lol, in this position as well. Hoping the remaining ASWs will clear things up a little. I've been hearing tons of negative comments about Chicago and that's probably my top choice, so I hope ASW proves them wrong but who knows.chargers21 wrote:I'm going to break out the dart board and throw at it blindfolded. Lots of debt or crippling debt are the 2 optionsStylnator wrote:To those who have tough decisions coming up, how is everyone deciding their options? Pro/con lists? Family/friends?
I'm so torn I literally don't know how to even begin to approach deciding on a school.
TLS c/o 2020 - In #Squad We Trust Forum
- dasq5511

- Posts: 195
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2016 3:52 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
- alpha kenny body

- Posts: 4850
- Joined: Sat May 07, 2011 8:28 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
Why not? Your scholly isnt set in stone for all three years. There's no harm in asking for more or talking with a FA counselor to figure out how to get more money. Even a Research Assistant position or something could net more cash. There's ways to hustle. Become a gigolo and offer off the cuff legal advice to your clientsRubbishdump wrote:Can you really?fips tedora wrote:As a 1L you can always renegotiate scholly, so you may not pay as much as you originally calculated. "Hey School, my grades are tight, and I need to not be so stressed, give me some money." Especially if people with good grades transfer, or you use the prospect of transferring as leverage, etc., they'll definitely be amenable. Also too, if you cop the 1L SA, that's like 10k you could put towards debt.chargers21 wrote:I'm going to break out the dart board and throw at it blindfolded. Lots of debt or crippling debt are the 2 optionsStylnator wrote:To those who have tough decisions coming up, how is everyone deciding their options? Pro/con lists? Family/friends?
I'm so torn I literally don't know how to even begin to approach deciding on a school.
- Dodocogon

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 11:45 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
I don't like this gamechargers21 wrote:Lots of debt or crippling debt are the 2 options
-
haley12

- Posts: 537
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2016 11:37 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
Not sure if there is a better forum for this, but-- has anyone used Spivey consulting and had a good or bad result they would like to share?
-
Rubbishdump

- Posts: 312
- Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2016 4:16 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
I've heard only good things, but fwiw I feel like you'll only hear positive things here, if you catch my drift.haley12 wrote:Not sure if there is a better forum for this, but-- has anyone used Spivey consulting and had a good or bad result they would like to share?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
Once I get all decisions, I am going to put together all of the information, and sit down and talk it out with the soon to be wife. I do wish at times that I had the freedom that a lot of people have (no significant other that they have to consider). It makes it a bit more difficult when my fiancee has to apply and find a job in four different cities while I am trying to decideStylnator wrote:To those who have tough decisions coming up, how is everyone deciding their options? Pro/con lists? Family/friends?
I'm so torn I literally don't know how to even begin to approach deciding on a school.
- SybillAnnDorsett

- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:59 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
I'd like your source regarding the withdrawal from a WL having absolutely no upside. It's a pretty declarative statement so is there any backup for it?dietcoke1 wrote:I can understand people are trying to be considerate in withdrawing but there is absolutely no upside to withdrawing from a WL. I'm not sure why people care if they withdraw now because if they are offered a spot off a WL then they would decline later and it would go to the next in line anyways.
- dietcoke1

- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
well as flips tedora stated apparently there is an upside if you use it to show one school that you've WL at that you are totally committed by withdrawing from the rest so I suppose I retract and rephrase by saying there is little upside. but schools only know that if you tell them and there is still a chance to negotiate with WL. I'm not advocating that everyone stay on every WL, I'm just saying that withdrawing permanently closes the door on leverage whereas staying on does not.SybillAnnDorsett wrote:I'd like your source regarding the withdrawal from a WL having absolutely no upside. It's a pretty declarative statement so is there any backup for it?dietcoke1 wrote:I can understand people are trying to be considerate in withdrawing but there is absolutely no upside to withdrawing from a WL. I'm not sure why people care if they withdraw now because if they are offered a spot off a WL then they would decline later and it would go to the next in line anyways.
- proteinshake

