Same here. What does this mean??username08 wrote:Weird. My status checker says 11/14 but I got the UR email on 11/22. Either way I haven't heard anything...thelawschoolproject wrote:Has anyone moved on from the 11/22 date?
Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- tamarind49

- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:12 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
- msblaw89

- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hopefully that the Berkeley admissions are looking at our applications and deciding to let us intamarind49 wrote:Same here. What does this mean??username08 wrote:Weird. My status checker says 11/14 but I got the UR email on 11/22. Either way I haven't heard anything...thelawschoolproject wrote:Has anyone moved on from the 11/22 date?
- clarion

- Posts: 235
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:53 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1. Hoping for the same as 89msblaw89 wrote:Hopefully that the Berkeley admissions are looking at our applications and deciding to let us intamarind49 wrote:Same here. What does this mean??username08 wrote:Weird. My status checker says 11/14 but I got the UR email on 11/22. Either way I haven't heard anything...thelawschoolproject wrote:Has anyone moved on from the 11/22 date?
- THATSHOWYOUGETANTS

- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 5:43 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
ur 11/22, have not heard anythingthelawschoolproject wrote:Has anyone moved on from the 11/22 date?
- gaud

- Posts: 5765
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2011 2:58 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
THATSHOWYOUGETANTS wrote:ur 11/22, have not heard anythingthelawschoolproject wrote:Has anyone moved on from the 11/22 date?
-
yupaws

- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2011 4:03 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
still UR from 10/27. This is getting increasingly worrisome 
- Green Glass Windows

- Posts: 743
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 3:37 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
UR as of 11/22 as well. Getting antsy.
- Zelda

- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2011 10:06 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't think anyone with UR 11/22 has heard back, have they?
- msblaw89

- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I have notZelda wrote:I don't think anyone with UR 11/22 has heard back, have they?
- ColumbiaChamp

- Posts: 185
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:01 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
i hope not!! maybe they will contact the people ITT first?Zelda wrote:I don't think anyone with UR 11/22 has heard back, have they?
-
lsdream

- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
ColumbiaChamp wrote:i hope not!! maybe they will contact the people ITT first?Zelda wrote:I don't think anyone with UR 11/22 has heard back, have they?
Still waiting!
- ColumbiaChamp

- Posts: 185
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:01 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm not excluding the possibility of a Saturday filled with acceptance phone calls but probably won't hear anything over the weekend. I'm fine with being proven wrong by someone!lsdream wrote:ColumbiaChamp wrote:i hope not!! maybe they will contact the people ITT first?Zelda wrote:I don't think anyone with UR 11/22 has heard back, have they?
Still waiting!
- msblaw89

- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Has Berk ever called on a Saturday?ColumbiaChamp wrote:I'm not excluding the possibility of a Saturday filled with acceptance phone calls but probably won't hear anything over the weekend. I'm fine with being proven wrong by someone!lsdream wrote:ColumbiaChamp wrote:i hope not!! maybe they will contact the people ITT first?Zelda wrote:I don't think anyone with UR 11/22 has heard back, have they?
Still waiting!
- ColumbiaChamp

- Posts: 185
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:01 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I've seen it before but could have been a troll. Though people got acceptances from other schools on a Sat so you never know but I wouldn't bet on it.msblaw89 wrote:
Has Berk ever called on a Saturday?
-
gravityrides0

- Posts: 552
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 8:22 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
finally finished applying to 14 schools a few days ago. berkeley is my top choice. how many weeks did it take those who have been admitted to hear from them? a few weeks? a couple months? since i'm a bit late, will it take longer? =/
*heart attack*
*heart attack*
- curiouscat

- Posts: 315
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 9:57 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just a couple of people. I was UR 11/22 and I heard back on 12/01. But it seems like the bulk of the 11/22 hasn't received a decision yet.Zelda wrote:I don't think anyone with UR 11/22 has heard back, have they?
-
newjersay

- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2011 9:03 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
has anyone gotten a rejection yet or has it only been acceptances so far?
- ColumbiaChamp

- Posts: 185
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:01 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
you would get accepted too!curiouscat wrote:Just a couple of people. I was UR 11/22 and I heard back on 12/01. But it seems like the bulk of the 11/22 hasn't received a decision yet.Zelda wrote:I don't think anyone with UR 11/22 has heard back, have they?
-
zinc

