Don't they usually send decisions early in the week? Also I see some people's profiles say they have been waitlisted. Has H sent out waitlists already?seeprybyrun wrote:True, but WL/ding emails don't take much work to send. Someone just has to push a button, assuming they've been batched up for release.Leliana wrote:I don't think so because admissions will almost certainly be busy at ASW tomorrow.seeprybyrun wrote:Could happen, certainly. Will happen? No idea.LSRAT wrote:Also, since there are no interviews tomorrow, doesn't it make sense that a large reject/wl wave will happen?
Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017) Forum
-
tartan2016

- Posts: 91
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:51 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
-
Pozzo

- Posts: 1918
- Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 3:36 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
'Grats!!!seeprybyrun wrote:Here's hoping!Kinch08 wrote: Here's some math I did in a PM to SMC that might be comforting/helpful to all the other JS1's who haven't heard back yet:
There's one wave left, probably average-sized (so, 1/5 of the 1000 non-WL admits, or 200 potential HLS'ers). Maybe 30 spots in it (I'm just spitballing here, but it's honest spitballing--I'm not fudging numbers to make you feel better) will be taken up by last-minute JS1's (there haven't been enough last-minute JS1's to fill more than 30 ish spots). We know from the thread that everyone who wasn't a last minute JS1 (i.e. people with JS1's in early March or earlier) was considered for this last wave, so the other 170 JS2's will be given out to people exactly like you. I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a better chance than someone who JS1'd in November, but by the same token, I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a worse shot than someone who JS1'd in late February. So the question is, how many people are you competing against for those 170 spots? Well, that math is easy--it's the total number of non-WL JS1's (around 1200, when you account for the last-minute people) minus the admits so far (800-ish). 400. 170/400 = 42.5%. You have a better than 40% "raw" chance of getting in. That's not the 75% chance you started out with, but it ain't bad.
Now, of course, those 170 spots are not given away randomly. It's a numbers game, just like it always has been.
FWIW, I just got a Vandy from NYU this morning. So that takes some of the sting out.
-
seeprybyrun

- Posts: 371
- Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 10:18 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Thank you!Pozzo wrote:'Grats!!!seeprybyrun wrote:Here's hoping!Kinch08 wrote: Here's some math I did in a PM to SMC that might be comforting/helpful to all the other JS1's who haven't heard back yet:
There's one wave left, probably average-sized (so, 1/5 of the 1000 non-WL admits, or 200 potential HLS'ers). Maybe 30 spots in it (I'm just spitballing here, but it's honest spitballing--I'm not fudging numbers to make you feel better) will be taken up by last-minute JS1's (there haven't been enough last-minute JS1's to fill more than 30 ish spots). We know from the thread that everyone who wasn't a last minute JS1 (i.e. people with JS1's in early March or earlier) was considered for this last wave, so the other 170 JS2's will be given out to people exactly like you. I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a better chance than someone who JS1'd in November, but by the same token, I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a worse shot than someone who JS1'd in late February. So the question is, how many people are you competing against for those 170 spots? Well, that math is easy--it's the total number of non-WL JS1's (around 1200, when you account for the last-minute people) minus the admits so far (800-ish). 400. 170/400 = 42.5%. You have a better than 40% "raw" chance of getting in. That's not the 75% chance you started out with, but it ain't bad.
Now, of course, those 170 spots are not given away randomly. It's a numbers game, just like it always has been.
FWIW, I just got a Vandy from NYU this morning. So that takes some of the sting out.
- LSRAT

- Posts: 207
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2016 10:02 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Right, I forgot about that. Makes sense. (Also, nice avatar).Leliana wrote:I don't think so because admissions will almost certainly be busy at ASW tomorrow.seeprybyrun wrote:Could happen, certainly. Will happen? No idea.LSRAT wrote:Also, since there are no interviews tomorrow, doesn't it make sense that a large reject/wl wave will happen?
- ws120

