One of the best episodes.NYU_Ugrad_Paralegal wrote:
Bingo. You took me by the haaaand, maaade me a maaan, that one NIGGHTT, you made eeeverything alriiiiight
Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
- NYU_Ugrad_Paralegal

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:53 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Ahahaha yes, my favorite part is his plasma flat screen.lawschool22 wrote:One of the best episodes.NYU_Ugrad_Paralegal wrote:
Bingo. You took me by the haaaand, maaade me a maaan, that one NIGGHTT, you made eeeverything alriiiiight
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
neprep wrote:Woah…I'm delighted to report a JayEsTwo! Apparently it was lying in my voicemail (long story short, I was abroad and they didn't remember, combined with poor roaming-client 4G and cell services).
This would not have been possible without the help of many individuals. A big thank you is issued to:
1. The October LSAT Group (you know who you are!);
2. LS22's amazing guide to light and sound during a Skype interview;
3. my ex, both for convincing me that there are occasions when it's appropriate for men to wear makeup, and for administering "light" makeup on me for my JS1;
4. Regulus and Lavitz, for their contributions to the interview threads;
5. and obviously, the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (I'm guessing H and S are the Golden Globes, with Y being the Oscars).
LSAT = Median; GPA<25th; K-JD; applied 11/15 and went complete on 12/6.
(Minor details changed)
OMG OMG OMG CONGRATNEPLATIONS!!!!!!!!!!
-
staples88

- Posts: 67
- Joined: Thu Aug 08, 2013 3:50 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Although the first 2 reasons are great, I'm actually curious about 3 because I can see it going both ways. There's "a guy with similar, maybe slightly better numbers got in, so I have a chance." But I think this is more appropriate when we see someone like binarytheatrics (4/174). When those w/o those types of numbers like you and me are speculating, don't you think an acceptance like neprep's (congrats) could just as well mean our own odds are worse because now that they've helped their LSAT median, they might look to "balance" him with an above-median GPA.lawschool22 wrote:THIS IS AMAZING.neprep wrote:Woah…I'm delighted to report a JayEsTwo! Apparently it was lying in my voicemail (long story short, I was abroad and they didn't remember, combined with poor roaming-client 4G and cell services).
This would not have been possible without the help of many individuals. A big thank you is issued to:
1. The October LSAT Group (you know who you are!);
2. LS22's amazing guide to light and sound during a Skype interview;
3. my ex, both for convincing me that there are occasions when it's appropriate for men to wear makeup, and for administering "light" makeup on me for my JS1;
4. Regulus and Lavitz, for their contributions to the interview threads;
5. and obviously, the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (I'm guessing H and S are the Golden Globes, with Y being the Oscars).
LSAT = Median; GPA<25th; K-JD; applied 11/15 and went complete on 12/6.
(Minor details changed)
I love this post because (1) you got in, (2) my light and sound guide was reason number two, and (3) your numbers give me such hope.
WELL DONE SIR!
Also, their taking someone like Mort this early (congrats) could mean not only does he have a unique profile, but also that they're not too concerned about maintaining their LSAT
Also iirc the average HYP hls admit has a 3.7 so it can't be that different. There's also the idea of a floor (I.e., <25 GPA is OK, but not if it's below the floor)
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Idk, I prefer to look at these sorts of things as a glass half full mentality. You're correct that by admitting nep it could mean our odds are worse, or it could be an indicator that they are needing some median LSATs, and there are more acceptances to come for 173s. We don't know the answer, so I choose to believe its the latterstaples88 wrote:Although the first 2 reasons are great, I'm actually curious about 3 because I can see it going both ways. There's "a guy with similar, maybe slightly better numbers got in, so I have a chance." But I think this is more appropriate when we see someone like binarytheatrics (4/174). When those w/o those types of numbers like you and me are speculating, don't you think an acceptance like neprep's (congrats) could just as well mean our own odds are worse because now that they've helped their LSAT median, they might look to "balance" him with an above-median GPA.lawschool22 wrote:THIS IS AMAZING.neprep wrote:Woah…I'm delighted to report a JayEsTwo! Apparently it was lying in my voicemail (long story short, I was abroad and they didn't remember, combined with poor roaming-client 4G and cell services).
This would not have been possible without the help of many individuals. A big thank you is issued to:
1. The October LSAT Group (you know who you are!);
2. LS22's amazing guide to light and sound during a Skype interview;
3. my ex, both for convincing me that there are occasions when it's appropriate for men to wear makeup, and for administering "light" makeup on me for my JS1;
4. Regulus and Lavitz, for their contributions to the interview threads;
5. and obviously, the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (I'm guessing H and S are the Golden Globes, with Y being the Oscars).
LSAT = Median; GPA<25th; K-JD; applied 11/15 and went complete on 12/6.
(Minor details changed)
I love this post because (1) you got in, (2) my light and sound guide was reason number two, and (3) your numbers give me such hope.
WELL DONE SIR!
Also, their taking someone like Mort this early (congrats) could mean not only does he have a unique profile, but also that they're not too concerned about maintaining their LSAT
Also iirc the average HYP hls admit has a 3.7 so it can't be that different. There's also the idea of a floor (I.e., <25 GPA is OK, but not if it's below the floor)
In any case this is all micro stuff, I don't know that we can say with near certainty what any of it means, so I choose to be on the optimistic side until HLS tells me otherwise
Edit: This post # was my birth year, so I just wanted to come back and acknowledge that for luck. Anything at this point lol.
Last edited by lawschool22 on Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:50 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- NYU_Ugrad_Paralegal

