AgreedGardenGnome wrote:People's statuses were changing before you last week. Seeing that no one has heard anything I'm guessing were out of luck this week.wannabelawstudent wrote:Oh yeah, sorry. I've logged all the changes to all my status checkers in a word doc and those were the only 2 I put for SMU. I literally saw it change as I was leaving work last friday (which would be 15 minutes from now).Wes0568 wrote:
A lot of people had their status update change from application complete, then application completed, then it changed the day your acceptances came out last Friday. Yours didn't change at all...so it is possible that we can't trust to glean anything from the status checker for movement, etc.
SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle) Forum
- crchildress
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:44 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
-
- Posts: 2578
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Ya good point, and I think decisions were cycling everyone 2 weeks.
- crchildress
- Posts: 134
- Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:44 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Makes sense, that also means the next batch would come out before Spring Break begins.wannabelawstudent wrote:Ya good point, and I think decisions were cycling everyone 2 weeks.
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Mar 01, 2013 10:38 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
If anybody has any questions about SMU, PM me. I am currently a 1L and know you guys probably have a lot of questions.
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Well, Admitted Students Day was today (which was awesome) and the staff was busy with that nearly all day. Hopefully you get something on Monday. 

Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jenm12
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2012 4:47 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Would you say it's worth going to ASD if we've already taken a tour? Also, did most people bring guests with them?JXander wrote:Well, Admitted Students Day was today (which was awesome) and the staff was busy with that nearly all day. Hopefully you get something on Monday.
Thanks!
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2012 7:40 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
(I'm going to put in my $0.02 even though I'm not the one quoted.) I'd say it's a really nice function and worth going to even if you took a tour, because it was fun meeting everyone and sitting through a class. Also, they feed you (ha) and the food was very good. A lot of parents were present, although not everyone took a guest.jenm12 wrote:Would you say it's worth going to ASD if we've already taken a tour? Also, did most people bring guests with them?JXander wrote:Well, Admitted Students Day was today (which was awesome) and the staff was busy with that nearly all day. Hopefully you get something on Monday.
Thanks!
That being said, it's not worth traveling there for an ASD if you've had a tour already. You won't get a lot of new information. But if you already live in Dallas, or nearby, it's a nice program to attend.
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
In my opinion, no. But if you want to sit in on a class (which is a great way to get a glimpse of what the school is like in terms of faculty), then do go.jenm12 wrote:Would you say it's worth going to ASD if we've already taken a tour?
Thanks!
It was pretty split. If you are relatively outgoing, I wouldn't worry too much. The staff was very friendly and conversational.jenm12 wrote:lso, did most people bring guests with them?
Side note: I was really surprised how many admits brought their parents with them.
majnana wrote:the food was very good
- Well_he_did_not
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:18 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
JXander wrote:In my opinion, no. But if you want to sit in on a class (which is a great way to get a glimpse of what the school is like in terms of faculty), then do go.jenm12 wrote:Would you say it's worth going to ASD if we've already taken a tour?
Thanks!It was pretty split. If you are relatively outgoing, I wouldn't worry too much. The staff was very friendly and conversational.jenm12 wrote:lso, did most people bring guests with them?
Side note: I was really surprised how many admits brought their parents with them.majnana wrote:the food was very good
I agree in that I don't think ASD is very useful. Most people this past weekend asks good questions along the lines of "why YOU vs. UT/Baylor/Etc" and the responses were meager at best. The summation of the dean's comments along with students comments was this: go to SMU if you want to work in DFW because it has great connections with law firms, clerkships, etc. If you've done the smallest bit of homework you already know this.majnana wrote:jenm12 wrote:Would you say it's worth going to ASD if we've already taken a tour? Also, did most people bring guests with them?JXander wrote:Well, Admitted Students Day was today (which was awesome) and the staff was busy with that nearly all day. Hopefully you get something on Monday.
Thanks
- Well_he_did_not
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:18 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I thought the same thing, although in SMU's defense all students in the panel/guides were really nice!JXander wrote:Well_he_did_not wrote: I thought some of the students had an air of douchery (One guy sitting right in front of me actually rolled his eyes because we were in his class and his friend LITERALLY scoffed when someone in their friends group said "should we say hi to them?".
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
What class did you guys sit in on?
