just now?
Columbia 2011! Forum
- Redsgomarchingon

- Posts: 457
- Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 7:42 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
emailed at 12:37 PM pacificCastleRock wrote:just now?
- glitched

- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
CANNOT STOP LAUGHING! HAHAHAHAHAHA
EDIT: AT the WEBSITE. Not at your situation! My condolences for the situation!
Last edited by glitched on Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
WestOfTheRest

- Posts: 1397
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 11:10 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
that's not really just. anyways, sorry to hear that.Redsgomarchingon wrote:emailed at 12:37 PM pacificCastleRock wrote:just now?
I wonder if I am ever going to hear anything.
-
amorfati

- Posts: 191
- Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2010 12:14 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
potentially stupid question, but I can't seem to find the answer anywhere...
I was just glancing at the other Columbia "holds" on LSN and trying to determine how my index stacks up. Up until this point, I knew the index had something to do with the combined weight of LSAT and GPA based on the school's past admissions data, and I just assumed that it was the same score that LSP spits out under "score" when you plug in your numbers (since mine seemed right in range).
So first off - is that right? Is that where you're all getting your index? (Or do you all just happen to know the magic formula?)
And secondly - I noticed that although the first person whose numbers I plugged in had a lower LSP "score" (and lower % at/below) than me, he/she was nonetheless given a "strong consider" at Columbia (and a "weak consider" at yale), while I only had a "consider" at columbia (and "deny" at yale). ...anybody know what the deal is there?
I was just glancing at the other Columbia "holds" on LSN and trying to determine how my index stacks up. Up until this point, I knew the index had something to do with the combined weight of LSAT and GPA based on the school's past admissions data, and I just assumed that it was the same score that LSP spits out under "score" when you plug in your numbers (since mine seemed right in range).
So first off - is that right? Is that where you're all getting your index? (Or do you all just happen to know the magic formula?)
And secondly - I noticed that although the first person whose numbers I plugged in had a lower LSP "score" (and lower % at/below) than me, he/she was nonetheless given a "strong consider" at Columbia (and a "weak consider" at yale), while I only had a "consider" at columbia (and "deny" at yale). ...anybody know what the deal is there?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- kruiz88

- Posts: 194
- Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2010 1:20 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Just got a fee wavier for CLS. Have a 3.9, 163 and URM(PR). Do you think my chances at getting admitted warrant the $12 this late in the cycle, or am I just paying $12 to increase their selectivity rating?
- mel2010

- Posts: 271
- Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 3:48 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I think you have a decent shot. It seems like at this point in the cycle they're not quite sure what to do with URMs, so I think a lot of those decisions are still there to be made and a 3.9/160 URM has already been accepted (according to LSN) this cycle. Nothing's guaranteed or even likely, but unless the $12 is way out there then I would go for it.kruiz88 wrote:Just got a fee wavier for CLS. Have a 3.9, 163 and URM(PR). Do you think my chances at getting admitted warrant the $12 this late in the cycle, or am I just paying $12 to increase their selectivity rating?
Last edited by mel2010 on Tue Feb 08, 2011 7:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- NikaneOkie

- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:39 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
prolly selectivity but how does that hurt you? go for it.kruiz88 wrote:Just got a fee wavier for CLS. Have a 3.9, 163 and URM(PR). Do you think my chances at getting admitted warrant the $12 this late in the cycle, or am I just paying $12 to increase their selectivity rating?
- Ratchet Jackson

- Posts: 2701
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
To be fair, I believe that 3.9/160 is a top 5 Ivy grad (trying not to out someone completely), so that might be important to note in order to stay grounded. However, I agree 110% to spend the $12.mel2010 wrote:I think you have a decent shot. It seems like at this point in the cycle they're not quite sure what to do with URMs, so I think a lot of those decisions are still there to be made and a 3.9/160 URM has already been accepted (according to LSN) this cycle. Nothing's guaranteed or even likely, but unless the $12 is way out there then I would go for it.kruiz88 wrote:Just got a fee wavier for CLS. Have a 3.9, 163 and URM(PR). Do you think my chances at getting admitted warrant the $12 this late in the cycle, or am I just paying $12 to increase their selectivity rating?
- awahoya

