+1nmlf16 wrote:Still UR but my date changed to 1/29.
Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread Forum
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:48 am
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:04 am
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
Same here.nmlf16 wrote:Still UR but my date changed to 1/29.
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:05 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
No change here. When did you guys submit/complete?
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:04 am
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
Submitted on 1/6. I believe I was complete on 1/8.nba101790 wrote:No change here. When did you guys submit/complete?
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:01 am
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
Submitted 1/11 and complete/UR 1/14 I believe?nba101790 wrote:No change here. When did you guys submit/complete?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:05 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
Received an email just now. Honors program does have a hard 165 cutoff. However, I was informed that my credentials put me in strong contention for a scholarship and to expect a general admission decision (one presumably with money included) in late February.
While it was a nice, and leading, email, now I have to wait three weeks to see if I've been admitted after that!
While it was a nice, and leading, email, now I have to wait three weeks to see if I've been admitted after that!
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:17 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
Does Kent place well in Chicago? I mean, I know that it's competitive what with NW and UChicago there, but are job prospects decent for Kent graduates?Giddy-Up wrote:Yes - one that requires a law degree, take home is about 90kromanticegotist wrote:HAVE YOU JOB.Giddy-Up wrote:Class of 2011 Kent Grad - Happy to answer questions.
I mean, that's the elephant in the room here.
What is Kent like (professors, classes, classrooms, students)? Is it as cut throat as other schools?
-
- Posts: 106
- Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 8:36 am
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
My info is coming from someone who graduated in 2011, when things were at or near their worst in the legal market. Kent has some name recognition in Chicago, but it is still extremely tough. In particular, some of the Patent Boutiques seem to look for Kent grads and generally those in top 5% to 10% have successful outcomes. Below that, which is a huge number, it is still a huge crapshoot. Some may remember the unemployed EIC of the law review. He is now at Kirkland, but he is very much the minority. Even though he was EIC he was still in the top third or so. Grades seem to matter a lot. Those outside the top 10% are generally in smaller firms, doing some local prosecution or defense etc. In my year a few got picked up for JAG (2-3 Army, 2 AF, 1 Navy) if I remember correctly.hi21 wrote:Does Kent place well in Chicago? I mean, I know that it's competitive what with NW and UChicago there, but are job prospects decent for Kent graduates?Giddy-Up wrote:Yes - one that requires a law degree, take home is about 90kromanticegotist wrote:HAVE YOU JOB.Giddy-Up wrote:Class of 2011 Kent Grad - Happy to answer questions.
I mean, that's the elephant in the room here.
What is Kent like (professors, classes, classrooms, students)? Is it as cut throat as other schools?
I think there is somewhat of a myth that students are cutthroat. I think everyone wants to do their best and will oiley work much harder (particularly in 1L year) than they may have in undergrad. However, I never saw or heard of anyone engaging in anything underhanded. Moreover, I found that upperclassmen who CALI'd a course were often happy to share their outlines.
The building is relatively new and quite pretty. It definitely does not have a college feel at all though. It is one building in the middle of the city. Only the law school and business school are in the building. You have to travel a little bit to get to some of the more pleasant areas of the city to hang out in. The school is very much in the business district.
Professors, for the overwhelming most part, are great. Very accessible, I never had any issues or heard of professors turning in grades late or reusing tests.
Bottom line, Kent is a great school. But, and it is a huge but, it is incredibly expensive. I think tuition is somewhere near 40k a year. While Chicago is not as expensive as NY it is still pricey. I would think long and hard about attending without a scholarship. Also, a significant number of students did lose their scholarships in my year. When I attended, the typical scholarship stip required a 3.25, with Kent's first year curve I think that worked out to approx top 25%. They may have changed things though.
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2012 5:39 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
bluegreen wrote: What is Kent like (professors, classes, classrooms, students)? Is it as cut throat as other schools?
bluegreen wrote: My info is coming from someone who graduated in 2011, when things were at or near their worst in the legal market. Kent has some name recognition in Chicago, but it is still extremely tough. In particular, some of the Patent Boutiques seem to look for Kent grads and generally those in top 5% to 10% have successful outcomes. Below that, which is a huge number, it is still a huge crapshoot. Some may remember the unemployed EIC of the law review. He is now at Kirkland, but he is very much the minority. Even though he was EIC he was still in the top third or so. Grades seem to matter a lot. Those outside the top 10% are generally in smaller firms, doing some local prosecution or defense etc. In my year a few got picked up for JAG (2-3 Army, 2 AF, 1 Navy) if I remember correctly.
I think there is somewhat of a myth that students are cutthroat. I think everyone wants to do their best and will oiley work much harder (particularly in 1L year) than they may have in undergrad. However, I never saw or heard of anyone engaging in anything underhanded. Moreover, I found that upperclassmen who CALI'd a course were often happy to share their outlines.
The building is relatively new and quite pretty. It definitely does not have a college feel at all though. It is one building in the middle of the city. Only the law school and business school are in the building. You have to travel a little bit to get to some of the more pleasant areas of the city to hang out in. The school is very much in the business district.
Professors, for the overwhelming most part, are great. Very accessible, I never had any issues or heard of professors turning in grades late or reusing tests.
