Hoping to be one of these once I move off of Complete, but people who are accepted are notified first via status checker and soon after receive an acceptance letter via snail mail.YesNoMaybe wrote:Am I correct in assuming that everyone that's gotten IN has found out via e-mail/status checker or have some folks also learned that they were accepted via snail mail?
Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:44 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:53 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I found out via snail mail and then saw it on my status checker the same day. They sent an email about a week after the letter came just really confirming it was sent.YesNoMaybe wrote:Am I correct in assuming that everyone that's gotten IN has found out via e-mail/status checker or have some folks also learned that they were accepted via snail mail?
-
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 10:27 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I found out via snail mail but i am complete. I go to Michigan so mail comes fast.
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I found out via an e-mail... although I was a special snowflake from what I understand. The e-mail was something like "your file has been read and you'll be accepted but first we must finalize other offers that were pending before yours... congrats and don't expect to hear from us for another X amount of weeks"YesNoMaybe wrote:Am I correct in assuming that everyone that's gotten IN has found out via e-mail/status checker or have some folks also learned that they were accepted via snail mail?
-
- Posts: 670
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:49 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
dinged via snail today
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:30 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
horrorbusiness wrote:dinged via snail today
Did the status checker update as well?
- FryBreadPower
- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Still complete. This has to be a joke at this point.
- lawschool899
- Posts: 196
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2011 4:11 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1FryBreadPower wrote:Still complete. This has to be a joke at this point.
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 11:44 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Still complete as well, although I've been away on break. I'm more than a wee bit afraid of what snail mail may be waiting for me. I had been assuming that I would hear via e-mail. Making the return to the mailbox quite anxiety filled!! Gulp.
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Thu Feb 02, 2012 10:21 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by legalabogada on Sat Apr 07, 2012 3:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- kennethellenparcell
- Posts: 498
- Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2010 1:02 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeep. I've been planning to visit Ann Arbor in a few weeks. This scares me.horrorbusiness wrote:dinged via snail today
-
- Posts: 670
- Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2011 6:49 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
yeah, as of now at least, it has the reject messagechipdx wrote:horrorbusiness wrote:dinged via snail today
Did the status checker update as well?
- Liquox
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:46 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
oy.
still complete. love you Michigan, with all my heart.
i may be just a college guy.
i may not have much.
but if you let me in, what's mine is yours.
just please don't ding me via snail mail,
or if you must, please don't send it to my house
still complete. love you Michigan, with all my heart.
i may be just a college guy.
i may not have much.
but if you let me in, what's mine is yours.
just please don't ding me via snail mail,
or if you must, please don't send it to my house
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2992
- Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
All,
It has come to my attention that somehow Admissions believes I misrepresented their policy on transferring people between Summer/Fall start and it was taken as university policy (or the person so asserted to them on the phone). They didn't explain when this happened (I contacted them about ASW), but after an extensive search of my post history and PMs, I can't find any advice I gave other than to contact Admissions with your story. So, I'm not sure where this came from. I don't know if someone else's post was misattributed to me, someone contacted Admissions with animus, or someone purposely mischaracterized my post in order to benefit themselves in their attempt to switch.
Fortunately, Admissions was gracious in their e-mail. After reiterating they weren't trying to admonish or silence me, they even offered to brief me on all of their policies in person now or answer any questions I had as they came up. However, I'm not taking them up on it. I'm not wasting my time doing your due diligence because you're too lazy/scared to call. If you're relying on TLS as a source of official policy, you're an idiot. If you purposely threw me under the bus in order to benefit yourself, you're a snake and don't belong here. Whoever you are, here is your first law school lesson: Rely only on authoritative sources.
I wouldn't say I've been "outed" per se as Admissions knew who I was from when I clarified policies with them during last year's fiascos. Still, I'm not at all happy that my reputation with them has been besmirched. I'm always careful to answer in general terms, provide only concrete examples I personally know of, and advise communication directly with Admissions. When I have commented on other policies, I cleared them first with them. I've never purported to speak for the University, except when authorized (and disclosed).
So, I'm out. I'll no longer be answering any questions (here or by PM) that involve dealing with the university. I'm happy to talk about my experiences (and I'll be at the dinners both ASWs for this purpose) but I'll no longer be actively monitoring any of the Michigan threads. Good luck, I hope you enjoy your visits.
TL,DR: Life's too short. Good luck.
It has come to my attention that somehow Admissions believes I misrepresented their policy on transferring people between Summer/Fall start and it was taken as university policy (or the person so asserted to them on the phone). They didn't explain when this happened (I contacted them about ASW), but after an extensive search of my post history and PMs, I can't find any advice I gave other than to contact Admissions with your story. So, I'm not sure where this came from. I don't know if someone else's post was misattributed to me, someone contacted Admissions with animus, or someone purposely mischaracterized my post in order to benefit themselves in their attempt to switch.
