Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum
-
curiousgeorgia

- Posts: 291
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Sorry to jump in here with a kind of off-topic question, but does anyone know about how long or how often Chicago grants fee waivers? Applicants with similar numbers to mine (171, 3.9) have received such waivers, and when I contacted Chicago about it they said that they do not grant solicited waivers just ones automatically through CRS, but I still have not received one (October LSAT taker). Does this mean that they do not give them to everyone with a certain set of numbers, or just that I am incredibly impatient and need to wait it out? (Or both?)
- j12

- Posts: 169
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 3:41 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I did not get a Chicago waiver either, but I think you're better off getting your app in ASAP instead of waiting to save $80. I also believe that Chicago will reimburse your application fee if you later get a waiver. They sent out waivers a while ago, so I don't know how long you will be waiting for the potential of another waiver.curiousgeorgia wrote:Sorry to jump in here with a kind of off-topic question, but does anyone know about how long or how often Chicago grants fee waivers? Applicants with similar numbers to mine (171, 3.9) have received such waivers, and when I contacted Chicago about it they said that they do not grant solicited waivers just ones automatically through CRS, but I still have not received one (October LSAT taker). Does this mean that they do not give them to everyone with a certain set of numbers, or just that I am incredibly impatient and need to wait it out? (Or both?)
-
curiousgeorgia

- Posts: 291
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2011 1:06 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Okay, good advice. Thanks!j12 wrote: I did not get a Chicago waiver either, but I think you're better off getting your app in ASAP instead of waiting to save $80. I also believe that Chicago will reimburse your application fee if you later get a waiver. They sent out waivers a while ago, so I don't know how long you will be waiting for the potential of another waiver.
-
seanPtheB

- Posts: 276
- Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:06 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Yea I was an October taker also and I got one so if you haven't yet I would definitely just go ahead and get your app in.curiousgeorgia wrote:Sorry to jump in here with a kind of off-topic question, but does anyone know about how long or how often Chicago grants fee waivers? Applicants with similar numbers to mine (171, 3.9) have received such waivers, and when I contacted Chicago about it they said that they do not grant solicited waivers just ones automatically through CRS, but I still have not received one (October LSAT taker). Does this mean that they do not give them to everyone with a certain set of numbers, or just that I am incredibly impatient and need to wait it out? (Or both?)
- JoeMo

- Posts: 1517
- Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 10:29 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Submitted today... joining thread.
Also, I did get a waiver although my numbers aren't very competitive so I'll probably get the big old rejected
Also, I did get a waiver although my numbers aren't very competitive so I'll probably get the big old rejected
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I didn't get one.
- FryBreadPower

- Posts: 908
- Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I was also waiver-less; you should probably just bite the bullet and get your app in.
-
thelawyler

- Posts: 941
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Submitted early Oct. UR 11/11. Maybe that'll be good luck for being UR on 11/11/11 =D
- annyong

- Posts: 317
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm under review as of 11/11 as well!thelawyler wrote:Submitted early Oct. UR 11/11. Maybe that'll be good luck for being UR on 11/11/11 =D
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
were you guys ED or RD?annyong wrote:I'm under review as of 11/11 as well!thelawyler wrote:Submitted early Oct. UR 11/11. Maybe that'll be good luck for being UR on 11/11/11 =D
-
rachelwang712

- Posts: 166
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:07 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
is it too late for ED? I can probably submit by 18th.
- Dany

- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
http://www.law.uchicago.edu/prospective/applyjd/earlyrachelwang712 wrote:is it too late for ED? I can probably submit by 18th.
-
rachelwang712

- Posts: 166
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:07 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
but i am late compared with other applicants for ED?Dany wrote:http://www.law.uchicago.edu/prospective/applyjd/earlyrachelwang712 wrote:is it too late for ED? I can probably submit by 18th.
- Xifeng

- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I don't think any of us can answer that question. You could email admissions if you're concerned.rachelwang712 wrote:but i am late compared with other applicants for ED?Dany wrote:http://www.law.uchicago.edu/prospective/applyjd/earlyrachelwang712 wrote:is it too late for ED? I can probably submit by 18th.
-
rachelwang712