- Posts: 86
- Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2013 11:53 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I just want to say I'm glad nobody has so far felt like they bombed their interview. GJ urrybody!!
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Nep when are you reactivating your Facebook??? I have some spamming congratulations that I want to give across all forms of communication but cannot.
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I think that poster was talking about the number 3 in my post - but I could be wrong. But as someone who has been on stage and screen, yeah, makeup is definitely not obvious in those sorts of applications. People tend to look worse on screen than they do in real life, so makeup helps correct that. I should have used some, I might have a JS2 by now lol.FuriousDuck wrote:If he did number three right, it wouldn't be obvious on webcam. Most guys on TV aren't showing you their natural face.staples88 wrote:
Although the first 2 reasons are great, I'm actually curious about 3 because I can see it going both ways....and regarding the lowish LSATs being admitted, I'm not at all surprised by it, and I don't think they're expecting to take a hit to their medians/25th percentile. If they understand math, they know that a few low outliers won't affect those things.
Last edited by lawschool22 on Fri Jan 24, 2014 1:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- bbkk

- Posts: 728
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:28 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
scoobers wrote:Nep when are you reactivating your Facebook??? I have somespammingcongratulations that I want to give across all forms of communication but cannot.
+100000000000
- neprep

- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Dat pressure to join that HLS 2017 group…scoobers wrote:Nep when are you reactivating your Facebook??? I have somespammingcongratulations that I want to give across all forms of communication but cannot.
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
- wtrc

- Posts: 2053
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 9:37 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I hereby add to the pressure.neprep wrote:Dat pressure to join that HLS 2017 group…scoobers wrote:Nep when are you reactivating your Facebook??? I have somespammingcongratulations that I want to give across all forms of communication but cannot.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
edwardt1988

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
So, nothing today so far?
-
tls2175

- Posts: 163
- Joined: Thu Jul 11, 2013 4:09 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
+1!wtrc wrote:I hereby add to the pressure.neprep wrote:Dat pressure to join that HLS 2017 group…scoobers wrote:Nep when are you reactivating your Facebook??? I have somespammingcongratulations that I want to give across all forms of communication but cannot.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Nothing so far...edwardt1988 wrote:So, nothing today so far?
- Gary

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
holy crap.... i missed a lot since checking out at 5pm yesterday. CONGRATS TO THE NEW HLS ADMITS
shoutout to mort who kept me positive and paglabba who shared in my negativity lol
shoutout to mort who kept me positive and paglabba who shared in my negativity lol
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- midwest17

- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Nothing reported here or on LSN.lawschool22 wrote:Nothing so far...edwardt1988 wrote:So, nothing today so far?
3 acceptances posted on LSN from yesterday's wave, though.
- barrelofmonkeys

- Posts: 1942
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 6:41 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I'm going with "it's still early"midwest17 wrote:Nothing reported here or on LSN.lawschool22 wrote:Nothing so far...edwardt1988 wrote:So, nothing today so far?
3 acceptances posted on LSN from yesterday's wave, though.
- midwest17

- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Yeah. And the people who posted yesterday on LSN didn't get around to it until ~7 pm.barrelofmonkeys wrote:I'm going with "it's still early"midwest17 wrote:Nothing reported here or on LSN.lawschool22 wrote:Nothing so far...edwardt1988 wrote:So, nothing today so far?
3 acceptances posted on LSN from yesterday's wave, though.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Post 2000 for luck. Doing it now before I accidentally waste it in the lounge or something.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Gary

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Something I was wondering (that's slightly negative so feel free to ignore)-
How many of you would actually consider reapplying next year if your JS1 isn't converted? Even if you snagged all the T14 below?
How many of you would actually consider reapplying next year if your JS1 isn't converted? Even if you snagged all the T14 below?
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
MeGary wrote:Something I was wondering (that's slightly negative so feel free to ignore)-
How many of you would actually consider reapplying next year if your JS1 isn't converted? Even if you snagged all the T14 below?
HYS or bust!
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Thu Jan 30, 2014 6:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Not me. It'd be NYU or Columbia (assuming CLS loves me) for me, most likely.Gary wrote:Something I was wondering (that's slightly negative so feel free to ignore)-
How many of you would actually consider reapplying next year if your JS1 isn't converted? Even if you snagged all the T14 below?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login