Georgetown 2013/ (2014) Forum

[Mardou]

So I already posted this, but I am not on the list.

UR 2/11. UR 2/12, UR 3/23
164/3.89

So far it seems like (with some notable exceptions like Taw) low GPA, high LSAT splitters are in the 3/16 batch along with people whose are not splitters but who have both GPA and LSAT around the median. It seems that many of us who are under review more recently are low Lsat splitters people who have both stats at or below the 25th percentile. Hmm... not sure if that bodes well for those of us in the second group.

sorry... either missed you or had issues finding your stats

3.3 163 urm with an update today.

Update today as well (from 3/9, my first under review date), URM with similar stats as chicoalto

[sibley]

So far it seems like (with some notable exceptions like Taw) low GPA, high LSAT splitters are in the 3/16 batch along with people whose are not splitters but who have both GPA and LSAT around the median. It seems that many of us who are under review more recently are low Lsat splitters people who have both stats at or below the 25th percentile. Hmm... not sure if that bodes well for those of us in the second group.

I like this analysis, mostly because it makes me feel like I have a little bit better chance than a snowball in hell.

Another update, just because if we're going to keep track of this it's easier to do it excessively... sorry if I'm spamming you.

Ok y'all... here's what we're going to do. Post your most recent UR date, along with your stats. Let's see if we can see some sort of pattern. Anyone not listed add... or update!

3/16 170/3.34 Sibley DR 3/24
2/17 167/3.4 pollaclc
3/16 167/3.6 SaintClarence27
2/19 (complete date) with 174/3.64. Held for Feb Score. chutzpah
3/16 3.6, 169 cardinalandgold
3/16 168/3.3 flowerpot
2/12 170/3.0 shadow.
3/23 170/2.8 taw856
3/24 PT 163, 3.2 DeSilentio2728
3/23 164/3.4 heyzeus
3/23 164/3.89 megster_29UR
3/24 3.3 163 urm chicoalto0649
3/24 ~3.3 ~163 URM Mardou
3/23 167/3.41 Schnauzerlover

[schnauzerlover]

So far it seems like (with some notable exceptions like Taw) low GPA, high LSAT splitters are in the 3/16 batch along with people whose are not splitters but who have both GPA and LSAT around the median. It seems that many of us who are under review more recently are low Lsat splitters people who have both stats at or below the 25th percentile. Hmm... not sure if that bodes well for those of us in the second group.

I like this analysis, mostly because it makes me feel like I have a little bit better chance than a snowball in hell.

Another update, just because if we're going to keep track of this it's easier to do it excessively... sorry if I'm spamming you.

Ok y'all... here's what we're going to do. Post your most recent UR date, along with your stats. Let's see if we can see some sort of pattern. Anyone not listed add... or update!

• 3/16 - 170/3.34
  2/17 167/3.4

3/16 - 170/3.34

good idea!
2/17 167/3.4 (LSP weak consider)

3/16 167/3.6

COMPLETE 2/19 with 174/3.64. Held for Feb Score.

3/16 3.6, 169

3/16, 168/3.3

Just updated from 2/12 to 3-23-weird that it changed on the 24th

Complete 1/13, UR 2/12, no further changes 170/3.0

UR 2/17 --> UR 3/23. 170/2.8

UR 3/9, UR 3/24 PT 163, 3.2

UR 2/5 UR 2/19 --- UR 3/23 164/3.4

UR 2/11. UR 2/12, UR 3/23 164/3.89

3/24 3.3 163 urm

3/9-->3/24 ~3.3 ~163 URM

UR 3/23 167/3.41

[megster_29]

So I already posted this, but I am not on the list.

UR 2/11. UR 2/12, UR 3/23
164/3.89

So far it seems like (with some notable exceptions like Taw) low GPA, high LSAT splitters are in the 3/16 batch along with people whose are not splitters but who have both GPA and LSAT around the median. It seems that many of us who are under review more recently are low Lsat splitters people who have both stats at or below the 25th percentile. Hmm... not sure if that bodes well for those of us in the second group.

I meant to write that those of us in this group are EITHER low LSAT splitters OR people who have both stats at or below the 25th, not that all of us have both LSATs and GPAs below the 25th. Also, it seems like a few of those with lower numbers are URM's... so that changes things a bit as well. I really don't know what to think.

[cyh]

So I already posted this, but I am not on the list.

UR 2/11. UR 2/12, UR 3/23
164/3.89

So far it seems like (with some notable exceptions like Taw) low GPA, high LSAT splitters are in the 3/16 batch along with people whose are not splitters but who have both GPA and LSAT around the median. It seems that many of us who are under review more recently are low Lsat splitters people who have both stats at or below the 25th percentile. Hmm... not sure if that bodes well for those of us in the second group.

