
I submitted a couple of days ago, and just received the status checker. Desperately hoping I go complete soon!
Gotta love being in this wonderful clubslax wrote:Yes, here I amsunsnow wrote:congrats to all the new JR1s! did anyone *not* get a JR1 today who submitted before November?
Samelshamlet wrote:welp, this is the third week since i've gone under review and i didn't get a JR1 today. sigh. i guess i'm heading for denied/held city.
Me either. But I was a long shot. I'm feeling a waitlist most likely.slax wrote:Yes, here I amsunsnow wrote:congrats to all the new JR1s! did anyone *not* get a JR1 today who submitted before November?
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Thats mesunsnow wrote:congrats to all the new JR1s! did anyone *not* get a JR1 today who submitted before November?
I feel this.slax wrote:I wouldn't be sad if it weren't for the fact that people with the same or worse numbers have gotten jr1's already. It's making me paranoid trying to figure out what makes my app not quite as good as theirs.
better softs or personal statement?slax wrote:I wouldn't be sad if it weren't for the fact that people with the same or worse numbers have gotten jr1's already. It's making me paranoid trying to figure out what makes my app not quite as good as theirs.
Agreed. I think work experience may have played a big role.sarahh wrote:better softs or personal statement?slax wrote:I wouldn't be sad if it weren't for the fact that people with the same or worse numbers have gotten jr1's already. It's making me paranoid trying to figure out what makes my app not quite as good as theirs.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Yep or lor's or did I have typos or who knows what? I thought my softs (work experience) were slightly impressive but perhaps not. I'm also cursing my school for not giving a+'s. I'd have a much better gpa if only they didsarahh wrote:better softs or personal statement?slax wrote:I wouldn't be sad if it weren't for the fact that people with the same or worse numbers have gotten jr1's already. It's making me paranoid trying to figure out what makes my app not quite as good as theirs.
Just out of curiosity, what makes you think the bolded?The Real Jack McCoy wrote:As someone who had a bad Friday last Friday:
Try to keep in mind that there is an inherent bias in who reports what information--those with JR1s are going to be more likely to report they have them than those who don't get them (it is nice sharing good news--if I flub my interview I'll probably want to talk about it as little as possible). It is a long cycle and Harvard keeps admitting for a long while; not getting an immediate JR1 is not necessarily an indication that you won't get one. And from all accounts, it looks like this cycle will be a touch softer than the last, so we might see more acceptances on the back end.
I'm happy to share stats/UR dates etc via PM.
Good luck all
Yes, a few days ago a splitter mentioned getting a JR1, and I posted about getting a JR1 and have mentioned my GPA before. Let's hope we have success.penguin1234 wrote:I hate to be a buzzkill to all you awesome applicants who have superb statistics or to send into a spinning cycle of rage those who have been looking at JR1 data, but since I basically just started reading TLS and I feel like giving myself and others like me hope, I haven't noticed one person who has sub-median GPA or LSAT has admitted to getting a JR1. Let me be the first to admit that (unless someone else already has and I simply haven't seen it).
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
Not to mention this guy is a urm.sarahh wrote:Yes, a few days ago a splitter mentioned getting a JR1, and I posted about getting a JR1 and have mentioned my GPA before. Let's hope we have success.penguin1234 wrote:I hate to be a buzzkill to all you awesome applicants who have superb statistics or to send into a spinning cycle of rage those who have been looking at JR1 data, but since I basically just started reading TLS and I feel like giving myself and others like me hope, I haven't noticed one person who has sub-median GPA or LSAT has admitted to getting a JR1. Let me be the first to admit that (unless someone else already has and I simply haven't seen it).
A few deans of admission are on record saying that this cycle does not look as bad as last. By the numbers, the most promising sign is that 10% fewer people took this year's October LSAT (as compared to last year)--that is ~ 6,000 fewer potential applicants. As for the last clause, I suspect most admissions committees will be a little cautious given how competitive last year turned out to be. Just educated guesses but there is some evidence.CreativityKing wrote:Just out of curiosity, what makes you think the bolded?The Real Jack McCoy wrote:As someone who had a bad Friday last Friday:
Try to keep in mind that there is an inherent bias in who reports what information--those with JR1s are going to be more likely to report they have them than those who don't get them (it is nice sharing good news--if I flub my interview I'll probably want to talk about it as little as possible). It is a long cycle and Harvard keeps admitting for a long while; not getting an immediate JR1 is not necessarily an indication that you won't get one. And from all accounts, it looks like this cycle will be a touch softer than the last, so we might see more acceptances on the back end.
