if I gotcherryalamode wrote:So if I got in with a 163 LSAT and a good GPA, should I expect a good scholly offer?
or
if I get?
either way, I wouldn't expect a scholly offer. I'm not expecting one - based on LSN. Maybe some grants?
if I gotcherryalamode wrote:So if I got in with a 163 LSAT and a good GPA, should I expect a good scholly offer?
I got 15k w a 165. It could happen...cherryalamode wrote:So if I got in with a 163 LSAT and a good GPA, should I expect a good scholly offer?
oooooooooo cool! congrats on that.Neelio wrote:I got 15k w a 165. It could happen...cherryalamode wrote:So if I got in with a 163 LSAT and a good GPA, should I expect a good scholly offer?
Thanks... I'd give it all back to get off the Berkeley waitlist/in at UW. But hey... i'll take it.Veritas wrote:oooooooooo cool! congrats on that.Neelio wrote:I got 15k w a 165. It could happen...cherryalamode wrote:So if I got in with a 163 LSAT and a good GPA, should I expect a good scholly offer?
yea congrats. you were over 75% in both GPA and LSAT to davis though right?Neelio wrote:Thanks... I'd give it all back to get off the Berkeley waitlist/in at UW. But hey... i'll take it.Veritas wrote:oooooooooo cool! congrats on that.Neelio wrote:I got 15k w a 165. It could happen...cherryalamode wrote:So if I got in with a 163 LSAT and a good GPA, should I expect a good scholly offer?
+1... this is getting real old.Inygma wrote:No new news for me today
I think they were just copying and pasting what I said in a previous post. I'm not sure if I will be on the WL, but I certainly don't expect to hear anything before April. I am a December LSAT applicant, and my numbers are sort of borderline; this normally makes for a long wait. With the increase in applicants, it will only make things tougher. While more applicants doesn't necessarily = stronger applicants as a whole, more applicants does = more applicants that are strong (unless if you assume all of the extra apps are 145/2.1 retards). To demonstrate the point, assume this for a normal cycle (~3000 apps-divided evenly for easy math, not accuracy ):Matteliszt wrote:Yo, We have very similar numbers. I haven't done the back research through the entire thread but I saw a lot of people saying you were going to get WL/accepted. Can you elaborate on why or should I just read the thread?
How/when did you hear??jahallc wrote:Just got accepted =)! Pleasant surprise! I was expecting a rejection, so I guess the holistic review helped me. Best of luck to those still waiting for that miserable 6:00:25 PM PST daily update.
Hope to see some of you all there in the fall.
I am bitterly jealous... But congratulations! That's awesome! I am glad at least some are seeing some love. Mind sharing your numbers? PM me if you like. Thanks!jahallc wrote:I found out through the decision letter they attach to your status checker. So, they are slowly getting around to getting decisions out.