55 here in Boulder right now. After the past few days of freezing our collective diques off, its a very welcome change.Sugar Lumps wrote:It's -2 where I am in CO right now. Boulder's slightly warmer, right? Right??
University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- LeDique
- Posts: 13462
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 2:10 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
55, sunny, still, and dry feels so nice. I never thought 55 would feel warm until I moved here though. The last two weeks have been eff'n cold.LeDique wrote:55 here in Boulder right now. After the past few days of freezing our collective diques off, its a very welcome change.Sugar Lumps wrote:It's -2 where I am in CO right now. Boulder's slightly warmer, right? Right??
-
- Posts: 1499
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 4:25 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Did anyone else get the email with the link to the Admitted Students' Portal, and if so, is it working for you?
- zniha
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:28 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
I cant even get the status checker to worknickb285 wrote:Did anyone else get the email with the link to the Admitted Students' Portal, and if so, is it working for you?
- kuttlefish
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:29 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
delete the ".htm" from the end of the address:zniha wrote: I cant even get the status checker to work
http://www.colorado.edu/law/admissions/status
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:57 am
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
I see what you did there....LeDique wrote:55 here in Boulder right now. After the past few days of freezing our collective diques off, its a very welcome change.Sugar Lumps wrote:It's -2 where I am in CO right now. Boulder's slightly warmer, right? Right??

- zniha
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:28 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
I can get to that site. When I click status track or whatever it asks for a certificate so i select one of the options and then it asks again.kuttlefish wrote:delete the ".htm" from the end of the address:zniha wrote: I cant even get the status checker to work
http://www.colorado.edu/law/admissions/status
-
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 11:57 am
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Try deleting your cookies or using another browser.zniha wrote:I can get to that site. When I click status track or whatever it asks for a certificate so i select one of the options and then it asks again.kuttlefish wrote:delete the ".htm" from the end of the address:zniha wrote: I cant even get the status checker to work
http://www.colorado.edu/law/admissions/status
- ALgooner
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 12:23 am
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Under review as of 1/15. Surprised they are looking at it already, I submitted 1/10.
- zniha
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 12:28 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Different browser worked. Thanks1693 wrote:Try deleting your cookies or using another browser.zniha wrote:I can get to that site. When I click status track or whatever it asks for a certificate so i select one of the options and then it asks again.kuttlefish wrote:delete the ".htm" from the end of the address:zniha wrote: I cant even get the status checker to work
http://www.colorado.edu/law/admissions/status
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:53 am
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
In via email yesterday. 160/3.63 Submitted 10/31
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Below both medians. Guess the new(er) dean doesn't have as much control over admissions as we thought. Same old same old at CU.nolabreeze wrote:In via email yesterday. 160/3.63 Submitted 10/31
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Congrats.nolabreeze wrote:In via email yesterday. 160/3.63 Submitted 10/31
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Pip42
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:25 am
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
I'm not quite sure what this ^ means. Plus she's a engineer and likely IP secure and very employable I would imagine (same name on law school numbers).Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:Below both medians. Guess the new(er) dean doesn't have as much control over admissions as we thought. Same old same old at CU.nolabreeze wrote:In via email yesterday. 160/3.63 Submitted 10/31
In any event I think we are likely to see most non-T14 schools medians fall this year (and likely some t-14's as well). They reduced class sizes last year at a ton of schools and I doubt they can do that again and keep their bottom lines healthy. Too many schools and less applicants etc. etc.
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
I didn't mean to suggest anything regarding her future employability. My point is that applying to law schools when you are below both medians is a death sentence. Only a few schools--CU, Tulane, Cornell, Utah, and a few others I don't know-- accept non-URM candidates who are below both medians. CU's new dean has been much more rankings conscience than the old dean. For example, under the new dean we have begun employing our own graduates, like the majority of schools have done for 3 or 4 years. However, it appears that CU admissions is still run in the same manner it was under the former dean. CU runs much more of a "full-file review" than other schools, to the detriment of its USNEWS ranking. I think this is cool; however, I'm somewhat surprised that this practice is continuing under the new dean. That's all I meant.Pip42 wrote:I'm not quite sure what this ^ means. Plus she's a engineer and likely IP secure and very employable I would imagine (same name on law school numbers).Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:Below both medians. Guess the new(er) dean doesn't have as much control over admissions as we thought. Same old same old at CU.nolabreeze wrote:In via email yesterday. 160/3.63 Submitted 10/31
In any event I think we are likely to see most non-T14 schools medians fall this year (and likely some t-14's as well). They reduced class sizes last year at a ton of schools and I doubt they can do that again and keep their bottom lines healthy. Too many schools and less applicants etc. etc.
Regarding medians falling-- I think you're absolutely right. Of course they will fall. According to some sources, we are looking at only 53k applicants to law school this year. However. CU has weathered the storm well. Medians have gone up the last two years while others have gone down, and applications are still very high. In fact, we set a school record in 2011, with 3,300+ applications. for a school with a class size of 150, this is pretty solid.
Bottom line: congrats Nola on your acceptance. I bet you've got a terrific resume and wrote the shit out your personal statement. Nice work.
- Pip42
- Posts: 143
- Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:25 am
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Ah. Ok. I got it. Sorry Lord, I thought you were being harsh. My misunderstanding.
I have already been accepted to a number of schools this cycle (with money even) where I was below both medians. Unfortunately not CU... yet.
