
Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I just resigned myself to the notion that I'll be waitlisted. That way I won't be disappointed and I may just be pleasantly surprised 

- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Someone with my exact numbers was admitted yesterday so I was just so sure I would has a chance.t-14orbust wrote:I just resigned myself to the notion that I'll be waitlisted. That way I won't be disappointed and I may just be pleasantly surprised

- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
lol you're forgetting that stanford dgafs when it comes to numbers. It really is the luck of the draw I guessapplelover wrote:Someone with my exact numbers was admitted yesterday so I was just so sure I would has a chance.t-14orbust wrote:I just resigned myself to the notion that I'll be waitlisted. That way I won't be disappointed and I may just be pleasantly surprisedguess not.


to clarify: #s are necessary but not sufficient. Mostly GPA, not so much LSAT. Then again, you all probably knew that. I'll let myself out
- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
t-14orbust wrote:lol you're forgetting that stanford dgafs when it comes to numbers. It really is the luck of the draw I guessapplelover wrote:Someone with my exact numbers was admitted yesterday so I was just so sure I would has a chance.t-14orbust wrote:I just resigned myself to the notion that I'll be waitlisted. That way I won't be disappointed and I may just be pleasantly surprisedguess not.
. I think they like science/engineering people though, so if you have that going for you you probably have a good shot
.
No but my LSAC GPA is going to be a 3.99 after this semester so maybe they will want me then.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'd want youapplelover wrote:t-14orbust wrote:lol you're forgetting that stanford dgafs when it comes to numbers. It really is the luck of the draw I guessapplelover wrote:Someone with my exact numbers was admitted yesterday so I was just so sure I would has a chance.t-14orbust wrote:I just resigned myself to the notion that I'll be waitlisted. That way I won't be disappointed and I may just be pleasantly surprisedguess not.
. I think they like science/engineering people though, so if you have that going for you you probably have a good shot
.
No but my LSAC GPA is going to be a 3.99 after this semester so maybe they will want me then.


FWIW my LSAC GPA is pretty damn high and they haven't even nibbled
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Sourrudedude
- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:34 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more about numbers.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more aboutnumbersthe LSAT.
- DrStudMuffin
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
The-Specs wrote:FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more aboutnumbersthe LSAT.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
FTFY bothDrStudMuffin wrote:The-Specs wrote:FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more about me.
- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
t-14orbust wrote:
I'd want you![]()
FWIW my LSAC GPA is pretty damn high and they haven't even nibbled
I wonder why...when'd you go complete?
Last edited by applelover on Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Mid October. Probably unspectacular softs though I do think I have a very unique backgroundapplelover wrote:t-14orbust wrote:
I'd want you![]()
FWIW my LSAC GPA is pretty damn high and they haven't even nibbled
I wonder why...when'd you go complete?
- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Same! Dean Deal, won't you give us a chance?t-14orbust wrote:Mid October. Probably unspectacular softs though I do think I have a very unique backgroundapplelover wrote:t-14orbust wrote:
I'd want you![]()
FWIW my LSAC GPA is pretty damn high and they haven't even nibbled
I wonder why...when'd you go complete?
- wowhio
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+1The-Specs wrote:FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more aboutnumbersthe LSAT.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Why can't SLS admissions care more about GPAs?wowhio wrote:+1The-Specs wrote:FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more aboutnumbersthe LSAT.
- js101b
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Has anyone had any movement on the status checker? I'm sitting at complete for like a month and a half.
- phillywc
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
because i have a good lsat and a sps gpa and i would like to still attend LSapplelover wrote:Why can't SLS admissions care more about GPAs?wowhio wrote:+1The-Specs wrote:FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more aboutnumbersthe LSAT.
- barrelofmonkeys
- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I think that's all you get until the decision comes.js101b wrote:Has anyone had any movement on the status checker? I'm sitting at complete for like a month and a half.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
phillywc wrote: because i have a good lsat and a sps gpa and i would like to still attend LS
Welp can't argue with that reason. I believe I owe you brownies still. Was it you I told that to?
- phillywc
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
It was, but you said I had to get in NYU. Or anywhere.applelover wrote:phillywc wrote: because i have a good lsat and a sps gpa and i would like to still attend LS
Welp can't argue with that reason. I believe I owe you brownies still. Was it you I told that to?
I'm just chilling here

- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
You will get in!! And I'll give you the brownies as a holiday treat now.phillywc wrote:It was, but you said I had to get in NYU. Or anywhere.applelover wrote:phillywc wrote: because i have a good lsat and a sps gpa and i would like to still attend LS
Welp can't argue with that reason. I believe I owe you brownies still. Was it you I told that to?
I'm just chilling here
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...stanford does care a lot about GPAapplelover wrote:Why can't SLS admissions care more about GPAs?wowhio wrote:+1The-Specs wrote:FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more aboutnumbersthe LSAT.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- phillywc
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
One day.applelover wrote:You will get in!! And I'll give you the brownies as a holiday treat now.phillywc wrote:It was, but you said I had to get in NYU. Or anywhere.applelover wrote:phillywc wrote: because i have a good lsat and a sps gpa and i would like to still attend LS
Welp can't argue with that reason. I believe I owe you brownies still. Was it you I told that to?
I'm just chilling here
And I'll take brownies

- js101b
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Thanks. I'll be patient.barrelofmonkeys wrote:I think that's all you get until the decision comes.js101b wrote:Has anyone had any movement on the status checker? I'm sitting at complete for like a month and a half.

- kershka
- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Checking in! Stanford is my top choice and someone with my exact numbers has already been admitted so here's hoping!
Good luck everyone; I hope that we all are admitted.

Good luck everyone; I hope that we all are admitted.



- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm hoping Stanford "forgot" to call me last week.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login