No very few (i.e. one or two) get into the others (Columbia, Stanford, Yale).Lavitz wrote:8-10 is "very few"?edamame wrote:Also, Sabanist (and others), I'm from a mid-tier public school. We send 8-10 kids to HLS each year. Undergrad doesn't seem to matter as much for HLS. But for CLS, SLS, and YLS, it's a different story. Very few from my school are lucky enough to be admitted there.![]()
Nobody from my undergrad has gotten into HLS since like 1980.
Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
edamame

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
mustached

- Posts: 36
- Joined: Sun Jan 06, 2013 8:53 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I hear that.Lavitz wrote:8-10 is "very few"?edamame wrote:Also, Sabanist (and others), I'm from a mid-tier public school. We send 8-10 kids to HLS each year. Undergrad doesn't seem to matter as much for HLS. But for CLS, SLS, and YLS, it's a different story. Very few from my school are lucky enough to be admitted there.![]()
Nobody from my undergrad has gotten into HLS since like 1980.
I wouldn't be surprised if I'm literally the first person from my undergrad to ever even get a JS1 at HLS. And it's been around since 1923.
I guarantee you there's not more than 3.
- wert3813

- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
@edamame sorry for bad quotingedamame wrote:sabanist wrote:Congrats!tekumamba wrote:Hey all good news! Just got a post hold js1 today! Complete 12/10 held Feb 14 I think and just got the js 1 at 2 pm PST. Number in profile
wert3813 wrote: Football playing ability>football mugging ability>machine-ing ability>academic ability
Look right?![]()
![]()
![]()
dead @ machine-ing.
very accurate.
Point is, there's hope for the public school proles at HLS.
Hmm I wonder if people on here would consider your school mid tier. Sabinist and I go to different large publics that would consider themselves mid tier. Mine has one at harvard total and id be shocked if hers has more than 3.
Anyway, it was just an observation, I didn't mean to disparage anyone or any school.
Last edited by wert3813 on Tue Apr 02, 2013 9:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
edamame

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I agree. My undergrad is also one of the reasons I haven't heard from YLS (and it will also be bad news in my case). But it was all my family could afford, and I wouldn't take on crazy amounts of debt just for undergrad.sabanist wrote:fair point. and sorryLavitz wrote: At least people have heard of your school.![]()
And this still doesn't help me
seriously guys I'm dying here. lolololololtrojandave wrote: Or... HLS is below median for National Championships this cycle?
8-10? Impressive. I'm the only one I know of, and one of my LOR professors said she'd never heard of someone going to HLS from here. One of my bros is held, though.edamame wrote: Congratulations, Tekumamba. Also, Sabanist (and others), I'm from a mid-tier public school. We send 8-10 kids to HLS each year. Undergrad doesn't seem to matter as much for HLS. But for CLS, SLS, and YLS, it's a different story. Very few from my school are lucky enough to be admitted there.
I think my UG is a big part of the reason I haven't heard from YLS yet (and will probably get bad news).
Also, at least your undergrad has good sports teams. We used to be good... like six years ago or so.
- sinfiery

- Posts: 3310
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:55 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Same, but probably never instead of 1980. The only data I saw had the highest acceptance being at UVA so I'm already a trailblazerLavitz wrote: 8-10 is "very few"?![]()
Nobody from my undergrad has gotten into HLS since like 1980.
Also, my school has like 30000 kids
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
edamame

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
No problem! Hmmm, maybe I can "out" my undergrad after my cycle is over.wert3813 wrote:Hmm I wonder if people on here would consider your school mid tier. Sabinist and I go to different large publics that would consider themselves mid tier. Mine has one at harvard total and id be shocked if hers has more than 3.edamame wrote:sabanist wrote:Congrats!tekumamba wrote:Hey all good news! Just got a post hold js1 today! Complete 12/10 held Feb 14 I think and just got the js 1 at 2 pm PST. Number in profile
wert3813 wrote: Football playing ability>football mugging ability>machine-ing ability>academic ability
Look right?![]()
![]()
![]()
dead @ machine-ing.
very accurate.
Point is, there's hope for the public school proles at HLS.
Anyway, it was just an observation, I didn't mean to disparage anyone or any school.
- Eli

- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:35 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Ditto. Though edamame's quote is rather depressing.. it's only a matter of time before Yale rejects me, but if I wish upon a star will they overlook my non-Ivy education and give me a fighting chance..?Lavitz wrote:8-10 is "very few"?edamame wrote:Also, Sabanist (and others), I'm from a mid-tier public school. We send 8-10 kids to HLS each year. Undergrad doesn't seem to matter as much for HLS. But for CLS, SLS, and YLS, it's a different story. Very few from my school are lucky enough to be admitted there.![]()
Nobody from my undergrad has gotten into HLS since like 1980.
Anyway it's good news for Harvard applicants!
PS My UG was NEVER good at sports. Never. Never ever ever.
- Lavitz

- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sorry, RC fail on my part.edamame wrote:No very few (i.e. one or two) get into the others (Columbia, Stanford, Yale).
Still, nobody's even gotten into Columbia in the last 10 years either.
-
edamame

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Eli wrote:Ditto. Though edamame's quote is rather depressing.. it's only a matter of time before Yale rejects me, but if I wish upon a star will they overlook my non-Ivy education and give me a fighting chance..?Lavitz wrote:8-10 is "very few"?edamame wrote:Also, Sabanist (and others), I'm from a mid-tier public school. We send 8-10 kids to HLS each year. Undergrad doesn't seem to matter as much for HLS. But for CLS, SLS, and YLS, it's a different story. Very few from my school are lucky enough to be admitted there.![]()
Nobody from my undergrad has gotten into HLS since like 1980.
Anyway it's good news for Harvard applicants!
PS My UG was NEVER good at sports. Never. Never ever ever.
- d330

- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Congrats.LexLeon wrote:JS2.
God is good.
PM me if you'd like any details.
- sabanist

- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
We do have that. As much as I'd like to land Yale, the student ticket prices might have been worth the opportunity costedamame wrote: Also, at least your undergrad has good sports teams. We used to be good... like six years ago or so.
-
az21833

- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
just joined to find 10 other facebook friends in the group. feel much less special lol. ivy UG to tie back to your observationwert3813 wrote:After looking through every single person in the Harvard FB group. Ain't no way undergrad doesn't matter. That TLSism isn't true for the very top at least.
- wert3813

- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So you weren't the person from [your hometown] who was added this morning? Ha it didn't seem like you.az21833 wrote:just joined to find 10 other facebook friends in the group. feel much less special lol. ivy UG to tie back to your observationwert3813 wrote:After looking through every single person in the Harvard FB group. Ain't no way undergrad doesn't matter. That TLSism isn't true for the very top at least.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Eli

- Posts: 115
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2013 11:35 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Alright, I'm going to eat my words after glimpsing over the facebook group. All but about three on the first page (not counting people who didn't report) come from really good/well-known schools. Crazy how many Harvards there are, too.
Thinking back on it, I didn't matricute at Harvard, but I do have some Harvard on my transcript. Maybe that cancels out my lowly UG. :/
Thinking back on it, I didn't matricute at Harvard, but I do have some Harvard on my transcript. Maybe that cancels out my lowly UG. :/
- wert3813

- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yah. In fairness to Edamame her school is absolutely mid-tier so I was wrong to question her. They just "outkick their coverage" so to speak.Eli wrote:Alright, I'm going to eat my words after glimpsing over the facebook group. All but about three on the first page (not counting people who didn't report) come from really good/well-known schools. Crazy how many Harvards there are, too.
Thinking back on it, I didn't matricute at Harvard, but I do have some Harvard on my transcript. Maybe that cancels out my lowly UG. :/
-
az21833

- Posts: 1403
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 4:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
whoa whoa theres another person from [insert hometown] in there? PM me immediately. no im not in group but can see whose in it at this ptwert3813 wrote:So you weren't the person from [your hometown] who was added this morning? Ha it didn't seem like you.az21833 wrote:just joined to find 10 other facebook friends in the group. feel much less special lol. ivy UG to tie back to your observationwert3813 wrote:After looking through every single person in the Harvard FB group. Ain't no way undergrad doesn't matter. That TLSism isn't true for the very top at least.
also i need to know what schools we are referring to here after hearing all this commentary lol
- jbagelboy

- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
.
Last edited by jbagelboy on Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:33 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
TrustInMusic

- Posts: 222
- Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2013 4:39 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
TLS sleuths at their finest.
-
edamame

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Relax. You'll find out after my cycle is over. It's a mid-tier state school.az21833 wrote:whoa whoa theres another person from [insert hometown] in there? PM me immediately. no im not in group but can see whose in it at this ptwert3813 wrote:So you weren't the person from [your hometown] who was added this morning? Ha it didn't seem like you.az21833 wrote:just joined to find 10 other facebook friends in the group. feel much less special lol. ivy UG to tie back to your observationwert3813 wrote:After looking through every single person in the Harvard FB group. Ain't no way undergrad doesn't matter. That TLSism isn't true for the very top at least.
also i need to know what schools we are referring to here after hearing all this commentary lol
- Jaqen

- Posts: 986
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 6:23 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
My high school didn't even have AP classes.jbagelboy wrote:For those of you who did go to mid tier large public schools, im curious why you did so? If you did well enough on the lsat to be considered for harvard law then you had to crush the SAT, and you must not be total slackers so AP classes wouldnt have ben very tough. There is also momentum from the supply end, i.e. kids from top schools test better so its more likely they would make up a larger % of the class at top LS.
-
edamame

- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:25 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
You're 100% correct. My parents couldn't afford to send me to a private undergrad and highly questioned the value of doing so, especially since I knew I wanted to go to a law school. Ultimately, I knew that undergrad didn't matter if I did well enough to get into a good grad school. I did get into better public schools (out-of-state schools) and great private colleges. I just decided the $50,000 / year wasn't worth it, especially if you combine that with law school tuition. Also, my undergrad was really generous with AP credit, allowing me to skip basic classes and take exciting seminars.jbagelboy wrote:For those of you who did go to mid tier large public schools, im curious why you did so? If you did well enough on the lsat to be considered for harvard law then you had to crush the SAT, and you must not be total slackers so AP classes wouldnt have ben very tough. There is also momentum from the supply end, i.e. kids from top schools test better so its more likely they would make up a larger % of the class at top LS.
I've had a great experience at a public school. I have no regrets. My undergrad is way ahead of where I went to high school, lol. I see a lot of my high school classmates going to schools that don't have as great programs (and employment prospects) as mine does. I'm so glad I chose a (relatively) good school that's above average in most categories. And I'm super, super glad I saved my money.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- wert3813

- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Two fold: First, 33ACT/1420 SAT 4.0 doesn't get what you might think. I did only take one AP class my junior year and made a two, although I had a broken dominant arm (I took a ton senior year and made fours and fives, but it's to late by then). Dinged at HY Duke G'town WL @BC (lol) That left Vanderbilt at sticker or [big state school squarely in the mid tier] for basically free.jbagelboy wrote:For those of you who did go to mid tier large public schools, im curious why you did so? If you did well enough on the lsat to be considered for harvard law then you had to crush the SAT, and you must not be total slackers so AP classes wouldnt have ben very tough.
Second, my parents told me they would either help pay for UG or Grad school. I had no clue what I wanted to do at 17. I didn't under Vanderbilt but me on a better life track than [BSSSITMT] so I chose the honors college at [BSSSITMT] got to register before seniors, had the best teachers, small class sizes, and a quality of discourse in class that was decent because they were honors classes.
It worked out. But if I'd made a 3.6 in college (and let's be clear I had no clue how important a 4.0 was in college) I'd be screwed right now.
Some but enough to account for all of this. Think about this 62K is rough the enrollment of all the Ivies. Ohio State has 40K by itself. One school.jbagelboy wrote: There is also momentum from the supply end, i.e. kids from top schools test better so its more likely they would make up a larger % of the class at top LS.
- Lavitz

- Posts: 3402
- Joined: Mon May 31, 2010 1:39 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Didn't got to a mid-tier large public school so I guess I'm not eligible to respond to this, lol.jbagelboy wrote:For those of you who did go to mid tier large public schools, im curious why you did so? If you did well enough on the lsat to be considered for harvard law then you had to crush the SAT, and you must not be total slackers so AP classes wouldnt have ben very tough. There is also momentum from the supply end, i.e. kids from top schools test better so its more likely they would make up a larger % of the class at top LS.
- sabanist

- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I think a lot of it was the environment I grew up in. Rural Georgia doesn't exactly have a lot of Ivy grads floating around, encouraging kids to shoot for the stars. My high school has a 40% attrition rate from 9th grade to graduation; my sister was one of the dropouts. Graduating was a huge success in my hometown, so going to a big state school was cause for a parade.jbagelboy wrote:For those of you who did go to mid tier large public schools, im curious why you did so? If you did well enough on the lsat to be considered for harvard law then you had to crush the SAT, and you must not be total slackers so AP classes wouldnt have ben very tough. There is also momentum from the supply end, i.e. kids from top schools test better so its more likely they would make up a larger % of the class at top LS.
If I'd known my SAT score had Ivy potential, I might have applied. But I figured I'd be going up against thousands of 2400s and saw no point. I was happy with what I got - a full tuition scholly to my UG - so I took that.
Sometimes I wonder what if, but I've had a good time.
This was also the case for me.wert3813 wrote:so I chose the honors college at [BSSSITMT] got to register before seniors, had the best teachers, small class sizes, and a quality of discourse in class that was decent because they were honors classes.
Wert, you and I may need to have a talk
- domino

- Posts: 324
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 8:51 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
People are less savvy about test prep in high school, too. I went to a middle-of-the-road public HS, and the most go-getter students maybe halfheartedly worked through part of a Princeton Review book.
Sabanist, did you see this article already?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/educa ... es.html?hp
Also in this op-ed someone talks about a similar experience:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/29/opini ... ml?hp&_r=0
Sabanist, did you see this article already?
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/17/educa ... es.html?hp
Also in this op-ed someone talks about a similar experience:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/29/opini ... ml?hp&_r=0
Last edited by domino on Wed Apr 03, 2013 12:48 am, edited 1 time in total.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login