- Posts: 26
- Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2016 9:21 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
[/quote]
There's one wave left, probably average-sized (so, 1/5 of the 1000 non-WL admits, or 200 potential HLS'ers). Maybe 30 spots in it (I'm just spitballing here, but it's honest spitballing--I'm not fudging numbers to make you feel better) will be taken up by last-minute JS1's (there haven't been enough last-minute JS1's to fill more than 30 ish spots). We know from the thread that everyone who wasn't a last minute JS1 (i.e. people with JS1's in early March or earlier) was considered for this last wave, so the other 170 JS2's will be given out to people exactly like you. I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a better chance than someone who JS1'd in November, but by the same token, I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a worse shot than someone who JS1'd in late February. So the question is, how many people are you competing against for those 170 spots? Well, that math is easy--it's the total number of non-WL JS1's (around 1200, when you account for the last-minute people) minus the admits so far (800-ish). 400. 170/400 = 42.5%. You have a better than 40% "raw" chance of getting in. That's not the 75% chance you started out with, but it ain't bad.
Now, of course, those 170 spots are not given away randomly. It's a numbers game, just like it always has been.[/quote]
This is dubious. First, there are about 800 non WL admits, since HLS usually admits about 100 off the waitlist. Second, the data on LSN suggests that most of those 800 offers have been given out, if we compare that data to last year's cycle. Not saying the wave next week will not include JS1's from early 2017 and 2016, but I think its time for those of us who were in those JS1s to start preparing for a waitlist. The odds are almost certainly less than 40% for a non-WL admit.
There's one wave left, probably average-sized (so, 1/5 of the 1000 non-WL admits, or 200 potential HLS'ers). Maybe 30 spots in it (I'm just spitballing here, but it's honest spitballing--I'm not fudging numbers to make you feel better) will be taken up by last-minute JS1's (there haven't been enough last-minute JS1's to fill more than 30 ish spots). We know from the thread that everyone who wasn't a last minute JS1 (i.e. people with JS1's in early March or earlier) was considered for this last wave, so the other 170 JS2's will be given out to people exactly like you. I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a better chance than someone who JS1'd in November, but by the same token, I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a worse shot than someone who JS1'd in late February. So the question is, how many people are you competing against for those 170 spots? Well, that math is easy--it's the total number of non-WL JS1's (around 1200, when you account for the last-minute people) minus the admits so far (800-ish). 400. 170/400 = 42.5%. You have a better than 40% "raw" chance of getting in. That's not the 75% chance you started out with, but it ain't bad.
Now, of course, those 170 spots are not given away randomly. It's a numbers game, just like it always has been.[/quote]
This is dubious. First, there are about 800 non WL admits, since HLS usually admits about 100 off the waitlist. Second, the data on LSN suggests that most of those 800 offers have been given out, if we compare that data to last year's cycle. Not saying the wave next week will not include JS1's from early 2017 and 2016, but I think its time for those of us who were in those JS1s to start preparing for a waitlist. The odds are almost certainly less than 40% for a non-WL admit.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Kinch08

- Posts: 309
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2016 7:52 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
It definitely is dubious, I'm pulling numbers out of thin air because there's no better alternative.ws120 wrote:
This is dubious. First, there are about 800 non WL admits, since HLS usually admits about 100 off the waitlist. Second, the data on LSN suggests that most of those 800 offers have been given out, if we compare that data to last year's cycle. Not saying the wave next week will not include JS1's from early 2017 and 2016, but I think its time for those of us who were in those JS1s to start preparing for a waitlist. The odds are almost certainly less than 40% for a non-WL admit.
Except, maybe, for the LSN data; I haven't looked at it. It's bad, huh?
- KaijuOh8

- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Notwithstanding specific numbers and data (thank you for your effort to calm us unselected JS1 souls, by the way), three things look certain at this point:Kinch08 wrote:It definitely is dubious, I'm pulling numbers out of thin air because there's no better alternative.
Except, maybe, for the LSN data; I haven't looked at it. It's bad, huh?
1. There will be a JS2 wave next week;
2. There are massive WL / Ding purges on our way; and
3. There will be no more JS1s.
There is also one possibility: Some JS1 may get in via the next wave. This is pure speculation, and I personally don't bet on being in that last wave. Better start looking into the schools I got into while praying I get into the waitlist.
- KaijuOh8

- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Oh, been there, done that. Believe me.SybillAnnDorsett wrote:I wonder why last year and the year before, the first JS2s went to WL-JS1s and not pre-WL JS1s.
Gives me hope that if I'm waitlisted I could hear as early as late May.
(delusions of grandeur are so fun, you should really try it!)
-
Anon.y.mousse.

