wtf? This is shocking to me.JamMasterJ wrote:priority reserve. 176/3.54
Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
- emkay625

- Posts: 1988
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
-
Curious1

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yeah wtf was that? Were you just totally careless about your app or did you send in a PS for Columbia?emkay625 wrote:wtf? This is shocking to me.JamMasterJ wrote:priority reserve. 176/3.54
- amc987

- Posts: 568
- Joined: Sat Aug 29, 2009 10:58 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Don't you think it's a little unfair to assume that JamMasterJ didn't send in quality materials just because he didn't get in via PT? Admissions is not an exact science. Maybe he just ran into the one adcomm who wasn't in love with his application and he got placed on the reserve list as a result. I'm sure it's happened (and will happen) to people with higher numbers than his at Duke and at other peer schools. That said, his LSAT is stellar and his GPA is alright so I'm sure he'll have a fine cycle.emkay625 wrote:Yeah wtf was that? Were you just totally careless about your app or did you send in a PS for Columbia?
-
Curious1

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Oh I wasn't assuming that--I was hoping that was the case, that way he can continue to perform at or above his numbers instead of below them.amc987 wrote:Don't you think it's a little unfair to assume that JamMasterJ didn't send in quality materials just because he didn't get in via PT? Admissions is not an exact science. Maybe he just ran into the one adcomm who wasn't in love with his application and he got placed on the reserve list as a result. I'm sure it's happened (and will happen) to people with higher numbers than his at Duke and at other peer schools. That said, his LSAT is stellar and his GPA is alright so I'm sure he'll have a fine cycle.emkay625 wrote:Yeah wtf was that? Were you just totally careless about your app or did you send in a PS for Columbia?
Sorry if it offended anyone. Not my intention.
- emkay625

- Posts: 1988
- Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
whoa.....i didn't post any of that. why is it attributed to me in the quote?amc987 wrote:Don't you think it's a little unfair to assume that JamMasterJ didn't send in quality materials just because he didn't get in via PT? Admissions is not an exact science. Maybe he just ran into the one adcomm who wasn't in love with his application and he got placed on the reserve list as a result. I'm sure it's happened (and will happen) to people with higher numbers than his at Duke and at other peer schools. That said, his LSAT is stellar and his GPA is alright so I'm sure he'll have a fine cycle.emkay625 wrote:Yeah wtf was that? Were you just totally careless about your app or did you send in a PS for Columbia?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Take Two

- Posts: 552
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:30 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Damn thats all sorts of cold and worries me more than a littleJamMasterJ wrote:priority reserve. 176/3.54
-
Curious1

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
He quoted the whole thing and deleted your post but left the [quote="emkay625emkay625 wrote:whoa.....i didn't post any of that. why is it attributed to me in the quote?amc987 wrote:Don't you think it's a little unfair to assume that JamMasterJ didn't send in quality materials just because he didn't get in via PT? Admissions is not an exact science. Maybe he just ran into the one adcomm who wasn't in love with his application and he got placed on the reserve list as a result. I'm sure it's happened (and will happen) to people with higher numbers than his at Duke and at other peer schools. That said, his LSAT is stellar and his GPA is alright so I'm sure he'll have a fine cycle.emkay625 wrote:Yeah wtf was that? Were you just totally careless about your app or did you send in a PS for Columbia?
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
lol. No, I wasn't careless, but my why Duke wasn't particularly great. I'm not assuming YP, based on the fact that someone with better numbers got in and also based on the fact that I've been in email conversation with a guy in the admissions office. So I doubt they thought I didn't give a fuck about them.emkay625 wrote:whoa.....i didn't post any of that. why is it attributed to me in the quote?amc987 wrote:Don't you think it's a little unfair to assume that JamMasterJ didn't send in quality materials just because he didn't get in via PT? Admissions is not an exact science. Maybe he just ran into the one adcomm who wasn't in love with his application and he got placed on the reserve list as a result. I'm sure it's happened (and will happen) to people with higher numbers than his at Duke and at other peer schools. That said, his LSAT is stellar and his GPA is alright so I'm sure he'll have a fine cycle.emkay625 wrote:Yeah wtf was that? Were you just totally careless about your app or did you send in a PS for Columbia?
amc, don't get so worked up. No one assumed anything. It's a common joke on TLS
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
meh. People with high numbers got WLd at Duke all the time. They are really into WLing splitters.Take Two wrote:Damn thats all sorts of cold and worries me more than a littleJamMasterJ wrote:priority reserve. 176/3.54
-
Curious1

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Duke was a safety for you anyway, but I feel your pain.JamMasterJ wrote:meh. People with high numbers got WLd at Duke all the time. They are really into WLing splitters.Take Two wrote:Damn thats all sorts of cold and worries me more than a littleJamMasterJ wrote:priority reserve. 176/3.54
See you at Columbia ASW?
- Take Two

- Posts: 552
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:30 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I appreciate your optimism, you're a cool dude J
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
hopefully not. I ED'd to Chicago, so hopefully I'll be withdrawn from everywhere else by that point. If I get rolled, though, then definitelyCurious1 wrote:Duke was a safety for you anyway, but I feel your pain.JamMasterJ wrote:meh. People with high numbers got WLd at Duke all the time. They are really into WLing splitters.Take Two wrote:Damn thats all sorts of cold and worries me more than a littleJamMasterJ wrote:priority reserve. 176/3.54
See you at Columbia ASW?
thanks, and gl to you. Though you're probably T6 secureTake Two wrote:I appreciate your optimism, you're a cool dude J
-
Curious1

