014 8:25 pm

HorseThief wrote:
psychmusic wrote:I have a wild guess about the slots/scheduling-

It seems like the actual slots for the js1s are in place when they send the wave. After a bit of time has passed, they post a few more slots that will actually be for the next wave to give additional options to people for whom the initial set didn't work. Once everyone from the wave has registered, they take the slots back down, and repost them before the next wave. Does that make any sense/does anyone else who has seen the schedule agree or disagree?
You're spot on. I've been seeing spots for Dec. 1st every few days over the past 2 weeks, but every time I refresh the page, they're gone. I think it's just how their scheduler works. The program won't allow them to hide a slot until it actually exists, so lame folk like myself who have nothing better to do but f5 their page get to see what they're planning.


PS: Post 500 :cry:
Lame folk like you help keep overly neurotic people like me sane. So feel no shame!

xylocarp

Platinum
Posts: 5215
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:16 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by xylocarp » Tue Nov 11, 2014 8:29 pm

HorseThief wrote:PS: Post 500 :cry:
nerd
Last edited by xylocarp on Mon Jan 29, 2018 5:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
nyanyanya

New
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Jun 20, 2013 2:36 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by nyanyanya » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:02 pm

It seems all JS1 invites this year were sent out on either Monday or Friday, so maybe we can expect the next wave to be on this Friday?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


BillsFan9907

Silver
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by BillsFan9907 » Tue Nov 11, 2014 9:29 pm

For those of you for which HLS is your uncompromising first choice, what would you say to someone asking you to justify your decision over taking a Hamilton or Ruby? I've always been curious WHY people do this.

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton

Platinum
Posts: 5414
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by Mack.Hambleton » Tue Nov 11, 2014 10:04 pm

Seoulless wrote:For those of you for which HLS is your uncompromising first choice, what would you say to someone asking you to justify your decision over taking a Hamilton or Ruby? I've always been curious WHY people do this.
They're rich

User avatar
LSATneurotic

Silver
Posts: 982
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by LSATneurotic » Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:25 am

Seoulless wrote:For those of you for which HLS is your uncompromising first choice, what would you say to someone asking you to justify your decision over taking a Hamilton or Ruby? I've always been curious WHY people do this.
A hamilton would be prettty tempting. I'd probably still opt for Harvard though but that's just cause I'm ambitious. If my only goal was making $$$ then I'd obviously take the scholarship and run.

BillsFan9907

Silver
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by BillsFan9907 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:06 am

LSATneurotic wrote:
Seoulless wrote:For those of you for which HLS is your uncompromising first choice, what would you say to someone asking you to justify your decision over taking a Hamilton or Ruby? I've always been curious WHY people do this.
A hamilton would be prettty tempting. I'd probably still opt for Harvard though but that's just cause I'm ambitious. If my only goal was making $$$ then I'd obviously take the scholarship and run.
Please expand! How does HLS better satisfy ambition than CLS ?

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


User avatar
blueberrycrumble

Bronze
Posts: 364
Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 2:07 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by blueberrycrumble » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:33 am

LSATneurotic wrote:
Seoulless wrote:For those of you for which HLS is your uncompromising first choice, what would you say to someone asking you to justify your decision over taking a Hamilton or Ruby? I've always been curious WHY people do this.
A hamilton would be prettty tempting. I'd probably still opt for Harvard though but that's just cause I'm ambitious. If my only goal was making $$$ then I'd obviously take the scholarship and run.
What are your ambitions?

WeeBey

Silver
Posts: 547
Joined: Sat May 31, 2014 8:23 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by WeeBey » Wed Nov 12, 2014 1:52 am

Seoulless wrote:For those of you for which HLS is your uncompromising first choice, what would you say to someone asking you to justify your decision over taking a Hamilton or Ruby? I've always been curious WHY people do this.
aren't a Ruby/Hammy the best possible outcomes in the ls admissions game? I think people fail to realize how much debt 250k is. Anything you can do with a Harvard jd you can with a cls jd. Even if you have to place a little higher in your CLS class for a clerkship, that extra effort to me is easily worth 250k.

