UCLA? 2011 Forum
-
r6_philly

- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
Ya Dean call me and vegenator tomorrow!
-
Arbiter213

- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
LOL @ r6 still not getting into an LA school. It's because they can smell the bay area on you.r6_philly wrote:Ya Dean call me and vegenator tomorrow!
- vegenator

- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:41 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
Hmmm... yah, I can see why YP WL would be a concern. You're just overall a better candidate than me lol- so I have no idea. If they let me in they should let you in
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Jun 23, 2010 7:14 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
I'm part of the 10/07 batch! Call me, too!!r6_philly wrote:Ya Dean call me and vegenator tomorrow!
-
Arbiter213

- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
Your numbers + WE + masters might make it possible- but what do I know.vegenator wrote:Hmmm... yah, I can see why YP WL would be a concern. You're just overall a better candidate than me lol- so I have no idea. If they let me in they should let you in
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:41 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
That'd be awesome, r6Arbiter213 wrote:LOL @ r6 still not getting into an LA school. It's because they can smell the bay area on you.r6_philly wrote:Ya Dean call me and vegenator tomorrow!
- vegenator

- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:41 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
Conference call? All tlsers at 10/7 complete get a call tomorrow?ellewoods2 wrote:I'm part of the 10/07 batch! Call me, too!!r6_philly wrote:Ya Dean call me and vegenator tomorrow!
-
r6_philly

- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
That's meanArbiter213 wrote:LOL @ r6 still not getting into an LA school. It's because they can smell the bay area on you.r6_philly wrote:Ya Dean call me and vegenator tomorrow!
- vegenator

- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:41 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
Thanks for the confidence.Arbiter213 wrote:Your numbers + WE + masters might make it possible- but what do I know.vegenator wrote:Hmmm... yah, I can see why YP WL would be a concern. You're just overall a better candidate than me lol- so I have no idea. If they let me in they should let you in
- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
r6_philly wrote:That's meanArbiter213 wrote:LOL @ r6 still not getting into an LA school. It's because they can smell the bay area on you.r6_philly wrote:Ya Dean call me and vegenator tomorrow!you are going to turn my happy face to a sad face!
Awww, I'm sorry r6- just think of your shiny acceptances
Also, I've just decided that UCLA admitting me must be a mistake. They admitted me too fast, over people with better numbers, and didn't give me any scholarship, despite people with worse numbers getting them, e.g. http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Destined
- vegenator

- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:41 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
You should be proud! Eau de bay is a really prestigious cologne.r6_philly wrote:That's meanArbiter213 wrote:LOL @ r6 still not getting into an LA school. It's because they can smell the bay area on you.r6_philly wrote:Ya Dean call me and vegenator tomorrow!you are going to turn my happy face to a sad face!
-
r6_philly

- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
There is always hope for this median applicant. I hope they like me! I am ready to move.vegenator wrote:That'd be awesome, r6Arbiter213 wrote:LOL @ r6 still not getting into an LA school. It's because they can smell the bay area on you.r6_philly wrote:Ya Dean call me and vegenator tomorrow!but I know which ca school you're really hoping will call tomorrow. Starts with an S and rhymes with banford
-
r6_philly

- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
Maybe they like your UG for diversity reasons? Your numbers are quite decent I think. You applied to Berkeley right? You never know!Arbiter213 wrote: Awww, I'm sorry r6- just think of your shiny acceptancesIf I could I'd trade you Berkeley for UCLA
Also, I've just decided that UCLA admitting me must be a mistake. They admitted me too fast, over people with better numbers, and didn't give me any scholarship, despite people with worse numbers getting them, e.g. http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Destined
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Arbiter213

- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
Haha, hope springs eternal! We shall see- I suppose they might like my UG- we definitely focus more at other schools in the region. My working theory is my personal statement talks about my study of philosophy, and UCLA has the premier Philosophy and Law program.r6_philly wrote:Maybe they like your UG for diversity reasons? Your numbers are quite decent I think. You applied to Berkeley right? You never know!Arbiter213 wrote: Awww, I'm sorry r6- just think of your shiny acceptancesIf I could I'd trade you Berkeley for UCLA
Also, I've just decided that UCLA admitting me must be a mistake. They admitted me too fast, over people with better numbers, and didn't give me any scholarship, despite people with worse numbers getting them, e.g. http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Destined
I fully expect you to get in to Stanford and thereby free up spots for
- vegenator

- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:41 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
I wouldn't be too worried (though probably confused and disappointed). I see you've been accepted to wustl and with your numbers you should get solid money there. If by then you haven't gotten money from ucla you should start negotiating. You'd also likey get close to a full ride at Illinois if you want to spend $12 for extra leverage.Arbiter213 wrote:
Also, I've just decided that UCLA admitting me must be a mistake. They admitted me too fast, over people with better numbers, and didn't give me any scholarship, despite people with worse numbers getting them, e.g. http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Destined
-
Arbiter213

- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
I'm tempted- I did the same thing to Minnesota- without giving too much away, I'm actually in Illinois, so maybe I should spend the $12- but is it worth the glass of single malt I could but with it?vegenator wrote:I wouldn't be too worried (though probably confused and disappointed). I see you've been accepted to wustl and with your numbers you should get solid money there. If by then you haven't gotten money from ucla you should start negotiating. You'd also likey get close to a full ride at Illinois if you want to spend $12 for extra leverage.Arbiter213 wrote:
Also, I've just decided that UCLA admitting me must be a mistake. They admitted me too fast, over people with better numbers, and didn't give me any scholarship, despite people with worse numbers getting them, e.g. http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Destined
-
r6_philly

- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
I really think you should get good money seeing they really liked your application. It should also be taken as a good sign for Berkeley. I am taking my Berkeley nod as a good sign for Stanford.Arbiter213 wrote: Haha, hope springs eternal! We shall see- I suppose they might like my UG- we definitely focus more at other schools in the region. My working theory is my personal statement talks about my study of philosophy, and UCLA has the premier Philosophy and Law program.
I fully expect you to get in to Stanford and thereby free up spots formeother deserving applicants.
It will def. work out for all of us if I get in then!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- vegenator

- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:41 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
Lol. I think illinois is a better $12 than mn. Mn gives out far fewer full rides than il, so I say forgo the malt beverage tonight and perhaps be thankful when you get thousands from ucla. Funny thing is, I'm in mn and was holding out for a mn fee waiver. I never got one and since I got both a full ride at Illinois (ranked higher) and accepted to Michigan I see no reason to spend 75 on my hometown school...Arbiter213 wrote:I'm tempted- I did the same thing to Minnesota- without giving too much away, I'm actually in Illinois, so maybe I should spend the $12- but is it worth the glass of single malt I could but with it?vegenator wrote:I wouldn't be too worried (though probably confused and disappointed). I see you've been accepted to wustl and with your numbers you should get solid money there. If by then you haven't gotten money from ucla you should start negotiating. You'd also likey get close to a full ride at Illinois if you want to spend $12 for extra leverage.Arbiter213 wrote:
Also, I've just decided that UCLA admitting me must be a mistake. They admitted me too fast, over people with better numbers, and didn't give me any scholarship, despite people with worse numbers getting them, e.g. http://lawschoolnumbers.com/Destined
- vegenator

- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:41 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
Yeah I keep thinking my quick acceptance to Michigan was a good sign for Berkeley. And r6's acceptance to Berkeley is definitely indicative of good things to come. Which of course would be awesome for arbiter and me (race you to Berkeley!)r6_philly wrote:I really think you should get good money seeing they really liked your application. It should also be taken as a good sign for Berkeley. I am taking my Berkeley nod as a good sign for Stanford.Arbiter213 wrote: Haha, hope springs eternal! We shall see- I suppose they might like my UG- we definitely focus more at other schools in the region. My working theory is my personal statement talks about my study of philosophy, and UCLA has the premier Philosophy and Law program.
I fully expect you to get in to Stanford and thereby free up spots formeother deserving applicants.
It will def. work out for all of us if I get in then!
-
r6_philly

- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
I am composing an essay for the Rothman at USC. Think they won't laugh at it and throw it away?
- vegenator

- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 1:41 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
I want to do this too, but I'm having a hard tome figuring out how to make it unlike my ps...r6_philly wrote:I am composing an essay for the Rothman at USC. Think they won't laugh at it and throw it away?
I don't think it'd be unusual for higher numbers to submit the essay, since after all aren't most of us trying to get into top law schools so we can work at firms like skadden anyways? That plus full ride = one lucky law
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Arbiter213

- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
Yah- I'm fortunate, in that my most impressive softs are not even hinted at in my PS and are barely discussed on my resume- so I can write a decent essay. But I have about 0 chance to win- for one thing, r6 is applying. >_<vegenator wrote:I want to do this too, but I'm having a hard tome figuring out how to make it unlike my ps...r6_philly wrote:I am composing an essay for the Rothman at USC. Think they won't laugh at it and throw it away?
I don't think it'd be unusual for higher numbers to submit the essay, since after all aren't most of us trying to get into top law schools so we can work at firms like skadden anyways? That plus full ride = one lucky lawbastardlaw student.
-
r6_philly

- Posts: 10752
- Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
Apparently I am good at tooting my own horn which is perfect for this (see?vegenator wrote:I want to do this too, but I'm having a hard tome figuring out how to make it unlike my ps...r6_philly wrote:I am composing an essay for the Rothman at USC. Think they won't laugh at it and throw it away?
I don't think it'd be unusual for higher numbers to submit the essay, since after all aren't most of us trying to get into top law schools so we can work at firms like skadden anyways? That plus full ride = one lucky lawbastardlaw student.
My PS doesn't quite apply, so I will write more of an "About me". I do have plenty to write about. Shameless self-promotion is a talent
-
Arbiter213

- Posts: 2248
- Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 10:16 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
I'm only applying because this is my first vacation without a thesis or major research project/ LSAT studying/ APPS hanging over my head in like 2 years- need a way to fill time.r6_philly wrote:Apparently I am good at tooting my own horn which is perfect for this (see?vegenator wrote:I want to do this too, but I'm having a hard tome figuring out how to make it unlike my ps...r6_philly wrote:I am composing an essay for the Rothman at USC. Think they won't laugh at it and throw it away?
I don't think it'd be unusual for higher numbers to submit the essay, since after all aren't most of us trying to get into top law schools so we can work at firms like skadden anyways? That plus full ride = one lucky lawbastardlaw student.)
My PS doesn't quite apply, so I will write more of an "About me". I do have plenty to write about. Shameless self-promotion is a talentWhether or not they will think it's sincerely I am not sure.
For the record, I just applied to Illinois. I'd feel guilty about my almost 100% false why Illinois if I had any interest in attending. Not sure how that makes it better in my mind but I'm ok with that.
-
Aggiegrad2011

- Posts: 1514
- Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2010 6:42 pm
Re: UCLA? 2011
I am quite sure they expect nothing less than a trove of falsehoods in everyone's "Why X" statements. In an interview over on AdmissionsDean, The dean of NYLS said exactly that in defending his decision of stopping the requirement of PStatements @ NYLS. It's a pretty fun read if you guys haven't seen it yet.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login