Bottom line, Kent is a great school. But, and it is a huge but, it is incredibly expensive. I think tuition is somewhere near 40k a year. While Chicago is not as expensive as NY it is still pricey. I would think long and hard about attending without a scholarship. Also, a significant number of students did lose their scholarships in my year. When I attended, the typical scholarship stip required a 3.25, with Kent's first year curve I think that worked out to approx top 25%. They may have changed things though.
thank you, this was helpful
-
- Posts: 172
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:37 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
Does Kent negotiate? $5000k more a year in scholly and I would enroll immediately!
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:44 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
Do u have competing offers from similar or higher ranked schools? U can try to
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:17 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
bluegreen wrote:bluegreen wrote: What is Kent like (professors, classes, classrooms, students)? Is it as cut throat as other schools?bluegreen wrote: My info is coming from someone who graduated in 2011, when things were at or near their worst in the legal market. Kent has some name recognition in Chicago, but it is still extremely tough. In particular, some of the Patent Boutiques seem to look for Kent grads and generally those in top 5% to 10% have successful outcomes. Below that, which is a huge number, it is still a huge crapshoot. Some may remember the unemployed EIC of the law review. He is now at Kirkland, but he is very much the minority. Even though he was EIC he was still in the top third or so. Grades seem to matter a lot. Those outside the top 10% are generally in smaller firms, doing some local prosecution or defense etc. In my year a few got picked up for JAG (2-3 Army, 2 AF, 1 Navy) if I remember correctly.
I think there is somewhat of a myth that students are cutthroat. I think everyone wants to do their best and will oiley work much harder (particularly in 1L year) than they may have in undergrad. However, I never saw or heard of anyone engaging in anything underhanded. Moreover, I found that upperclassmen who CALI'd a course were often happy to share their outlines.
The building is relatively new and quite pretty. It definitely does not have a college feel at all though. It is one building in the middle of the city. Only the law school and business school are in the building. You have to travel a little bit to get to some of the more pleasant areas of the city to hang out in. The school is very much in the business district.
Professors, for the overwhelming most part, are great. Very accessible, I never had any issues or heard of professors turning in grades late or reusing tests.
Bottom line, Kent is a great school. But, and it is a huge but, it is incredibly expensive. I think tuition is somewhere near 40k a year. While Chicago is not as expensive as NY it is still pricey. I would think long and hard about attending without a scholarship. Also, a significant number of students did lose their scholarships in my year. When I attended, the typical scholarship stip required a 3.25, with Kent's first year curve I think that worked out to approx top 25%. They may have changed things though.
thank you, this was helpful
Indeed, this was helpful! Thank you for your input.
I'd love to go to school in Chicago, but with the financial aspect in mind, I am wary. I did get a 10,000 scholarship with no stipulation other than having to attend classes at the school (which, I mean, I'd obviously be doing). That will decrease the cost a bit, but it is still a lot.
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:17 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
illiniguy1551 wrote:Does Kent negotiate? $5000k more a year in scholly and I would enroll immediately!
I could use another $5000 more a year, too.cnk wrote:Do u have competing offers from similar or higher ranked schools? U can try to
What if I have a competing offer from a significantly lower ranked school? Would they not think much of it?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- hhockberger
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:28 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
Doesn't hurt to try! Let us know what they say.hi21 wrote:illiniguy1551 wrote:Does Kent negotiate? $5000k more a year in scholly and I would enroll immediately!I could use another $5000 more a year, too.cnk wrote:Do u have competing offers from similar or higher ranked schools? U can try to
What if I have a competing offer from a significantly lower ranked school? Would they not think much of it?
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:17 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
hhockberger wrote:Doesn't hurt to try! Let us know what they say.hi21 wrote:illiniguy1551 wrote:Does Kent negotiate? $5000k more a year in scholly and I would enroll immediately!I could use another $5000 more a year, too.cnk wrote:Do u have competing offers from similar or higher ranked schools? U can try to
What if I have a competing offer from a significantly lower ranked school? Would they not think much of it?
How does one even go about asking...?
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:44 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
I would assume emailing admissions
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:17 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
I don't know if email is the best way to do it? Would calling or sending an actual letter be better?cnk wrote:I would assume emailing admissions
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 36
- Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 8:17 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
Also, would it make sense to hold off on negotiating scholarships until I actually receive the acceptance packet?
- hhockberger
- Posts: 174
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:28 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
This post is really useful if you're unsure how to negotiate scholarships:hi21 wrote:I don't know if email is the best way to do it? Would calling or sending an actual letter be better?cnk wrote:I would assume emailing admissions
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 22&t=79373
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:04 am
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
It was tweeted that a big batch of decisions should come this afternoon. Good luck to all that are waiting.
-
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2011 12:44 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
ahh exciting!! *fingers crossed*rshw89 wrote:It was tweeted that a big batch of decisions should come this afternoon. Good luck to all that are waiting.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:04 am
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
In via status checker.
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2013 10:48 am
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 5:05 pm
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
For those of you hearing back, when did you go complete?
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 2:04 am
Re: Chicago-Kent c/o 2016 (2012-2013) cycle Applicant Thread
1/8/13nba101790 wrote:For those of you hearing back, when did you go complete?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login