I think I still would.blue5385 wrote:He's cute, it's a nerdy/bad pic thoughConMan345 wrote:--ImageRemoved--
Harvard 2010! Forum
-
creatinganalt

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
+1, the only problem is that he looks potentially short and I'm tall for a girl.creatinganalt wrote:I think I still would.blue5385 wrote:He's cute, it's a nerdy/bad pic thoughConMan345 wrote:--ImageRemoved--
-
creatinganalt

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
You're right. You might get away if under 5'8''. Any guy under 6 foot looks short to me.blue5385 wrote:+1, the only problem is that he looks potentially short and I'm tall for a girl.creatinganalt wrote:I think I still would.blue5385 wrote:He's cute, it's a nerdy/bad pic thoughConMan345 wrote:--ImageRemoved--
Truth is I'm only fussy about intelligence and he already has that so...
- ConMan345

- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
No, he's tall. I'm 6'2"-6'3" and I was looking him in the eye.
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Can't get away with it then, haha. Although, as long as a guy was taller than me I wouldn't be that picky about his height (just a little pissed that I couldn't wear heels when we were out together).creatinganalt wrote:You're right. You might get away if under 5'8''. Any guy under 6 foot looks short to me.
Truth is I'm only fussy about intelligence and he already has that so...
And yeah, in a battle of height v. intelligence you'd have to be crazy not to pick intelligence.
edit: hooray for ConMan's post above
-
creatinganalt

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Wow you are tall! I'm jealous. I'm 5'6'' and would love to be taller. As for JR, 6'2'' is always good. This is why it's probably good that I didn't get admitted before the ASW.
(Also I'm glad I have TLS or RL people would think I was insane when I tried to explain who JR was and why I think his voice is sexy.)
(Also I'm glad I have TLS or RL people would think I was insane when I tried to explain who JR was and why I think his voice is sexy.)
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
haha thanks! I think 6'2" is a good height for a guy too actually -- it's a big enough height difference that I can wear heels without the awkward 'I'm taller than my boyfriend' effect.
- clyde_barrow

- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Sep 23, 2009 3:33 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
what was that about JR's large foggy middle, conman? 
-
creatinganalt

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Hahaha! I know it's weird and we're all being brainwashed by patriarchy but it still feels funny when some guy is shorter than you!blue5385 wrote:haha thanks! I think 6'2" is a good height for a guy too actually -- it's a big enough height difference that I can wear heels without the awkward 'I'm taller than my boyfriend' effect.
EDIT: Is H your first choice? Sorry, it's a long thread and I'm too lazy to look.
- ConMan345

- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I'd give him a P (as in "pass").clyde_barrow wrote:what was that about JR's large foggy middle, conman?
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
There's some kind of biological factor involved, too. I remember reading an article that said women were genetically wired to be most attracted to men who were their height multiplied by 1.xx (don't remember what the exact number was). I think it worked out to ~6 in. for most heights.creatinganalt wrote:Hahaha! I know it's weird and we're all being brainwashed by patriarchy but it still feels funny when some guy is shorter than you!blue5385 wrote:haha thanks! I think 6'2" is a good height for a guy too actually -- it's a big enough height difference that I can wear heels without the awkward 'I'm taller than my boyfriend' effect.
edit: And to answer your question, CLS was my first choice coming into the cycle, but I think a HLS acceptance would make me think twice about that for sure.
Last edited by blue5385 on Tue Apr 13, 2010 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
MichelledeMontaigne

- Posts: 40
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:11 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
It is definitely biological. Women are wired to be attracted to men 5/6 inches taller. Men prefer women 4 inches shorter than them on average. I mean if anything the fact that men like women who have a .7 hip to waist ratio on average should tell you that our mate preferences are biological. This is all cross-cultural.blue5385 wrote:There's some kind of biological factor involved, too. I remember reading an article that said women were genetically wired to be most attracted to men who were their height multiplied by 1.xx (don't remember what the exact number was). I think it worked out to ~6 in. for most heights.creatinganalt wrote:Hahaha! I know it's weird and we're all being brainwashed by patriarchy but it still feels funny when some guy is shorter than you!blue5385 wrote:haha thanks! I think 6'2" is a good height for a guy too actually -- it's a big enough height difference that I can wear heels without the awkward 'I'm taller than my boyfriend' effect.
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
I'm inferring he doesn't have killer 8-pack abs.ConMan345 wrote:I'd give him a P (as in "pass").clyde_barrow wrote:what was that about JR's large foggy middle, conman?
- ConMan345

- Posts: 577
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:08 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I would be shocked if he did, yes.blue5385 wrote:I'm inferring he doesn't have killer 8-pack abs.ConMan345 wrote:I'd give him a P (as in "pass").clyde_barrow wrote:what was that about JR's large foggy middle, conman?
He looks slightly younger and slimmer in person than he does in that picture.
-
creatinganalt

