so you're REALLY good at mathbbkk wrote:Sorry, Team China here.Vincent wrote: USAMO?To clarify: I was in a special maths class trained for that, but I didn't participate in the actual one.

CMO is harder than IMO, no?
so you're REALLY good at mathbbkk wrote:Sorry, Team China here.Vincent wrote: USAMO?To clarify: I was in a special maths class trained for that, but I didn't participate in the actual one.
...did you recruit Lindsay Lohan in order to obtain jackets?jingosaur wrote:Haha, I was 2nd in my region and 9th in NJ in Mathcounts. I never made the USAMO but I came really close. I think I got an 8 on the AIME one year. I got a 10 on the Putnam exam as a college freshman but I didn't take it again. So yeah, I guess I'm a mathlete. I only minored in math in college because I wanted to work in finance and my UG has a really good 2 year UG business school.midwest17 wrote: I think I still have a Mathcounts t-shirt somewhere.
ftfykoalacity wrote:...did you recruit Cady Heron in order to obtain jackets?jingosaur wrote:Haha, I was 2nd in my region and 9th in NJ in Mathcounts. I never made the USAMO but I came really close. I think I got an 8 on the AIME one year. I got a 10 on the Putnam exam as a college freshman but I didn't take it again. So yeah, I guess I'm a mathlete. I only minored in math in college because I wanted to work in finance and my UG has a really good 2 year UG business school.midwest17 wrote: I think I still have a Mathcounts t-shirt somewhere.
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
I'm now really curious as to how MATHCOUNTS people do on the LSAT (and how many of us are math competition "close but not quite" members of the closet mathlete retirement community. 11th(?) in CA missing out on Countdown by 1 place; I was sad for weeks.angels2fly wrote:ftfykoalacity wrote:...did you recruit Cady Heron in order to obtain jackets?jingosaur wrote:Haha, I was 2nd in my region and 9th in NJ in Mathcounts. I never made the USAMO but I came really close. I think I got an 8 on the AIME one year. I got a 10 on the Putnam exam as a college freshman but I didn't take it again. So yeah, I guess I'm a mathlete. I only minored in math in college because I wanted to work in finance and my UG has a really good 2 year UG business school.midwest17 wrote: I think I still have a Mathcounts t-shirt somewhere.
bbkk,bee wrote:i like how you're acting like your numbers arent equally as impressivebbkk wrote:and yes..I'm a bit jelly toophysicsguy wrote:Just sent in my apps! 4.04/174/about to get my Ph.D. in physics from a top university.
I'm also applying to Berkeley, Columbia, Chicago, and Harvard (and likely Yale but I haven't written the 250 yet).
Sorry dude I'm married. I don't need any guy (with the exceptions of adcoms) to like me.Vincent wrote: bbkk,
I know havinga boyfriendStanford might seem like the only thing important to you right now, but you don't have to dumb yourself down in order fora guyFaye to like you.
Not really, CMO can be viewed as a process of selecting IMO candidates.2x2Matrix wrote:
CMO is harder than IMO, no?
bbkk, PLEASE tell me you have seen Mean Girls (Vincent was quoting from it).bbkk wrote:Sorry dude I'm married. I don't need any guy (with the exceptions of adcoms) to like me.Vincent wrote: bbkk,
I know havinga boyfriendStanford might seem like the only thing important to you right now, but you don't have to dumb yourself down in order fora guyFaye to like you.
Sorry I haven't seen it. International kid here. Sorry if I missed some of the insider jokes here.koalacity wrote:bbkk, PLEASE tell me you have seen Mean Girls (Vincent was quoting from it).bbkk wrote:Sorry dude I'm married. I don't need any guy (with the exceptions of adcoms) to like me.Vincent wrote: bbkk,
I know havinga boyfriendStanford might seem like the only thing important to you right now, but you don't have to dumb yourself down in order fora guyFaye to like you.
P.S. I appreciated the reference
Ooh, I could see how my comment could be awkward. You should see it! One of the most quotable movies ever.bbkk wrote:Sorry I haven't seen it. International kid here. Sorry if I missed some of the insider jokes here.koalacity wrote:bbkk, PLEASE tell me you have seen Mean Girls (Vincent was quoting from it).bbkk wrote:Sorry dude I'm married. I don't need any guy (with the exceptions of adcoms) to like me.Vincent wrote: bbkk,
I know havinga boyfriendStanford might seem like the only thing important to you right now, but you don't have to dumb yourself down in order fora guyFaye to like you.
P.S. I appreciated the reference![]()
![]()
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
haha sure why not! I have plenty of time while waiting for admission decisions.Vincent wrote: Ooh, I could see how my comment could be awkward. You should see it! One of the most quotable movies ever.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I think the consensus is that emails won't be changing case this year.Nooblarzlarz wrote:So is there any reason to expect any changes in the status checker once you go UR?
I'd prefer not to go into that detail, since it would be possible to identify me from that. The number of people graduating with a Ph.D. in a particular year in a particular subfield of physics from a "top" university is not that high. Black holes are tres cool though.bbkk wrote:Just out of curiosity, what kind of physics you study? I have a very good friend who is getting a Ph.D in Physics in Stanford. He studies the black hole and time machines. IT IS SO COOL.physicsguy wrote:
Aww, thank guys. TLS has been a great resource for me as I've lurked through the whole application process.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
If you don't mind my asking, why law?physicsguy wrote:I'd prefer not to go into that detail, since it would be possible to identify me from that. The number of people graduating with a Ph.D. in a particular year in a particular subfield of physics from a "top" university is not that high. Black holes are tres cool though.bbkk wrote:Just out of curiosity, what kind of physics you study? I have a very good friend who is getting a Ph.D in Physics in Stanford. He studies the black hole and time machines. IT IS SO COOL.physicsguy wrote:
Aww, thank guys. TLS has been a great resource for me as I've lurked through the whole application process.
However, to add to this wonderful discussion on math that I've incited, I'll say that I did Mathcounts, and I also did the AIME test but didn't qualify (or even come close) for USAMO. I never did Putnam, though I remember looking at some of the questions in college and feeling frightened. But I really enjoy applied math, and even abstract math to a point.
I was sitting like this as well, but went to submitted for review yesterday evening.esther0123 wrote:Is anyone else still waiting for their application to go complete? I wrote December LSAT but submitted in November with my October score..
When I was 21, I felt sure that I wanted to do science for the rest of my life. I thought the dream was to get a Ph.D., become a professor at a renowned research institution, and live a life of academic purity. On a fellowship application, I wrote that my career goal was to stay in physics research, and I meant it. Now, I could stay in physics. I am pretty good at it, and I enjoy the work, too. And the freedom to set your own schedule cannot be beat.Vincent wrote:If you don't mind my asking, why law?physicsguy wrote:I'd prefer not to go into that detail, since it would be possible to identify me from that. The number of people graduating with a Ph.D. in a particular year in a particular subfield of physics from a "top" university is not that high. Black holes are tres cool though.bbkk wrote: Just out of curiosity, what kind of physics you study? I have a very good friend who is getting a Ph.D in Physics in Stanford. He studies the black hole and time machines. IT IS SO COOL.
However, to add to this wonderful discussion on math that I've incited, I'll say that I did Mathcounts, and I also did the AIME test but didn't qualify (or even come close) for USAMO. I never did Putnam, though I remember looking at some of the questions in college and feeling frightened. But I really enjoy applied math, and even abstract math to a point.
Oh sure, they're all pounding down my door.AmericanBeauty wrote:Are MIT, Harvard, Caltech, Stanford, Princeton, and Berkeley all not offering tenure track professorships for your particular field in physics?!
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login