- Posts: 190
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 3:57 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
Hold e-mail, complete since late Nov/beginning of Dec., received abroad
- law_monkey

- Posts: 1709
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:25 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
This. Only a select few have been chosen. The rest of us have been held, waitlisted, or forgotten with no pattern in the numbers. And it seems that a lot of URMs have been reporting fee waivers. Apparently they're not satisfied with what they already have.mel2010 wrote:I think you have a decent shot. It seems like at this point in the cycle they're not quite sure what to do with URMs, so I think a lot of those decisions are still there to be made and a 3.9/160 URM has already been accepted (according to LSN) this cycle. Nothing's guaranteed or even likely, but unless the $12 is way out there then I would go for it.kruiz88 wrote:Just got a fee wavier for CLS. Have a 3.9, 163 and URM(PR). Do you think my chances at getting admitted warrant the $12 this late in the cycle, or am I just paying $12 to increase their selectivity rating?
-
tomwatts

- Posts: 1710
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
1) It's also on the law school report that LSAC sends to the school.amorfati wrote:So first off - is that right? Is that where you're all getting your index? (Or do you all just happen to know the magic formula?)
And secondly - I noticed that although the first person whose numbers I plugged in had a lower LSP "score" (and lower % at/below) than me, he/she was nonetheless given a "strong consider" at Columbia (and a "weak consider" at yale), while I only had a "consider" at columbia (and "deny" at yale). ...anybody know what the deal is there?
2) Might have something to do with splitter/non-splitter status. Two people with the same index, but one with a much higher LSAT and lower GPA (a splitter) and the other about even for both, may have different chances at certain schools.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
masterthearts

- Posts: 396
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 11:04 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
[
I think you have a decent shot. It seems like at this point in the cycle they're not quite sure what to do with URMs, so I think a lot of those decisions are still there to be made and a 3.9/160 URM has already been accepted (according to LSN) this cycle. Nothing's guaranteed or even likely, but unless the $12 is way out there then I would go for it.[/quote]
This. Only a select few have been chosen. The rest of us have been held, waitlisted, or forgotten with no pattern in the numbers. And it seems that a lot of URMs have been reporting fee waivers. Apparently they're not satisfied with what they already have.
[/quote]
Instead of rolling admissions, this has really become like college admissions at the Ivies where you find out April 1st if you got in, regardless of when you applied!
I think you have a decent shot. It seems like at this point in the cycle they're not quite sure what to do with URMs, so I think a lot of those decisions are still there to be made and a 3.9/160 URM has already been accepted (according to LSN) this cycle. Nothing's guaranteed or even likely, but unless the $12 is way out there then I would go for it.[/quote]
This. Only a select few have been chosen. The rest of us have been held, waitlisted, or forgotten with no pattern in the numbers. And it seems that a lot of URMs have been reporting fee waivers. Apparently they're not satisfied with what they already have.
Instead of rolling admissions, this has really become like college admissions at the Ivies where you find out April 1st if you got in, regardless of when you applied!
-
justhoping

- Posts: 147
- Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 12:38 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
before i get off the island, just want to mention this: received the GULC package the same day as I got the reserve e-mail from CLS. The package was postmarked 1/20...
@ snail mail...
- artichoke

- Posts: 760
- Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 11:20 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I am so bookmarking this link. I can envision a million online situations in which this would come in handy.
- gatorgirl4life

- Posts: 354
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:06 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
.
Last edited by gatorgirl4life on Sat Feb 26, 2011 8:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- law_monkey