- Posts: 166
- Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2011 8:07 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
thanks. i will email them on Monday.Xifeng wrote:I don't think any of us can answer that question. You could email admissions if you're concerned.rachelwang712 wrote:but i am late compared with other applicants for ED?Dany wrote:http://www.law.uchicago.edu/prospective/applyjd/earlyrachelwang712 wrote:is it too late for ED? I can probably submit by 18th.
-
thelawyler

- Posts: 941
- Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2011 9:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I'm RD.JamMasterJ wrote:were you guys ED or RD?annyong wrote:I'm under review as of 11/11 as well!thelawyler wrote:Submitted early Oct. UR 11/11. Maybe that'll be good luck for being UR on 11/11/11 =D
- annyong

- Posts: 317
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 10:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
RD. Went complete on 10/11 - UR a month later, 11/11JamMasterJ wrote:were you guys ED or RD?annyong wrote:I'm under review as of 11/11 as well!thelawyler wrote:Submitted early Oct. UR 11/11. Maybe that'll be good luck for being UR on 11/11/11 =D
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Hey, I'm reading the admit/waitlist/deny chart and it looks like ED admits came between Dec 2 and Dec 4. Is that right?
- Hawkeye Pierce

- Posts: 1261
- Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 12:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Last cycle it was chiefly the middle to end of December.JamMasterJ wrote:Hey, I'm reading the admit/waitlist/deny chart and it looks like ED admits came between Dec 2 and Dec 4. Is that right?
- Dany

- Posts: 11559
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 3:00 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 5#p4916683JamMasterJ wrote:Hey, I'm reading the admit/waitlist/deny chart and it looks like ED admits came between Dec 2 and Dec 4. Is that right?
- soj

- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
Dany wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 5#p4916683JamMasterJ wrote:Hey, I'm reading the admit/waitlist/deny chart and it looks like ED admits came between Dec 2 and Dec 4. Is that right?
- Samara

- Posts: 3238
- Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 4:26 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
He doesn't know how to page back in a thread?soj wrote:Dany wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 5#p4916683JamMasterJ wrote:Hey, I'm reading the admit/waitlist/deny chart and it looks like ED admits came between Dec 2 and Dec 4. Is that right?Jam, I love that you asked again a page after someone answered the same question ... from you.
- JamMasterJ

- Posts: 6649
- Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
No, I was just looking at the chart and it seemed wrong. That's what I thought the answer was. I just was wondering why it looked like their was a spike that early.Samara wrote:He doesn't know how to page back in a thread?soj wrote:Dany wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 5#p4916683JamMasterJ wrote:Hey, I'm reading the admit/waitlist/deny chart and it looks like ED admits came between Dec 2 and Dec 4. Is that right?Jam, I love that you asked again a page after someone answered the same question ... from you.
ETA: I need to create a fake profile so that I can ask my stupid questions without getting ridiculed (not srs, mods)
- hyakku

- Posts: 584
- Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:35 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
I was thinking the same Georgia, and now I know that it's random since I know of people with stats lower than yours that have gotten one already, and I'm a rum with a relatively strong LSAT although my gpa is low, so it can't be solely LSAT based + gpa based as you kill both of them. I think I'm just going to have to find a way to apply this week before I fall too far behind.curiousgeorgia wrote:Sorry to jump in here with a kind of off-topic question, but does anyone know about how long or how often Chicago grants fee waivers? Applicants with similar numbers to mine (171, 3.9) have received such waivers, and when I contacted Chicago about it they said that they do not grant solicited waivers just ones automatically through CRS, but I still have not received one (October LSAT taker). Does this mean that they do not give them to everyone with a certain set of numbers, or just that I am incredibly impatient and need to wait it out? (Or both?)
- soj

- Posts: 7888
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)
On phone so not 100% sure, but the 2 and 4 represent weeks, not dates. Chart's correct.JamMasterJ wrote:No, I was just looking at the chart and it seemed wrong. That's what I thought the answer was. I just was wondering why it looked like their was a spike that early.Samara wrote:He doesn't know how to page back in a thread?soj wrote:Jam, I love that you asked again a page after someone answered the same question ... from you.
ETA: I need to create a fake profile so that I can ask my stupid questions without getting ridiculed (not srs, mods)