WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle) Forum
- DoveBodyWash

- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
my class is too small anyway, i wouldn't mind a bigger class. I'd guess between 230 for you guys
- Ricky-Bobby

- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
2 students, Bob.johnnyquest wrote:We're going by "Price is Right" rules? In that case I'd like to change my answer to 1 student.scottidsntknow wrote:Thank you for not price-is-righting me there and guessing 213, whew.LET'S GET IT wrote: God I hope not. I'm with scotti, 210-215 sounds right.
- johnnyquest

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:56 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
NOOOOOOOOO!!!!!Ricky-Bobby wrote:2 students, Bob.johnnyquest wrote:We're going by "Price is Right" rules? In that case I'd like to change my answer to 1 student.scottidsntknow wrote:Thank you for not price-is-righting me there and guessing 213, whew.LET'S GET IT wrote: God I hope not. I'm with scotti, 210-215 sounds right.
- Fiero85

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Good grief guys, someone guessing 1, 2, or 3 is not a tragedy under PIR rules...That's below the reasonable range, so it could be easily thwarted by a guess of 150 or something on the low end of real possibilities (not a formal guess btw).
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
To be followed by a guess of 151...Fiero85 wrote:Good grief guys, someone guessing 1, 2, or 3 is not a tragedy under PIR rules...That's below the reasonable range, so it could be easily thwarted by a guess of 150 or something on the low end of real possibilities (not a formal guess btw).
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Fiero85

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Exactly, there's no safe ground if you're playing PIR with dozens of contestants.scottidsntknow wrote:To be followed by a guess of 151...Fiero85 wrote:Good grief guys, someone guessing 1, 2, or 3 is not a tragedy under PIR rules...That's below the reasonable range, so it could be easily thwarted by a guess of 150 or something on the low end of real possibilities (not a formal guess btw).
- Ricky-Bobby

- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Dec 18, 2013 12:42 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
[youtube]BMCFRElyaCc[/youtube]
ETA: 1 min, 15 sec
ETA: 1 min, 15 sec
- ms9

- Posts: 2999
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:28 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Imma guess greater than 230.cusenation wrote:my class is too small anyway, i wouldn't mind a bigger class. I'd guess between 230 for you guys
- lhanvt13

- Posts: 2378
- Joined: Wed Jun 09, 2010 12:59 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
God has spokenMikeSpivey wrote:Imma guess greater than 230.cusenation wrote:my class is too small anyway, i wouldn't mind a bigger class. I'd guess between 230 for you guys
- KanyeShrug

- Posts: 617
- Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2012 3:46 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Second seat deposit down. It's official. 
- Fiero85

- Posts: 1983
- Joined: Sun Jun 30, 2013 3:38 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Well shit. Big class it is then.
And congrats my boy Shrugg!
And congrats my boy Shrugg!
- georgej

- Posts: 3109
- Joined: Sun Nov 10, 2013 12:55 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I really wonder though how many people are just holding on to wustl and maybe even leading adcomms along in order to try to land giant scholarships late in the game like wustl gave out last year. Six months ago tons of people were talking about applying here solely for the purpose of scholly negotiation.MikeSpivey wrote:Imma guess greater than 230.cusenation wrote:my class is too small anyway, i wouldn't mind a bigger class. I'd guess between 230 for you guys
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Hooray congrats Kanye! And yea, big class... Whatever. It just sounds big because the class before us is so small.Fiero85 wrote:Well shit. Big class it is then.
And congrats my boy Shrugg!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
chizzy

- Posts: 551
- Joined: Tue Jul 02, 2013 5:07 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
+1 I think TLS has contributed to alot of students double depositing. Everyone wants to negotiate schollys now.georgej wrote:I really wonder though how many people are just holding on to wustl and maybe even leading adcomms along in order to try to land giant scholarships late in the game like wustl gave out last year. Six months ago tons of people were talking about applying here solely for the purpose of scholly negotiation.MikeSpivey wrote:Imma guess greater than 230.cusenation wrote:my class is too small anyway, i wouldn't mind a bigger class. I'd guess between 230 for you guys
- DoveBodyWash

- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
bigger class means more kids in the Top X%. Of course it also means more kids who aren't in the X%, but you guys are all special snowflakes so you'll be fine 
- chuckbass

- Posts: 9956
- Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Yea my first thought was more spots in the top x% at leastcusenation wrote:bigger class means more kids in the Top X%. Of course it also means more kids who aren't in the X%, but you guys are all special snowflakes so you'll be fine
- sublime

- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- DoveBodyWash

- Posts: 3177
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:12 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Con law has way too much power on my career trajectory right now bro.sublime wrote:Waiting on grades is the worst part of LS (at least the first year), with Write-on as a close second. Don't let anybody tell you differently.
Write-on is all about who's strong enough to overcome the primal urge to abandon all-things-legal after finals and watch Netflix all day...needless to say i was not strong enough and my submission was a flaming turd.
- sublime

- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- johnnyquest

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 3:56 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
What would be your guess Mike? Do you think it's well over 230?MikeSpivey wrote:Imma guess greater than 230.cusenation wrote:my class is too small anyway, i wouldn't mind a bigger class. I'd guess between 230 for you guys
- njdevils2626

- Posts: 536
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:53 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Anyone who may have went down to WUSTL for the May 29th housing day, I was wondering what your experiences were and how it is run and any other comments you might have. Just want to kind of get an idea of what I should be expecting as I'm registered for the June 19th day. Looking especially at those who toured the CWE region, since that is what I will be doing as well.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
chingwoo

- Posts: 345
- Joined: Wed Sep 18, 2013 11:28 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
Tour is super informal. You are given a list of places and can go visit them. CWE was abnormally expensive in comparison to ULoop with studios running upwards of $700 in older non-renovated buildings. Realistically, going on the actual housing day wasn't especially needed if you are intending on going to live in CWE.
Lots of parents were there. I think I might have been one of the only people that didn't bring them. Only about 15 students showed up.
Lots of parents were there. I think I might have been one of the only people that didn't bring them. Only about 15 students showed up.
- peachesthedoge

- Posts: 350
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 12:57 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
chingwoo wrote:Tour is super informal. You are given a list of places and can go visit them. CWE was abnormally expensive in comparison to ULoop with studios running upwards of $700 in older non-renovated buildings. Realistically, going on the actual housing day wasn't especially needed if you are intending on going to live in CWE.
Lots of parents were there. I think I might have been one of the only people that didn't bring them. Only about 15 students showed up.
sup kids I had the largest studio here last year http://www.monticelloapts.net/ and it was pretty cool
it's in the central west end, definitely an older, non-renovated building, but prices are all under $600 for studios
- njdevils2626

- Posts: 536
- Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2014 9:53 pm
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
How was your commute to school in terms of length and convenience?peachesthedoge wrote:chingwoo wrote:Tour is super informal. You are given a list of places and can go visit them. CWE was abnormally expensive in comparison to ULoop with studios running upwards of $700 in older non-renovated buildings. Realistically, going on the actual housing day wasn't especially needed if you are intending on going to live in CWE.
Lots of parents were there. I think I might have been one of the only people that didn't bring them. Only about 15 students showed up.
sup kids I had the largest studio here last year http://www.monticelloapts.net/ and it was pretty cool
it's in the central west end, definitely an older, non-renovated building, but prices are all under $600 for studios
- peachesthedoge

- Posts: 350
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 12:57 am
Re: WUSTL c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014 Cycle)
I was working at my office in clayton at the time so I took the metro every day. from the monticello to Wash U, it's about a ten minute or so walk to the metrostop, then a 7-8 minute metro ride! definitely an easy commutenjdevils2626 wrote:How was your commute to school in terms of length and convenience?peachesthedoge wrote:chingwoo wrote:Tour is super informal. You are given a list of places and can go visit them. CWE was abnormally expensive in comparison to ULoop with studios running upwards of $700 in older non-renovated buildings. Realistically, going on the actual housing day wasn't especially needed if you are intending on going to live in CWE.
Lots of parents were there. I think I might have been one of the only people that didn't bring them. Only about 15 students showed up.
sup kids I had the largest studio here last year http://www.monticelloapts.net/ and it was pretty cool
it's in the central west end, definitely an older, non-renovated building, but prices are all under $600 for studios
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login