Idk; Berkeley is tied with Penn in the USNR and it's definitely a good idea to write a Why Penn...slack_academic wrote:Cool link. Thanks for posting it. The author mentions cases in which you should not submit a "Why X" statement, including when a school is so legit that it goes without saying why you'd want to study law there. I kind of feel like Berkeley fits in that category.outlookingin wrote:This post is kinda cool:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 22&t=94015
But the thing is, I'm wondering if Berkeley is going to read it and whether or not having family in the area is worth mentioning. Hmmmm.... decisions, decisions. What does my heart say? How about my stomach? I'll get back to you guys.
Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- honeybadger12
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:40 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
- 06102016
- Posts: 13460
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:29 pm
- outlookingin
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 4:08 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yeah I've watched some of those too!slack_academic wrote:True. I guess it really can't hurt, especially for a school making such a big deal of how holistic their review process is.honeybadger12 wrote:Idk; Berkeley is tied with Penn in the USNR and it's definitely a good idea to write a Why Penn...slack_academic wrote:Cool link. Thanks for posting it. The author mentions cases in which you should not submit a "Why X" statement, including when a school is so legit that it goes without saying why you'd want to study law there. I kind of feel like Berkeley fits in that category.outlookingin wrote:This post is kinda cool:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 22&t=94015
But the thing is, I'm wondering if Berkeley is going to read it and whether or not having family in the area is worth mentioning. Hmmmm.... decisions, decisions. What does my heart say? How about my stomach? I'll get back to you guys.
Watched a couple lectures from Berkeley law on the YouTubes today. I'd recommend it as a nice way for anyone writing a "Why Berkeley" addendum to gain some added inspiration.
Also, the videos where John Yoo gets dressed-down by some angry congressmen is pretty great. They call him "professor" but really they mean "evasive and slimy." They must have been Dems. I don't know about you guys, but if I go to Berkeley, I'm gonna be pretty interested in meeting Dr. Yoo... funny thought: what if someone wrote a "Why Berkeley" essay about how they really loved John Yoo... but there probably somebody who is actually doing that right now, and it's not funny to that guy. Just like Ayn Rand isn't funny.
OK, back to applications.
- honeybadger12
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:40 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Good ideaslack_academic wrote:True. I guess it really can't hurt, especially for a school making such a big deal of how holistic their review process is.honeybadger12 wrote:Idk; Berkeley is tied with Penn in the USNR and it's definitely a good idea to write a Why Penn...slack_academic wrote:Cool link. Thanks for posting it. The author mentions cases in which you should not submit a "Why X" statement, including when a school is so legit that it goes without saying why you'd want to study law there. I kind of feel like Berkeley fits in that category.outlookingin wrote:This post is kinda cool:
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 22&t=94015
But the thing is, I'm wondering if Berkeley is going to read it and whether or not having family in the area is worth mentioning. Hmmmm.... decisions, decisions. What does my heart say? How about my stomach? I'll get back to you guys.
Watched a couple lectures from Berkeley law on the YouTubes today. I'd recommend it as a nice way for anyone writing a "Why Berkeley" addendum to gain some added inspiration.
- bobr
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 4:42 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I am currently doing a Fellowship under the AmeriCorps banner and would like to apply for Boalt's fee waiver. On the one page application I accessed it requested a "Program Verification Documentation." Is a screenshot of my acceptance email sufficient or is something else needed? Thank you for your future help.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Wed Aug 29, 2012 9:08 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Checking In!! Good Luck everyone!!
- MayBJack426
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 6:28 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
What are people answering for this question in the app: Do you grant permission to have your file reviewed by student members of the Admissions Committee?
Do you think it matters? I have a feeling that students will be more judgmental than regular adcoms, but it also might look poorly to answer "no."
Do you think it matters? I have a feeling that students will be more judgmental than regular adcoms, but it also might look poorly to answer "no."
- 06102016
- Posts: 13460
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 1:29 pm
- outlookingin
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 4:08 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Yeah I think we had better answer yes. While I agree that our peers might be harder on us than others would be, this might be mitigated by the fact that these students on the committee are seeing tons of applications. Viewing a bunch of crappy apps may make them less critical of ours? Obviously we are not psychologists, hahaMayBJack426 wrote:What are people answering for this question in the app: Do you grant permission to have your file reviewed by student members of the Admissions Committee?
Do you think it matters? I have a feeling that students will be more judgmental than regular adcoms, but it also might look poorly to answer "no."
But as for what to check on this box, for sure we need to let them look at it. The only reason I would think that would be valid in NOT wanting them to look at our app is if we are revealing some highly personal business in the essays. If it's just a normal app, they will wonder why our peers couldn't help them look at it--they may assume we are thin-skinned and overly sensitive.
- Psib337
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:18 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I'm saying yes but I think I feel the opposite way. Maybe I'm just really nice (and people have told me that I'm too nice sometimes) but I feel like having students review your application could help. Especially if you've done something really interesting or maybe you said something and a week before the students had been sitting around going, "We need more of ______ here." If it were me I'd only be judgmental of the applications that give off a, "I'm smart but have no idea so I decided to go to law school," or the, "I just want to me make money, this is (supposedly) easy money," types of applications.MayBJack426 wrote:What are people answering for this question in the app: Do you grant permission to have your file reviewed by student members of the Admissions Committee?
Do you think it matters? I have a feeling that students will be more judgmental than regular adcoms, but it also might look poorly to answer "no."
- outlookingin
- Posts: 161
- Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 4:08 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Haha, glad to hear that we've got an optimist here. Yeah you're probably right. If the student body is anything like you, then most likely they're not going to poo poo our apps.Psib337 wrote:I'm saying yes but I think I feel the opposite way. Maybe I'm just really nice (and people have told me that I'm too nice sometimes) but I feel like having students review your application could help. Especially if you've done something really interesting or maybe you said something and a week before the students had been sitting around going, "We need more of ______ here." If it were me I'd only be judgmental of the applications that give off a, "I'm smart but have no idea so I decided to go to law school," or the, "I just want to me make money, this is (supposedly) easy money," types of applications.MayBJack426 wrote:What are people answering for this question in the app: Do you grant permission to have your file reviewed by student members of the Admissions Committee?
Do you think it matters? I have a feeling that students will be more judgmental than regular adcoms, but it also might look poorly to answer "no."
- MayBJack426
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Aug 17, 2012 6:28 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I think you both are right..we have to say yes. And good perspective on student reviews! We gotta stay positiveoutlookingin wrote:Haha, glad to hear that we've got an optimist here. Yeah you're probably right. If the student body is anything like you, then most likely they're not going to poo poo our apps.Psib337 wrote:I'm saying yes but I think I feel the opposite way. Maybe I'm just really nice (and people have told me that I'm too nice sometimes) but I feel like having students review your application could help. Especially if you've done something really interesting or maybe you said something and a week before the students had been sitting around going, "We need more of ______ here." If it were me I'd only be judgmental of the applications that give off a, "I'm smart but have no idea so I decided to go to law school," or the, "I just want to me make money, this is (supposedly) easy money," types of applications.MayBJack426 wrote:What are people answering for this question in the app: Do you grant permission to have your file reviewed by student members of the Admissions Committee?
Do you think it matters? I have a feeling that students will be more judgmental than regular adcoms, but it also might look poorly to answer "no."

