Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
- Assasindowntheavenue
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2016 6:45 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Sorry to be that guy, but you do have to interview to be admitted right?
- dddddd90
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2016 3:55 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Depends on how behind they are. But yeah, they're trying to pretend they're not 100% numbers drivenAssasindowntheavenue wrote:Sorry to be that guy, but you do have to interview to be admitted right?

-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:54 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
RC was my best cold...then -5 on the actual, worse than any practice test (n > 10)
Really could have used a couple extra questions to bump up my 171 a few notches

Really could have used a couple extra questions to bump up my 171 a few notches
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Logical reasoning was my best section but I would pick games over RC any day.ashrice13 wrote:+180. Just about to write the same thingjjcorvino wrote:What kind of black magic is this? Who actually is best at RC?!chasima wrote:Noooo logic games is my worst section!!!!!suitsandpotions wrote:At this point I would def be down for that.haley12 wrote:My theory is that they'll put us all in a dome, hunger games style, and just let us fight it out. Maybe with some logic game elimination rounds.seeprybyrun wrote:My pet theory is that there are still a few slots left and they're having a deathmatch to see which adcomms get their favorites in.KaijuOh8 wrote:My current theory is that the adcoms, (apparently) very behind on their WL/rejection emails, are planning to send out everything at once tomorrow. They are taking this long because they have thousands of emails to send out and are making sure no one receives the wrong message by scrolling through the lists of recipients. Either that, or somebody made a mistake and they had to reenter all recipients all over again.
*blends in with mud & leaves peeta-style until RC rounds begin*
- jjcorvino
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
chasima wrote:IDK I DON'T UNDERSTAND IT EITHERjjcorvino wrote:What kind of black magic is this? Who actually is best at RC?!chasima wrote:Noooo logic games is my worst section!!!!!suitsandpotions wrote:At this point I would def be down for that.haley12 wrote:My theory is that they'll put us all in a dome, hunger games style, and just let us fight it out. Maybe with some logic game elimination rounds.seeprybyrun wrote:My pet theory is that there are still a few slots left and they're having a deathmatch to see which adcomms get their favorites in.KaijuOh8 wrote:My current theory is that the adcoms, (apparently) very behind on their WL/rejection emails, are planning to send out everything at once tomorrow. They are taking this long because they have thousands of emails to send out and are making sure no one receives the wrong message by scrolling through the lists of recipients. Either that, or somebody made a mistake and they had to reenter all recipients all over again.
*blends in with mud & leaves peeta-style until RC rounds begin*

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Thu Jan 19, 2017 5:46 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Do you have to wait to receive email account info before applying for finaid? Sorry, I am still a bit confused about the aid application process even after looking at the website
- KaijuOh8
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Yes. No need to feel sorry - just turn down the offer when you get JS1 or JS2 and we will gladly forgive you. Well, I don't know about others. But I will.Assasindowntheavenue wrote:Sorry to be that guy, but you do have to interview to be admitted right?

