I see.drawstring wrote:yep nepneprep wrote:Draw's referring to the previous cycle, I think.bbkk wrote:drawstring wrote:Does anyone know if there were different rates of acceptance between KB1s and JS1s? I wonder if certain interviewers are more likely to get favorable impressions of candidates.I thought there is no more KB? Or now we are referring all non-JS interviewers as KB1?
Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- bbkk

- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
We can both help you keep that 173, JSlawschool22 wrote:ftfydrawstring wrote:Well I'm hoping that they're still concerned about LSAT medians!
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Ya, although it's the same idea (is JS a more favorable interviewer than the others, etc.).
- neprep

- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I think the perception people had was that JS ensured that the interview proceeded organically from the application, whereas the other interviewers were more formal in that they seemed to have a list of impersonal questions. I don't think this would actually affect the outcome of the interview, unless the interviewee is particularly averse to either approach so much so as to underperform.drawstring wrote:Ya, although it's the same idea (is JS a more favorable interviewer than the others, etc.).
-
staples88

- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:50 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Oops I didn't write what I drafted: yes there are ppl like kingsfield and mort every year but the timing might be telling. He heard back in the 3rd wave, in Jan instead of April or Aug. If hls were worried about maintaining their 173, wouldn't they, as you theorized a few months ago, wait til April or Aug to see how the pool and yield plays out?lawschool22 wrote:Idk, I prefer to look at these sorts of things as a glass half full mentality. You're correct that by admitting nep it could mean our odds are worse, or it could be an indicator that they are needing some median LSATs, and there are more acceptances to come for 173s. We don't know the answer, so I choose to believe its the latterstaples88 wrote:
Although the first 2 reasons are great, I'm actually curious about 3 because I can see it going both ways. There's "a guy with similar, maybe slightly better numbers got in, so I have a chance." But I think this is more appropriate when we see someone like binarytheatrics (4/174). When those w/o those types of numbers like you and me are speculating, don't you think an acceptance like neprep's (congrats) could just as well mean our own odds are worse because now that they've helped their LSAT median, they might look to "balance" him with an above-median GPA.
Also, their taking someone like Mort this early (congrats) could mean not only does he have a unique profile, but also that they're not too concerned about maintaining their LSAT
Also iirc the average HYP hls admit has a 3.7 so it can't be that different. There's also the idea of a floor (I.e., <25 GPA is OK, but not if it's below the floor). As far as accepting Mort, I don't think that indicates they aren't concerned about maintaining their LSAT. Every year they admit plenty of people below the 25th percentile LSAT who have unique profiles. Mort's acceptance is great for Mort (obviously), and in some small way, good for splitters, because now they need a median or above LSAT to balance that out.
In any case this is all micro stuff, I don't know that we can say with near certainty what any of it means, so I choose to be on the optimistic side until HLS tells me otherwise
Edit: This post # was my birth year, so I just wanted to come back and acknowledge that for luck. Anything at this point lol.
And Mort was below both medians so he was probably already balanced by someone like binarytheatrics who was above both. Otherwise they'd have to take 2 apps, a splitter and a reverse splitter.
And what I meant to say (a minor point) a few posts ago was that YUG and PUG report that the average hls admit from their schools has about a 3.7. It can't be that different for neprep's top 10 UG.
Last edited by staples88 on Fri Jan 24, 2014 7:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- pokemonsters

- Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Dec 09, 2013 1:58 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
So, no calls today. Looks like this wave is done. Any guesses on when we'll see more JS2's? Im guessing mid-February.
- midwest17

- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
A below-both, a reverse splitter, and a splitter don't balance, unfortunately.staples88 wrote:And Mort was below both medians so he was probably already balanced by someone like binarytheatrics who was above both. Otherwise they'd have to take 2 apps, a splitter and a reverse splitter.
- selden

- Posts: 97
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 10:27 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
They could...but I see what you're saying.midwest17 wrote:A below-both, a reverse splitter, and a splitter don't balance, unfortunately.staples88 wrote:And Mort was below both medians so he was probably already balanced by someone like binarytheatrics who was above both. Otherwise they'd have to take 2 apps, a splitter and a reverse splitter.
-
staples88

- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:50 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Lol Yea which is more reason to think that they're more likely to balance a below-both with an above both than a splitter.midwest17 wrote:A below-both, a reverse splitter, and a splitter don't balance, unfortunately.staples88 wrote:And Mort was below both medians so he was probably already balanced by someone like binarytheatrics who was above both. Otherwise they'd have to take 2 apps, a splitter and a reverse splitter.
- Optimist Prime

- Posts: 200
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:28 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Hey Draw, if you don't mind me asking, any reason for the lack of hope other than the long post JS1 wait? Seems like according to LSN you should be a lock. Did you accidentally stand up while not wear pants during the interview?drawstring wrote:omg
I have like nearly identical numbers too and interviewed a bit later. Hope is back.
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
It's pretty much just the long wait and seeing so many people get accepted with similar or worse numbers even though they interviewed much later. It makes me think that there is something about my application they don't like, even though nothing really stood out to me as being that detrimental; I thought my interview was ok, I don't have CF issues, I don't have crappy softs, and my PS wasn't crazy or anything like that.Optimist Prime wrote:Hey Draw, if you don't mind me asking, any reason for the lack of hope other than the long post JS1 wait? Seems like according to LSN you should be a lock. Did you accidentally stand up while not wear pants during the interview?drawstring wrote:omg
I have like nearly identical numbers too and interviewed a bit later. Hope is back.
- Jessasaurus

