The comment, though partially aimed at your grouping of Chicago with the actual middle top 14 schools, was mostly in response to the poster who called hopeful a "troll" for hinting that Chicago was not in fact in the same group as Penn. Still understand that when most people on here talk about being in a certain area within the rankings they mean in "real life" as opposed to US News. Anyway that's not the purpose of this thread so let's just leave it at that.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Are you shitting me? It is a middle T14 (it is not #1, 2 or 3 is it?, it is also not #12, 13 or 14 right?) I was giving some useful information and I only listed those three because those were the first three schools whose yield rate I looked up. My information was regarding Yield Rate not its ranking. And Chicago's yield rate is right around 28%.kurama20 wrote:
See what I was talking about when I said US News is starting to distort younger people/and those who don't know about law school's perception of Chicago? You now have people classifying a school that is only out placed by HYS (and barely out placed by Stanford at that) into the same group as Penn and UVA. Making it even worse they actually are so sure that their assertion of Chicago as a "middle" top 14 that they are calling you a troll. Chicago needs to get on the ball with this US News thing, even though the people who count the most in the short term (hiring partners, law firms, government agencies, legal academics) know it's on a par with Columbia many current applicants do not.
What's really bad is that that poster said Chicago was a middle top 14 on par with UVA and Penn, with such certainty that people who are looking for honest information, and don't realize that that poster doesn't know what they are talking about, will take them seriously.
U Penn 2010 Forum
- kurama20
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 5:04 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 3:04 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
according to ABA data linked from LSAC, for 5,811 apps they made 957 offers (last yr i would guess?) 16.47% acceptance rate
-
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 3:46 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
thalassocrat wrote:Yep. Complete 10/23, UR 11/11, UR again 12/3. RD.vmmf wrote:I had my first UR update today. I originally went UR on 11/11. RD. Did anyone else's UR date change today?
I've been focusing so much on Berkeley and Michigan I keep on forgetting about Penn and UVA.
Same here. UR 11/11, updated to UR today, 12/3. Please let this be a good sign.
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:38 pm
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:01 am
Re: U Penn 2010
Then if all the numbers we are hearing are correct, ED has a considerably LOWER acceptance rate, despite having no YP issues.alm2127 wrote:according to ABA data linked from LSAC, for 5,811 apps they made 957 offers (last yr i would guess?) 16.47% acceptance rate
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
I think hopeful is a troll because a) he spends time in multiple threads, trolling, like telling kids in the NYU thread that he got in, and calling CLS a degree mill that will drop out of the T14 in the CLS thread, and b) he goes into other (non-Chicago) threads just to make comments about Chicago. But thanks for the lecture on the Real World.kurama20 wrote: The comment, though partially aimed at your grouping of Chicago with the actual middle top 14 schools, was mostly in response to the poster who called hopeful a "troll" for hinting that Chicago was not in fact in the same group as Penn. Still understand that when most people on here talk about being in a certain area within the rankings they mean in "real life" as opposed to US News. Anyway that's not the purpose of this thread so let's just leave it at that.
- MC Southstar
- Posts: 1191
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
Yeah, but it doesn't mean that ED has WORSE chances, it just means that people who actually ED to Penn probably have bad numbers and are reaching with the ED.The Kim Jong illest wrote:Then if all the numbers we are hearing are correct, ED has a considerably LOWER acceptance rate, despite having no YP issues.alm2127 wrote:according to ABA data linked from LSAC, for 5,811 apps they made 957 offers (last yr i would guess?) 16.47% acceptance rate
-
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
I still love that kurama20 is trying to explain to me how TLS works. I have never been here before, so it was nice to have the explanation.puppins wrote:I think hopeful is a troll because a) he spends time in multiple threads, trolling, like telling kids in the NYU thread that he got in, and calling CLS a degree mill that will drop out of the T14 in the CLS thread, and b) he goes into other (non-Chicago) threads just to make comments about Chicago. But thanks for the lecture on the Real World.kurama20 wrote: The comment, though partially aimed at your grouping of Chicago with the actual middle top 14 schools, was mostly in response to the poster who called hopeful a "troll" for hinting that Chicago was not in fact in the same group as Penn. Still understand that when most people on here talk about being in a certain area within the rankings they mean in "real life" as opposed to US News. Anyway that's not the purpose of this thread so let's just leave it at that.
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:01 am
Re: U Penn 2010
Right, but this bolsters Penn's claim that they don't favor ED applicants in any way.shadowfrost000 wrote:Yeah, but it doesn't mean that ED has WORSE chances, it just means that people who actually ED to Penn probably have bad numbers and are reaching with the ED.The Kim Jong illest wrote:Then if all the numbers we are hearing are correct, ED has a considerably LOWER acceptance rate, despite having no YP issues.alm2127 wrote:according to ABA data linked from LSAC, for 5,811 apps they made 957 offers (last yr i would guess?) 16.47% acceptance rate
- MC Southstar
- Posts: 1191
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
W/e I bet you get in.The Kim Jong illest wrote:Right, but this bolsters Penn's claim that they don't favor ED applicants in any way.shadowfrost000 wrote:Yeah, but it doesn't mean that ED has WORSE chances, it just means that people who actually ED to Penn probably have bad numbers and are reaching with the ED.The Kim Jong illest wrote:Then if all the numbers we are hearing are correct, ED has a considerably LOWER acceptance rate, despite having no YP issues.alm2127 wrote:according to ABA data linked from LSAC, for 5,811 apps they made 957 offers (last yr i would guess?) 16.47% acceptance rate
- SteakEmUp
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 10:46 am
Re: U Penn 2010
There are 6 ED acceptances on LSN from last year, so if there are a total of 15, that's 40% of the ED class. If nothing else, it makes that data a little easier to extrapolate from.
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
0L Hoping for 1 wrote:I still love that kurama20 is trying to explain to me how TLS works. I have never been here before, so it was nice to have the explanation.puppins wrote:I think hopeful is a troll because a) he spends time in multiple threads, trolling, like telling kids in the NYU thread that he got in, and calling CLS a degree mill that will drop out of the T14 in the CLS thread, and b) he goes into other (non-Chicago) threads just to make comments about Chicago. But thanks for the lecture on the Real World.kurama20 wrote: The comment, though partially aimed at your grouping of Chicago with the actual middle top 14 schools, was mostly in response to the poster who called hopeful a "troll" for hinting that Chicago was not in fact in the same group as Penn. Still understand that when most people on here talk about being in a certain area within the rankings they mean in "real life" as opposed to US News. Anyway that's not the purpose of this thread so let's just leave it at that.
<3
- kurama20
- Posts: 538
- Joined: Thu May 24, 2007 5:04 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
I love how someone thinks amassing close to 5000 posts on an anonymous online message board is something to be proud of.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:I still love that kurama20 is trying to explain to me how TLS works. I have never been here before, so it was nice to have the explanation.puppins wrote:I think hopeful is a troll because a) he spends time in multiple threads, trolling, like telling kids in the NYU thread that he got in, and calling CLS a degree mill that will drop out of the T14 in the CLS thread, and b) he goes into other (non-Chicago) threads just to make comments about Chicago. But thanks for the lecture on the Real World.kurama20 wrote: The comment, though partially aimed at your grouping of Chicago with the actual middle top 14 schools, was mostly in response to the poster who called hopeful a "troll" for hinting that Chicago was not in fact in the same group as Penn. Still understand that when most people on here talk about being in a certain area within the rankings they mean in "real life" as opposed to US News. Anyway that's not the purpose of this thread so let's just leave it at that.

