They do kinda have a point, in that most of us will be getting into fabulous schools even if Harvard doesn't work out, and will be set for great careers in most cases.waferthinmint wrote:As silly as it is to feel crappy about an impending ding from Harvard Law...
I'm feeling crappy about an impending ding from Harvard Law.
eta: The worst part may be what happens when I try to talk about this IRL w/ folks who don't really get the mania that accompanies applying to law school. Usually goes something like:
Me: Ahh I think I'm getting dinged from Harvard.
Normal folk: Why are you sad? Didn't you get into XYZ schools?
Me: Yeah, but--
Normal folk: [judgy eyes]
Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
- waferthinmint

- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:57 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Sigh, you are right, LS22, as always.lawschool22 wrote:They do kinda have a point, in that most of us will be getting into fabulous schools even if Harvard doesn't work out, and will be set for great careers in most cases.waferthinmint wrote:As silly as it is to feel crappy about an impending ding from Harvard Law...
I'm feeling crappy about an impending ding from Harvard Law.
eta: The worst part may be what happens when I try to talk about this IRL w/ folks who don't really get the mania that accompanies applying to law school. Usually goes something like:
Me: Ahh I think I'm getting dinged from Harvard.
Normal folk: Why are you sad? Didn't you get into XYZ schools?
Me: Yeah, but--
Normal folk: [judgy eyes]
- andapieceoftoast

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
You're right. The other reason I've stopped saying it is because it makes me sound like a total jackhole. BUT THE EMOTIONSlawschool22 wrote:They do kinda have a point, in that most of us will be getting into fabulous schools even if Harvard doesn't work out, and will be set for great careers in most cases.waferthinmint wrote:As silly as it is to feel crappy about an impending ding from Harvard Law...
I'm feeling crappy about an impending ding from Harvard Law.
eta: The worst part may be what happens when I try to talk about this IRL w/ folks who don't really get the mania that accompanies applying to law school. Usually goes something like:
Me: Ahh I think I'm getting dinged from Harvard.
Normal folk: Why are you sad? Didn't you get into XYZ schools?
Me: Yeah, but--
Normal folk: [judgy eyes]
- waferthinmint

- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:57 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
SO MANY FEELSandapieceoftoast wrote:You're right. The other reason I've stopped saying it is because it makes me sound like a total jackhole. BUT THE EMOTIONSlawschool22 wrote:They do kinda have a point, in that most of us will be getting into fabulous schools even if Harvard doesn't work out, and will be set for great careers in most cases.waferthinmint wrote:As silly as it is to feel crappy about an impending ding from Harvard Law...
I'm feeling crappy about an impending ding from Harvard Law.
eta: The worst part may be what happens when I try to talk about this IRL w/ folks who don't really get the mania that accompanies applying to law school. Usually goes something like:
Me: Ahh I think I'm getting dinged from Harvard.
Normal folk: Why are you sad? Didn't you get into XYZ schools?
Me: Yeah, but--
Normal folk: [judgy eyes]
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I don't even tell people that I've applied to Harvard. I used to and they'd just roll their eyes/laugh/not take me seriously.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- andapieceoftoast

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
it's mostly my parents and my sister who are tired of hearing me talk about it hahahahdrawstring wrote:I don't even tell people that I've applied to Harvard. I used to and they'd just roll their eyes/laugh/not take me seriously.
you'd think they'd be more understanding
-
cruxisfalcon

- Posts: 33
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 5:00 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Any other Nov/Dec JS1s still waiting? Someone with nearly my exact numbers got in yesterday and I'm getting a little antsy
- waferthinmint

- Posts: 337
- Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 6:57 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Yeah, I should probably stop telling people, too, haha.andapieceoftoast wrote:it's mostly my parents and my sister who are tired of hearing me talk about it hahahahdrawstring wrote:I don't even tell people that I've applied to Harvard. I used to and they'd just roll their eyes/laugh/not take me seriously.
you'd think they'd be more understanding
So, my sister is currently also in an admissions cycle for a different type of grad program, and hadn't heard back from any yet, when I started to be silly and discontent with the awesome schools I'd already gotten into, IN FRONT OF HER. Then I REALLY felt like a jackhole. It's awful. Ugh. Gross.
- neprep

- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
People waiting for a JS2 having had a JS1 (effectively at a JS 1.5 in their lives) might want to post on this page (180 x 1.5 = 270).
This type of thing definitely paid off in the LSAT waiting thread, as proved by science.
This type of thing definitely paid off in the LSAT waiting thread, as proved by science.
Last edited by neprep on Tue Feb 04, 2014 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- malleus discentium