User avatar
LSATneurotic

Silver
Posts: 982
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by LSATneurotic » Wed Nov 12, 2014 2:07 am

Seoulless wrote:
LSATneurotic wrote:
Seoulless wrote:For those of you for which HLS is your uncompromising first choice, what would you say to someone asking you to justify your decision over taking a Hamilton or Ruby? I've always been curious WHY people do this.
A hamilton would be prettty tempting. I'd probably still opt for Harvard though but that's just cause I'm ambitious. If my only goal was making $$$ then I'd obviously take the scholarship and run.
Please expand! How does HLS better satisfy ambition than CLS ?
I don't have to spell out the inordinate success of harvard law grads. Columbia is a fine school and all, assuming you're okay with second place. If you want to win, HLS is the move. Really don't care to argue this, honestly. If i got a JS2 id withdraw from everywhere immediately, even if through some act of god I got yale and stanford.

Call it poor decision making, but that's what I'd do.

User avatar
everything_bagel

Bronze
Posts: 432
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:10 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by everything_bagel » Wed Nov 12, 2014 10:40 am

LSATneurotic wrote:
Seoulless wrote:For those of you for which HLS is your uncompromising first choice, what would you say to someone asking you to justify your decision over taking a Hamilton or Ruby? I've always been curious WHY people do this.
A hamilton would be prettty tempting. I'd probably still opt for Harvard though but that's just cause I'm ambitious. If my only goal was making $$$ then I'd obviously take the scholarship and run.
I don't think you get it. People don't take the Hamilton or Rubenstein because they want to make money, they take them because they want to avoid having hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt hanging over their heads...which is why most people feel like they have no choice but to go into biglaw to make money anyway.

I don't think this argument is worth having (you'd pick Harvard over CLS because it's "number one" but then you'd withdraw from YLS immediately?) but that had to be addressed...

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


BillsFan9907

Silver
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by BillsFan9907 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 10:47 am

LSATneurotic wrote:
I don't have to spell out the inordinate success of harvard law grads. Columbia is a fine school and all, assuming you're okay with second place. If you want to win, HLS is the move. Really don't care to argue this, honestly. If i got a JS2 id withdraw from everywhere immediately, even if through some act of god I got yale and stanford.

Call it poor decision making, but that's what I'd do.
Nobody is asking you to argue anything! I am just really curious as to what the core reasoning is. What do you mean by "inordinate success of HLS grads?"

User avatar
LSATneurotic

Silver
Posts: 982
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by LSATneurotic » Wed Nov 12, 2014 10:52 am

Seoulless wrote:
LSATneurotic wrote:
I don't have to spell out the inordinate success of harvard law grads. Columbia is a fine school and all, assuming you're okay with second place. If you want to win, HLS is the move. Really don't care to argue this, honestly. If i got a JS2 id withdraw from everywhere immediately, even if through some act of god I got yale and stanford.

Call it poor decision making, but that's what I'd do.
Nobody is asking you to argue anything! I am just really curious as to what the core reasoning is. What do you mean by "inordinate success of HLS grads?"
supreme court justices, congressmen, law firm partners, SCOTUS clerks, the list goes on.

HLS has a huge alumni network. the size of HLS is what makes it the best choice.

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by Colonel_funkadunk » Wed Nov 12, 2014 11:07 am

LSATneurotic wrote:
Seoulless wrote:
LSATneurotic wrote:
Seoulless wrote:For those of you for which HLS is your uncompromising first choice, what would you say to someone asking you to justify your decision over taking a Hamilton or Ruby? I've always been curious WHY people do this.
A hamilton would be prettty tempting. I'd probably still opt for Harvard though but that's just cause I'm ambitious. If my only goal was making $$$ then I'd obviously take the scholarship and run.
Please expand! How does HLS better satisfy ambition than CLS ?
I don't have to spell out the inordinate success of harvard law grads. Columbia is a fine school and all, assuming you're okay with second place. If you want to win, HLS is the move. Really don't care to argue this, honestly. If i got a JS2 id withdraw from everywhere immediately, even if through some act of god I got yale and stanford.

Call it poor decision making, but that's what I'd do.
Do you have any friends IRL?

User avatar
LSATneurotic

Silver
Posts: 982
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by LSATneurotic » Wed Nov 12, 2014 11:19 am

^heyyyy that was really personal.

ETA:
I don't think you get it. People don't take the Hamilton or Rubenstein because they want to make money, they take them because they want to avoid having hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt hanging over their heads...which is why most people feel like they have no choice but to go into biglaw to make money anyway.

I don't think this argument is worth having (you'd pick Harvard over CLS because it's "number one" but then you'd withdraw from YLS immediately?) but that had to be addressed...
agree with bolded.

Choosing a school really depends on your goals. As far as I am concerned, HLS is the best. I'm not saying that YLS, CLS, or SLS grads don't go on to do some pretty amazing stuff.

