I discussed this in a previous post, but yes, looking at the decision timeline from previous years, by late February/early March, any applicants who haven't heard back are basically facing a waitlist or rejection. It seems like the people who have not heard anything now are essentially being considered for the final handful of spots.whjohnso444 wrote:If one went complete in mid January and hasn't heard anything does that mean it's probably a waitlist or ding?
UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum
- samumenco

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Feb 21, 2014 5:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
-
whjohnso444

- Posts: 112
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:57 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
According to mylsn they accept about as many January apps in March as they do in January.
-
krispymenudo

- Posts: 230
- Joined: Thu Nov 21, 2013 8:59 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
whjohnso444 wrote:Would sending a loci be a bad idea? I never answered any essays on the application.Frozinite wrote:I don't think it means anything just yet. It doesn't seem like UCLA has a pattern like some of the top T14 schools. However, it is true that the auto-admits are getting their notifications very quickly.whjohnso444 wrote:If one went complete in mid January and hasn't heard anything does that mean it's probably a waitlist or ding?
I went complete mid-December and sent in a LOCI two weeks ago, but I was sure to have something legit to talk about
- Frozinite

- Posts: 79
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 3:27 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Anyone here already accept their UCLA admission? I'm probably 90% going to choose UCLA and curious what other TLS-er I'm going to meet there. Maybe this is a little bit early to ask.
- cron1834

- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
UCLA is a legit option, but it's too early for me to decide.
- MnM22

- Posts: 272
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 1:09 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I'm SO happy. I got accepted to UCLA last week, but was so excited I forgot to post about it! I'm 25%>LSAT<50% and GPA>50%
Dean Schwartz is incredibly nice. And for me UCLA is a TOP choice because geographically, it's where I want to be and academically, they have the exact clinics and legal specializations I want. The Williams Institute and the Epstein Program are also HUGE draws. If I get into Epstein, I 99% will go.
Dean Schwartz is incredibly nice. And for me UCLA is a TOP choice because geographically, it's where I want to be and academically, they have the exact clinics and legal specializations I want. The Williams Institute and the Epstein Program are also HUGE draws. If I get into Epstein, I 99% will go.
- Hitchensian

- Posts: 208
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:34 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I'm also very interested in the Williams Institute. I wrote about it on my app and they've been definitely reaching out in different ways regarding it, so I'm thinking it was maybe influential in the admissions decision.MnM22 wrote:I'm SO happy. I got accepted to UCLA last week, but was so excited I forgot to post about it! I'm 25%>LSAT<50% and GPA>50%
Dean Schwartz is incredibly nice. And for me UCLA is a TOP choice because geographically, it's where I want to be and academically, they have the exact clinics and legal specializations I want. The Williams Institute and the Epstein Program are also HUGE draws. If I get into Epstein, I 99% will go.
-
wygtsmile

- Posts: 15
- Joined: Fri Oct 25, 2013 11:07 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Anyone already accepted their admission to ucla and submitted SIR already?
Please PM me, have a few things I want to ask
Please PM me, have a few things I want to ask
- mes10d

- Posts: 149
- Joined: Thu May 09, 2013 11:12 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Congratulations! When did you go complete? It looks like we have pretty similar stats, so I was wondering. I wrote a bit about wanting to pursue a Specialization in Law & Philosophy because 1) that is something I am pretty interested in & 2) I didn't want to just be a set of numbers, so I'm hoping that helps me a little.MnM22 wrote:I'm SO happy. I got accepted to UCLA last week, but was so excited I forgot to post about it! I'm 25%>LSAT<50% and GPA>50%
Dean Schwartz is incredibly nice. And for me UCLA is a TOP choice because geographically, it's where I want to be and academically, they have the exact clinics and legal specializations I want. The Williams Institute and the Epstein Program are also HUGE draws. If I get into Epstein, I 99% will go.
-
c16cross

- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 8:35 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Anyone else still waiting? I went complete in mid-December and had an interview late January.
-
gimmedanger

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2013 8:28 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I'm still waiting. no interview. complete early jan.
-
cmilleruni

- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:13 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Since early January, even wrote a Why UCLA statement with my application
- AceDeuces

- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 5:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
So even after the interview they requested and furnishing them with very significant offers (PM for details) from Wash U., ND, and UMN, UCLA gave me NO merit-aid. Which is disappointing, as there is no way I can make UCLA work now.
-
fiji

- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sun Jan 26, 2014 5:03 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
.AceDeuces wrote:So even after the interview they requested and furnishing them with very significant offers (PM for details) from Wash U., ND, and UMN, UCLA gave me NO merit-aid. Which is disappointing, as there is no way I can make UCLA work now.
Last edited by fiji on Wed Mar 05, 2014 4:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- rion91

