See you under my Christmas tree.Baby Gaga wrote: This doesn't make any sense because I gots no happy holidays email and Lady Gaga has a christmas song
Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017) Forum
- Nickel94
- Posts: 138
- Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2015 12:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
- jjcorvino
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
LSAT scores and applicants are down across the board: https://twitter.com/SpiveyConsult
Applicants:
Applicants DOWN 5.1% Applications DOWN 1.7%.
LSAT:
165-169 (-18.8%)
170-174 (-2.0%)
175-180 ( -25.4%)
Applicants:
Applicants DOWN 5.1% Applications DOWN 1.7%.
LSAT:
165-169 (-18.8%)
170-174 (-2.0%)
175-180 ( -25.4%)
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
jjcorvino wrote:LSAT scores and applicants are down across the board: https://twitter.com/SpiveyConsult
Applicants:
Applicants DOWN 5.1% Applications DOWN 1.7%.
LSAT:
165-169 (-18.8%)
170-174 (-2.0%)
175-180 ( -25.4%)
Hopefully the Dec. LSAT scores won't change this too much. One of his tweets said he thinks part of the reason applicants and apps are down is due to how many people scheduled to retake after the Sept. LSAT.
- jjcorvino
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Yeah, Dec was up 15% or something right?brinicolec wrote:jjcorvino wrote:LSAT scores and applicants are down across the board: https://twitter.com/SpiveyConsult
Applicants:
Applicants DOWN 5.1% Applications DOWN 1.7%.
LSAT:
165-169 (-18.8%)
170-174 (-2.0%)
175-180 ( -25.4%)
Hopefully the Dec. LSAT scores won't change this too much. One of his tweets said he thinks part of the reason applicants and apps are down is due to how many people scheduled to retake after the Sept. LSAT.
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
That's something I'm not sure about but if it's retakers + a regular amt. of first-timers, I could see how it would've been up. Hopefully the decrease in high scores is a sign that the test is either harder so less people will be scoring high this go around too or people aren't prepping properly. Lol.jjcorvino wrote:Yeah, Dec was up 15% or something right?brinicolec wrote:jjcorvino wrote:LSAT scores and applicants are down across the board: https://twitter.com/SpiveyConsult
Applicants:
Applicants DOWN 5.1% Applications DOWN 1.7%.
LSAT:
165-169 (-18.8%)
170-174 (-2.0%)
175-180 ( -25.4%)
Hopefully the Dec. LSAT scores won't change this too much. One of his tweets said he thinks part of the reason applicants and apps are down is due to how many people scheduled to retake after the Sept. LSAT.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- SybillAnnDorsett
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:59 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by SybillAnnDorsett on Fri Dec 09, 2016 1:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Lol, I guess they just want to make sure they don't leave anything out!mm2368 wrote:.
Last edited by brinicolec on Fri Dec 09, 2016 1:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Fri Dec 09, 2016 1:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
I'm really not sure if this is something the adcomm truly cares about though.canafsa wrote:.
I don't think they sit around like, "Omg, ew. They're on a forum site typing... like they're on a forum site?!"
I think they care more about people who are either lying about application stuff, bashing the school even though they've applied, or spreading misinformation.
But, OP is right. Some adcomm folks do peruse this site and may be able to identify you based on stuff you disclose.
- SybillAnnDorsett
- Posts: 1719
- Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2016 12:59 pm
- jjcorvino
- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
What type of stuff would turn off an adcomm though? I have stated my numbers and what schools I have applied to. I don't see why that would anger an adcomm though. The only things that I could see hurting are bashing the school or talking about immoral/illegal things "I went out and did xxx drug last night".brinicolec wrote:I'm really not sure if this is something the adcomm truly cares about though.canafsa wrote:.
I don't think they sit around like, "Omg, ew. They're on a forum site typing... like they're on a forum site?!"
I think they care more about people who are either lying about application stuff, bashing the school even though they've applied, or spreading misinformation.
But, OP is right. Some adcomm folks do peruse this site and may be able to identify you based on stuff you disclose.
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:21 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Some ED decisions are out. I got accepted!!! Best of luck to everyone else!
- calpolisci2016
- Posts: 391
- Joined: Mon Apr 04, 2016 1:42 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
46% increase in 170 scorers, however. Maybe a bunch of typical 165-174 scorers all bunched up at exactly 170 this cycle?jjcorvino wrote:LSAT scores and applicants are down across the board: https://twitter.com/SpiveyConsult
Applicants:
Applicants DOWN 5.1% Applications DOWN 1.7%.
