applied 11/27, complete 12/3, waitlisted todayAlly Mcbeal wrote:Those of you with movement today...what was your timeline?
UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Thu Aug 23, 2012 5:20 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
- Iroh
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 10:20 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Awwwww yeahhhhh me too!scoobers wrote:Waitlisted. >median GPA, >75th LSAT, will be withdrawing.
Good luck everyone!
Except my GPA was below median but above the 25th. Mex URM though. Aren't you a URM too? If so yours is an undeniable case of yield protect.
- Lebrarian_Booker
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Hearing about all these WL emails coming out today...


-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Iroh wrote:Awwwww yeahhhhh me too!scoobers wrote:Waitlisted. >median GPA, >75th LSAT, will be withdrawing.
Good luck everyone!
Except my GPA was below median but above the 25th. Mex URM though. Aren't you a URM too? If so yours is an undeniable case of yield protect.

I wish I was urm.
But not in the institutionalized history of racism and historical second-class citizen status has created a system systematically lowering standardized test scores across the board and leading to an achievement gap that in does not reflect complete equal ability between different people type, more of the law-and-order episode where the really white kid finds out he's black just before he applies to college type. Aka the have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too urm.
- FlyingNorth
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:25 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Fucking lol, scoobs. This should be copy/pasted into the URM board.scoobers wrote:Iroh wrote:Awwwww yeahhhhh me too!scoobers wrote:Waitlisted. >median GPA, >75th LSAT, will be withdrawing.
Good luck everyone!
Except my GPA was below median but above the 25th. Mex URM though. Aren't you a URM too? If so yours is an undeniable case of yield protect.![]()
I wish I was urm.
But not in the institutionalized history of racism and historical second-class citizen status has created a system systematically lowering standardized test scores across the board and leading to an achievement gap that in does not reflect complete equal ability between different people type, more of the law-and-order episode where the really white kid finds out he's black just before he applies to college type. Aka the have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too urm.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Lebrarian_Booker
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 1:05 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
scoobers wrote:Iroh wrote:Awwwww yeahhhhh me too!scoobers wrote:Waitlisted. >median GPA, >75th LSAT, will be withdrawing.
Good luck everyone!
Except my GPA was below median but above the 25th. Mex URM though. Aren't you a URM too? If so yours is an undeniable case of yield protect.![]()
I wish I was urm.
But not in the institutionalized history of racism and historical second-class citizen status has created a system systematically lowering standardized test scores across the board and leading to an achievement gap that in does not reflect complete equal ability between different people type, more of the law-and-order episode where the really white kid finds out he's black just before he applies to college type. Aka the have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too urm.
- Savage13
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2009 3:06 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
scoobers wrote:Iroh wrote:Awwwww yeahhhhh me too!scoobers wrote:Waitlisted. >median GPA, >75th LSAT, will be withdrawing.
Good luck everyone!
Except my GPA was below median but above the 25th. Mex URM though. Aren't you a URM too? If so yours is an undeniable case of yield protect.![]()
I wish I was urm.
But not in the institutionalized history of racism and historical second-class citizen status has created a system systematically lowering standardized test scores across the board and leading to an achievement gap that in does not reflect complete equal ability between different people type, more of the law-and-order episode where the really white kid finds out he's black just before he applies to college type. Aka the have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too urm.
So, like the regular white kid who can gain tribal membership because they have a great great grandparent who was on the Dawes Roll?
- uconjak
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 6:20 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
There ya go, that was me last year... I didnt use it. Some other folks on the forums thought i was nuts for not using it....i just needed to apply for the tribal card. My family has a "thing" about those preferences....it must be a midwest/repub thing.....instead of Stanford i am at UCLA.Savage13 wrote:scoobers wrote:Iroh wrote:Awwwww yeahhhhh me too!scoobers wrote:Waitlisted. >median GPA, >75th LSAT, will be withdrawing.
Good luck everyone!
Except my GPA was below median but above the 25th. Mex URM though. Aren't you a URM too? If so yours is an undeniable case of yield protect.![]()
I wish I was urm.
But not in the institutionalized history of racism and historical second-class citizen status has created a system systematically lowering standardized test scores across the board and leading to an achievement gap that in does not reflect complete equal ability between different people type, more of the law-and-order episode where the really white kid finds out he's black just before he applies to college type. Aka the have-your-cake-and-eat-it-too urm.
So, like the regular white kid who can gain tribal membership because they have a great great grandparent who was on the Dawes Roll?
-
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:57 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
No waitlist email today. I have a 168 and a 3.2. Anyone else accepted with these numbers? Do I have a chance?
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:31 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Maybe I'm on the slower side. Can someone explain Scoobs urm blurb? lol
-
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:44 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
If you didn't hear anything about financial merit scholarships during the admission call or acceptance letter, that means you weren't awarded any, right? Or, do they send scholarship info later?