- Posts: 599
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Agreed. I personally am not betting on it either, and I'm coming to terms with that. Ultimately I probably wouldn't have ended up on Harvard anyways - $250k is a lot of money and a lot of debt to have hanging over my head when I have other great options and like .01% likelihood of need based aid. A WL/ding will just kind of sting because I didn't make the cut for undergrad either, despite stellar stats (*single tear rolls down cheek*), but maybe Harvard and me just weren't meant to be </3.KaijuOh8 wrote:Notwithstanding specific numbers and data (thank you for your effort to calm us unselected JS1 souls, by the way), three things look certain at this point:Kinch08 wrote:It definitely is dubious, I'm pulling numbers out of thin air because there's no better alternative.
Except, maybe, for the LSN data; I haven't looked at it. It's bad, huh?
1. There will be a JS2 wave next week;
2. There are massive WL / Ding purges on our way; and
3. There will be no more JS1s.
There is also one possibility: Some JS1 may get in via the next wave. This is pure speculation, and I personally don't bet on being in that last wave. Better start looking into the schools I got into while praying I get into the waitlist.
- KaijuOh8

- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Or maybe the karma for breaking the sacred 180 magic has finally began to hunt you down.Anon.y.mousse. wrote:maybe Harvard and me just weren't meant to be </3.
-
Anon.y.mousse.

- Posts: 599
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
lol true s/o to all the first time posters who pushed my post to 181 and cursed me forever.KaijuOh8 wrote:Or maybe the karma for breaking the sacred 180 magic has finally began to hunt you down.Anon.y.mousse. wrote:maybe Harvard and me just weren't meant to be </3.
-
Rodgepwnd

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2017 3:49 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
First time posting but longtime lurker.
I had my interview 3/8 and didn't get a JS2 yesterday
. Does this mean I'll likely get dinged or WL'ed? My numbers are pretty good and I thought the interview went okay. Just looking for an honest assessment of my chances based on my interview date and the fact that I missed that last wave.
I had my interview 3/8 and didn't get a JS2 yesterday
-
Anon.y.mousse.

- Posts: 599
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
If you look through last year's end-of-March-wave admits, many of them have JS2 dates in late February and early March. Many of the people admitted in yesterday's wave "missed" the first (and maybe second/third) wave that happened after their interview. Don't lose hope! It's not over until it's over and clearly they liked something about your app enough to give you an interview at this point.Rodgepwnd wrote:First time posting but longtime lurker.
I had my interview 3/8 and didn't get a JS2 yesterday. Does this mean I'll likely get dinged or WL'ed? My numbers are pretty good and I thought the interview went okay. Just looking for an honest assessment of my chances based on my interview date and the fact that I missed that last wave.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
gizmo1024

- Posts: 123
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 1:09 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Right there with ya buddy. Early March JS1.Rodgepwnd wrote:First time posting but longtime lurker.
I had my interview 3/8 and didn't get a JS2 yesterday. Does this mean I'll likely get dinged or WL'ed? My numbers are pretty good and I thought the interview went okay. Just looking for an honest assessment of my chances based on my interview date and the fact that I missed that last wave.
-
curry1

- Posts: 884
- Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
I'm beginning to wonder if I should have retaken my above median lsat...
-
LHS17

- Posts: 121
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:29 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
What time do ASW sessions start and end on first and last days? Would help in organizing airfares (for the April weekend, believe the official detail is forthcoming). Stipend amount?
- jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
RETAKE!curry1 wrote:I'm beginning to wonder if I should have retaken my above median lsat...
Jk
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- KateMcKitten