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


smile0751

Bronze
Posts: 490
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2014 11:40 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by smile0751 » Wed Nov 12, 2014 11:35 am

LSATneurotic wrote:^heyyyy that was really personal.
Hey, I'll back you. I feel the same way about Harvard. Even though I'm extremely debt adverse and wouldn't want to pay full price anywhere else...

User avatar
R. Jeeves

Gold
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by R. Jeeves » Wed Nov 12, 2014 11:43 am

LSATneurotic wrote:
Seoulless wrote:
LSATneurotic wrote:
Seoulless wrote:For those of you for which HLS is your uncompromising first choice, what would you say to someone asking you to justify your decision over taking a Hamilton or Ruby? I've always been curious WHY people do this.
A hamilton would be prettty tempting. I'd probably still opt for Harvard though but that's just cause I'm ambitious. If my only goal was making $$$ then I'd obviously take the scholarship and run.
Please expand! How does HLS better satisfy ambition than CLS ?
I don't have to spell out the inordinate success of harvard law grads. Columbia is a fine school and all, assuming you're okay with second place. If you want to win, HLS is the move. Really don't care to argue this, honestly. If i got a JS2 id withdraw from everywhere immediately, even if through some act of god I got yale and stanford.

Call it poor decision making, but that's what I'd do.
Yeah and also I saw this documentary on USA about a law firm that only hires from HLS. Im assuming that a lot of the most prestigious firms are like this. There was one girl from Columbia Law that was allowed to work as an attorney at this firm but she had already been a paralegal there for a long time and essentially had to blackmail the managing partner into allowing her to work as an associate there despite the fact that she didnt go to H. It just goes to show how much clout an HLS degree carries compared to other schools.

Gray

Platinum
Posts: 7003
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

.

Post by Gray » Wed Nov 12, 2014 11:46 am

.

User avatar
R. Jeeves

Gold
Posts: 1980
Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by R. Jeeves » Wed Nov 12, 2014 11:55 am

smccgrey wrote:
pulstar1 wrote: Yeah and also I saw this documentary on USA about a law firm that only hires from HLS. Im assuming that a lot of the most prestigious firms are like this. There was one girl from Columbia Law that was allowed to work as an attorney at this firm but she had already been a paralegal there for a long time and essentially had to blackmail the managing partner into allowing her to work as an associate there despite the fact that she didnt go to H. It just goes to show how much clout an HLS degree carries compared to other schools.
I think the main attorney they featured on that documentary didn't have too many friends though. Just his GF and sometimes his boss. Basically everyone else hated him because he was a self absorbed dbag.
and you do notice that quite a few people who gun exclusively for HLS turn out to be self-absorbed dbags like the attorney you are describing. One can only hope that such people pick up on cues from the people around them and make an effort to reform their behavior once they become aware of how douchey they are.
Last edited by R. Jeeves on Wed Nov 12, 2014 11:57 am, edited 2 times in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16639
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by Rigo » Wed Nov 12, 2014 11:56 am

pulstar1 wrote: Yeah and also I saw this documentary on USA about a law firm that only hires from HLS. Im assuming that a lot of the most prestigious firms are like this. There was one girl from Columbia Law that was allowed to work as an attorney at this firm but she had already been a paralegal there for a long time and essentially had to blackmail the managing partner into allowing her to work as an associate there despite the fact that she didnt go to H. It just goes to show how much clout an HLS degree carries compared to other schools.
:lol:

Gray

Platinum
Posts: 7003
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

.

Post by Gray » Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:05 pm

.

Rigo

Diamond
Posts: 16639
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: Harvard c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by Rigo » Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:15 pm

smccgrey wrote:
Dirigo wrote:
pulstar1 wrote: Yeah and also I saw this documentary on USA about a law firm that only hires from HLS. Im assuming that a lot of the most prestigious firms are like this. There was one girl from Columbia Law that was allowed to work as an attorney at this firm but she had already been a paralegal there for a long time and essentially had to blackmail the managing partner into allowing her to work as an associate there despite the fact that she didnt go to H. It just goes to show how much clout an HLS degree carries compared to other schools.
:lol:
They might have been trolling though because that Columbia associate got into S but not H and like seriously when does that ever happen.
Utterly shocking that someone with a 172 wouldn't be accepted to Harvard!

Gray

Platinum
Posts: 7003
Joined: Tue Jun 17, 2014 1:02 pm

.

Post by Gray » Wed Nov 12, 2014 12:25 pm

.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”