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I know how you feel. The dreaming hasn't helped. I have the Hamilton but can't quite want it because I want DC. Are you worried about the people at Columbia at all? Part of me can't shake the idea that Harvard/DC is more 'me' and NY is not.blue5385 wrote:There's some kind of biological factor involved, too. I remember reading an article that said women were genetically wired to be most attracted to men who were their height multiplied by 1.xx (don't remember what the exact number was). I think it worked out to ~6 in. for most heights.creatinganalt wrote:Hahaha! I know it's weird and we're all being brainwashed by patriarchy but it still feels funny when some guy is shorter than you!blue5385 wrote:haha thanks! I think 6'2" is a good height for a guy too actually -- it's a big enough height difference that I can wear heels without the awkward 'I'm taller than my boyfriend' effect.
edit: And to answer your question, CLS was my first choice coming into the cycle, but I think a HLS acceptance would make me think twice about that for sure.I guess the way I feel about it is that I would go if accepted, but I'm wary of mentally making it my 'first choice' since the odds are so small that I'll actually get in.
I see! I know I am 5'6'', last boyf was 5'10'' and he felt a bit short.MichelledeMontaigne wrote:It is definitely biological. Women are wired to be attracted to men 5/6 inches taller. Men prefer women 4 inches shorter than them on average. I mean if anything the fact that men like women who have a .7 hip to waist ratio on average should tell you that our mate preferences are biological. This is all cross-cultural.blue5385 wrote:There's some kind of biological factor involved, too. I remember reading an article that said women were genetically wired to be most attracted to men who were their height multiplied by 1.xx (don't remember what the exact number was). I think it worked out to ~6 in. for most heights.creatinganalt wrote:Hahaha! I know it's weird and we're all being brainwashed by patriarchy but it still feels funny when some guy is shorter than you!blue5385 wrote:haha thanks! I think 6'2" is a good height for a guy too actually -- it's a big enough height difference that I can wear heels without the awkward 'I'm taller than my boyfriend' effect.
-
creatinganalt

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
this whole conversation is a bit surrealConMan345 wrote:I would be shocked if he did, yes.blue5385 wrote:I'm inferring he doesn't have killer 8-pack abs.ConMan345 wrote:I'd give him a P (as in "pass").clyde_barrow wrote:what was that about JR's large foggy middle, conman?
He looks slightly younger and slimmer in person than he does in that picture.
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Both the prospective & the current students I met at the CLS ASW were friendly (even though there were a couple of pretty annoying admitted students, haha). I'm not really worried about the people there -- I sat in on a couple classes and the people in them didn't seem gunner-esque or extremely competitive. A couple people answered questions wrong and other people didn't rush to correct them, and people seemed ok with admitting they were uncertain about an issue. I feel the opposite of you in that NY is more 'me' and Harvard isn't.creatinganalt wrote:Are you worried about the people at Columbia at all? Part of me can't shake the idea that Harvard/DC is more 'me' and NY is not.
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
He isn't very old, is he? He's HLS '06, so that would put him in his early thirties unless he had a long stretch of WE after college.ConMan345 wrote:I would be shocked if he did, yes.blue5385 wrote:I'm inferring he doesn't have killer 8-pack abs.ConMan345 wrote:I'd give him a P (as in "pass").clyde_barrow wrote:what was that about JR's large foggy middle, conman?
He looks slightly younger and slimmer in person than he does in that picture.
-
creatinganalt

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I wish I could have gotten to the ASWs but am in the UK (on that note I have to go to bed as it is GMT+5 where I am LOL). I think I am just being carried away by TLS and the reality is that the diff won't be enough to make a difference. Lived in NY and liked it but like Boston a lot more. Like DC a lot more than Boston as well so want to maximise my chances in that market.blue5385 wrote:Both the prospective & the current students I met at the CLS ASW were friendly (even though there were a couple of pretty annoying admitted students, haha). I'm not really worried about the people there -- I sat in on a couple classes and the people in them didn't seem gunner-esque or extremely competitive. A couple people answered questions wrong and other people didn't rush to correct them, and people seemed ok with admitting they were uncertain about an issue. I feel the opposite of you in that NY is more 'me' and Harvard isn't.creatinganalt wrote:Are you worried about the people at Columbia at all? Part of me can't shake the idea that Harvard/DC is more 'me' and NY is not.
- Boba Fett

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Mar 30, 2010 5:09 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
He's one ugly mofo. He's got that Learned Brow thing going on:ConMan345 wrote:--ImageRemoved--

-
creatinganalt

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
So conman - did you spot a wedding ring? (since we've abandoned any pretense at detachment?)
Edit: ^ LOL!
Edit: ^ LOL!
Last edited by creatinganalt on Tue Apr 13, 2010 7:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Well if you've lived in all of those cities, you're in a great position to evaluate which school would be the best fit for you based on location. Either CLS or HLS would probably get you a job in DC, but HLS obviously transcends CLS in markets other than NY.creatinganalt wrote:I wish I could have gotten to the ASWs but am in the UK (on that note I have to go to bed as it is GMT+5 where I am LOL). I think I am just being carried away by TLS and the reality is that the diff won't be enough to make a difference. Lived in NY and liked it but like Boston a lot more. Like DC a lot more than Boston as well so want to maximise my chances in that market.
and lol @ your wedding ring comment
- soonergirl

- Posts: 311
- Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2010 12:26 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I sure hope you mean a .7 waist-to-hip ratio. Either that or I'd better start eating a lot more.MichelledeMontaigne wrote:I mean if anything the fact that men like women who have a .7 hip to waist ratio...
(see, Harvard?? I'm good at math, too! You should soooo let me in!)
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
hahaha, I really hope not a .7 HTW ratio, that would be the most awkward apple shape imaginablesoonergirl wrote:I sure hope you mean a .7 waist-to-hip ratio. Either that or I'd better start eating a lot more.MichelledeMontaigne wrote:I mean if anything the fact that men like women who have a .7 hip to waist ratio...
(see, Harvard?? I'm good at math, too! You should soooo let me in!)
-
creatinganalt

- Posts: 212
- Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
hahahaha.blue5385 wrote:hahaha, I really hope not a .7 HTW ratio, that would be the most awkward apple shape imaginablesoonergirl wrote:I sure hope you mean a .7 waist-to-hip ratio. Either that or I'd better start eating a lot more.MichelledeMontaigne wrote:I mean if anything the fact that men like women who have a .7 hip to waist ratio...
(see, Harvard?? I'm good at math, too! You should soooo let me in!)