-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:54 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
My pet theory is that there are still a few slots left and they're having a deathmatch to see which adcomms get their favorites in.[/quote]
My theory is that they'll put us all in a dome, hunger games style, and just let us fight it out. Maybe with some logic game elimination rounds.[/quote]
At this point I would def be down for that.[/quote]
Noooo logic games is my worst section!!!!!
*blends in with mud & leaves peeta-style until RC rounds begin*[/quote]
What kind of black magic is this? Who actually is best at RC?![/quote]
+180. Just about to write the same thing[/quote]
Logical reasoning was my best section but I would pick games over RC any day.[/quote]
Anyone else HATE the "which sentence summarizes the main point" questions? Should be easy but we're always my worst questions
My theory is that they'll put us all in a dome, hunger games style, and just let us fight it out. Maybe with some logic game elimination rounds.[/quote]
At this point I would def be down for that.[/quote]
Noooo logic games is my worst section!!!!!
*blends in with mud & leaves peeta-style until RC rounds begin*[/quote]
What kind of black magic is this? Who actually is best at RC?![/quote]
+180. Just about to write the same thing[/quote]
Logical reasoning was my best section but I would pick games over RC any day.[/quote]
Anyone else HATE the "which sentence summarizes the main point" questions? Should be easy but we're always my worst questions
- Smc1994
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Even though it's difficult to remain that optimistic, I certainly appreciate all you do for us waitersPozzo wrote:FB page up to 563. Looking at the past couple classes, they get to about 800. I'm sure there are admits who need to be added yet, but it seems like another JS2 wave isn't *totally* out of the question.
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:29 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
+1Smc1994 wrote:Even though it's difficult to remain that optimistic, I certainly appreciate all you do for us waitersPozzo wrote:FB page up to 563. Looking at the past couple classes, they get to about 800. I'm sure there are admits who need to be added yet, but it seems like another JS2 wave isn't *totally* out of the question.
I just find it unbelievable that it'll top out around 600 instead of 800 this year
& statistically they have to start admitting LSAT<25 at some point, which doesn't seem to have happened much in previous waves
/fingers crossed
-
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 4:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
pupperlover wrote:Do you have to wait to receive email account info before applying for finaid? Sorry, I am still a bit confused about the aid application process even after looking at the website
Most of us are either on here to cope with anxiety from waiting for a js2, waitlist, or a ding. Now is prob not the best time to post on this page about the financial aid papers that you need lmaoooo

-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I was you a week ago. I stand with every waiter.Smc1994 wrote:Even though it's difficult to remain that optimistic, I certainly appreciate all you do for us waitersPozzo wrote:FB page up to 563. Looking at the past couple classes, they get to about 800. I'm sure there are admits who need to be added yet, but it seems like another JS2 wave isn't *totally* out of the question.
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2015 11:03 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
it took me months just to be able to finish all the games on a PT even though my lsat instructor would always be like "logic games are so easy, you don't even have to study for them!"
i am that child in the hunger games that dies on night 1 and no one will ever remember again

Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- KaijuOh8
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Since LSAT seems to be the fad atm... I was not a big fan of AR sections. Not because it's difficult, but because that section seemed to be the section most liable to curveballs.
Naturally, I wasn"t happy when I saw the AR section. Turns out the June 2016 LSAT contained only linear and grouping games. Had 10 minutes left, and I was fine with RC too (had 5 minutes left). Thought I finally dominated the test. Then I found out I was destroyed in the first LR section. Sigh.
Naturally, I wasn"t happy when I saw the AR section. Turns out the June 2016 LSAT contained only linear and grouping games. Had 10 minutes left, and I was fine with RC too (had 5 minutes left). Thought I finally dominated the test. Then I found out I was destroyed in the first LR section. Sigh.
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2015 11:03 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
POZZO FOR TLS PRESIDENT!!! a 0L for the peoplePozzo wrote:I was you a week ago. I stand with every waiter.Smc1994 wrote:Even though it's difficult to remain that optimistic, I certainly appreciate all you do for us waitersPozzo wrote:FB page up to 563. Looking at the past couple classes, they get to about 800. I'm sure there are admits who need to be added yet, but it seems like another JS2 wave isn't *totally* out of the question.
- jjcorvino
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Atleast you made it to night one! Half of the contestants seem to die in the first minute.chasima wrote:it took me months just to be able to finish all the games on a PT even though my lsat instructor would always be like "logic games are so easy, you don't even have to study for them!"i am that child in the hunger games that dies on night 1 and no one will ever remember again