- Well_he_did_not
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:18 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Contracts II with a older white professor with glasses? Sorry I don't remember his name.kalvano wrote:What class did you guys sit in on?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Could you tell me about this reputation. I'm not aware of it.SMU students tend to have a bit of a reputation about them.
- Well_he_did_not
- Posts: 50
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2013 10:18 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I'll PM you but please take it with a grain of salt!TheJanitor6203 wrote:Could you tell me about this reputation. I'm not aware of it.SMU students tend to have a bit of a reputation about them.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 1:34 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
SMU students have the reputation of being douches. At least, I know the undergrads do. (some of it is well deserved). i dont necessarily feel it has to do with the SMU itself, but more so the fact many SMU undergrads typically come from Dallas $.TheJanitor6203 wrote:Could you tell me about this reputation. I'm not aware of it.SMU students tend to have a bit of a reputation about them.
Last edited by nirvanah on Mon Mar 04, 2013 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I grew up as "the poor kid" in Highland Park so I think I already know what you're going to say. I'm just curious.Well_he_did_not wrote:I'll PM you but please take it with a grain of salt!TheJanitor6203 wrote:Could you tell me about this reputation. I'm not aware of it.SMU students tend to have a bit of a reputation about them.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Professor C. Rogers.Well_he_did_not wrote:Contracts II with a older white professor with glasses? Sorry I don't remember his name.kalvano wrote:What class did you guys sit in on?
- kalvano
- Posts: 11951
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I don't know why they stick you guys in Contracts. It's so boring. Upper-level classes would be much more interesting.
SMU students, particularly the undergrads, have the reputation of being spoiled, entitled douchebags. There is a bit of that in the law school, but it's nowhere near what you'd find in the undergrad. There's a good chunk of students not from Dallas, so it balances out. Although if you're the kind of person who gets irritable by young people with money, even nice people, SMU will be rough.
SMU students, particularly the undergrads, have the reputation of being spoiled, entitled douchebags. There is a bit of that in the law school, but it's nowhere near what you'd find in the undergrad. There's a good chunk of students not from Dallas, so it balances out. Although if you're the kind of person who gets irritable by young people with money, even nice people, SMU will be rough.
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I thought it was very interesting how very few (identifiable) URMs were at the ASD and in the class. Does SMU typically suffer in terms of ethnic diversity?
- StylinNProfilin
- Posts: 410
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 4:27 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
alot of kid brought their parents? really? thats...um...embarassing. Is this typcial?Well_he_did_not wrote:JXander wrote:In my opinion, no. But if you want to sit in on a class (which is a great way to get a glimpse of what the school is like in terms of faculty), then do go.jenm12 wrote:Would you say it's worth going to ASD if we've already taken a tour?
Thanks!It was pretty split. If you are relatively outgoing, I wouldn't worry too much. The staff was very friendly and conversational.jenm12 wrote:lso, did most people bring guests with them?
Side note: I was really surprised how many admits brought their parents with them.majnana wrote:the food was very goodI agree in that I don't think ASD is very useful. Most people this past weekend asks good questions along the lines of "why YOU vs. UT/Baylor/Etc" and the responses were meager at best. The summation of the dean's comments along with students comments was this: go to SMU if you want to work in DFW because it has great connections with law firms, clerkships, etc. If you've done the smallest bit of homework you already know this.majnana wrote:jenm12 wrote:Would you say it's worth going to ASD if we've already taken a tour? Also, did most people bring guests with them?JXander wrote:Well, Admitted Students Day was today (which was awesome) and the staff was busy with that nearly all day. Hopefully you get something on Monday.
Thanks
- JXander
- Posts: 966
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 10:23 am
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
+1TheRedBlueBerry wrote:I was shocked when I walked into the breakfast area alone and I was surrounded by parents.
- TheJanitor6203
- Posts: 880
- Joined: Sun Nov 04, 2012 5:12 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
Well, next year as an admitted student (hopefully), I'll be sure to bring my wife, kids, parents and grandparents. I'll be the coolest kid there.
-
- Posts: 136
- Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2012 4:18 pm
Re: SMU c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013 cycle)
I don't see why everyone is shocked about parents being there. They're more than likely paying for a large portion if not all of the student's COL or tuition, so they should get to see what they're paying for. Also, they're probably excited their child is going to law school and want to be there before their kid is sent off for another three years.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login