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I made a grammatical mistake in my personal statement.
why zinc why??? why was I not careful??
I have zero probability of getting in now.
UR 11/22, median LSAT for Boalt, international GPA
why zinc why??? why was I not careful??
I have zero probability of getting in now.
UR 11/22, median LSAT for Boalt, international GPA
- AmandaPB

- Posts: 430
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 1:37 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I’m sorry. I definitely didn’t read any of my application materials after I submitted, though, because I didn’t want this to happen to me.zinc wrote:I made a grammatical mistake in my personal statement.![]()
why zinc why??? why was I not careful??
I have zero probability of getting in now.![]()
![]()
UR 11/22, median LSAT for Boalt, international GPA
- ColumbiaChamp

- Posts: 185
- Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 12:01 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
with your stats, I would take a dump inside a fax machine and send it as a PS.AmandaPB wrote:I’m sorry. I definitely didn’t read any of my application materials after I submitted, though, because I didn’t want this to happen to me.zinc wrote:I made a grammatical mistake in my personal statement.![]()
why zinc why??? why was I not careful??
I have zero probability of getting in now.![]()
![]()
UR 11/22, median LSAT for Boalt, international GPA
- curiouscat

- Posts: 315
- Joined: Wed May 04, 2011 9:57 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Don't worry! People get in all the time with typos and other little mistakes in their personal statement. It's not a big deal. There's a good chance that no one at Berkeley will even notice it, and even if they would, they probably wouldn't care.zinc wrote:I made a grammatical mistake in my personal statement.![]()
why zinc why??? why was I not careful??
I have zero probability of getting in now.![]()
![]()
UR 11/22, median LSAT for Boalt, international GPA
How serious is this grammatical error? If we're talking about, like, a dangling modifier, you can forget about it. If it's something huge and glaring ("Me loves Berkley") it might be possible to give the admissions office a call and ask them to replace your PS with an updated one - but it would have to be really, really egregious to warrant that.
tl;dr - don't sweat it.
-
Rdubs

- Posts: 54
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 12:20 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I was UR 10/18 and have yet to hear back or see an update in my status checker = /Zelda wrote:I don't think anyone with UR 11/22 has heard back, have they?
-
addy11

- Posts: 479
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:01 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
TITCR... I found a typo in Berkeley's view book for crying out loud. I've received dozens of emails from schools with massive errors. This stuff happens.curiouscat wrote:Don't worry! People get in all the time with typos and other little mistakes in their personal statement. It's not a big deal. There's a good chance that no one at Berkeley will even notice it, and even if they would, they probably wouldn't care.zinc wrote:I made a grammatical mistake in my personal statement.![]()
why zinc why??? why was I not careful??
I have zero probability of getting in now.![]()
![]()
UR 11/22, median LSAT for Boalt, international GPA
How serious is this grammatical error? If we're talking about, like, a dangling modifier, you can forget about it. If it's something huge and glaring ("Me loves Berkley") it might be possible to give the admissions office a call and ask them to replace your PS with an updated one - but it would have to be really, really egregious to warrant that.
tl;dr - don't sweat it.
-
zinc

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 1:45 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
addy11 wrote:curiouscat wrote:Don't worry! People get in all the time with typos and other little mistakes in their personal statement. It's not a big deal. There's a good chance that no one at Berkeley will even notice it, and even if they would, they probably wouldn't care.zinc wrote:I made a grammatical mistake in my personal statement.![]()
why zinc why??? why was I not careful??
I have zero probability of getting in now.![]()
![]()
UR 11/22, median LSAT for Boalt, international GPA
How serious is this grammatical error? If we're talking about, like, a dangling modifier, you can forget about it. If it's something huge and glaring ("Me loves Berkley") it might be possible to give the admissions office a call and ask them to replace your PS with an updated one - but it would have to be really, really egregious to warrant that.
tl;dr - don't sweat it.
TITCR... I found a typo in Berkeley's view book for crying out loud. I've received dozens of emails from schools with massive errors. This stuff happens.
Thanks everyone. I feel better now. The sentence is not wrong, per se. However it makes me look a bit more aggressive than what I would like. We shall see what happens.