What I don't understand is why they can't just email or call to let you know you're in. No...it has to be mail first...blowhard wrote:This may be an appropriate time for this post... Last year there were several group-think freakouts on TLS with people applying to Michigan. Including people interpreting status e-mails to mean they were waitlisted. (Michigan will typically send an e-mail if you've been under consideration for a while just to say they haven't forgotten about you.) In another instance, a poster on TLS lied about the admissions office threatening her if she tried to be released from ED. http://www.law.umich.edu/connection/a2z ... 397d820295
They received dozens of panicked calls from TLS people asking the same questions. In the end, it took several e-mails from me to the admissions office (and Dean Z's blog post) to finally quell everyones fears. This cannot and should not happen again. Our admissions office is not out to get you. They are probably the most down-to-earth people in the profession. I know it's hard, but try not to read motives into every little situation or occurrence. If you are concerned about something or have a question, do not rant/rave on TLS and try to work others up. Either call the office yourself or PM me/another current student (if you are so afraid to do so) and we will contact the admissions office with your question. They won't bite, I promise.
Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
Curious1

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
-
03121202698008

- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
They send this ultra-nice packet with a handwritten note and flash-drive with a video of the school. I agree it could be helpful but they've made a decision this is what they want the first impression to be. Dean Z feels it is a big deal and wants to make it a big deal...not just an e-mail. Every year, they try to time it so your tracker doesn't go to decision until after you receive the packet. But, every year people on TLS figure out the login trick and find out that way.Curious1 wrote:
What I don't understand is why they can't just email or call to let you know you're in. No...it has to be mail first...
Edit: This is based upon past things I've heard her say when asked this. I'm not speaking for her which I want to make clear in case I need to post a statement from her again like last year...
I believe part of this also has to do with how their system is designed. It seems like every night their database is mined and actions are taken...e.g. the date updating on the status checker each day, it changing people's statuses, etc. One of these steps is allowing you to login. Considering they wouldn't get around to e-mailing or calling until roughly when you received the packet...what's the big deal?
-
Curious1

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It's not, I just thought it was kind of snobby/old fashioned to insist on mail first--kind of like how Georgetown undergrad required a handwritten essay or Chicago undergrad had their own essays.blowhard wrote:They send this ultra-nice packet with a handwritten note and flash-drive with a video of the school. I agree it could be helpful but they've made a decision this is what they want the first impression to be. Dean Z feels it is a big deal and wants to make it a big deal...not just an e-mail. Every year, they try to time it so your tracker doesn't go to decision until after you receive the packet. But, every year people on TLS figure out the login trick and find out that way.Curious1 wrote:
What I don't understand is why they can't just email or call to let you know you're in. No...it has to be mail first...
Edit: This is based upon past things I've heard her say when asked this. I'm not speaking for her which I want to make clear in case I need to post a statement from her again like last year...
I believe part of this also has to do with how their system is designed. It seems like every night their database is mined and actions are taken...e.g. the date updating on the status checker each day, it changing people's statuses, etc. One of these steps is allowing you to login. Considering they wouldn't get around to e-mailing or calling until roughly when you received the packet...what's the big deal?
I can see the first impression thing, and how getting a big envelope in the mail is a really nice feeling though.
-
03121202698008

- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Don't get me wrong, I see your point. I felt the same way. At some schools that e-mail though it was so generic I felt like I was just an application. I really felt like Michigan was trying to treat me as a person they were interested in. Although I confess, I did get an e-mail from Dean Z first because it was Christmas Eve and she didn't want the status checker to change before those of us she decided on that day got the packet and us assume the worst.Curious1 wrote:
It's not, I just thought it was kind of snobby/old fashioned to insist on mail first--kind of like how Georgetown undergrad required a handwritten essay or Chicago undergrad had their own essays.
I can see the first impression thing, and how getting a big envelope in the mail is a really nice feeling though.
Also RE the phone call, you don't want that...lol. After several of them from law review/OCI, I can tell you it's super awkward, always at a bad time, and you never have any idea what to say back.
- icedflames