Fortunately, Admissions was gracious in their e-mail. After reiterating they weren't trying to admonish or silence me, they even offered to brief me on all of their policies in person now or answer any questions I had as they came up. However, I'm not taking them up on it. I'm not wasting my time doing your due diligence because you're too lazy/scared to call. If you're relying on TLS as a source of official policy, you're an idiot. If you purposely threw me under the bus in order to benefit yourself, you're a snake and don't belong here. Whoever you are, here is your first law school lesson: Rely only on authoritative sources.
I wouldn't say I've been "outed" per se as Admissions knew who I was from when I clarified policies with them during last year's fiascos. Still, I'm not at all happy that my reputation with them has been besmirched. I'm always careful to answer in general terms, provide only concrete examples I personally know of, and advise communication directly with Admissions. When I have commented on other policies, I cleared them first with them. I've never purported to speak for the University, except when authorized (and disclosed).
So, I'm out. I'll no longer be answering any questions (here or by PM) that involve dealing with the university. I'm happy to talk about my experiences (and I'll be at the dinners both ASWs for this purpose) but I'll no longer be actively monitoring any of the Michigan threads. Good luck, I hope you enjoy your visits.
TL,DR: Life's too short. Good luck.
- Liquox
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2012 3:46 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
[quote="blowhard"][/quote]
sorry man. hate to see you go, but for what it's worth, thanks for helping, even if there's a hidden ass or two around here.
sorry man. hate to see you go, but for what it's worth, thanks for helping, even if there's a hidden ass or two around here.
Last edited by Liquox on Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In for the ~drama~
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
If they were so gracious then I say you just ignore it. I don't think your reputation has been besmirched.blowhard wrote: redacted
I do think that whoever did it should learn to be more adult about things. If they were curious about switching they should have called and found out what the policy was rather than say "so and so told me that..." After all, isn't what is heard or read on TLS just hearsay? I don't recall blowhard or anyone else saying they worked for admissions.
This is why we can't have anything nice.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- aekea
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 2:10 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
That sucks. But I'm imagining the phone call that must have taken place between admissions and our mystery would-be fall starter and at some point, the latter must have said something along the lines of "But blowhard on tls TOLD me I could..." and that image is making me smile.blowhard wrote:
TL,DR: Life's too short. Good luck.
- JDizzle2015
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:16 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I appreciated your insight. TLS is losing a valuable resource on UMich Law.Liquox wrote:blowhard wrote:
sorry man. hate to see you go, but for what it's worth, thanks for helping, even if there's a hidden ass or two around here.
- soj
- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Can we please investigate who besmirched blowhard's reputation so we can shame them for lacking the proper Michigan spirit?
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
FTFY...aekea wrote:That sucks. But I'm imagining the phone call that must have taken place between admissions and our mystery would-be fall starter and at some point, the latter must have said something along the lines of "But blowhard on tls TOLD me I could..." and that image is making meblowhard wrote:
TL,DR: Life's too short. Good luck.smilecringe.
kids
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
soj wrote:Can we please investigate who besmirched blowhard's reputation so we can shame them for lacking the proper Michigan spirit?
- aekea
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 2:10 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Well obviously, it's making me smile because they have wronged blowhard and I wish cringe-worthy and embarrassing outbursts, in front of the admissions office, upon them.JoeMo wrote:FTFY...aekea wrote:That sucks. But I'm imagining the phone call that must have taken place between admissions and our mystery would-be fall starter and at some point, the latter must have said something along the lines of "But blowhard on tls TOLD me I could..." and that image is making meblowhard wrote:
TL,DR: Life's too short. Good luck.smilecringe.
kids
- JoeMo
- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
lol...aekea wrote: Well obviously, it's making me smile because they have wronged blowhard and I wish cringe-worthy and embarrassing outbursts, in front of the admissions office, upon them.
I wasn't calling you a kid btw, I was calling whoever did this a kid.
Chances that it's one of these two?
http://top-law-schools.com/forums/viewt ... &start=800
- aekea
- Posts: 236
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 2:10 pm
Re: Michigan c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Well, let's not be insulting to children now.JoeMo wrote:lol...aekea wrote: Well obviously, it's making me smile because they have wronged blowhard and I wish cringe-worthy and embarrassing outbursts, in front of the admissions office, upon them.
I wasn't calling you a kid btw, I was calling whoever did this a kid.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login