http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=axCCAUUnUPUminnbills wrote:They can mitigate the revenue loss by raising tuition though.timeandspace11 wrote:Thats understandable. I certainly think law schools probably should be cutting class sizes, but you also have to consider how much they can cut before losing revenue. That said I do believe the school has generous alumni donations.Nova wrote:Last years changes:
Minnesota: 167 (0), 3.8 (0), 205 (-46, -16.67%)
It is estimated apps will be down another 15% or so across the nation this cycle.
IDK what they are going to do. Im guessing they will do everything they can to maintain 167, which would likely mean cutting the class size a bit.
Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
- timeandspace11
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
minnbills wrote:They can mitigate the revenue loss by raising tuition though.timeandspace11 wrote:Thats understandable. I certainly think law schools probably should be cutting class sizes, but you also have to consider how much they can cut before losing revenue. That said I do believe the school has generous alumni donations.Nova wrote:Last years changes:
Minnesota: 167 (0), 3.8 (0), 205 (-46, -16.67%)
It is estimated apps will be down another 15% or so across the nation this cycle.
IDK what they are going to do. Im guessing they will do everything they can to maintain 167, which would likely mean cutting the class size a bit.
True, but they risk losing students if the costs get absurdly high
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
They need to find 103 kids with lsats > 166...
If you have that, expect a nice scholarship imo
If you have that, expect a nice scholarship imo
- timeandspace11
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
They seem to be pretty generous with scholarship money. I certainly hope you are right.ThreeRivers wrote:They need to find 103 kids with lsats > 166...
If you have that, expect a nice scholarship imo
- willio
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:17 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I've been Under Review since 11/5. Has anyone had any movement lately?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:34 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I've been in review since 10/5. Kill me now.willio wrote:I've been Under Review since 11/5. Has anyone had any movement lately?
I casually check all of my status a few times a day now, but for some reason that nagging "In Review" has me checking Minnesota every few hours. I even checked it 30 minutes ago, fully aware that nothing would have changed between 10 and 11 pm. This has turned into an unhealthy obsession.
-
- Posts: 80
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:34 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
a2blifeUIUC wrote:I've been in review since 10/5. Kill me now.willio wrote:I've been Under Review since 11/5. Has anyone had any movement lately?
I casually check all of my status a few times a day now, but for some reason that nagging "In Review" has me checking Minnesota every few hours. I even checked it 30 minutes ago, fully aware that nothing would have changed between 10 and 11 pm. This has turned into an unhealthy obsession.
......Ermahgerd. Problem solved: http://www.lsstatuscheck.com
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:00 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I was Under review 11/5 today it changed under review 12/7! Now time to keep waiting... i wonder how much longer :/
- willio
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:17 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
My In Review status was changed to 12/7 as well.
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:00 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
What are your numbers if you dont mind me asking?
- willio
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 1:17 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
165/3.6. Slightly below their sweet spot of 167 but we'll see. You?
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:00 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Im way below 154/3.39, MBA and work experience and URM. It is a reach for me but im being hopeful.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:27 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I submitted on 12/3, went complete on 12/4 & into review...but already moved from in review 12/4 and the date changed again on 12/7...is this a bad sign??? It's going through the review process a lot faster than other people who have been posting here. i am freaking OUT. haha
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I submitted 11/26 went in review 11/27/2012 and status date changed today to 12/7/2012coffeeaddict wrote:I submitted on 12/3, went complete on 12/4 & into review...but already moved from in review 12/4 and the date changed again on 12/7...is this a bad sign??? It's going through the review process a lot faster than other people who have been posting here. i am freaking OUT. haha
- ThreeRivers
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 12:54 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I have 2 comments. One might relax you, one will probably cause you to freak out more (sorry)
1. I wouldn't worry about changing dates
2. Based on historical trends, a large wave of acceptances should be coming relatively soon
1. I wouldn't worry about changing dates
2. Based on historical trends, a large wave of acceptances should be coming relatively soon
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:27 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
ThreeRivers wrote:I have 2 comments. One might relax you, one will probably cause you to freak out more (sorry)
1. I wouldn't worry about changing dates
2. Based on historical trends, a large wave of acceptances should be coming relatively soon
I've been freaking out every day...I don't even know how everyone stays so calm. I find myself obsessively checking my email, status checker, & TLS....yikes.
How soon? & do you think I'd hear back in this large wave even though I JUST submitted my app? yikes!
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Lol. If you think now is bad... just wait till finals roll around next year.coffeeaddict wrote: I've been freaking out every day...I don't even know how everyone stays so calm. I find myself obsessively checking my email, status checker, & TLS....yikes.
According to the chart on the front page, December week 2.How soon? & do you think I'd hear back in this large wave even though I JUST submitted my app? yikes
IDK if you will be in this batch. I would guess no. Probably the next batch.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 1:27 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Thanks. I'm somewhat of a TLS newbie. What chart on the front page are you referring to? can you attach a link here, so that I can obsess about this whole thing some more? LOL thx.Nova wrote:Lol. If you think now is bad... just wait till finals roll around next year.coffeeaddict wrote: I've been freaking out every day...I don't even know how everyone stays so calm. I find myself obsessively checking my email, status checker, & TLS....yikes.
According to the chart on the front page, December week 2.How soon? & do you think I'd hear back in this large wave even though I JUST submitted my app? yikes
IDK if you will be in this batch. I would guess no. Probably the next batch.
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Its in the original post on the first page of the thread.coffeeaddict wrote: Thanks. I'm somewhat of a TLS newbie. What chart on the front page are you referring to? can you attach a link here, so that I can obsess about this whole thing some more? LOL thx.
- michaelm55
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 1:52 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Accepted via phone call (12/14/12) at 11:54 Central Standard Time.
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:43 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
michaelm55 wrote:Accepted via phone call (12/14/1) at 11:54 Central Standard Time.
Ur date?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2012 4:01 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Congrats! Did your status checker change?michaelm55 wrote:Accepted via phone call (12/14/12) at 11:54 Central Standard Time.
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 1:00 pm
-
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:43 am
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
In via phone call! Submited early sept. UR early oct.
- timeandspace11
- Posts: 605
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: Minnesota c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Congrats!!coldweather wrote:In via phone call! Submited early sept. UR early oct.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login