- Posts: 353
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2017 1:07 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Let's take this to http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=274102 ?LHS17 wrote:What time do ASW sessions start and end on first and last days? Would help in organizing airfares (for the April weekend, believe the official detail is forthcoming). Stipend amount?
- taxman14

- Posts: 504
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2015 8:04 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
bless youAnon.y.mousse. wrote:you're my heroKinch08 wrote:Here's some math I did in a PM to SMC that might be comforting/helpful to all the other JS1's who haven't heard back yet:taxman14 wrote:so bizarre...a ton will happen in the next weekpoptart123 wrote:yeskamy123 wrote:Any URM's still waiting/hoping for a JS1?
What's going on with this cycle... Going insane!
Quick q: any estimates of how many JS2s are remaining?? I'm sure someone has done the analysis
There's one wave left, probably average-sized (so, 1/5 of the 1000 non-WL admits, or 200 potential HLS'ers). Maybe 30 spots in it (I'm just spitballing here, but it's honest spitballing--I'm not fudging numbers to make you feel better) will be taken up by last-minute JS1's (there haven't been enough last-minute JS1's to fill more than 30 ish spots). We know from the thread that everyone who wasn't a last minute JS1 (i.e. people with JS1's in early March or earlier) was considered for this last wave, so the other 170 JS2's will be given out to people exactly like you. I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a better chance than someone who JS1'd in November, but by the same token, I don't think there's any reason to suppose that you have a worse shot than someone who JS1'd in late February. So the question is, how many people are you competing against for those 170 spots? Well, that math is easy--it's the total number of non-WL JS1's (around 1200, when you account for the last-minute people) minus the admits so far (800-ish). 400. 170/400 = 42.5%. You have a better than 40% "raw" chance of getting in. That's not the 75% chance you started out with, but it ain't bad.
Now, of course, those 170 spots are not given away randomly. It's a numbers game, just like it always has been.
-
edwardcyz

- Posts: 6
- Joined: Thu Mar 16, 2017 9:18 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Same. Had my JS1 on 2/28 and both LSAT GPA 50<75gizmo1024 wrote:Right there with ya buddy. Early March JS1.Rodgepwnd wrote:First time posting but longtime lurker.
I had my interview 3/8 and didn't get a JS2 yesterday. Does this mean I'll likely get dinged or WL'ed? My numbers are pretty good and I thought the interview went okay. Just looking for an honest assessment of my chances based on my interview date and the fact that I missed that last wave.
-
LHS17

- Posts: 121
- Joined: Fri Mar 03, 2017 4:29 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
Solid. Thanks.KateMcKitten wrote:Let's take this to http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 7&t=274102 ?LHS17 wrote:What time do ASW sessions start and end on first and last days? Would help in organizing airfares (for the April weekend, believe the official detail is forthcoming). Stipend amount?There is info there!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
AllHailKingMao

- Posts: 113
- Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2017 12:38 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
What's HLS's take on extra LORs? Do they look upon them favorably? Considering asking two profs for emergency letters lol
- jjcorvino

- Posts: 1459
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2016 9:49 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
HLS actually said they do not want more letters in their waitlist FAQ. I think they would appreciate a LOCI or new resume if there is an update though.AllHailKingMao wrote:What's HLS's take on extra LORs? Do they look upon them favorably? Considering asking two profs for emergency letters lol
- KaijuOh8

- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2017 2:19 am
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
It's about 10:30 a.m., and no news of a rejection email yet. Looks like we - as in potential WL candidates - will all live to witness the final week...?
*tension builds up*
*tension builds up*
-
LegalAAA

- Posts: 38
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2017 12:17 pm
Re: Harvard Law c/o 2020 Applicants (2016-2017)
To recap:
There will be at least one more wave next week.
It will include some early JS1s.
Good luck to everyone.
There will be at least one more wave next week.
It will include some early JS1s.
Good luck to everyone.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login