- Serett
- Posts: 16088
- Joined: Wed Oct 09, 2013 11:06 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Credited response if you weren't awarded initial aid over the phone but are seriously interested in attending UCLA is to reach out to the Admissions Office.lawyereddd wrote:If you didn't hear anything about financial merit scholarships during the admission call or acceptance letter, that means you weren't awarded any, right? Or, do they send scholarship info later?
-
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Mon Oct 07, 2013 10:48 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
whjohnso444 wrote:No waitlist email today. I have a 168 and a 3.2. Anyone else accepted with these numbers? Do I have a chance?
I was accepted a few weeks back - 3.4, 168. There's hope still!
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Feb 12, 2014 5:47 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Applied 1/30 accepted 2/7; 167 LSAT and 3.9 GPA and I was a UCLA undergrad
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:40 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Did everybody who got accepted hear back about merit-based scholarships yet?
I thought I would receive at least a few thousand because I'm slightly above their 75ths, but it's been a month since the acceptance letter and no financial aid letter. I don't know if I should give up on my chances of a scholarship or not. Or should I email them?
I don't know if this affects anything, but I also didn't hear back from them until more than a month after I applied, even though everybody with similar stats heard back within one or two weeks and got their scholarships with their acceptance letters.
I thought I would receive at least a few thousand because I'm slightly above their 75ths, but it's been a month since the acceptance letter and no financial aid letter. I don't know if I should give up on my chances of a scholarship or not. Or should I email them?
I don't know if this affects anything, but I also didn't hear back from them until more than a month after I applied, even though everybody with similar stats heard back within one or two weeks and got their scholarships with their acceptance letters.
- Vexed
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 2:55 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I'm in roughly the same boat, although I'm above 75th LSAT and wedged in-between 25th and median GPA. The ASW makes it seem like they are continuously reviewing to offer scholarships, but I haven't seen anybody post that received a scholarship offer after the initial admissions info.JR20 wrote:Did everybody who got accepted hear back about merit-based scholarships yet?
I thought I would receive at least a few thousand because I'm slightly above their 75ths, but it's been a month since the acceptance letter and no financial aid letter. I don't know if I should give up on my chances of a scholarship or not. Or should I email them?
I don't know if this affects anything, but I also didn't hear back from them until more than a month after I applied, even though everybody with similar stats heard back within one or two weeks and got their scholarships with their acceptance letters.
Also not really sure how to approach them about it while I still wait to hear back from other schools and don't have another offer to try to get them to match... seems a little too blunt to just be like "so, my numbers...".
I also took a month to hear back on a decision, although I did go complete relatively quickly.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2014 10:40 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Vexed wrote:I'm in roughly the same boat, although I'm above 75th LSAT and wedged in-between 25th and median GPA. The ASW makes it seem like they are continuously reviewing to offer scholarships, but I haven't seen anybody post that received a scholarship offer after the initial admissions info.JR20 wrote:Did everybody who got accepted hear back about merit-based scholarships yet?
I thought I would receive at least a few thousand because I'm slightly above their 75ths, but it's been a month since the acceptance letter and no financial aid letter. I don't know if I should give up on my chances of a scholarship or not. Or should I email them?
I don't know if this affects anything, but I also didn't hear back from them until more than a month after I applied, even though everybody with similar stats heard back within one or two weeks and got their scholarships with their acceptance letters.
Also not really sure how to approach them about it while I still wait to hear back from other schools and don't have another offer to try to get them to match... seems a little too blunt to just be like "so, my numbers...".
I also took a month to hear back on a decision, although I did go complete relatively quickly.
I was thinking about sending them an email stating that I was interested in merit aid. It's just weird because they're not very clear if they just passed us up on merit scholarships or are still reviewing our applications from a merit scholarship point.
I haven't received any scholarship offers from other schools yet but I have been accepted to multiple T-14 schools. Do you think I should mention that in my email to them or hold off sending an email until I do receive other scholarships?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Pishee77
- Posts: 238
- Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 6:14 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
HoldJR20 wrote:Vexed wrote:I'm in roughly the same boat, although I'm above 75th LSAT and wedged in-between 25th and median GPA. The ASW makes it seem like they are continuously reviewing to offer scholarships, but I haven't seen anybody post that received a scholarship offer after the initial admissions info.JR20 wrote:Did everybody who got accepted hear back about merit-based scholarships yet?
I thought I would receive at least a few thousand because I'm slightly above their 75ths, but it's been a month since the acceptance letter and no financial aid letter. I don't know if I should give up on my chances of a scholarship or not. Or should I email them?
I don't know if this affects anything, but I also didn't hear back from them until more than a month after I applied, even though everybody with similar stats heard back within one or two weeks and got their scholarships with their acceptance letters.