- KanyeShrug
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:46 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Checking in. Good luck to all.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- SaintsTheMetal
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:08 am
- iMisto
- Posts: 658
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 3:55 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I have been waiting for today! Mine has been sent.
I know I'm not the most competitive here, but they are seriously one of the few schools with some heart and compassion - or so it seems. It's my only West Coast option. Fingers Crossed
Good luck to everybody!

I know I'm not the most competitive here, but they are seriously one of the few schools with some heart and compassion - or so it seems. It's my only West Coast option. Fingers Crossed
Good luck to everybody!
- yarsten
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2012 11:28 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Checking in. Quick question- I just found a couple posts on here about the importance of a longer PS at Berkeley. I just ignorantly sent the app with my standard PS- do you think it's worth it to write more and send it to them as my new PS (can I even do that?)?
-
- Posts: 1695
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
.
Last edited by 04102014 on Tue Apr 08, 2014 9:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Opinions on if a Why Berkeley essay in the addenda and supplemental materials section is appropriate? Not sure but don't want to be the only one not including one.
- SaintsTheMetal
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 5:08 am
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
They don't ask for it so I wouldn't include it. I didn't.TheThriller wrote:Opinions on if a Why Berkeley essay in the addenda and supplemental materials section is appropriate? Not sure but don't want to be the only one not including one.
- TheThriller
- Posts: 2282
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2012 10:12 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Thanks STMSaintsTheMetal wrote:They don't ask for it so I wouldn't include it. I didn't.TheThriller wrote:Opinions on if a Why Berkeley essay in the addenda and supplemental materials section is appropriate? Not sure but don't want to be the only one not including one.
- honeybadger12
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:40 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I recently talked to the dean of admissions and he specifically said a Why Berkeley is unnecessaryTheThriller wrote:Thanks STMSaintsTheMetal wrote:They don't ask for it so I wouldn't include it. I didn't.TheThriller wrote:Opinions on if a Why Berkeley essay in the addenda and supplemental materials section is appropriate? Not sure but don't want to be the only one not including one.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- honeybadger12
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2012 10:40 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Idk if you can send a new one, but I'd say it's definitely better to write more than two pages for Berkeley...yarsten wrote:Checking in. Quick question- I just found a couple posts on here about the importance of a longer PS at Berkeley. I just ignorantly sent the app with my standard PS- do you think it's worth it to write more and send it to them as my new PS (can I even do that?)?
- WhiteyCakes
- Posts: 1390
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 2:38 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Only bad thing about Berkeley is that the law buildings are right on frat row
- geary86
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 9:09 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Checking in
Love BAY AREA & CAL!!

Love BAY AREA & CAL!!
-
- Posts: 397
- Joined: Sun May 08, 2011 2:08 pm
Re: Berkeley c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
What difference would that make? I walk past frat guys on my way from the parking garage to the building but otherwise it doesn't affect my life at all whatsoever.WhiteyCakes wrote:Only bad thing about Berkeley is that the law buildings are right on frat row
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login