That's true, but have rejections/reserves ever come via e-mail? It would be a precedent I believe.MahaloMontana wrote:They've moved on to accepting by email though, so they may send all remaining decisions for the 21st group via email on that day. That would ensure they meet the deadline regardless of location.starsong wrote:Strange that no major wave of hold decisions has gone out yet. For letters to arrive by the 21st, they would have to leave NYC pretty soon. NYC applicants would hear first, but there's been no widespread reporting of hold decisions AFAIK...Z3RO wrote:anxiety bump
Columbia 2010 Forum
-
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:35 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
- utcris410
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:37 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I visited two weeks ago. They said they were trying to let all holds know by April 21, but that it could be up until May 1.
- Jacinda
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:21 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
That's late! Don't they know some people have arrangements to make?utcris410 wrote:I visited two weeks ago. They said they were trying to let all holds know by April 21, but that it could be up until May 1.
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Jacinda wrote:That's late! Don't they know some people have arrangements to make?utcris410 wrote:I visited two weeks ago. They said they were trying to let all holds know by April 21, but that it could be up until May 1.
They know. And they don't care.
-
- Posts: 226
- Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 7:48 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Withdrew from admission today....hope someone on TLS gets my slot. Good luck all!
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BaiAilian2013
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:05 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
No, you were both right. The original hold letter reads as above, but the useless follow-up e-mail we received more recently did say that they would "make every effort." I hope they didn't think that change in language would go unnoticed. Reason #586 Columbia are a bunch of bastards.holybartender wrote:Words. I am eating them.nawktasy wrote:The hold letter I have says:
Hope that helps.Please be advised that you will receive a decision from the Committee no later than April 21, 2010.
- BaiAilian2013
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:05 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Yeah, I'm worried about the 'maybe they really don't like me as a person' thing too... but I think the truth is that Columbia just isn't as predictable as TLS thinks. There are a handful of waitlists and rejections on LSN every year in what TLS would term the auto-admit zone, so I think there are "awesome shot" numbers, but really no such thing as auto-admit numbers. I mean, when you take all those waitlists and rejections and multiply them by whatever number to represent the entire applicant pool, that's a sizable number of 175+/3.7+ applicants not getting in. They can't all be felons.scribelaw wrote:I'm kinda wondering same thing for Columbia and Chicago, too.BaiAilian2013 wrote:No, I'm in the 'you'll hear by 4/21' batch. But realistically, they've had my application for seven months now (and my LOCI for two), and it's not like my numbers are so borderline that they'd have to wait till the very end to see if they could afford to take me... so I'm pretty sure I'm boned. I just wish I knew what it was that turned them off. My numbers twin on LSN got a Butler.Jacinda wrote:Did you already find out? I'm an EDer, and the admissions office told me I may not find out until after April.BaiAilian2013 wrote:Sigh. Anyone else here who has given up hope but just wants to know why they didn't get in? I think I would feel a lot better if I knew why.
I don't have Butler numbers, but I have a decent GPA and above-median LSAT. I'm thinking that CC were turned off by my no-name undergrad or the fact that I had a prior LSAT score, because that's better than them just not liking me.
Nope, not international... that sucks though.$1.99 wrote:if you are international, that could be the difference, they may have already filled up their quota of whatever country you are a citizen of, and please don't tell me law schools don't have quotas for foreign students

Jacinda wrote:I think when they said wait, it means they're going through all the apps on hold again. Yours could just be at the bottom because you applied early. I know I sent them at least 20 pages to read. So I wouldn't sweat it out until April 21st because then you know they're snail mailing you something, which means either a ding or waitlist.BaiAilian2013 wrote:No, I'm in the 'you'll hear by 4/21' batch. But realistically, they've had my application for seven months now (and my LOCI for two), and it's not like my numbers are so borderline that they'd have to wait till the very end to see if they could afford to take me... so I'm pretty sure I'm boned. I just wish I knew what it was that turned them off. My numbers twin on LSN got a Butler.Jacinda wrote:Did you already find out? I'm an EDer, and the admissions office told me I may not find out until after April.BaiAilian2013 wrote:Sigh. Anyone else here who has given up hope but just wants to know why they didn't get in? I think I would feel a lot better if I knew why.Cheer up Bai. Your worth don't go down cuz Columbia may not accept you.