- Posts: 906
- Joined: Sun May 26, 2013 2:30 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Oh my god inb4 271neprep wrote:People waiting for a JS2 having had a JS1 (effectively at a JS 1.5 in their lives) might want to post on this page (180 x 1.5 = 270).
This type of thing definitely paid of in the LSAT waiting thread, as proved by science.
- Mojosodope

- Posts: 941
- Joined: Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
ok thenneprep wrote:People waiting for a JS2 having had a JS1 (effectively at a JS 1.5 in their lives) might want to post on this page (180 x 1.5 = 270).
This type of thing definitely paid of in the LSAT waiting thread, as proved by science.
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
looooolllllllneprep wrote:People waiting for a JS2 having had a JS1 (effectively at a JS 1.5 in their lives) might want to post on this page (180 x 1.5 = 270).
This type of thing definitely paid off in the LSAT waiting thread, as proved by science.
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
There's a bunch of us. I'm mid-November.cruxisfalcon wrote:Any other Nov/Dec JS1s still waiting? Someone with nearly my exact numbers got in yesterday and I'm getting a little antsy
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Tela1283

- Posts: 118
- Joined: Thu Sep 26, 2013 10:44 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
sureneprep wrote:People waiting for a JS2 having had a JS1 (effectively at a JS 1.5 in their lives) might want to post on this page (180 x 1.5 = 270).
This type of thing definitely paid off in the LSAT waiting thread, as proved by science.
- andapieceoftoast

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Welcome to the fold, friend.drawstring wrote:There's a bunch of us. I'm mid-November.cruxisfalcon wrote:Any other Nov/Dec JS1s still waiting? Someone with nearly my exact numbers got in yesterday and I'm getting a little antsy
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
-
lawapp2014

- Posts: 35
- Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 7:46 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Does anyone know what the unofficial max number of students accepted from one school can be? I know at least ten have already been accepted from my school, so I am nervous that there may be some kind of unspoken cap.
Ps. Idk if I'm posting this in the right place, so sorry about that.
Ps. Idk if I'm posting this in the right place, so sorry about that.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- August Wilson

- Posts: 548
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 10:59 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
for science.
- Leo

- Posts: 366
- Joined: Thu Nov 14, 2013 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Well, can't argue with that logic.neprep wrote:People waiting for a JS2 having had a JS1 (effectively at a JS 1.5 in their lives) might want to post on this page (180 x 1.5 = 270).
This type of thing definitely paid off in the LSAT waiting thread, as proved by science.
- Nonconsecutive

- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Indeed, everyone needs to get in myah.Leo wrote:Well, can't argue with that logic.neprep wrote:People waiting for a JS2 having had a JS1 (effectively at a JS 1.5 in their lives) might want to post on this page (180 x 1.5 = 270).
This type of thing definitely paid off in the LSAT waiting thread, as proved by science.
- Ren

- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2013 5:42 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
+1Nonconsecutive wrote:Indeed, everyone needs to get in myah.Leo wrote:Well, can't argue with that logic.neprep wrote:People waiting for a JS2 having had a JS1 (effectively at a JS 1.5 in their lives) might want to post on this page (180 x 1.5 = 270).
This type of thing definitely paid off in the LSAT waiting thread, as proved by science.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
SplitMyPants

- Posts: 1673
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 9:22 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Let'sneprep wrote:People waiting for a JS2 having had a JS1 (effectively at a JS 1.5 in their lives) might want to post on this page (180 x 1.5 = 270).
This type of thing definitely paid off in the LSAT waiting thread, as proved by science.
- The-Specs

- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Or when I tell people that I have been accepted to HLS (only when they ask specifically where I am going, I never volunteer the information) they give me judgy eyes and try to tell me that it would be cheaper to go to Western State College of Law and that I would have all of the same opportunities…right.drawstring wrote:I don't even tell people that I've applied to Harvard. I used to and they'd just roll their eyes/laugh/not take me seriously.
- The-Specs

- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I don't think there is an offical cap and DANG! You must go to some UG if there are already 10 admitted students from your school.lawapp2014 wrote:Does anyone know what the unofficial max number of students accepted from one school can be? I know at least ten have already been accepted from my school, so I am nervous that there may be some kind of unspoken cap.
Ps. Idk if I'm posting this in the right place, so sorry about that.
- dubster101

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2012 2:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
So I don't regret it later.Nonconsecutive wrote:Indeed, everyone needs to get in myah.Leo wrote:Well, can't argue with that logic.neprep wrote:People waiting for a JS2 having had a JS1 (effectively at a JS 1.5 in their lives) might want to post on this page (180 x 1.5 = 270).
This type of thing definitely paid off in the LSAT waiting thread, as proved by science.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login