Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply

Pick one:

Stanford
111
38%
Yale
61
21%
Harvard
50
17%
Columbia with $$-$$$
18
6%
Chicago with $$-$$$
14
5%
NYU with $$-$$$
15
5%
Lower T-14 with $$$
25
9%
 
Total votes: 294

User avatar
Toby Ziegler

Silver
Posts: 701
Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 2:59 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by Toby Ziegler » Tue Aug 19, 2014 12:53 pm

lilyt93 wrote:
Toby Ziegler wrote: Yep! And hopefully ONLY in September. I hope to channel the spirit of Toby and all his pithy wit. And Jim and Pam's relationship is, in my opinion, the greatest love story on television, ever.
Good luck!! And I couldn't agree more, they have such a great story that is so well told. The only blip I did not appreciate was the temp storyline in season 8. I'm watching those episodes now and just cringe. I did not like her!!
Have you not seen the whole series? If not, just wait until season 9 -- phenomenal television.

User avatar
lilyt93

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:22 am

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by lilyt93 » Tue Aug 19, 2014 3:39 pm

Toby Ziegler wrote: Have you not seen the whole series? If not, just wait until season 9 -- phenomenal television.
I've seen the whole show (way too many times probably), and I loved their storyline for season 9. I think that some version of the season 9 conflict between Jim and Pam was inevitable, so I appreciated that the writers addressed that problem and then were able to resolve it in such a great way, even though it was hard to watch at times. I wouldn't have felt satisfied with the show ending if they hadn't wrapped up their individual and collective storylines so well.

I just found Cathy annoying and didn't like her trying to seduce Jim in Florida. I'm rewatching the show again on Netflix and just hit her arc. Ugh.

xylocarp

Platinum
Posts: 5215
Joined: Tue Jun 11, 2013 2:16 am

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by xylocarp » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:01 pm

lilyt93 wrote:
Toby Ziegler wrote: Have you not seen the whole series? If not, just wait until season 9 -- phenomenal television.
I've seen the whole show (way too many times probably), and I loved their storyline for season 9. I think that some version of the season 9 conflict between Jim and Pam was inevitable, so I appreciated that the writers addressed that problem and then were able to resolve it in such a great way, even though it was hard to watch at times. I wouldn't have felt satisfied with the show ending if they hadn't wrapped up their individual and collective storylines so well.

I just found Cathy annoying and didn't like her trying to seduce Jim in Florida. I'm rewatching the show again on Netflix and just hit her arc. Ugh.
She is the worst and I hate her
Last edited by xylocarp on Mon Jan 29, 2018 6:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lilyt93

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:22 am

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by lilyt93 » Tue Aug 19, 2014 4:24 pm

xylocarp wrote: She is the worst and I hate her
titcr

zaetoroftheprotoss

Bronze
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:42 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by zaetoroftheprotoss » Tue Aug 19, 2014 5:43 pm

Checking in! GPA 4.0X but need to take the LSAT in Sept..X_X

Btw, what do you mean by SLS-specific letters? None of my recommenders have any connection to the school; should they mention why SLS is a good fit for me?

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


User avatar
lilyt93

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:22 am

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by lilyt93 » Tue Aug 19, 2014 5:55 pm

zaetoroftheprotoss wrote:Checking in! GPA 4.0X but need to take the LSAT in Sept..X_X

Btw, what do you mean by SLS-specific letters? None of my recommenders have any connection to the school; should they mention why SLS is a good fit for me?
This is the question no one seems to have a really solid answer to. Stanford is my top choice, so I wanted to show some extra initiative by having my recommenders write a Stanford letter even though they have no connections to the school. I'm not sure exactly what they ended up writing, but I sent them two paragraphs about why SLS is my top choice with the assumption that they would mention something from them.

My theory (someone please correct me if this sounds stupid and I'm reading too much into this) is that the most SLS usually gets out of these letters is that 1) SLS is really important to you 2) so much so that you would ask a recommender to write an extra letter for you and 3) that your recommenders think highly enough of you that they would actually write you two letters.

zaetoroftheprotoss

Bronze
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:42 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by zaetoroftheprotoss » Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:01 pm

Btw, for the poll, you should add attend a football game...they are doing quite well at the moment.

User avatar
everything_bagel

Bronze
Posts: 432
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:10 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by everything_bagel » Tue Aug 19, 2014 6:03 pm

zaetoroftheprotoss wrote:Btw, for the poll, you should add attend a football game...they are doing quite well at the moment.
Great idea, but I think if I add another option the current responses will disappear. What a good "other" response though! (Someone, correct me if this is wrong...)