- Posts: 4643
- Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
Dodocogon wrote:I don't like this gamechargers21 wrote:Lots of debt or crippling debt are the 2 options
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
Yeah I don't really see an upside to withdrawing. The absence of a downside doesn't make an upside.
It seems like the only reason to do it is altruism.
It seems like the only reason to do it is altruism.
- Sarastro

- Posts: 389
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2016 3:25 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
Well, it was maybe overstated by saying "absolutely no" upside to withdrawing. It's just the opportunity cost from withdrawing almost always outweighs the favor you're doing for others, it seems. Your first point is well taken about signalling, but even if you aren't interested in going to the school, I've heard of people getting sizable scholarships off WL's. Until you put a deposit down somewhere (or maybe after even), it just seems like you're taking opportunities to negotiate with off the table for yourself just for the small, theoretical convenience of others. That's noble, but I don't see it as a reasonable trade if you have any chance at all of getting money off a WL. Not withdrawing could possibly make other applicants wait a few extra days to get on the list, but a few hours of convenience for anonymous strangers to get on at the back of the waitlist doesn't seem worth trading potential thousands of dollars off one's probably substantial debt burden. Maybe I'm just a jerk though.fips tedora wrote:Not quite TCR. You could use withdrawing as a signal at another school you're waitlisted at as a way to show your interest by telling them you withdrew other apps, especially if they're peer schools. Also, it could reduce the time that someone else has to wait to get accepted, and thus move on with their lives. Finally, reducing the waitlist pool means that the school may accept reaches that may not have had a shot if there were more applicants in the pool. It's similar to staying in a relationship that you're no longer interested in, and have no intention of marrying that person, why hang on if there are no benefits and youre just going to dump them later on anyways?Sarastro wrote:TCRdietcoke1 wrote:I can understand people are trying to be considerate in withdrawing but there is absolutely no upside to withdrawing from a WL. I'm not sure why people care if they withdraw now because if they are offered a spot off a WL then they would decline later and it would go to the next in line anyways.
- ashrice13

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
I'm with ya...my SO can't move with his current profession so my only choices were 1. stay here, 2. go somewhere close enough that we could visit each other by driving, 3. try to make a long distance relationship work (which it probably wouldn't....so this wasn't really much of an option for me)jjcorvino wrote:Once I get all decisions, I am going to put together all of the information, and sit down and talk it out with the soon to be wife. I do wish at times that I had the freedom that a lot of people have (no significant other that they have to consider). It makes it a bit more difficult when my fiancee has to apply and find a job in four different cities while I am trying to decideStylnator wrote:To those who have tough decisions coming up, how is everyone deciding their options? Pro/con lists? Family/friends?
I'm so torn I literally don't know how to even begin to approach deciding on a school.. Luckily she is a teacher and it isn't difficult for her to get a job, but getting one in a good school that she will like is hard.
- dietcoke1

