I guess we can safely assume that today's not the day90convoy wrote:we might have to call it a day yall...

I guess we can safely assume that today's not the day90convoy wrote:we might have to call it a day yall...
Heresy.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Maybe they'll skip JS1bs this year
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
I'm 75th percentile-ish.mimiquestionmark wrote:Maybe everything is taking so long because their carefully constructed LSAT medians got crushed and they are working hard to piece the class back together? Which would mean that they aren't just picking applicants they like/think are cool people; they're having to do numbers analysis?
Spivey seems to think that schools like Harvard are going to have to dip into the waitlist big time in order to keep medians (if they can keep their medians at all): http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/coming ... -movement/
This would all bode well for those with high LSATs. I'd be interested to know if most of the post-waitlist JS1's had relatively high LSAT scores (at or above median).
Wouldn't number analysis mean things would take shorter, not longer? I wouldn't be surprised if H struggles to hold LSAT medians, but I feel like that would 1) make it easier to identify high scorers to take off the waitlist; 2) put pressure on H to accept those people quickly before other schools take them.mimiquestionmark wrote:Maybe everything is taking so long because their carefully constructed LSAT medians got crushed and they are working hard to piece the class back together? Which would mean that they aren't just picking applicants they like/think are cool people; they're having to do numbers analysis?
Spivey seems to think that schools like Harvard are going to have to dip into the waitlist big time in order to keep medians (if they can keep their medians at all): http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/coming ... -movement/
This would all bode well for those with high LSATs. I'd be interested to know if most of the post-waitlist JS1's had relatively high LSAT scores (at or above median).
That is possible...but I think that having to factor in LSAT probably takes more time. In earlier years they perhaps picked the few applicants who struck their fancy/whose applications they remembered (which could be done in minutes). They probably took into account class demographics mostly and barely even looked at scores. Now they have to keep their class demographics AND find a way to fix their LSAT median... they are probably looking at SUPER splitters...which makes them worried about maintaining their GPA medians.stoopkid13 wrote:Wouldn't number analysis mean things would take shorter, not longer? I wouldn't be surprised if H struggles to hold LSAT medians, but I feel like that would 1) make it easier to identify high scorers to take off the waitlist; 2) put pressure on H to accept those people quickly before other schools take them.mimiquestionmark wrote:Maybe everything is taking so long because their carefully constructed LSAT medians got crushed and they are working hard to piece the class back together? Which would mean that they aren't just picking applicants they like/think are cool people; they're having to do numbers analysis?
Spivey seems to think that schools like Harvard are going to have to dip into the waitlist big time in order to keep medians (if they can keep their medians at all): http://spiveyconsulting.com/blog/coming ... -movement/
This would all bode well for those with high LSATs. I'd be interested to know if most of the post-waitlist JS1's had relatively high LSAT scores (at or above median).
How so? It seems like Harvard will have more trouble than anyone keeping their medians because their class is so big. They need more than 250 people with an LSAT of 173 or above (whereas Y/S need about 120). I'm not a statistician or anything though, so if my logic is wrong please correct me.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Highly doubt it has anything to do with medians, their class is big enough it won't matter
I doubt it as well. Further evidence against the case: I'm a post-waitlist JS1 and a reverse-splitter. Maybe it's that their numbers are solid and now they have the difficult task of evaluating people on things more substantive than their score on the LSAT.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Highly doubt it has anything to do with medians, their class is big enough it won't matter
possibly, maybe JS1bs didnt work out very well for them last year, so they decided to send us an email instead (the email we got two weeks ago regarding the waitlist process), i think that email served the same purpose as JS1bs, both are not binding but urge us to drop out if we are not committed. Plus, the email saves them a lot of trouble, for example, some people are currently not in US so they simply cannot reach them by phone. This happened last year, i saw someone quoting the story this morning.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Maybe they'll skip JS1bs this year
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Ya that's what I was thinking and the fact that they didn't do the homework thing for post WL js1s tookadyevna wrote:possibly, maybe JS1bs didnt work out very well for them last year, so they decided to send us an email instead (the email we got two weeks ago regarding the waitlist process), i think that email served the same purpose as JS1bs, both are not binding but urge us to drop out if we are not committed. Plus, the email saves them a lot of trouble, for example, some people are currently not in US so they simply cannot reach them by phone. This happened last year, i saw someone quoting the story this morning.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Maybe they'll skip JS1bs this year
said the chaos space marine.Eladriel wrote:Heresy.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Maybe they'll skip JS1bs this year
This would imply, if u get a JS1, you are more likely in?Mack.Hambleton wrote:Ya that's what I was thinking and the fact that they didn't do the homework thing for post WL js1s tookadyevna wrote:possibly, maybe JS1bs didnt work out very well for them last year, so they decided to send us an email instead (the email we got two weeks ago regarding the waitlist process), i think that email served the same purpose as JS1bs, both are not binding but urge us to drop out if we are not committed. Plus, the email saves them a lot of trouble, for example, some people are currently not in US so they simply cannot reach them by phone. This happened last year, i saw someone quoting the story this morning.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Maybe they'll skip JS1bs this year
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
I think we already established, thanks to Pylon that--from the perspective of being on the waitlist--a post-WL JS1 is more likely to get in than a pre-WL JS1.Hikari wrote:This would imply, if u get a JS1, you are more likely in?Mack.Hambleton wrote:Ya that's what I was thinking and the fact that they didn't do the homework thing for post WL js1s tookadyevna wrote:possibly, maybe JS1bs didnt work out very well for them last year, so they decided to send us an email instead (the email we got two weeks ago regarding the waitlist process), i think that email served the same purpose as JS1bs, both are not binding but urge us to drop out if we are not committed. Plus, the email saves them a lot of trouble, for example, some people are currently not in US so they simply cannot reach them by phone. This happened last year, i saw someone quoting the story this morning.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Maybe they'll skip JS1bs this year
The Emperor is the true heretic.dabigchina wrote:said the chaos space marine.Eladriel wrote:Heresy.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Maybe they'll skip JS1bs this year
Ha I wasn't told anything about the wait list because we were already running over by the end of the interview but I hope thats true….qwertyTLS wrote:I still think there will be some movement this week (js1bs and js2s, but I see why people are saying js1bs may no longer be necessary).
post-WL interviewees were told within two weeks, right? so I guess latest we could hear is end of next week, which isn't too bad.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
yeah I think well hear something thurs/friqwertyTLS wrote:I still think there will be some movement this week (js1bs and js2s, but I see why people are saying js1bs may no longer be necessary).
post-WL interviewees were told within two weeks, right? so I guess latest we could hear is end of next week, which isn't too bad.
IF they were concerned about their medians, it would be a much easier/quicker process to fill the class. literally plug whatever desirable into their admissions spreadsheet and voila you have your WL admits. not worrying about numbers and trying to pick 'interesting/cool' people would take longer, just because of the nature of choosing. with softs, you're comparing apples to oranges. with numbers, you're comparing oranges to oranges. the reality i's somewhere in betweenmimiquestionmark wrote:How so? It seems like Harvard will have more trouble than anyone keeping their medians because their class is so big. They need more than 250 people with an LSAT of 173 or above (whereas Y/S need about 120). I'm not a statistician or anything though, so if my logic is wrong please correct me.Mack.Hambleton wrote:Highly doubt it has anything to do with medians, their class is big enough it won't matter
Wow congrats!!!!!! Pre or post waitlist JS1?sorcer wrote:Just got my acceptance off the waitlist 12 minutes ago!! I'm international, so I received an e-mail. Good luck to the rest of you!
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login