Also not really sure how to approach them about it while I still wait to hear back from other schools and don't have another offer to try to get them to match... seems a little too blunt to just be like "so, my numbers...".
I also took a month to hear back on a decision, although I did go complete relatively quickly.
I was thinking about sending them an email stating that I was interested in merit aid. It's just weird because they're not very clear if they just passed us up on merit scholarships or are still reviewing our applications from a merit scholarship point.
I haven't received any scholarship offers from other schools yet but I have been accepted to multiple T-14 schools. Do you think I should mention that in my email to them or hold off sending an email until I do receive other scholarships?
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Thu May 02, 2013 4:17 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Curious about this as well. I was accepted without a phone call and never received scholarship info with my acceptance packet. Maybe they're waiting to offer out of state students admitted in the last month or so?JR20 wrote:Vexed wrote:I'm in roughly the same boat, although I'm above 75th LSAT and wedged in-between 25th and median GPA. The ASW makes it seem like they are continuously reviewing to offer scholarships, but I haven't seen anybody post that received a scholarship offer after the initial admissions info.JR20 wrote:Did everybody who got accepted hear back about merit-based scholarships yet?
I thought I would receive at least a few thousand because I'm slightly above their 75ths, but it's been a month since the acceptance letter and no financial aid letter. I don't know if I should give up on my chances of a scholarship or not. Or should I email them?
I don't know if this affects anything, but I also didn't hear back from them until more than a month after I applied, even though everybody with similar stats heard back within one or two weeks and got their scholarships with their acceptance letters.
Also not really sure how to approach them about it while I still wait to hear back from other schools and don't have another offer to try to get them to match... seems a little too blunt to just be like "so, my numbers...".
I also took a month to hear back on a decision, although I did go complete relatively quickly.
I was thinking about sending them an email stating that I was interested in merit aid. It's just weird because they're not very clear if they just passed us up on merit scholarships or are still reviewing our applications from a merit scholarship point.
I haven't received any scholarship offers from other schools yet but I have been accepted to multiple T-14 schools. Do you think I should mention that in my email to them or hold off sending an email until I do receive other scholarships?
- aboutmydaylight
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:50 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Accepted today in mail (though I've been getting emails that were suggesting I got in for a few days).
Merit based letter came with the rest of the admissions package for those curious. Dean's scholarship for full tuition conditional on 2.5+.
URM + above both 75th's + In state.
Merit based letter came with the rest of the admissions package for those curious. Dean's scholarship for full tuition conditional on 2.5+.
URM + above both 75th's + In state.
Last edited by aboutmydaylight on Thu Feb 13, 2014 7:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I also received scholarship info with my admit earlier this week by mail. Total amount was about $5k higher than LSN predicted based on my numbers - which is to say, LSN was very accurate.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- FlyingNorth
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:25 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Dios mio, you're like UCLA's holy grail.aboutmydaylight wrote:
URM + above both 75th's + In state.
- cron1834
- Posts: 2299
- Joined: Thu Jan 02, 2014 1:36 am
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
No, in-state has a lower base rate of tuition, so it's arguably not preferable for them. Unless they have a quota to fill like UT or UVA, in-state is not a boost. I'm not aware of any quotas, but correct me if I'm wrong.
Also, Holy Grail would be URM! Then you're cooking with gas!
Also, Holy Grail would be URM! Then you're cooking with gas!

- aboutmydaylight
- Posts: 580
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 7:50 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
So question I guess. How hard is it to maintain a 2.5 GPA at UCLA? I've heard anecdotally that most people maintain UCLA scholarships but I've also read on here that conditional scholarships are a no go. Which is it?
Lower base rate of tuition, but I'd assume much higher rate of attrition probably outweighs that.cron1834 wrote:No, in-state has a lower base rate of tuition, so it's arguably not preferable for them. Unless they have a quota to fill like UT or UVA, in-state is not a boost. I'm not aware of any quotas, but correct me if I'm wrong.
Also, Holy Grail would be URM! Then you're cooking with gas!
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 8:36 pm
Re: UCLA c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Curve at UCLA law
25-29% As, 41-52% B/B+s, 18-22% B-s, and 5-8% Cs
Pretty hard to get sub 2.5 gpa considering that only 5-8% of the class get Cs (usually C+'s)
You can get 1/2 B-'s (2.7) and 1/2 C+'s (2.3) to maintain 2.5
25-29% As, 41-52% B/B+s, 18-22% B-s, and 5-8% Cs
Pretty hard to get sub 2.5 gpa considering that only 5-8% of the class get Cs (usually C+'s)
You can get 1/2 B-'s (2.7) and 1/2 C+'s (2.3) to maintain 2.5
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login