- Posts: 1709
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:25 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Ahhh sorry gatorgirl.gatorgirl4life wrote:3.97/168 PR/other hispanic here...i was held.kruiz88 wrote:Just got a fee wavier for CLS. Have a 3.9, 163 and URM(PR). Do you think my chances at getting admitted warrant the $12 this late in the cycle, or am I just paying $12 to increase their selectivity rating?
-
subtle

- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:43 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
gatorgirl4life wrote:3.97/168 PR/other hispanic here...i was held.kruiz88 wrote:Just got a fee wavier for CLS. Have a 3.9, 163 and URM(PR). Do you think my chances at getting admitted warrant the $12 this late in the cycle, or am I just paying $12 to increase their selectivity rating?
- gatorgirl4life

- Posts: 354
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:06 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
aw thanks! but i'm not that upset...i'll ride it out, but i think i've always leaned a bit more towards NYU anyway. good luck!law_monkey wrote:Ahhh sorry gatorgirl.gatorgirl4life wrote:3.97/168 PR/other hispanic here...i was held.kruiz88 wrote:Just got a fee wavier for CLS. Have a 3.9, 163 and URM(PR). Do you think my chances at getting admitted warrant the $12 this late in the cycle, or am I just paying $12 to increase their selectivity rating?Or maybe it's a good thing since at this point we can't tell whether it's better to have been forgotten or held.
-
rundoxierun

- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:46 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
3.7/177/AA male and held as well. If you are serious about CLS I suggest you write them a tailored PS about your interest in that school in particular.gatorgirl4life wrote:3.97/168 PR/other hispanic here...i was held.kruiz88 wrote:Just got a fee wavier for CLS. Have a 3.9, 163 and URM(PR). Do you think my chances at getting admitted warrant the $12 this late in the cycle, or am I just paying $12 to increase their selectivity rating?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
subtle

- Posts: 927
- Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 2:43 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
tkgrrett wrote:3.7/177/AA male and held as well. If you are serious about CLS I suggest you write them a tailored PS about your interest in that school in particular.gatorgirl4life wrote:3.97/168 PR/other hispanic here...i was held.kruiz88 wrote:Just got a fee wavier for CLS. Have a 3.9, 163 and URM(PR). Do you think my chances at getting admitted warrant the $12 this late in the cycle, or am I just paying $12 to increase their selectivity rating?
OK. Now *that* scares me. You're an AA male with almost perfect numbers. WTF?!??!?!
- law_monkey

- Posts: 1709
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2010 5:25 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
But they're barely letting in any URMs this cycle. I'm confused by all of this but especially by their URM strategy. Even if they are suddenly worried about their yield because of the Rubensteins, they've been holding sooooo many people. And sending out more fee waivers to a bunch of URMs.tkgrrett wrote:3.7/177/AA male and held as well. If you are serious about CLS I suggest you write them a tailored PS about your interest in that school in particular.gatorgirl4life wrote:3.97/168 PR/other hispanic here...i was held.kruiz88 wrote:Just got a fee wavier for CLS. Have a 3.9, 163 and URM(PR). Do you think my chances at getting admitted warrant the $12 this late in the cycle, or am I just paying $12 to increase their selectivity rating?
- gatorgirl4life

- Posts: 354
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 1:06 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
3.7/177/AA male and held as well. If you are serious about CLS I suggest you write them a tailored PS about your interest in that school in particular.
obvious YP. mine...probably not so much. hahaOK. Now *that* scares me. You're an AA male with almost perfect numbers. WTF?!??!?!
-
jrose5

- Posts: 660
- Joined: Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Holy crap!tkgrrett wrote:3.7/177/AA male and held as well. If you are serious about CLS I suggest you write them a tailored PS about your interest in that school in particular.gatorgirl4life wrote:3.97/168 PR/other hispanic here...i was held.kruiz88 wrote:Just got a fee wavier for CLS. Have a 3.9, 163 and URM(PR). Do you think my chances at getting admitted warrant the $12 this late in the cycle, or am I just paying $12 to increase their selectivity rating?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login