User avatar
pylon

Silver
Posts: 929
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:58 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by pylon » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:10 pm

lilyt93 wrote:
zaetoroftheprotoss wrote:Btw, what do you mean by SLS-specific letters? None of my recommenders have any connection to the school; should they mention why SLS is a good fit for me?
My theory (someone please correct me if this sounds stupid and I'm reading too much into this) is that the most SLS usually gets out of these letters is that 1) SLS is really important to you 2) so much so that you would ask a recommender to write an extra letter for you and 3) that your recommenders think highly enough of you that they would actually write you two letters.
I think that's a pretty good idea, especially 2). Since Stanford has such a small class to fill with so many applicants, this could be a way for them to potentially weed out candidates? Or perhaps not weed out, but look favourably upon those that do make the effort for SLS specific LORs.

Want to continue reading?

Register for access!

Did I mention it was FREE ?


sneakyleo

Bronze
Posts: 265
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2014 9:24 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by sneakyleo » Tue Aug 19, 2014 7:39 pm

---
Last edited by sneakyleo on Fri Aug 11, 2017 10:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lilyt93

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:22 am

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by lilyt93 » Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:51 pm

Pylon, I'm glad you agree! I know that I was very nervous about asking my recommenders for an extra Stanford letter after they had agreed to write me one. I only did it because making a positive impression on SLS is so important to me. It must be a very useful way for them to identify people who are really interested in them.

User avatar
lilyt93

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:22 am

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by lilyt93 » Tue Aug 19, 2014 9:57 pm

I have also always thought that people who are strong HYS candidates tend to choose HLS or YLS over SLS, so Stanford is especially careful about yield.

User avatar
everything_bagel

Bronze
Posts: 432
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:10 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by everything_bagel » Wed Aug 20, 2014 4:32 am

lilyt93 wrote:I have also always thought that people who are strong HYS candidates tend to choose HLS or YLS over SLS, so Stanford is especially careful about yield.
Everyone I know who's gotten in to both has picked SLS (except for one guy who was going to choose HLS solely because it's on the east coast until he got into Yale (ugh). I've always thought the yp stuff is a little dated. But people on these boards have definitely been anti-California so maybe it depends.

Register now!

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

It's still FREE!


User avatar
ikethegremlin

Bronze
Posts: 133
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2014 3:09 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by ikethegremlin » Wed Aug 20, 2014 6:12 am

everything_bagel wrote:
lilyt93 wrote:I have also always thought that people who are strong HYS candidates tend to choose HLS or YLS over SLS, so Stanford is especially careful about yield.
Everyone I know who's gotten in to both has picked SLS (except for one guy who was going to choose HLS solely because it's on the east coast until he got into Yale (ugh). I've always thought the yp stuff is a little dated. But people on these boards have definitely been anti-California so maybe it depends.
Would be an incredibly difficult decision. It's funny that California is the point about which people get worried - if Yale or Harvard was in Stanford's location I'd find them impossible to turn down. As it is, Yale is Yale, Harvard has that slight lay-prestige boost, and Stanford is basically Yale but in the sun. I can only dream of getting to choose between them.

User avatar
pylon

Silver
Posts: 929
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:58 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by pylon » Wed Aug 20, 2014 9:56 am

everything_bagel wrote:
lilyt93 wrote:I have also always thought that people who are strong HYS candidates tend to choose HLS or YLS over SLS, so Stanford is especially careful about yield.
Everyone I know who's gotten in to both has picked SLS (except for one guy who was going to choose HLS solely because it's on the east coast until he got into Yale (ugh). I've always thought the yp stuff is a little dated. But people on these boards have definitely been anti-California so maybe it depends.
I wonder if we could look at LSN and see where applicants who were accepted to two of HYS matriculated. This might have been done in the past, I'll try and look. Albeit small sample size, it could be interesting!

User avatar
everything_bagel

Bronze
Posts: 432
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:10 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by everything_bagel » Wed Aug 20, 2014 4:58 pm

pylon wrote:I wonder if we could look at LSN and see where applicants who were accepted to two of HYS matriculated. This might have been done in the past, I'll try and look. Albeit small sample size, it could be interesting!
I thought this was an interesting idea and looked into it for a while, looking through HLS profiles for people also admitted to SLS. Interesting results, though I'm not sure it was a great idea on my part; here's what I learned:
- SLS is the clear winner of the profiles updated in the last 5 months (didn't go back further). 13 people went to SLS, including many who only got in off the WL; only four went to HLS.
- A lot of people don't apply to SLS.
- Getting stuck in "under review" purgatory for six months sounds like the worst.
- The people who get into both HLS and SLS are ridiculously impressive (just guess what other choices they had...)
- :(.

Anyway, I started this weird chart; anyone who wants to is welcome to continue it or look at other years (but I'm not sure I recommend it; it's interesting but kind of disheartening).

edit: spreadsheet was accidentally private before but should be viewable now; let me know if it doesn't work.

