even though i got in, this is one of the reasons I dislike GW. For some reason it just irks me that they would use such a strong cutoff...skitlets wrote:Does look like a big drop off below 168. I'm a 3.3x, 168 and was accepted. Crazy that people with a 167 and a much higher gpa are getting waitlisted.
GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- T00L
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Fri Oct 28, 2011 3:35 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
-
- Posts: 55
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 1:57 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Wow, I got accepted. 164/3.8 I guess I'm a splitter. I got an email saying I was in consideration for a merit scholarship. Not sure what their angle is.
-
- Posts: 2166
- Joined: Sun Jan 08, 2012 11:09 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
/
Last edited by hoos89 on Sat Apr 11, 2015 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- luxxe
- Posts: 830
- Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 11:12 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
They have accepted a lot of people with 3.8+/168+, they aren't YPing 167s.hoos89 wrote:Unless you're a URM that is weird. I saw plenty of 167s with good GPAs get w/led today. Maybe they're YPing?lndixon wrote:Wow, I got accepted. 164/3.8 I guess I'm a splitter. I got an email saying I was in consideration for a merit scholarship. Not sure what their angle is.
- law4vus
- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Especially since last year's medians are 3.83 and 167.luxxe wrote:They have accepted a lot of people with 3.8+/168+, they aren't YPing 167s.hoos89 wrote:Unless you're a URM that is weird. I saw plenty of 167s with good GPAs get w/led today. Maybe they're YPing?lndixon wrote:Wow, I got accepted. 164/3.8 I guess I'm a splitter. I got an email saying I was in consideration for a merit scholarship. Not sure what their angle is.
They're pushing hard to up their median LSAT to 168 like WUSTL did last year. Only problem is those numbers border T14 territory and many students would rather go to a T14 or elsewhere rather than a overpriced school in an overpriced, large market. I think they will eventually have to let a lot of 167s off of the waitlist.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 89
- Joined: Fri Mar 11, 2011 10:30 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Or offer a lot of money.
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I think the fin aid council starts sending all that out this month... so we will seeunitedfrutopia wrote:Or offer a lot of money.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 11:42 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Waitlisted 12/16. Submitted 11/15. 165/3.48
I think I will be staying on the list for a while. Does anyone know what the deal is with sending a letter of continued interest?
I think I will be staying on the list for a while. Does anyone know what the deal is with sending a letter of continued interest?
- avd90
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:26 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In via mail. No status update since going complete 1/19. Contained a nice (though illegible) note from the dean.
- crumpledq
- Posts: 335
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 5:28 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
It seems from my perusal of this thread that scholarship offers have not come out yet, and do not come with the admittance letter. Is that correct?
- msblaw89
- Posts: 2662
- Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2011 6:10 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yes, 100%crumpledq wrote:It seems from my perusal of this thread that scholarship offers have not come out yet, and do not come with the admittance letter. Is that correct?
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 4:45 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Nice! I'm a 1/19 complete date too soavd90 wrote:In via mail. No status update since going complete 1/19. Contained a nice (though illegible) note from the dean.
hopefully i hear back soon too. Congrats.
- law4vus
- Posts: 743
- Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2011 11:35 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Just send it to 2000 H St NW Washington, DC 20052. The mailroom here will separate it out to the admissions office.mja330 wrote:Waitlisted 12/16. Submitted 11/15. 165/3.48
I think I will be staying on the list for a while. Does anyone know what the deal is with sending a letter of continued interest?
And yeah, I'd recommend sending it via mail as opposed to email.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- moxy
- Posts: 482
- Joined: Sat Dec 24, 2011 3:00 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1, Same complete date .. although I might be a W/L and may have to wait longer to hear from GWRoseMVP wrote:Nice! I'm a 1/19 complete date too soavd90 wrote:In via mail. No status update since going complete 1/19. Contained a nice (though illegible) note from the dean.
hopefully i hear back soon too. Congrats.
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:04 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
.
Last edited by Leighmak on Wed May 16, 2012 2:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2011 12:38 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In, illegible note and all. First accept, feeling awesome about it.
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Sun Oct 25, 2009 4:21 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Sophia Sim? Yeah, I had to decipher her handwriting. At the end it was "I hope you stay in the area and join us!"
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- avd90
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2011 7:26 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
still no idea, had 5 friends look at it.Minesweeper wrote:Sophia Sim? Yeah, I had to decipher her handwriting. At the end it was "I hope you stay in the area and join us!"
- woodscommaL
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:14 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I got a packet today. if I had gotten a scholly would it have been in there? or do they come later?
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:12 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Later. No merit scholarships have been decided/awarded yet.woodscommaL wrote:I got a packet today. if I had gotten a scholly would it have been in there? or do they come later?
- abstract
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2011 11:08 am
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In via snail mail today. On a business trip to NYC, so husband had to read letter (and handwritten note) to me over phone. Very excited.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- woodscommaL
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2011 1:14 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
yayyy. not that I'm expecting monies from Gdub, but it'd be a nice gesture.zylaxice wrote:Later. No merit scholarships have been decided/awarded yet.woodscommaL wrote:I got a packet today. if I had gotten a scholly would it have been in there? or do they come later?
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 1:10 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
In via mail today. I went complete on 1/19 as well with no updates. There was a note from asst. Dean at the bottom of the letter. Single envelope...I thought I was rejected!
- clarion
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Tue Nov 08, 2011 5:53 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Finally got my fancy admit packet in the mail today. Being interested in both IP and International Law, GW is very near to the top of my list (along with GULC), so now I just need to wait and see if my email was enough to get them to give me some money
Good luck everyone else!

- gavinstevens
- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu May 13, 2010 6:17 pm
Re: GW c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
+1law4vus wrote: They're pushing hard to up their median LSAT to 168 like WUSTL did last year. Only problem is those numbers border T14 territory and many students would rather go to a T14 or elsewhere rather than a overpriced school in an overpriced, large market.
Seems that a lot of GW's median admits also get into Cornell/GULC/Vandy/Texas, etc.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login