Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants) Forum
- t-14orbust

- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I just resigned myself to the notion that I'll be waitlisted. That way I won't be disappointed and I may just be pleasantly surprised 
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Someone with my exact numbers was admitted yesterday so I was just so sure I would has a chance.t-14orbust wrote:I just resigned myself to the notion that I'll be waitlisted. That way I won't be disappointed and I may just be pleasantly surprised
- t-14orbust

- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
lol you're forgetting that stanford dgafs when it comes to numbers. It really is the luck of the draw I guessapplelover wrote:Someone with my exact numbers was admitted yesterday so I was just so sure I would has a chance.t-14orbust wrote:I just resigned myself to the notion that I'll be waitlisted. That way I won't be disappointed and I may just be pleasantly surprisedguess not.
to clarify: #s are necessary but not sufficient. Mostly GPA, not so much LSAT. Then again, you all probably knew that. I'll let myself out
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
t-14orbust wrote:lol you're forgetting that stanford dgafs when it comes to numbers. It really is the luck of the draw I guessapplelover wrote:Someone with my exact numbers was admitted yesterday so I was just so sure I would has a chance.t-14orbust wrote:I just resigned myself to the notion that I'll be waitlisted. That way I won't be disappointed and I may just be pleasantly surprisedguess not.
. I think they like science/engineering people though, so if you have that going for you you probably have a good shot
.
No but my LSAC GPA is going to be a 3.99 after this semester so maybe they will want me then.
- t-14orbust

- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'd want youapplelover wrote:t-14orbust wrote:lol you're forgetting that stanford dgafs when it comes to numbers. It really is the luck of the draw I guessapplelover wrote:Someone with my exact numbers was admitted yesterday so I was just so sure I would has a chance.t-14orbust wrote:I just resigned myself to the notion that I'll be waitlisted. That way I won't be disappointed and I may just be pleasantly surprisedguess not.
. I think they like science/engineering people though, so if you have that going for you you probably have a good shot
.
No but my LSAC GPA is going to be a 3.99 after this semester so maybe they will want me then.
FWIW my LSAC GPA is pretty damn high and they haven't even nibbled
- Sourrudedude

- Posts: 415
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:34 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more about numbers.
- The-Specs

- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more aboutnumbersthe LSAT.
- DrStudMuffin

- Posts: 236
- Joined: Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
The-Specs wrote:FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more aboutnumbersthe LSAT.
- t-14orbust

- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
FTFY bothDrStudMuffin wrote:The-Specs wrote:FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more about me.
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
t-14orbust wrote:
I'd want you![]()
FWIW my LSAC GPA is pretty damn high and they haven't even nibbled
I wonder why...when'd you go complete?
Last edited by applelover on Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- t-14orbust

- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Mid October. Probably unspectacular softs though I do think I have a very unique backgroundapplelover wrote:t-14orbust wrote:
I'd want you![]()
FWIW my LSAC GPA is pretty damn high and they haven't even nibbled
I wonder why...when'd you go complete?
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Same! Dean Deal, won't you give us a chance?t-14orbust wrote:Mid October. Probably unspectacular softs though I do think I have a very unique backgroundapplelover wrote:t-14orbust wrote:
I'd want you![]()
FWIW my LSAC GPA is pretty damn high and they haven't even nibbled
I wonder why...when'd you go complete?
- wowhio

- Posts: 163
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
+1The-Specs wrote:FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more aboutnumbersthe LSAT.
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Why can't SLS admissions care more about GPAs?wowhio wrote:+1The-Specs wrote:FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more aboutnumbersthe LSAT.
- js101b

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Has anyone had any movement on the status checker? I'm sitting at complete for like a month and a half.
- phillywc

- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
because i have a good lsat and a sps gpa and i would like to still attend LSapplelover wrote:Why can't SLS admissions care more about GPAs?wowhio wrote:+1The-Specs wrote:FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more aboutnumbersthe LSAT.
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I think that's all you get until the decision comes.js101b wrote:Has anyone had any movement on the status checker? I'm sitting at complete for like a month and a half.
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
phillywc wrote: because i have a good lsat and a sps gpa and i would like to still attend LS
Welp can't argue with that reason. I believe I owe you brownies still. Was it you I told that to?
- phillywc

- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
It was, but you said I had to get in NYU. Or anywhere.applelover wrote:phillywc wrote: because i have a good lsat and a sps gpa and i would like to still attend LS
Welp can't argue with that reason. I believe I owe you brownies still. Was it you I told that to?
I'm just chilling here
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
You will get in!! And I'll give you the brownies as a holiday treat now.phillywc wrote:It was, but you said I had to get in NYU. Or anywhere.applelover wrote:phillywc wrote: because i have a good lsat and a sps gpa and i would like to still attend LS
Welp can't argue with that reason. I believe I owe you brownies still. Was it you I told that to?
I'm just chilling here
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
...stanford does care a lot about GPAapplelover wrote:Why can't SLS admissions care more about GPAs?wowhio wrote:+1The-Specs wrote:FTFYSourrudedude wrote:What I wouldn't give for SLS to care more aboutnumbersthe LSAT.
- phillywc

- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
One day.applelover wrote:You will get in!! And I'll give you the brownies as a holiday treat now.phillywc wrote:It was, but you said I had to get in NYU. Or anywhere.applelover wrote:phillywc wrote: because i have a good lsat and a sps gpa and i would like to still attend LS
Welp can't argue with that reason. I believe I owe you brownies still. Was it you I told that to?
I'm just chilling here
And I'll take brownies
- js101b

- Posts: 27
- Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 3:21 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Thanks. I'll be patient.barrelofmonkeys wrote:I think that's all you get until the decision comes.js101b wrote:Has anyone had any movement on the status checker? I'm sitting at complete for like a month and a half.
- kershka

- Posts: 630
- Joined: Sat Dec 21, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
Checking in! Stanford is my top choice and someone with my exact numbers has already been admitted so here's hoping!
Good luck everyone; I hope that we all are admitted.

Good luck everyone; I hope that we all are admitted.
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Stanford c/o 2017 (2013-2014 applicants)
I'm hoping Stanford "forgot" to call me last week.