- Posts: 969
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:58 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Was it just a cold no? Or let's talk about it later?AceDeuces wrote:So even after the interview they requested and furnishing them with very significant offers (PM for details) from Wash U., ND, and UMN, UCLA gave me NO merit-aid. Which is disappointing, as there is no way I can make UCLA work now.
- AceDeuces

- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 5:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
rion91 wrote:Was it just a cold no? Or let's talk about it later?AceDeuces wrote:So even after the interview they requested and furnishing them with very significant offers (PM for details) from Wash U., ND, and UMN, UCLA gave me NO merit-aid. Which is disappointing, as there is no way I can make UCLA work now.
Pretty much no cold:
"I’m sorry to inform you that you have not been selected by the Scholarship Committee to receive a merit award. We still hope you will join our UCLA Law community this fall. Please stay in touch with any questions."
- rion91

- Posts: 969
- Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2011 12:58 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
That is about as blunt as you can get.AceDeuces wrote:rion91 wrote:Was it just a cold no? Or let's talk about it later?AceDeuces wrote:So even after the interview they requested and furnishing them with very significant offers (PM for details) from Wash U., ND, and UMN, UCLA gave me NO merit-aid. Which is disappointing, as there is no way I can make UCLA work now.
Pretty much no cold:
"I’m sorry to inform you that you have not been selected by the Scholarship Committee to receive a merit award. We still hope you will join our UCLA Law community this fall. Please stay in touch with any questions."
- AceDeuces

- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 5:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I don't know if I'm going to approach them with other offers (say, from Texas) if I get anything else significant, but I'm pretty hesitant to. If they had given me even 5-10K, that at least would have started a dialogue, but this is a straight stonewall.rion91 wrote:That is about as blunt as you can get.AceDeuces wrote:rion91 wrote:Was it just a cold no? Or let's talk about it later?AceDeuces wrote:So even after the interview they requested and furnishing them with very significant offers (PM for details) from Wash U., ND, and UMN, UCLA gave me NO merit-aid. Which is disappointing, as there is no way I can make UCLA work now.
Pretty much no cold:
"I’m sorry to inform you that you have not been selected by the Scholarship Committee to receive a merit award. We still hope you will join our UCLA Law community this fall. Please stay in touch with any questions."
- Hitchensian

- Posts: 208
- Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2013 7:34 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Sorry if you've already posted elsewhere in this thread, but could I ask what your numbers are? Feel free to PM or just give ranges/estimations if you'd rather not say. Also, how do you feel the interview went?AceDeuces wrote:
I don't know if I'm going to approach them with other offers (say, from Texas) if I get anything else significant, but I'm pretty hesitant to. If they had given me even 5-10K, that at least would have started a dialogue, but this is a straight stonewall.
- AceDeuces

- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Feb 16, 2014 5:14 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Interview went okay I thought. Not my best ever, not my worst. But it was over Skype, and I hate those. Anyway I think my numbers are in my profile, so I might as well put them here: 168/3.7. So you know, around their median. I wasn't expecting huge money, just something to make doing UCLA from way out of state feasible.Hitchensian wrote:Sorry if you've already posted elsewhere in this thread, but could I ask what your numbers are? Feel free to PM or just give ranges/estimations if you'd rather not say. Also, how do you feel the interview went?AceDeuces wrote:
I don't know if I'm going to approach them with other offers (say, from Texas) if I get anything else significant, but I'm pretty hesitant to. If they had given me even 5-10K, that at least would have started a dialogue, but this is a straight stonewall.
- MnM22

- Posts: 272
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 1:09 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Thanks! Went complete 1/30. It has been the fastest turn around time from any of the schools I applied to.mes10d wrote:Congratulations! When did you go complete? It looks like we have pretty similar stats, so I was wondering. I wrote a bit about wanting to pursue a Specialization in Law & Philosophy because 1) that is something I am pretty interested in & 2) I didn't want to just be a set of numbers, so I'm hoping that helps me a little.MnM22 wrote:I'm SO happy. I got accepted to UCLA last week, but was so excited I forgot to post about it! I'm 25%>LSAT<50% and GPA>50%
Dean Schwartz is incredibly nice. And for me UCLA is a TOP choice because geographically, it's where I want to be and academically, they have the exact clinics and legal specializations I want. The Williams Institute and the Epstein Program are also HUGE draws. If I get into Epstein, I 99% will go.
I also applied to the Epstein Program so I think that it kind of served as a "Why UCLA?"
- alecks

- Posts: 155
- Joined: Wed Sep 11, 2013 8:24 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Went complete today. I'm at both the 25ths so I'm assuming a rejection here... ho hum. Taking the LSAT again and applying next cycle but still keeping my apps in as a shot in the dark.
-
logicspeaks

- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2013 2:38 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Also went complete today as a URM splitter.
-
Black_Swan

- Posts: 248
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 12:47 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
What is their interview like? I wasn't aware they did one until I found this thread. Who is the interviewer?
-
dehesse

- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 6:37 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Just got the call from Dean Schwartz
IN with a merit scholarship!!