eskimo wrote:WTF NO HOLD NO NOTHING?!?!?!!!!???? wrote: r6
dulcatis
justhoping
RJ127
absolutazn87
Philip_J_Fry
Kent M
TrustMeI'mAnActress
glitched
ahduth
pastadog
eskimo
Non-Chalant1
Columbia 2011! Forum
- Non-Chalant1

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:54 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
- Knock

- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
My new theory: they meant to accept people in the held group.alphagamma wrote:Held.
169/177, 4.0, complete in late November.
-
somewhere

- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 12:38 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
Yeah, it sure seems like you've still got a great shot, hold or no.tkgrrett wrote:Yeah usually I would have no problem believing that maybe Columbia is magically holistic but I just dont see it.. seems like one of these 10ish other schools and scholarship committees wouldve figured it out by now. I dont have AMAZING softs but they are definitely solid at the very least.
- NikaneOkie

- Posts: 222
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 12:39 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
easternstandardtime1 wrote:+1eskimo wrote:WTF NO HOLD NO NOTHING?!?!?!!!!???? wrote: r6
dulcatis
justhoping
RJ127
absolutazn87
Philip_J_Fry
Kent M
TrustMeI'mAnActress
glitched
ahduth
pastadog
eskimo
-
somewhere

- Posts: 233
- Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 12:38 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
Obviously for a different (and more selective) school, but there's some interesting statistics here: http://www.law.yale.edu/admissions/profile.htmarism87 wrote:I just wanted to know what DOES set an applicant apart.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- arism87

- Posts: 1310
- Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 7:46 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
F the CLS noise, I'm gonna go catch up with the Bachelor.
...
. <-- arism realizing why she wasn't accepted, lol
...
- ebeth

- Posts: 214
- Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 12:51 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
If this were on facebook, I would like it. I guess here I say +1.Knock wrote: My new theory: they meant to accept people in the held group.
- timmna

- Posts: 524
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:15 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
Non-Chalant1 wrote:eskimo wrote:WTF NO HOLD NO NOTHING?!?!?!!!!???? wrote: r6
dulcatis
justhoping
RJ127
absolutazn87
Philip_J_Fry
Kent M
TrustMeI'mAnActress
glitched
ahduth
pastadog
eskimo
Non-Chalant1
Really! What does this mean!
- Knock

- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
This is going to be awkward in the morning.ebeth wrote:If this were on facebook, I would like it. I guess here I say +1.Knock wrote: My new theory: they meant to accept people in the held group.
- glitched

- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
few are accepted in the 1/28 batch, few are rejected by next week, the rest are thrown into madness? Madness?! THIS IS WAITLIST!
BTW. I hate waitlist.
BTW. I hate waitlist.
- glitched

- Posts: 1263
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 9:50 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
few are accepted in the 1/28 batch, few are rejected by next week, the rest are thrown into madness? Madness?! THIS IS WAITLIST!
BTW. I hate waitlist.
BTW. I hate waitlist.
- alphagamma

- Posts: 189
- Joined: Mon Apr 12, 2010 9:16 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
I choose to believe this theory fanatically.Knock wrote:My new theory: they meant to accept people in the held group.alphagamma wrote:Held.
169/177, 4.0, complete in late November.
-
TrustMeI'mAnActress

- Posts: 182
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 10:43 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
So what does everyone think it means for those of us who haven't heard anything yet? Good or bad?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Ratchet Jackson

- Posts: 2701
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 6:41 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Good if your numbers are high, bad if they suck.TrustMeI'mAnActress wrote:So what does everyone think it means for those of us who haven't heard anything yet? Good or bad?
- dbrddr

- Posts: 287
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 8:24 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
add me to the nothing list
-
melamine

- Posts: 196
- Joined: Sat May 22, 2010 11:06 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
somewhere wrote:Obviously for a different (and more selective) school, but there's some interesting statistics here: http://www.law.yale.edu/admissions/profile.htmarism87 wrote:I just wanted to know what DOES set an applicant apart.
now THAT's what i meant by great softs. Marionette-maker. LMAO. I retract my earlier statment about softs. (j/k - or am i?).
- Non-Chalant1

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:54 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Are you going to write another LOCI? That must feel like too much work at this point.timmna wrote:Really! What does this mean!Non-Chalant1 wrote:eskimo wrote:WTF NO HOLD NO NOTHING?!?!?!!!!???? wrote: r6
dulcatis
justhoping
RJ127
absolutazn87
Philip_J_Fry
Kent M
TrustMeI'mAnActress
glitched
ahduth
pastadog
eskimo
Non-Chalant1
Last edited by Non-Chalant1 on Wed Feb 02, 2011 8:43 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- moopness

- Posts: 310
- Joined: Fri Jul 16, 2010 8:56 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Just wanted to say that I've been checking this thread incessantly since it was created, multiple times a day, and I'm not even applying to law school this cycle. I dunno what it is about Columbia's thread, maybe the perplexing decisions/holds, etc going out, but it certainly is the most exciting (beats Harvard by a landslide). Good luck to everyone still in the running (I wish you all the vomit you can dream of), and congrats to all those who've been accepted. I'll continue to silently stalk this thread (and all of you
)
-
tomwatts

- Posts: 1710
- Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 12:01 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
I assume that someone has said this in the past 20 pages, but...
They email holds, but snail mail acceptances? What is wrong with them?
They email holds, but snail mail acceptances? What is wrong with them?
- Knock

- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Perhaps this is a selectivity ploy, and they want to receive some LOCI's?
-
ExpectLess

- Posts: 219
- Joined: Mon Apr 26, 2010 3:12 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
4.5 index and held.
Thought I had decent softs too--bunch of awards, publications, etc.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- timmna

- Posts: 524
- Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 11:15 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
It does, but I still plan on it. Looking through last year's thread, though, LOCIs didn't seem to do much. At least I'll have tried.Non-Chalant1 wrote:Are you going to write another LOCI? That must feel like too much work at this point.
Edit: I wonder why one numbers twin was held and the other wasn't.
-
rundoxierun

- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 1:46 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
Thats what Im thinking.Knock wrote:Perhaps this is a selectivity ploy, and they want to receive some LOCI's?
- Non-Chalant1

- Posts: 852
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:54 pm
Re: Columbia 2011!
Go for it! I will say this though...out of CCN...Columbia's PR department needs some work. That's a very good point about me not getting held as well. I think Penn is the only place where our cylce has split so far. And honestly, who knows what I'll hear from them after they get my grade update.timmna wrote:It does, but I still plan on it. Looking through last year's thread, though, LOCIs didn't seem to do much. At least I'll have tried.Non-Chalant1 wrote:Are you going to write another LOCI? That must feel like too much work at this point.
Edit: I wonder why one numbers twin was held and the other wasn't.
- jd2014!

- Posts: 431
- Joined: Sat Oct 16, 2010 10:31 am
Re: Columbia 2011!
So I have been hiding from my email and all of you since holds starting going out and I lit my hair on fire. I survived the slaughter, but don't know weather to be relieved or sad. Probably the latter, since no hold likely = ding or WL (which = ding essentially). This is crazy. But so many people haven't heard anything! They can't WL or reject all of us, can they?
Is it over yet? Or are they still sending these things out?
Is it over yet? Or are they still sending these things out?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login