I think I still would.blue5385 wrote:He's cute, it's a nerdy/bad pic thoughConMan345 wrote:--ImageRemoved--
Harvard 2010! Forum
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
+1, the only problem is that he looks potentially short and I'm tall for a girl.creatinganalt wrote:I think I still would.blue5385 wrote:He's cute, it's a nerdy/bad pic thoughConMan345 wrote:--ImageRemoved--

-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
You're right. You might get away if under 5'8''. Any guy under 6 foot looks short to me.blue5385 wrote:+1, the only problem is that he looks potentially short and I'm tall for a girl.creatinganalt wrote:I think I still would.blue5385 wrote:He's cute, it's a nerdy/bad pic thoughConMan345 wrote:--ImageRemoved--
Truth is I'm only fussy about intelligence and he already has that so...
- ConMan345
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
No, he's tall. I'm 6'2"-6'3" and I was looking him in the eye.
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Can't get away with it then, haha. Although, as long as a guy was taller than me I wouldn't be that picky about his height (just a little pissed that I couldn't wear heels when we were out together).creatinganalt wrote:You're right. You might get away if under 5'8''. Any guy under 6 foot looks short to me.
Truth is I'm only fussy about intelligence and he already has that so...
And yeah, in a battle of height v. intelligence you'd have to be crazy not to pick intelligence.
edit: hooray for ConMan's post above
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Wow you are tall! I'm jealous. I'm 5'6'' and would love to be taller. As for JR, 6'2'' is always good. This is why it's probably good that I didn't get admitted before the ASW.
(Also I'm glad I have TLS or RL people would think I was insane when I tried to explain who JR was and why I think his voice is sexy.)

(Also I'm glad I have TLS or RL people would think I was insane when I tried to explain who JR was and why I think his voice is sexy.)
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
haha thanks! I think 6'2" is a good height for a guy too actually -- it's a big enough height difference that I can wear heels without the awkward 'I'm taller than my boyfriend' effect.
- clyde_barrow
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:33 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
what was that about JR's large foggy middle, conman? 

-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Hahaha! I know it's weird and we're all being brainwashed by patriarchy but it still feels funny when some guy is shorter than you!blue5385 wrote:haha thanks! I think 6'2" is a good height for a guy too actually -- it's a big enough height difference that I can wear heels without the awkward 'I'm taller than my boyfriend' effect.
EDIT: Is H your first choice? Sorry, it's a long thread and I'm too lazy to look.
- ConMan345
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I'd give him a P (as in "pass").clyde_barrow wrote:what was that about JR's large foggy middle, conman?

-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
There's some kind of biological factor involved, too. I remember reading an article that said women were genetically wired to be most attracted to men who were their height multiplied by 1.xx (don't remember what the exact number was). I think it worked out to ~6 in. for most heights.creatinganalt wrote:Hahaha! I know it's weird and we're all being brainwashed by patriarchy but it still feels funny when some guy is shorter than you!blue5385 wrote:haha thanks! I think 6'2" is a good height for a guy too actually -- it's a big enough height difference that I can wear heels without the awkward 'I'm taller than my boyfriend' effect.
edit: And to answer your question, CLS was my first choice coming into the cycle, but I think a HLS acceptance would make me think twice about that for sure.