User avatar
lilyt93

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:22 am

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by lilyt93 » Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:18 pm

everything_bagel wrote:
I thought this was an interesting idea and looked into it for a while, looking through HLS profiles for people also admitted to SLS. Interesting results, though I'm not sure it was a great idea on my part; here's what I learned:
- SLS is the clear winner of the profiles updated in the last 5 months (didn't go back further). 13 people went to SLS, including many who only got in off the WL; only four went to HLS.
- A lot of people don't apply to SLS.
- Getting stuck in "under review" purgatory for six months sounds like the worst.
- The people who get into both HLS and SLS are ridiculously impressive (just guess what other choices they had...)
- :(.

Anyway, I started this weird chart; anyone who wants to is welcome to continue it or look at other years (but I'm not sure I recommend it; it's interesting but kind of disheartening).

edit: spreadsheet was accidentally private before but should be viewable now; let me know if it doesn't work.
This is a great analysis, thanks so much for doing it! Interesting to know that SLS seemed to be the first choice. Even though it's my top choice, I had always thought most people preferred HLS or YLS!

Get unlimited access to all forums and topics

Register now!

I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...


User avatar
everything_bagel

Bronze
Posts: 432
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2014 7:10 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by everything_bagel » Thu Aug 21, 2014 5:18 am

lilyt93 wrote:This is a great analysis, thanks so much for doing it! Interesting to know that SLS seemed to be the first choice. Even though it's my top choice, I had always thought most people preferred HLS or YLS!
I should have mentioned this before, but one possible way in which Stanford's advantage is overstated is that they seem to be slower at getting back to people than Harvard is (grrr), so some people withdraw and pick Harvard (or another school with $$$). It's hard to say whether these people (a) would have been admitted and (b) would have picked Harvard in that instance, so I omitted them, but they might help HLS's numbers a bit.

And Stanford's advantage is also obviously helped by the people who don't even apply to SLS, and would thus presumably pick HLS instead if given a choice...but I omitted them too.

User avatar
pylon

Silver
Posts: 929
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2014 8:58 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by pylon » Thu Aug 21, 2014 8:37 am

everything_bagel wrote:
lilyt93 wrote:This is a great analysis, thanks so much for doing it! Interesting to know that SLS seemed to be the first choice. Even though it's my top choice, I had always thought most people preferred HLS or YLS!
I should have mentioned this before, but one possible way in which Stanford's advantage is overstated is that they seem to be slower at getting back to people than Harvard is (grrr), so some people withdraw and pick Harvard (or another school with $$$). It's hard to say whether these people (a) would have been admitted and (b) would have picked Harvard in that instance, so I omitted them, but they might help HLS's numbers a bit.

And Stanford's advantage is also obviously helped by the people who don't even apply to SLS, and would thus presumably pick HLS instead if given a choice...but I omitted them too.
Thanks for the spreadsheet everything_bagel! I enjoy numbers and have been compiling a list of things to look at once my personal statement is done, and will definitely add to this once that glorious day comes! :P

This is just conjecture, but I doubt that many people would withdraw from SLS before hearing a response, even if they had been accepted to HLS or T14 w $$. There would be no incentive for them to do so, right? As long as SLS gets back to them before deposit deadlines, which I believe they do.

But definitely is surprising that the majority chose SLS, it's not what I would have expected. I would have thought the same as lilyt!

User avatar
Colonel_funkadunk

Gold
Posts: 3248
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2014 11:03 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by Colonel_funkadunk » Thu Aug 21, 2014 9:30 am

The poll should have the option "bask in the fact I'm not in indiana anymore".

User avatar
LSATneurotic

Silver
Posts: 982
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 7:27 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by LSATneurotic » Mon Aug 25, 2014 9:58 am

-
Last edited by LSATneurotic on Mon Apr 06, 2015 9:29 am, edited 1 time in total.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.

Register now, it's still FREE!


User avatar
psychmusic

Bronze
Posts: 245
Joined: Thu Jan 09, 2014 9:42 am

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by psychmusic » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:02 am

.
Last edited by psychmusic on Wed Apr 29, 2015 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
hillz

Silver
Posts: 1050
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 1:41 pm

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by hillz » Mon Aug 25, 2014 10:44 am

psychmusic wrote:Checking in. I've been getting stressed about SLS because their on campus housing is so incredible looking, but I'm hoping to get a dog with my SO next summer and they don't allow pets... then I remember it won't matter because I'm not getting in anyway
LOL. My thoughts exactly.

Hand

Gold
Posts: 3843
Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by Hand » Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:52 am

Last edited by Hand on Wed Dec 17, 2014 7:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
lilyt93

New
Posts: 88
Joined: Tue Oct 22, 2013 10:22 am

Re: Stanford Law School c/o 2018 Applicants (2014-2015 Cycle)

Post by lilyt93 » Mon Aug 25, 2014 7:05 pm

GUYS THE STANFORD WEBSITE NOW SAYS THAT THE APPLICATION WILL BECOME AVAILABLE ON SEPTEMBER 2

https://www.law.stanford.edu/degrees/jd/jd_application

Seriously? What are you waiting for?

Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”