- Posts: 1326
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
basically the point I was trying to make. you said it far betterSarastro wrote:Well, it was maybe overstated by saying "absolutely no" upside to withdrawing. It's just the opportunity cost from withdrawing almost always outweighs the favor you're doing for others, it seems. Your first point is well taken about signalling, but even if you aren't interested in going to the school, I've heard of people getting sizable scholarships off WL's. Until you put a deposit down somewhere (or maybe after even), it just seems like you're taking opportunities to negotiate with off the table for yourself just for the small, theoretical convenience of others. That's noble, but I don't see it as a reasonable trade if you have any chance at all of getting money off a WL. Not withdrawing could possibly make other applicants wait a few extra days to get on the list, but a few hours of convenience for anonymous strangers to get on at the back of the waitlist doesn't seem worth trading potential thousands of dollars off one's probably substantial debt burden. Maybe I'm just a jerk though.fips tedora wrote:Not quite TCR. You could use withdrawing as a signal at another school you're waitlisted at as a way to show your interest by telling them you withdrew other apps, especially if they're peer schools. Also, it could reduce the time that someone else has to wait to get accepted, and thus move on with their lives. Finally, reducing the waitlist pool means that the school may accept reaches that may not have had a shot if there were more applicants in the pool. It's similar to staying in a relationship that you're no longer interested in, and have no intention of marrying that person, why hang on if there are no benefits and youre just going to dump them later on anyways?Sarastro wrote:TCRdietcoke1 wrote:I can understand people are trying to be considerate in withdrawing but there is absolutely no upside to withdrawing from a WL. I'm not sure why people care if they withdraw now because if they are offered a spot off a WL then they would decline later and it would go to the next in line anyways.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
I'm skeptical if withdrawing really helps other applicants. Schools probably just wait until deposit deadline anyways to assess their yield.
- jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
That is tough, especially living around Boston. Not an easy goal if you are shooting for T14ashrice13 wrote:I'm with ya...my SO can't move with his current profession so my only choices were 1. stay here, 2. go somewhere close enough that we could visit each other by driving, 3. try to make a long distance relationship work (which it probably wouldn't....so this wasn't really much of an option for me)jjcorvino wrote:Once I get all decisions, I am going to put together all of the information, and sit down and talk it out with the soon to be wife. I do wish at times that I had the freedom that a lot of people have (no significant other that they have to consider). It makes it a bit more difficult when my fiancee has to apply and find a job in four different cities while I am trying to decideStylnator wrote:To those who have tough decisions coming up, how is everyone deciding their options? Pro/con lists? Family/friends?
I'm so torn I literally don't know how to even begin to approach deciding on a school.. Luckily she is a teacher and it isn't difficult for her to get a job, but getting one in a good school that she will like is hard.
- Stylnator

- Posts: 502
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2014 4:26 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
I really hope this doesn't come off mean or sound like I'm trying to preach but I'm genuinely curious as to why you're creating limitations on such a major life choice for a relationship that wouldn't even survive distance?ashrice13 wrote:I'm with ya...my SO can't move with his current profession so my only choices were 1. stay here, 2. go somewhere close enough that we could visit each other by driving, 3. try to make a long distance relationship work (which it probably wouldn't....so this wasn't really much of an option for me)jjcorvino wrote:
Once I get all decisions, I am going to put together all of the information, and sit down and talk it out with the soon to be wife. I do wish at times that I had the freedom that a lot of people have (no significant other that they have to consider). It makes it a bit more difficult when my fiancee has to apply and find a job in four different cities while I am trying to decide. Luckily she is a teacher and it isn't difficult for her to get a job, but getting one in a good school that she will like is hard.
- jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
I am not the one you are asking, but I know that long distance wouldn't work for my relationship either. My fiancee does not enjoy time apart, and would get pretty lonely when I had two week long business trips. It is not that she can't survive by herself or that she doesn't have other friends. She is just not the type of person that long distance works for. Talking on the phone/skyping isn't the same. She likes being physically near me (I hope this doesn't come off weird or sexual, it is not).Stylnator wrote:I really hope this doesn't come off mean or sound like I'm trying to preach but I'm genuinely curious as to why you're creating limitations on such a major life choice for a relationship that wouldn't even survive distance?ashrice13 wrote:I'm with ya...my SO can't move with his current profession so my only choices were 1. stay here, 2. go somewhere close enough that we could visit each other by driving, 3. try to make a long distance relationship work (which it probably wouldn't....so this wasn't really much of an option for me)jjcorvino wrote:
Once I get all decisions, I am going to put together all of the information, and sit down and talk it out with the soon to be wife. I do wish at times that I had the freedom that a lot of people have (no significant other that they have to consider). It makes it a bit more difficult when my fiancee has to apply and find a job in four different cities while I am trying to decide. Luckily she is a teacher and it isn't difficult for her to get a job, but getting one in a good school that she will like is hard.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- waldorf

- Posts: 2376
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 6:28 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
I have a friend (not on TLS) who used Spivey and had great things to say about it. He didn't have anyone in his life with any knowledge on law school applications, where to apply for his goals, etc., though, so I'm sure he found it a lot more beneficial than your average TLSer.haley12 wrote:Not sure if there is a better forum for this, but-- has anyone used Spivey consulting and had a good or bad result they would like to share?
I almost used Ann Levine (someone else who another friend recommended) but ultimately decided the price wasn't worth the upside with my goals/stats. Had a consultation with her, though, and she seemed incredibly knowledgeable and was very kind and informative.
- jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
Guys, here we go, another /r/lawschooladmissions chance to bash us
https://www.reddit.com/r/lawschooladmis ... ts_on_tls/
https://www.reddit.com/r/lawschooladmis ... ts_on_tls/
- Kopetz