- $1.99
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Tue Feb 09, 2010 1:49 am
Re: Columbia 2010
Bai, dont you have like a 179 LSAT and a gpa way above their 25th? lol did you send in the wrong PS?
-
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
She has a 180 LSAT and a GPA a little above CLS's median, IIRC.
No matter. We'll become friends at NYU, Bai, and have a lot more fun than those crazy kids at Columbia. You don't need CLS to know that you're awesome.
No matter. We'll become friends at NYU, Bai, and have a lot more fun than those crazy kids at Columbia. You don't need CLS to know that you're awesome.
- Core
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
When are we expecting any news (aside from before the end of the month lol)?
- ShibaDan
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:34 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I haven't been following this thread closely enough. If someone wouldn't mind helping me out. I was an ED'er and after being deferred have heard nothing. They said they'd start reviewing in March so I send an LOCI and additional LOR and still nothing. Is this typical for the ED --> Defer people?
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
my understanding is that an ED defer should be treated like a ding, basically.def2104 wrote:I haven't been following this thread closely enough. If someone wouldn't mind helping me out. I was an ED'er and after being deferred have heard nothing. They said they'd start reviewing in March so I send an LOCI and additional LOR and still nothing. Is this typical for the ED --> Defer people?
-
- Posts: 421
- Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:35 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
At this rate, it's looking like end of April. Last night I compared this year's timetable with last year's, and there definitely seems to be a delay this year. Holds started hearing 4/13 last year if I remember correctly.Core wrote:When are we expecting any news (aside from before the end of the month lol)?
FWIW, the WL wave hasn't gone out at NYU either; last year they started on 4/6. So maybe things are just slower this year...
Last edited by starsong on Thu Apr 15, 2010 11:39 am, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ShibaDan
- Posts: 337
- Joined: Fri Jun 22, 2007 11:34 am
Re: Columbia 2010
We don't even get reserve...that's lame. super lame. expect no donations from this alum.puppleberry finn wrote:my understanding is that an ED defer should be treated like a ding, basically.def2104 wrote:I haven't been following this thread closely enough. If someone wouldn't mind helping me out. I was an ED'er and after being deferred have heard nothing. They said they'd start reviewing in March so I send an LOCI and additional LOR and still nothing. Is this typical for the ED --> Defer people?

-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:13 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I've read some conflicting opinions. Some people say an ED defferal is as good as a rejection, but, supposedly, a few people do get accepted after being deffered. So our chances are either zero or very, very slim. I don't think that they would reject every single person they deferred because, after all, what would be the point of deferring us in the first place, then?
Anyways, I still have some hope, but I'll be the first to admit that I'm most likely setting myself up for disappointment, and I'm prepared for that.
Anyways, I still have some hope, but I'll be the first to admit that I'm most likely setting myself up for disappointment, and I'm prepared for that.
-
- Posts: 254
- Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I can't take it anymore.
- Core
- Posts: 890
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
LMAO! I've felt like this since Monday, but with CLS, SLS, and HLS.legalnoeagle wrote:I can't take it anymore.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Jacinda
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 10:21 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Don't worry Bai. We've all felt like this at one point or another, at least I have, but it ain't true. They just feelings, and feeling ain't necessary reality.BaiAilian2013 wrote:Jacinda wrote: I think when they said wait, it means they're going through all the apps on hold again. Yours could just be at the bottom because you applied early. I know I sent them at least 20 pages to read. So I wouldn't sweat it out until April 21st because then you know they're snail mailing you something, which means either a ding or waitlist.Cheer up Bai. Your worth don't go down cuz Columbia may not accept you.
Thanks Jacinda. You are perceptive.