I meant to write that those of us in this group are EITHER low LSAT splitters OR people who have both stats at or below the 25th, not that all of us have both LSATs and GPAs below the 25th. Also, it seems like a few of those with lower numbers are URM's... so that changes things a bit as well. I really don't know what to think.

+1

[megster_29]

Also interesting is that scarletlady did not get a DR before her ding, which is putting me even more on edge.

[jman77]

Just changed to UR 3/24 from previous 3/9 (this was the first UR date). Stats in profile.

[sibley]

Also interesting is that scarletlady did not get a DR before her ding, which is putting me even more on edge.

she didn't? I was leaving her off the list bc I guess it doesn't really apply to what we're trying to figure out.. but her info is definitely good to keep in mind.

[sibley]

Anyone not listed add... or update!

1/12 PT 163/4.0 savesthedayajb
2/12 170/3.0 shadow.
2/17 167/3.4 pollaclc
2/19 (complete date) 174/3.64. Held for Feb Score. chutzpah
3/16 170/3.34 sibley
3/16 167/3.6 SaintClarence27
3/16 169/3.6 cardinalandgold
3/16 168/3.3 flowerpot
3/23 170/2.8 taw856
3/23 164/3.4 heyzeus
3/23 164/3.89 megster_29
3/23 167/3.41 Schnauzerlover
3/23 167/3.67 madforsadness
3/24 PT 163/3.2 DeSilentio2728
3/24 3.3 163 urm chicoalto0649
3/24 ~3.3 ~163 URM Mardou
3/24 167/3.9 (late app) jman77

[madforsadness]

I'm in the 3/23 group as well, updated from 2/19. 167, international (so unofficial) 3.67.

[chutzpah]

I dont think my situation will fit into any discernable pattern. There are applicants with similar numbers who went complete in early March and have already heard decisions. I am an outlier, an exception, a "which one of these doesn't belong". ugh

As for the splitters, it certainly makes sense that they're holding onto your applications until they have a good sense of where they are in relation to the medians.

[sibley]

I dont think my situation will fit into any discernable pattern. There are applicants with similar numbers who went complete in early March and have already heard decisions. I am an outlier, an exception, a "which one of these doesn't belong". ugh

As for the splitters, it certainly makes sense that they're holding onto your applications until they have a good sense of where they are in relation to the medians.

you're sure they still have your app?
maybe they're waiting to see where else you get in. if you get (edit) columbia or something like that they probably won't want to mess with you

[savesthedayajb]

UR 1/12 163/4.0 PT

[chutzpah]

I dont think my situation will fit into any discernable pattern. There are applicants with similar numbers who went complete in early March and have already heard decisions. I am an outlier, an exception, a "which one of these doesn't belong". ugh

As for the splitters, it certainly makes sense that they're holding onto your applications until they have a good sense of where they are in relation to the medians.

you're sure they still have your app?
maybe they're waiting to see where else you get in. if you get (edit) columbia or something like that they probably won't want to mess with you

Yup, I have an ongoing correspondence with a lady in admissions who most recently told me that it can take up to 6-8 weeks for an application to go from "complete" to "under review". I indicated that my application was originally complete on DECEMBER 3RD.

[eaters333]

so does decision rendered on the status checker = deny?

[sibley]

so does decision rendered on the status checker = deny?

oh FUCK mine says that now too. let's hope not.

[SaintClarence27]

.

[jman77]

so does decision rendered on the status checker = deny?

oh FUCK mine says that now too. let's hope not.

Try logging into the admitted students website.

[sibley]

so does decision rendered on the status checker = deny?

were you previously 3/16?

[Kim617]

Also interesting is that scarletlady did not get a DR before her ding, which is putting me even more on edge.

she didn't? I was leaving her off the list bc I guess it doesn't really apply to what we're trying to figure out.. but her info is definitely good to keep in mind.

i'm not sure i ever went DR either. i checked about a week before i received my letter, and it still said complete 12/9. so in less than a week i guess it could've went Complete->UR->DR but would all that have happened in time for me to receive the letter? weird. i guess maybe i should've been more obsessive about my status checker.

[chutzpah]

Good news comes via postal mail, bad and WL news comes via email. It might take a few days.

[eaters333]

so does decision rendered on the status checker = deny?

were you previously 3/16?

ya

[cardinalandgold]

Also just went DR...GULP

[sibley]

Good news comes via postal mail, bad and WL news comes via email. It might take a few days.

ughhhh why not immediate. this can't be good news. if it was good news they would have held onto us longer. right?

[SaintClarence27]

.