- Posts: 952
- Joined: Sat Sep 03, 2011 7:54 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Chicago ASW then--though from the reputation of their students, it might be less fun.hopefully not. I ED'd to Chicago, so hopefully I'll be withdrawn from everywhere else by that point. If I get rolled, though, then definitely
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- FryBreadPower

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Eh, maybe that kid just wrote an absolute dynamite Why Duke?JamMasterJ wrote:lol. No, I wasn't careless, but my why Duke wasn't particularly great. I'm not assuming YP, based on the fact that someone with better numbers got in and also based on the fact that I've been in email conversation with a guy in the admissions office. So I doubt they thought I didn't give a fuck about them.emkay625 wrote:whoa.....i didn't post any of that. why is it attributed to me in the quote?amc987 wrote:Don't you think it's a little unfair to assume that JamMasterJ didn't send in quality materials just because he didn't get in via PT? Admissions is not an exact science. Maybe he just ran into the one adcomm who wasn't in love with his application and he got placed on the reserve list as a result. I'm sure it's happened (and will happen) to people with higher numbers than his at Duke and at other peer schools. That said, his LSAT is stellar and his GPA is alright so I'm sure he'll have a fine cycle.emkay625 wrote:Yeah wtf was that? Were you just totally careless about your app or did you send in a PS for Columbia?
amc, don't get so worked up. No one assumed anything. It's a common joke on TLS
I see better things in your future, I feel like this will be one of few blemishes during your cycle.
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
not as true as in the past. I have a couple 1L friends there who are really cool. The reputation is overblownCurious1 wrote:Chicago ASW then--though from the reputation of their students, it might be less fun.hopefully not. I ED'd to Chicago, so hopefully I'll be withdrawn from everywhere else by that point. If I get rolled, though, then definitely
ETA: thanks fry
-
AS33

- Posts: 173
- Joined: Thu Nov 10, 2011 3:01 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
What is YP?
-
anewaphorist

- Posts: 380
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:13 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yield Protection. I wonder, Jam, do you think the fact that you thrice took the LSAT had any effect? I ask bc it does seem so out of Duke's character to WL a strong applicant, but not one so strong that he is a shoo-in at HYSCC.
Last edited by anewaphorist on Sat Nov 12, 2011 1:54 am, edited 4 times in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- FryBreadPower

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
What is Duke's policy on multiple lsats?anewaphorist wrote:Yield Protection. I wonder, Jam, do you think the fact that you thrice took the LSAT had any effect?
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I doubt it. I think their policy is to WL a lot of splittersanewaphorist wrote:Yield Protection. I wonder, Jam, do you think the fact that you thrice took the LSAT had any effect? I ask bc it does seem so out of Duke's character to WL a strong applicant, but not one so strong that he is in a shoo-in at HYSCC.
-
thelawyler

- Posts: 941
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I am fully expecting to get WL as well.JamMasterJ wrote:I doubt it. I think their policy is to WL a lot of splittersanewaphorist wrote:Yield Protection. I wonder, Jam, do you think the fact that you thrice took the LSAT had any effect? I ask bc it does seem so out of Duke's character to WL a strong applicant, but not one so strong that he is in a shoo-in at HYSCC.
- tdicks

- Posts: 130
- Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2011 12:54 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
just checked back in with this thread and now it's making me really nervous... i went complete 11/9 and am under review now... it's going to be a long 5 days...
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
MumofCad

- Posts: 973
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 8:46 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't think PR is a WL exactly. I took it from LSN results to just mean essentially the same as Harvard's "hold." Not that you are on a WL, but that your application basically didn't receive a decision and will be re-evaluated with those that RD at a later date. I think that's why splitters get placed on it alot. From what I see from last year, most PR people get in, just later when regular decisions start coming out. I don't think its YPing. Its just they don't fit as easily into that 10 day processing guarantee as people with numbers above both medians or 75ths, so they need more time to evaluate them based on the entirety of the applications they receive.
-
TMC116

- Posts: 284
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 6:08 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I submitted 2 days ago, they should have my file completed no later than Nov 15. I'm right around both medians from last year
Do they get quickly back to those around the medians or just those way above their numbers?
When will i hear baacckk
Do they get quickly back to those around the medians or just those way above their numbers?
When will i hear baacckk
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
guys, I wouldn't get too freaked out.tdicks wrote:just checked back in with this thread and now it's making me really nervous... i went complete 11/9 and am under review now... it's going to be a long 5 days...
Also, thanks mumofcad. I've seen your comments in several applicants threads, and you've been one of the few sources of sanity lately.
- Take Two

- Posts: 552
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:30 am
Re: Duke c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I thought that was the point of TLS to get and express freakedoutness, my bad, hahaJamMasterJ wrote:guys, I wouldn't get too freaked out.tdicks wrote:just checked back in with this thread and now it's making me really nervous... i went complete 11/9 and am under review now... it's going to be a long 5 days...
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login