LSAT:
165-169 (-18.8%)
170-174 (-2.0%)
175-180 ( -25.4%)
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- brinicolec
- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Like I said, bashing schools, lying on your application (which people do discuss on these threads sometimes, especially regarding stretching their URM status because, "Well, my great-grandfather was black and I've never claimed I was black before but can I claim I'm black now for the boost?"), maybe even generally being a major asshole on these threads lol. It's hard to know exactly, but I don't think an adcomm is going to ding you because you've shared where you've applied and your numbers. I mean, technically, they know that info anywayjjcorvino wrote:.

-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:39 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Have any RD applicants who have had an interview received a decision as yet? My interviewer said decisions were going to come out in January.
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2016 3:53 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
It was the virus game! Never missed any logic games until that one. Dropped me 3+ points!calpolisci2016 wrote:46% increase in 170 scorers, however. Maybe a bunch of typical 165-174 scorers all bunched up at exactly 170 this cycle?jjcorvino wrote:LSAT scores and applicants are down across the board: https://twitter.com/SpiveyConsult
Applicants:
Applicants DOWN 5.1% Applications DOWN 1.7%.
LSAT:
165-169 (-18.8%)
170-174 (-2.0%)
175-180 ( -25.4%)
- Assasindowntheavenue
- Posts: 818
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2016 6:45 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
I do not believe any RD decisions have come out yet, interviewed or non-interviewed.RickyBunny wrote:Have any RD applicants who have had an interview received a decision as yet? My interviewer said decisions were going to come out in January.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 11:53 am
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Me too! Congrats!!!! See you there and wishing the best of luck to others as well!lawdude31 wrote:Some ED decisions are out. I got accepted!!! Best of luck to everyone else!
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2016 3:39 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Thanks I believe that is right/expected based on the thread from last year.Assasindowntheavenue wrote:I do not believe any RD decisions have come out yet, interviewed or non-interviewed.RickyBunny wrote:Have any RD applicants who have had an interview received a decision as yet? My interviewer said decisions were going to come out in January.
-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Jul 03, 2016 2:37 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Gracias. How long did it last? Typical 20-ish minutes or shorter?lawdude31 wrote:No, it was very straightforward and pleasant. Nothing shocking or trying to trip me up.Fantasyfreak294 wrote:Congrats on landing an interview. Were there any curveball questions?lawdude31 wrote:I got interviewed and I am above 75 in both LSAT and GPA. Don't overthink it. Apparently they are interested in talking to you and that's what is important. Just be yourself and well behaved and it will be fine.mm2368 wrote:Lol depends on your stats I thinkHarvardHopeful95 wrote:I just got a request for an interview from Columbia, is this a good sign? I'm freaking out right now lol
- NotAGolfer
- Posts: 596
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 1:50 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
It sounds like most interviews have been 20 minutes (based on this thread). Mine went a little bit longer (30 minutes) but I think that was the longer end of things.Fantasyfreak294 wrote:Gracias. How long did it last? Typical 20-ish minutes or shorter?lawdude31 wrote:No, it was very straightforward and pleasant. Nothing shocking or trying to trip me up.Fantasyfreak294 wrote:Congrats on landing an interview. Were there any curveball questions?lawdude31 wrote:I got interviewed and I am above 75 in both LSAT and GPA. Don't overthink it. Apparently they are interested in talking to you and that's what is important. Just be yourself and well behaved and it will be fine.mm2368 wrote:Lol depends on your stats I thinkHarvardHopeful95 wrote:I just got a request for an interview from Columbia, is this a good sign? I'm freaking out right now lol
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2016 6:04 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
^ I think mine was pretty close to 20
- xn3345
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2016 10:49 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
+1lsa16 wrote:^ I think mine was pretty close to 20
- Baby Gaga
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Fri Jul 08, 2016 1:07 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Mine was exactly 20 mins 5 sec
-
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2016 2:21 pm
Re: Columbia c/o 2020 applicants (2016-2017)
Yes right around there.Fantasyfreak294 wrote:Gracias. How long did it last? Typical 20-ish minutes or shorter?lawdude31 wrote:No, it was very straightforward and pleasant. Nothing shocking or trying to trip me up.Fantasyfreak294 wrote:Congrats on landing an interview. Were there any curveball questions?lawdude31 wrote:I got interviewed and I am above 75 in both LSAT and GPA. Don't overthink it. Apparently they are interested in talking to you and that's what is important. Just be yourself and well behaved and it will be fine.mm2368 wrote:Lol depends on your stats I thinkHarvardHopeful95 wrote:I just got a request for an interview from Columbia, is this a good sign? I'm freaking out right now lol
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login