- Posts: 376
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 7:04 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I want, especially since I didnt get my lanyard in my duke package.blowhard wrote:They send this ultra-nice packet with a handwritten note and flash-drive with a video of the school. I agree it could be helpful but they've made a decision this is what they want the first impression to be. Dean Z feels it is a big deal and wants to make it a big deal...not just an e-mail. Every year, they try to time it so your tracker doesn't go to decision until after you receive the packet. But, every year people on TLS figure out the login trick and find out that way.Curious1 wrote:
What I don't understand is why they can't just email or call to let you know you're in. No...it has to be mail first...
Edit: This is based upon past things I've heard her say when asked this. I'm not speaking for her which I want to make clear in case I need to post a statement from her again like last year...
I believe part of this also has to do with how their system is designed. It seems like every night their database is mined and actions are taken...e.g. the date updating on the status checker each day, it changing people's statuses, etc. One of these steps is allowing you to login. Considering they wouldn't get around to e-mailing or calling until roughly when you received the packet...what's the big deal?
I do like the idea of personalized mail first. Its definitely better when the note is about something specific in your application so it feels like they read your resume and personal statement and everything else you put your time into instead of looking at only your numbers
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Curious1

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
This is really cute. Wow. I really like Michigan now.Although I confess, I did get an e-mail from Dean Z first because it was Christmas Eve and she didn't want the status checker to change before those of us she decided on that day got the packet and us assume the worst.
-
03121202698008

- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just wait until you visit. I urge anyone admitted to visit even if they are strongly considering somewhere else.Curious1 wrote:This is really cute. Wow. I really like Michigan now.Although I confess, I did get an e-mail from Dean Z first because it was Christmas Eve and she didn't want the status checker to change before those of us she decided on that day got the packet and us assume the worst.
I know I sound completely brain-washed here...but I'm not. It just really is a great place and Dean Z really is one of the nicest (and funniest) people I've ever met. If you aren't already, you guys should read her blog posts.
-
Curious1

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I definitely will--if only for the architecture.blowhard wrote:Just wait until you visit. I urge anyone admitted to visit even if they are strongly considering somewhere else.Curious1 wrote:This is really cute. Wow. I really like Michigan now.Although I confess, I did get an e-mail from Dean Z first because it was Christmas Eve and she didn't want the status checker to change before those of us she decided on that day got the packet and us assume the worst.
I know I sound completely brain-washed here...but I'm not. It just really is a great place and Dean Z really is one of the nicest (and funniest) people I've ever met. If you aren't already, you guys should read her blog posts.
ADMIT ME ALREADY DAMN IT!
- BuckinghamB

- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:37 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
At some point, I think I remember having read something about how we shouldn't check the ASW too often because they know when you try and fail to get in. I tried to search for it on TLS and Google but to no avail...anybody else remember reading this, or am I just paranoid?
- icedflames

- Posts: 376
- Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 7:04 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I hope this isnt true! I checked it like 10 times today.BuckinghamB wrote:At some point, I think I remember having read something about how we shouldn't check the ASW too often because they know when you try and fail to get in. I tried to search for it on TLS and Google but to no avail...anybody else remember reading this, or am I just paranoid?
- BuckinghamB

- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:37 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Haha...I'm sure it won't affect the decision on applications, but I thought they got really annoyed or something.
- chem

- Posts: 871
- Joined: Thu Mar 03, 2011 8:14 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It's true, in one of Dean Z's blogs. They also can tell how many times you check the status checker. I don't think they thought it was annoying, just humorousicedflames wrote:I hope this isnt true! I checked it like 10 times today.BuckinghamB wrote:At some point, I think I remember having read something about how we shouldn't check the ASW too often because they know when you try and fail to get in. I tried to search for it on TLS and Google but to no avail...anybody else remember reading this, or am I just paranoid?
-
AspiringAcademic

- Posts: 130
- Joined: Mon Jul 11, 2011 12:36 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I recall seeing that too, though I can't recall where. I got the impression that it is more something that they laugh about around the office than something they take into consideration.BuckinghamB wrote:Haha...I'm sure it won't affect the decision on applications, but I thought they got really annoyed or something.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Schola