What's even more hilarious is that puppins has hopeful confused with another poster!



Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- x47point6
- Posts: 101
- Joined: Mon Sep 21, 2009 12:43 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
Right. I knew something looked a little off (I missed the "1" when I copied and pasted the numbers).alm2127 wrote:according to ABA data linked from LSAC, for 5,811 apps they made 957 offers (last yr i would guess?) 16.47% acceptance rate
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 8#p2254488kurama20 wrote: I love how someone thinks amassing close to 5000 posts on an anonymous online message board is something to be proud of.![]()
What's even more hilarious is that puppins has hopeful confused with another poster!![]()
![]()
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 5#p2243815


































-
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
Really? I said I was proud? Where? I jsut thought you'd be smart enough to not try and explain what happens on this board to someone who has been on it longer than you.kurama20 wrote:
I love how someone thinks amassing close to 5000 posts on an anonymous online message board is something to be proud of.![]()
What's even more hilarious is that puppins has hopeful confused with another poster!![]()
![]()
Secondly, Puppins wasnt confused.
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:01 am
Re: U Penn 2010
HEY STOP SHITTING ALL OVER OUR THREAD YOU DOUCHE BAGS
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
Look at the author of the thread. All your UPenn thread is mineThe Kim Jong illest wrote:HEY STOP SHITTING ALL OVER OUR THREAD YOU DOUCHE BAGS
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
ALL YOUR UPENN THREAD IS BELONG TO US0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Look at the author of the thread. All your UPenn thread is mineThe Kim Jong illest wrote:HEY STOP SHITTING ALL OVER OUR THREAD YOU DOUCHE BAGS
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2009 7:38 pm
- MC Southstar
- Posts: 1191
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 3:27 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
And another thread bites the dust..
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 192
- Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 1:01 am
Re: U Penn 2010
Give me your address sir, I am going to slap you in person.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Look at the author of the thread. All your UPenn thread is mineThe Kim Jong illest wrote:HEY STOP SHITTING ALL OVER OUR THREAD YOU DOUCHE BAGS
-
- Posts: 1322
- Joined: Sun Jan 25, 2009 9:36 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
haha slap. Are you a girl?The Kim Jong illest wrote:Give me your address sir, I am going to slap you in person.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Look at the author of the thread. All your UPenn thread is mineThe Kim Jong illest wrote:HEY STOP SHITTING ALL OVER OUR THREAD YOU DOUCHE BAGS
- gahthelaw
- Posts: 727
- Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 11:30 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
i think the more important question is whether or not (s)he has driving gloves with which to slap.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:haha slap. Are you a girl?The Kim Jong illest wrote:Give me your address sir, I am going to slap you in person.0L Hoping for 1 wrote:Look at the author of the thread. All your UPenn thread is mineThe Kim Jong illest wrote:HEY STOP SHITTING ALL OVER OUR THREAD YOU DOUCHE BAGS
- puppleberry finn
- Posts: 1035
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 7:03 pm
Re: U Penn 2010
this isn't a duel challenge homey!gahthelaw wrote: i think the more important question is whether or not (s)he has driving gloves with which to slap.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login