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:06 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
jjcorvino wrote:Guys, here we go, another /r/lawschooladmissions chance to bash us![]()
https://www.reddit.com/r/lawschooladmis ... ts_on_tls/
not seeing the problem herereddit wrote:Another time, I saw someone with a 3.8/174 called a dumbfuck for not retaking.
- jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
I think their sarcasm filter is off, because I don't think that would ever happenKopetz wrote:jjcorvino wrote:Guys, here we go, another /r/lawschooladmissions chance to bash us![]()
https://www.reddit.com/r/lawschooladmis ... ts_on_tls/not seeing the problem herereddit wrote:Another time, I saw someone with a 3.8/174 called a dumbfuck for not retaking.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
It's not sarcasm, if you have such a pedestrian GPA you need at least a 180 to hit the T13jjcorvino wrote:I think their sarcasm filter is off, because I don't think that would ever happenKopetz wrote:jjcorvino wrote:Guys, here we go, another /r/lawschooladmissions chance to bash us![]()
https://www.reddit.com/r/lawschooladmis ... ts_on_tls/not seeing the problem herereddit wrote:Another time, I saw someone with a 3.8/174 called a dumbfuck for not retaking.
- ashrice13

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
JJ - definitely consider NY close enough. I really wouldn't mind stay in Boston anyway so going to a strong regional was never a problem for me though.jjcorvino wrote:I am not the one you are asking, but I know that long distance wouldn't work for my relationship either. My fiancee does not enjoy time apart, and would get pretty lonely when I had two week long business trips. It is not that she can't survive by herself or that she doesn't have other friends. She is just not the type of person that long distance works for. Talking on the phone/skyping isn't the same. She likes being physically near me (I hope this doesn't come off weird or sexual, it is not).Stylnator wrote:I really hope this doesn't come off mean or sound like I'm trying to preach but I'm genuinely curious as to why you're creating limitations on such a major life choice for a relationship that wouldn't even survive distance?ashrice13 wrote:I'm with ya...my SO can't move with his current profession so my only choices were 1. stay here, 2. go somewhere close enough that we could visit each other by driving, 3. try to make a long distance relationship work (which it probably wouldn't....so this wasn't really much of an option for me)jjcorvino wrote:
Once I get all decisions, I am going to put together all of the information, and sit down and talk it out with the soon to be wife. I do wish at times that I had the freedom that a lot of people have (no significant other that they have to consider). It makes it a bit more difficult when my fiancee has to apply and find a job in four different cities while I am trying to decide. Luckily she is a teacher and it isn't difficult for her to get a job, but getting one in a good school that she will like is hard.
Stylnator - not mean at all! Similar to what JJ said above - I just know we wouldn't survive a distance that was so long we'd have to fly to each other (i.e. never see each other what with being poor). If I knew we'd have whole summers together it would be one thing but I could be working anywhere over the summers. That's 3 years of spending probably around a month/year together total and I'm jsut not someone that would do well with that
- jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
I would probably need at least a 185 with my 3.4 then. Should I retake twice and get 180 both times to show the schools that I am better than the other 180s?!Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:It's not sarcasm, if you have such a pedestrian GPA you need at least a 180 to hit the T13jjcorvino wrote:I think their sarcasm filter is off, because I don't think that would ever happenKopetz wrote:jjcorvino wrote:Guys, here we go, another /r/lawschooladmissions chance to bash us![]()
https://www.reddit.com/r/lawschooladmis ... ts_on_tls/not seeing the problem herereddit wrote:Another time, I saw someone with a 3.8/174 called a dumbfuck for not retaking.
-
Hennessy

- Posts: 2516
- Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 2:54 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants
My tough decision has become full ride at local TTT with 25% unemployment or sticker at Emory. Or sit out the cycle.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login