- BaiAilian2013
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:05 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
Yep, 3.79. Harvard hasn't bitten either, but I really was expecting Columbia to come through.BenJ wrote:She has a 180 LSAT and a GPA a little above CLS's median, IIRC.
No matter. We'll become friends at NYU, Bai, and have a lot more fun than those crazy kids at Columbia. You don't need CLS to know that you're awesome.

But no matter indeed! We will have super fun at NYU.

-
- Posts: 248
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 4:18 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
unless you get in on 4/21!BaiAilian2013 wrote:Yep, 3.79. Harvard hasn't bitten either, but I really was expecting Columbia to come through.BenJ wrote:She has a 180 LSAT and a GPA a little above CLS's median, IIRC.
No matter. We'll become friends at NYU, Bai, and have a lot more fun than those crazy kids at Columbia. You don't need CLS to know that you're awesome.
But no matter indeed! We will have super fun at NYU.<3
- ChildPlease
- Posts: 86
- Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 3:42 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
I didn't get this. Do you remember when this was sent?BaiAilian2013 wrote:No, you were both right. The original hold letter reads as above, but the useless follow-up e-mail we received more recently did say that they would "make every effort." I hope they didn't think that change in language would go unnoticed. Reason #586 Columbia are a bunch of bastards.holybartender wrote:Words. I am eating them.nawktasy wrote:The hold letter I have says:
Hope that helps.Please be advised that you will receive a decision from the Committee no later than April 21, 2010.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BaiAilian2013
- Posts: 958
- Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 4:05 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
March 31st. Here's the text:ChildPlease wrote:I didn't get this. Do you remember when this was sent?BaiAilian2013 wrote: No, you were both right. The original hold letter reads as above, but the useless follow-up e-mail we received more recently did say that they would "make every effort." I hope they didn't think that change in language would go unnoticed. Reason #586 Columbia are a bunch of bastards.
We hope you are enjoying your spring. As we continue to evaluate applications for the Columbia Law School Class of 2013, we are also reviewing candidates whom we placed on "Hold" earlier in the admissions season. This year's applicant pool continues to be among the largest and most highly qualified in our history; therefore, we would like to encourage you, if you have not already done so, to submit a statement of continuing interest in Columbia that includes new pertinent information, if any. To the extent possible, kindly limit the statement to one page. Please send the statement to Danielle Flores, Assistant Director of Admissions, at danielle.flores@law.columbia.edu, no later than April 7, 2010. Upon receipt of your correspondence, we will add the statement to your file but will not be able to confirm receipt of individual statements.
At this date, we also understand that you might have committed to another law school for the next three years. While we are saddened by the loss of your candidacy, we would appreciate it if you could notify us of this as soon as possible by contacting Danielle Flores at danielle.flores@law.columbia.edu.
Please be advised that should you remain under consideration, we will make every effort to mail your decision no later than the date specified in your letter. Thank you again for your continued patience and interest in Columbia Law School.
-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Tue May 12, 2009 7:31 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
i didn't get it eitherI didn't get this. Do you remember when this was sent?
- gmail
- Posts: 1012
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 9:41 pm
Re: Columbia 2010
If I don't have an acceptance tomorrow then I'm guessing it'll come next week. I also have a feeling they've been saving one last Hamilton for me. Good luck to everyone else.
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:14 am
Re: Columbia 2010
I'm another ED deferral. They sure are dragging this out. Telling me maybe in December only to tell me in mid- to late April NO is kind of rude! I would've preferred to know the NO in December since I am a non-URM and a 4.0/158.
They've allowed me to hold on to hope! :/
Any idea when we WILL hear, though? Obviously, I'd go in a heartbeat.
They've allowed me to hold on to hope! :/
Any idea when we WILL hear, though? Obviously, I'd go in a heartbeat.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login