It would figure that my two biggest targets (Utah and CU) are taking the longest to get back to me.
I would also guess that most schools accept "some" non-urm's that are below both medians - its just that TLS and LSN are a self selecting group that scare most, but not all, people who are not "T-14 or bust" away. Just a hunch anyway. /shrug
I have already been accepted to a number of schools this cycle (with money even) where I was below both medians. Unfortunately not CU... yet.

I would also guess that most schools accept "some" non-urm's that are below both medians - its just that TLS and LSN are a self selecting group that scare most, but not all, people who are not "T-14 or bust" away. Just a hunch anyway. /shrug
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Really? Which schools? Were you close to their medians? (as you mentioned, maybe they figure you will be the new median..)Pip42 wrote:
I have already been accepted to a number of schools this cycle (with money even) where I was below both medians. Unfortunately not CU... yet.It would figure that my two biggest targets (Utah and CU) are taking the longest to get back to me.
I guess it does happen once in a blue moon, but looking at the data suggests that it doesn't happen much. In fact, the last two years I've looked, I haven't seen more than a handful of non-urms who have gotten accepted to a school where they are below both medians. Of course, I'm not talking about schools like Cooley. I guess I focused on schools 1-75 or so. In that group, there was like 7 people outside of the schools I mentioned. Further, many TLS'ers have worked in their respective school's admissions office and shared details. Schools set a median goal, then try to buy 20% above/at both median students, admit 40% splitter, and admit 40% reverse spitter. Obviously not all admission strategies are exactly alike but you get the idea.
Surely Utah and CU do something like that as well, but they also seem to have some large percentage set aside for students in a "full-file review." Again, I think that is great and I'm proud of it. It isn't like Utah or CU will ever be Harvard, or ever be more or less than a good regional school. I guess Utah competes (to an extent, complicated Morman stuff..) with BYU, but with CU, there isn't a better school for nearly a thousand miles in each direction (I think st. louis is like 900 miles away..). Like many law schools, CU's reputation is set in the area where it places students. Might as well admit who you want!
Gl on both CU and Utah.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:53 am
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
I was surprised, but of course glad, that I got in. I bank on my engineering degree, studying to take the patent bar (taking it in a month), W/E, and PS. I applied to a bunch of reach schools because for me - worse comes to worse - I stay at my job and retake the LSAT. Only reason I didn't retake this go round is the patent bar which I want to get out of the way before AIA fully kicks in in March 2013.
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Don't get so excited about law school that you forget about option # 1.-- stay at your current job.nolabreeze wrote:I was surprised, but of course glad, that I got in. I bank on my engineering degree, studying to take the patent bar (taking it in a month), W/E, and PS. I applied to a bunch of reach schools because for me - worse comes to worse - I stay at my job.
I have loved my time at CU and everyone here is very positive about the school, but do your homework. You may likely be in a much stronger financial situation at your current job than after receiving your CU JD in 2016. Finances aren't the only consideration for most people, but it's an important one. At least you have that engineering background. The students here (and at most schools I know) with similar backgrounds are actually doing very well, so congrats on that fine life choice as well.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 9:53 am
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
I have definitely been going back and forth whether law school is right for me at this time. It's definitely something I want to do, but I'm not in a huge rush to do so. Honestly, TLS is working it's magic on me and has me thinking that I should probably keep my job and retake unless by some miracle I get into UT.Lord Randolph McDuff wrote:Don't get so excited about law school that you forget about option # 1.-- stay at your current job.nolabreeze wrote:I was surprised, but of course glad, that I got in. I bank on my engineering degree, studying to take the patent bar (taking it in a month), W/E, and PS. I applied to a bunch of reach schools because for me - worse comes to worse - I stay at my job.
I have loved my time at CU and everyone here is very positive about the school, but do your homework. You may likely be in a much stronger financial situation at your current job than after receiving your CU JD in 2016. Finances aren't the only consideration for most people, but it's an important one. At least you have that engineering background. The students here (and at most schools I know) with similar backgrounds are actually doing very well, so congrats on that fine life choice as well.
I don't think it'll be worth much but if I pass the Patent Bar I fully plan on letting all the schools know that day, haha.
-
- Posts: 1592
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 4:37 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
UT>CUnolabreeze wrote:Honestly, TLS is working it's magic on me and has me thinking that I should probably keep my job and retake unless by some miracle I get into UT.
Your job>UT
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- md22
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 6:02 pm
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Any movement so far this week???
-
- Posts: 117
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 11:01 am
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Nope. Been UR since 11/20.md22 wrote:Any movement so far this week???
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Me, too...nmlf16 wrote:Nope. Been UR since 11/20.md22 wrote:Any movement so far this week???
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:34 am
Re: University of Colorado c/o 2016 (2012-2013 cycle)
Waitlisted today: 162/3.44
Disappointed for sure, but not end of world. From Boulder so hoping to have it as an option. Still trying to decide between Law school and applied statistics grad school and have other good offers but was hoping for this one. Hopefully you guys hear back soon then, I assume it has taken so long as they are trying to figure out where to draw the line between acceptances and waitlists with small cycle.
Disappointed for sure, but not end of world. From Boulder so hoping to have it as an option. Still trying to decide between Law school and applied statistics grad school and have other good offers but was hoping for this one. Hopefully you guys hear back soon then, I assume it has taken so long as they are trying to figure out where to draw the line between acceptances and waitlists with small cycle.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login