- KaijuOh8
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Each to his or her own, so...chasima wrote:it took me months just to be able to finish all the games on a PT even though my lsat instructor would always be like "logic games are so easy, you don't even have to study for them!"i am that child in the hunger games that dies on night 1 and no one will ever remember again
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2015 11:03 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
RIGHT. like, my biggest thing is that if you mess up on 1 rule on a game then you mess up like 5 questions at once. and they have weird games!KaijuOh8 wrote:Since LSAT seems to be the fad atm... I was not a big fan of AR sections. Not because it's difficult, but because that section seemed to be the section most liable to curveballs.
Naturally, I wasn"t happy when I saw the AR section. Turns out the June 2016 LSAT contained only linear and grouping games. Had 10 minutes left, and I was fine with RC too (had 5 minutes left). Thought I finally dominated the test. Then I found out I was destroyed in the first LR section. Sigh.
-
- Posts: 244
- Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2016 10:11 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
What is AR?KaijuOh8 wrote:Since LSAT seems to be the fad atm... I was not a big fan of AR sections. Not because it's difficult, but because that section seemed to be the section most liable to curveballs.
Naturally, I wasn"t happy when I saw the AR section. Turns out the June 2016 LSAT contained only linear and grouping games. Had 10 minutes left, and I was fine with RC too (had 5 minutes left). Thought I finally dominated the test. Then I found out I was destroyed in the first LR section. Sigh.
- KateMcKitten
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 1:07 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Where do I join the campaign teamchasima wrote:POZZO FOR TLS PRESIDENT!!! a 0L for the peoplePozzo wrote:I was you a week ago. I stand with every waiter.Smc1994 wrote:Even though it's difficult to remain that optimistic, I certainly appreciate all you do for us waitersPozzo wrote:FB page up to 563. Looking at the past couple classes, they get to about 800. I'm sure there are admits who need to be added yet, but it seems like another JS2 wave isn't *totally* out of the question.
- KaijuOh8
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Analytical Reasoning (aka Logic Games)VapidP wrote:What is AR?KaijuOh8 wrote:Since LSAT seems to be the fad atm... I was not a big fan of AR sections. Not because it's difficult, but because that section seemed to be the section most liable to curveballs.
Naturally, I wasn"t happy when I saw the AR section. Turns out the June 2016 LSAT contained only linear and grouping games. Had 10 minutes left, and I was fine with RC too (had 5 minutes left). Thought I finally dominated the test. Then I found out I was destroyed in the first LR section. Sigh.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- KateMcKitten
- Posts: 353
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 1:07 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Hey pupper let's go to http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=274102 to discuss doggo fundingsuitsandpotions wrote:pupperlover wrote:Do you have to wait to receive email account info before applying for finaid? Sorry, I am still a bit confused about the aid application process even after looking at the website
Most of us are either on here to cope with anxiety from waiting for a js2, waitlist, or a ding. Now is prob not the best time to post on this page about the financial aid papers that you need lmaoooo
- Smc1994
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Tue Jan 12, 2016 5:58 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Actually, that would be a demotion. He's already our Lorax.KateMcKitten wrote:Where do I join the campaign teamchasima wrote:POZZO FOR TLS PRESIDENT!!! a 0L for the peoplePozzo wrote:I was you a week ago. I stand with every waiter.Smc1994 wrote:Even though it's difficult to remain that optimistic, I certainly appreciate all you do for us waitersPozzo wrote:FB page up to 563. Looking at the past couple classes, they get to about 800. I'm sure there are admits who need to be added yet, but it seems like another JS2 wave isn't *totally* out of the question.
-
- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Do we really expect a school that just started taking the GRE to put so much faith in a branch of the LSAT?
-
- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
chasima wrote:POZZO FOR TLS PRESIDENT!!! a 0L for the peoplePozzo wrote:I was you a week ago. I stand with every waiter.Smc1994 wrote:Even though it's difficult to remain that optimistic, I certainly appreciate all you do for us waitersPozzo wrote:FB page up to 563. Looking at the past couple classes, they get to about 800. I'm sure there are admits who need to be added yet, but it seems like another JS2 wave isn't *totally* out of the question.

Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login