I'm happy to share stats/UR dates etc via PM.
Good luck all
(I'm hoping you're right!)
yeah...if he's URM, then that is more of a URM+ post/hope giving issue, not one for splitters or low numbers lol.CastleRock wrote:Not to mention this guy is a urm.sarahh wrote:Yes, a few days ago a splitter mentioned getting a JR1, and I posted about getting a JR1 and have mentioned my GPA before. Let's hope we have success.penguin1234 wrote:I hate to be a buzzkill to all you awesome applicants who have superb statistics or to send into a spinning cycle of rage those who have been looking at JR1 data, but since I basically just started reading TLS and I feel like giving myself and others like me hope, I haven't noticed one person who has sub-median GPA or LSAT has admitted to getting a JR1. Let me be the first to admit that (unless someone else already has and I simply haven't seen it).
Maybe you aren't implying this, but you make it sounds like all submedian people are URM.DoubleChecks wrote:yeah...if he's URM, then that is more of a URM+ post/hope giving issue, not one for splitters or low numbers lol.CastleRock wrote:Not to mention this guy is a urm.sarahh wrote:Yes, a few days ago a splitter mentioned getting a JR1, and I posted about getting a JR1 and have mentioned my GPA before. Let's hope we have success.penguin1234 wrote:I hate to be a buzzkill to all you awesome applicants who have superb statistics or to send into a spinning cycle of rage those who have been looking at JR1 data, but since I basically just started reading TLS and I feel like giving myself and others like me hope, I haven't noticed one person who has sub-median GPA or LSAT has admitted to getting a JR1. Let me be the first to admit that (unless someone else already has and I simply haven't seen it).
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
No, he's just saying that your post gives more hope to other URM's than it does to non-URM's who are submedian and have not gotten a JR1 yet. A non-URM JR1 splitter post would "give hope" for non-URM splitters since that variable is taken out of the equation.penguin1234 wrote:
Maybe you aren't implying this, but you make it sounds like all submedian people are URM.
I am a non-URM splitter. But there are other things in my background that probably explain why I got a JR1. (You can PM if you want more info - I did not cure cancer or have a relative that donated a building to the school.) If you have a lower GPA or LSAT, you probably do have to bring something extra to the table.Wannabelawyer101 wrote:No, he's just saying that your post gives more hope to other URM's than it does to non-URM's who are submedian and have not gotten a JR1 yet. A non-URM JR1 splitter post would "give hope" for non-URM splitters since that variable is taken out of the equation.penguin1234 wrote:
Maybe you aren't implying this, but you make it sounds like all submedian people are URM.
I, too, as I've said before, am under the 25th GPA and above the 75th LSAT but also have some background things (PM as well if interested) that may explain the JR1 I received.sarahh wrote:I am a non-URM splitter. But there are other things in my background that probably explain why I got a JR1. (You can PM if you want more info - I did not cure cancer or have a relative that donated a building to the school.) If you have a lower GPA or LSAT, you probably do have to bring something extra to the table.Wannabelawyer101 wrote:No, he's just saying that your post gives more hope to other URM's than it does to non-URM's who are submedian and have not gotten a JR1 yet. A non-URM JR1 splitter post would "give hope" for non-URM splitters since that variable is taken out of the equation.penguin1234 wrote:
Maybe you aren't implying this, but you make it sounds like all submedian people are URM.
Just out of pure curiosity, is there any particular reason why didn't you ask any questions? I don't mean this in a rude way at all, but it seems like there is no better of an opportunity at this point in the cycle to learn about HLS than from the dean of admissions himself...penguin1234 wrote:As for the actual phone interview, it lasted 5 minutes; JR asked me how my job was going, why I wanted to go to law school and why I wanted to go to Harvard (pretty simple answer: Learned Hand went therejust kidding). He then asked if I had any questions, I said no but thank you for the opportunity to speak to you, and he then said we will keep reviewing applications and start sending out decisions by late November.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login