Last edited by blue5385 on Tue Apr 13, 2010 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:11 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
It is definitely biological. Women are wired to be attracted to men 5/6 inches taller. Men prefer women 4 inches shorter than them on average. I mean if anything the fact that men like women who have a .7 hip to waist ratio on average should tell you that our mate preferences are biological. This is all cross-cultural.blue5385 wrote:There's some kind of biological factor involved, too. I remember reading an article that said women were genetically wired to be most attracted to men who were their height multiplied by 1.xx (don't remember what the exact number was). I think it worked out to ~6 in. for most heights.creatinganalt wrote:Hahaha! I know it's weird and we're all being brainwashed by patriarchy but it still feels funny when some guy is shorter than you!blue5385 wrote:haha thanks! I think 6'2" is a good height for a guy too actually -- it's a big enough height difference that I can wear heels without the awkward 'I'm taller than my boyfriend' effect.
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
I'm inferring he doesn't have killer 8-pack abs.ConMan345 wrote:I'd give him a P (as in "pass").clyde_barrow wrote:what was that about JR's large foggy middle, conman?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ConMan345
- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I would be shocked if he did, yes.blue5385 wrote:I'm inferring he doesn't have killer 8-pack abs.ConMan345 wrote:I'd give him a P (as in "pass").clyde_barrow wrote:what was that about JR's large foggy middle, conman?
He looks slightly younger and slimmer in person than he does in that picture.
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I know how you feel. The dreaming hasn't helped. I have the Hamilton but can't quite want it because I want DC. Are you worried about the people at Columbia at all? Part of me can't shake the idea that Harvard/DC is more 'me' and NY is not.blue5385 wrote:There's some kind of biological factor involved, too. I remember reading an article that said women were genetically wired to be most attracted to men who were their height multiplied by 1.xx (don't remember what the exact number was). I think it worked out to ~6 in. for most heights.creatinganalt wrote:Hahaha! I know it's weird and we're all being brainwashed by patriarchy but it still feels funny when some guy is shorter than you!blue5385 wrote:haha thanks! I think 6'2" is a good height for a guy too actually -- it's a big enough height difference that I can wear heels without the awkward 'I'm taller than my boyfriend' effect.
edit: And to answer your question, CLS was my first choice coming into the cycle, but I think a HLS acceptance would make me think twice about that for sure.I guess the way I feel about it is that I would go if accepted, but I'm wary of mentally making it my 'first choice' since the odds are so small that I'll actually get in.
I see! I know I am 5'6'', last boyf was 5'10'' and he felt a bit short.MichelledeMontaigne wrote:It is definitely biological. Women are wired to be attracted to men 5/6 inches taller. Men prefer women 4 inches shorter than them on average. I mean if anything the fact that men like women who have a .7 hip to waist ratio on average should tell you that our mate preferences are biological. This is all cross-cultural.blue5385 wrote:There's some kind of biological factor involved, too. I remember reading an article that said women were genetically wired to be most attracted to men who were their height multiplied by 1.xx (don't remember what the exact number was). I think it worked out to ~6 in. for most heights.creatinganalt wrote:Hahaha! I know it's weird and we're all being brainwashed by patriarchy but it still feels funny when some guy is shorter than you!blue5385 wrote:haha thanks! I think 6'2" is a good height for a guy too actually -- it's a big enough height difference that I can wear heels without the awkward 'I'm taller than my boyfriend' effect.
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
this whole conversation is a bit surrealConMan345 wrote:I would be shocked if he did, yes.blue5385 wrote:I'm inferring he doesn't have killer 8-pack abs.ConMan345 wrote:I'd give him a P (as in "pass").clyde_barrow wrote:what was that about JR's large foggy middle, conman?
He looks slightly younger and slimmer in person than he does in that picture.
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Both the prospective & the current students I met at the CLS ASW were friendly (even though there were a couple of pretty annoying admitted students, haha). I'm not really worried about the people there -- I sat in on a couple classes and the people in them didn't seem gunner-esque or extremely competitive. A couple people answered questions wrong and other people didn't rush to correct them, and people seemed ok with admitting they were uncertain about an issue. I feel the opposite of you in that NY is more 'me' and Harvard isn't.creatinganalt wrote:Are you worried about the people at Columbia at all? Part of me can't shake the idea that Harvard/DC is more 'me' and NY is not.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
He isn't very old, is he? He's HLS '06, so that would put him in his early thirties unless he had a long stretch of WE after college.ConMan345 wrote:I would be shocked if he did, yes.blue5385 wrote:I'm inferring he doesn't have killer 8-pack abs.ConMan345 wrote:I'd give him a P (as in "pass").clyde_barrow wrote:what was that about JR's large foggy middle, conman?
He looks slightly younger and slimmer in person than he does in that picture.
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I wish I could have gotten to the ASWs but am in the UK (on that note I have to go to bed as it is GMT+5 where I am LOL). I think I am just being carried away by TLS and the reality is that the diff won't be enough to make a difference. Lived in NY and liked it but like Boston a lot more. Like DC a lot more than Boston as well so want to maximise my chances in that market.blue5385 wrote:Both the prospective & the current students I met at the CLS ASW were friendly (even though there were a couple of pretty annoying admitted students, haha). I'm not really worried about the people there -- I sat in on a couple classes and the people in them didn't seem gunner-esque or extremely competitive. A couple people answered questions wrong and other people didn't rush to correct them, and people seemed ok with admitting they were uncertain about an issue. I feel the opposite of you in that NY is more 'me' and Harvard isn't.creatinganalt wrote:Are you worried about the people at Columbia at all? Part of me can't shake the idea that Harvard/DC is more 'me' and NY is not.
- Boba Fett
- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:09 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
He's one ugly mofo. He's got that Learned Brow thing going on:ConMan345 wrote:--ImageRemoved--

-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
So conman - did you spot a wedding ring? (since we've abandoned any pretense at detachment?)
Edit: ^ LOL!
Edit: ^ LOL!
Last edited by creatinganalt on Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Well if you've lived in all of those cities, you're in a great position to evaluate which school would be the best fit for you based on location. Either CLS or HLS would probably get you a job in DC, but HLS obviously transcends CLS in markets other than NY.creatinganalt wrote:I wish I could have gotten to the ASWs but am in the UK (on that note I have to go to bed as it is GMT+5 where I am LOL). I think I am just being carried away by TLS and the reality is that the diff won't be enough to make a difference. Lived in NY and liked it but like Boston a lot more. Like DC a lot more than Boston as well so want to maximise my chances in that market.
and lol @ your wedding ring comment
- soonergirl
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 12:26 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I sure hope you mean a .7 waist-to-hip ratio. Either that or I'd better start eating a lot more.MichelledeMontaigne wrote:I mean if anything the fact that men like women who have a .7 hip to waist ratio...
(see, Harvard?? I'm good at math, too! You should soooo let me in!)
-
- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
hahaha, I really hope not a .7 HTW ratio, that would be the most awkward apple shape imaginablesoonergirl wrote:I sure hope you mean a .7 waist-to-hip ratio. Either that or I'd better start eating a lot more.MichelledeMontaigne wrote:I mean if anything the fact that men like women who have a .7 hip to waist ratio...
(see, Harvard?? I'm good at math, too! You should soooo let me in!)
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
hahahaha.blue5385 wrote:hahaha, I really hope not a .7 HTW ratio, that would be the most awkward apple shape imaginablesoonergirl wrote:I sure hope you mean a .7 waist-to-hip ratio. Either that or I'd better start eating a lot more.MichelledeMontaigne wrote:I mean if anything the fact that men like women who have a .7 hip to waist ratio...
(see, Harvard?? I'm good at math, too! You should soooo let me in!)
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login