- Posts: 103
- Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:55 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I would agree with this. I think this is kind of a classy way to do it, and while I am already VERY interested in Michigan, I expect that the packet will do more to heighten my interest than any generic phone call about how they liked my application ever could.blowhard wrote:Don't get me wrong, I see your point. I felt the same way. At some schools that e-mail though it was so generic I felt like I was just an application. I really felt like Michigan was trying to treat me as a person they were interested in. Although I confess, I did get an e-mail from Dean Z first because it was Christmas Eve and she didn't want the status checker to change before those of us she decided on that day got the packet and us assume the worst.Curious1 wrote:
It's not, I just thought it was kind of snobby/old fashioned to insist on mail first--kind of like how Georgetown undergrad required a handwritten essay or Chicago undergrad had their own essays.
I can see the first impression thing, and how getting a big envelope in the mail is a really nice feeling though.
Also RE the phone call, you don't want that...lol. After several of them from law review/OCI, I can tell you it's super awkward, always at a bad time, and you never have any idea what to say back.
-
ketchup

- Posts: 47
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 12:05 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just got my status checker... I guess they got some of the auto-admits out of the way and can move on to the rest of us. 
-
03121202698008

- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm pretty sure this was one of the rumors from last years application thread. Of course they have the technical ability to look up logs. Why they ever would is a wholly different question.AspiringAcademic wrote:I recall seeing that too, though I can't recall where. I got the impression that it is more something that they laugh about around the office than something they take into consideration.BuckinghamB wrote:Haha...I'm sure it won't affect the decision on applications, but I thought they got really annoyed or something.
- erv2107

- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 12:32 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Got the packet and the flash drive!!!!!!
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Justdoingmybest

- Posts: 172
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 10:58 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
When did you submit your app?ketchup wrote:Just got my status checker... I guess they got some of the auto-admits out of the way and can move on to the rest of us.
- No13baby

- Posts: 440
- Joined: Fri Aug 19, 2011 12:42 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Me too, although I didn't submit until mid-October.ketchup wrote:Just got my status checker... I guess they got some of the auto-admits out of the way and can move on to the rest of us.
- thelaststraw05

- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:47 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I would second Blowhard on this. You've got to visit Michigan. It has a different feel from almost every other law school out there.blowhard wrote:Just wait until you visit. I urge anyone admitted to visit even if they are strongly considering somewhere else.Curious1 wrote:This is really cute. Wow. I really like Michigan now.Although I confess, I did get an e-mail from Dean Z first because it was Christmas Eve and she didn't want the status checker to change before those of us she decided on that day got the packet and us assume the worst.
I know I sound completely brain-washed here...but I'm not. It just really is a great place and Dean Z really is one of the nicest (and funniest) people I've ever met. If you aren't already, you guys should read her blog posts.
I say all of this having no idea who Blowhard is. But I am a 1L at Michigan. I know that there are a few of us current students around who are happy to answer questions.
-
gdh

- Posts: 50
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 3:05 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
This is literally a life-changing event due to the doors that Michigan can open. I can't speak to how excited I am. I'm not bothered in the least that I found out via the steps posted on here earlier.
Can we talk about the reading room? Wow!
Can we talk about the reading room? Wow!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- UnamSanctam

- Posts: 7342
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't think you understand how much I envy you right now.erv2107 wrote:Got the packet and the flash drive!!!!!!
Also, Michigan oozes class (and probably Dean Z, though I've never had any direct contact with her). I am just so impressed with them.
- BuckinghamB

- Posts: 458
- Joined: Wed Jun 15, 2011 3:37 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by BuckinghamB on Wed Jan 02, 2013 8:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- JoeMo

- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
She does... she's the reason I decided to apply. She's a freaking rockstar.UnamSanctam wrote:I don't think you understand how much I envy you right now.erv2107 wrote:Got the packet and the flash drive!!!!!!
Also, Michigan oozes class (and probably Dean Z, though I've never had any direct contact with her). I am just so impressed with them.
- thelaststraw05

- Posts: 1028
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:47 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I do suggest that you create a Michigan Admitted Students c/o 2015 topic or a facebook group so that you can separate the discussion on issues important to admitted to students from the ones important to waiting applicants.JoeMo wrote:She does... she's the reason I decided to apply. She's a freaking rockstar.UnamSanctam wrote:I don't think you understand how much I envy you right now.erv2107 wrote:Got the packet and the flash drive!!!!!!
Also, Michigan oozes class (and probably Dean Z, though I've never had any direct contact with her). I am just so impressed with them.
That was very useful to us last year.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login