- Posts: 289
- Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2013 4:02 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
SUPER THIS. Although I would have never found TLS if I didn't get a JS1. So it's a mixed bag for melawschool22 wrote:Good point. I miss the pre-JS1 days when I had forgotten about HLS the moment I submitted my app.barrelofmonkeys wrote:Let's be honest, I'll be pleasantly surprised if I get a JS2 no matter what.lawschool22 wrote:Haha. If we discuss the worst case scenario we can only be pleasantly surprised if we get JS2's.midwest17 wrote:So this discussion is fun and all, but where are our JS2s?
jk i love you all
-
edwardt1988

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
4.0 GPA is really impressive though, I'm sure they will take you. On the other hand, I don't think they need many more people with my numbers, and since I wasn't included in this wave, I think a waitlist is my best possible outcome. However, this past wave was still good because they accepted a bunch of you cool TLSers (Mort, who is going to inhert your "tomorrow?")drawstring wrote:It's pretty much just the long wait and seeing so many people get accepted with similar or worse numbers even though they interviewed much later. It makes me think that there is something about my application they don't like, even though nothing really stood out to me as being that detrimental; I thought my interview was ok, I don't have CF issues, I don't have crappy softs, and my PS wasn't crazy or anything like that.Optimist Prime wrote:Hey Draw, if you don't mind me asking, any reason for the lack of hope other than the long post JS1 wait? Seems like according to LSN you should be a lock. Did you accidentally stand up while not wear pants during the interview?drawstring wrote:omg
I have like nearly identical numbers too and interviewed a bit later. Hope is back.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Pau.C.

- Posts: 90
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 5:46 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by Pau.C. on Sun Jul 17, 2016 6:13 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- ShrimpToastMasters

- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Pau.C. wrote:This is what I think every day! (except I haven't even interviewed yet, and my softs are indeed crappy.)drawstring wrote:
It's pretty much just the long wait and seeing so many people get accepted with similar or worse numbers even though they interviewed much later. It makes me think that there is something about my application they don't like, even though nothing really stood out to me as being that detrimental; I thought my interview was ok, I don't have CF issues, I don't have crappy softs, and my PS wasn't crazy or anything like that.
+ a hundred million bajillion i-literally-cannot-express-how-much-this-is-my-feels
*(edit - should've quoted the original quote only, had JS1 in what feels like forever-ago, and have decent softs. decent. not outstanding.)
- ShrimpToastMasters

- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
deleted. too much toggling between threads.
Last edited by ShrimpToastMasters on Fri Jan 24, 2014 8:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Optimist Prime

- Posts: 200
- Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 6:28 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Got it, maybe JS wrote on the blog that she had checked behind her desk that day and there weren't any applications... because she checked the day before and found yours. Good luck, I'm sure it will come eventually.drawstring wrote:It's pretty much just the long wait and seeing so many people get accepted with similar or worse numbers even though they interviewed much later. It makes me think that there is something about my application they don't like, even though nothing really stood out to me as being that detrimental; I thought my interview was ok, I don't have CF issues, I don't have crappy softs, and my PS wasn't crazy or anything like that.Optimist Prime wrote:Hey Draw, if you don't mind me asking, any reason for the lack of hope other than the long post JS1 wait? Seems like according to LSN you should be a lock. Did you accidentally stand up while not wear pants during the interview?drawstring wrote:omg
I have like nearly identical numbers too and interviewed a bit later. Hope is back.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Wrong thread shrimpShrimpToastMasters wrote:Can we get info on stats from people who are RD, not why Penn? Thx. I'm at the WTF breaking point :/
- ShrimpToastMasters

- Posts: 411
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 9:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
notedlawschool22 wrote:Wrong thread shrimpShrimpToastMasters wrote:Can we get info on stats from people who are RD, not why Penn? Thx. I'm at the WTF breaking point :/
- iamgeorgebush

- Posts: 911
- Joined: Sat Oct 05, 2013 3:57 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Just stop there.jy9626 wrote:Stats are 174, 4.12.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Colorado10

- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Sep 28, 2010 12:49 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by Colorado10 on Fri Jan 24, 2014 11:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
watColorado10 wrote:If everyone at Harvard is as needy and hungry for attention as Mort, then damn, it would be quite a place to be for 3 years.
GTFO this thread.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Tell us how you really feel, koalakoalacity wrote:watColorado10 wrote:If everyone at Harvard is as needy and hungry for attention as Mort, then damn, it would be quite a place to be for 3 years.
GTFO this thread.
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
A wild troll appears!lawschool22 wrote:Tell us how you really feel, koalakoalacity wrote:watColorado10 wrote:If everyone at Harvard is as needy and hungry for attention as Mort, then damn, it would be quite a place to be for 3 years.
GTFO this thread.![]()
Koala uses GTFO attack.
It's super effective!
Enemy troll has fainted!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login