That's pretty much my story in a nutshell, haha. I didn't think it was the best idea to revisit it, but I was looking for reassurance that it would be OK not to mention it in my LOCI. Thanks BenJBenJ wrote:If there's a story (death in the family, serious illness, etc.), you might write a separate addendum about your GPA and include it in the envelope with the LOCI (and have the LOCI just mention "additional materials enclosed"). But I wouldn't bother if the story is "I partied too much freshman year but am mature now." That's what they'll take from an upward trend anyway unless you tell them otherwise.
(I hope that's sound advice.)
Harvard 2010! Forum
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
-
NightHooded

- Posts: 81
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:56 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
So if they're STILL holding people, why not WL them immediately? Is this a sign that some, maybe even a considerable portion of the Holds, will get admitted and not WLed?
-
BenJ

- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
It may just be that they're committed to not establishing their waitlist until mid-April, which is how it's worked in past years. Although there are still somewhere around 50-100 total seats left to be given out according to this thread's calculations, so some holds will still get straight-out admitted.
(Is there anyone still in contention who has not been held? I was under the impression that I was one of the last not-held, not-rejected, not-admitted people.)
(Is there anyone still in contention who has not been held? I was under the impression that I was one of the last not-held, not-rejected, not-admitted people.)
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
One of the posters above, jgolimow, gives the impression he/she has not been held, but has a later UR date (1/21) than most people I've seen in the Harvard threads.BenJ wrote:(Is there anyone still in contention who has not been held? I was under the impression that I was one of the last not-held, not-rejected, not-admitted people.)
-
jgolimow

- Posts: 39
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 7:02 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Yep, no hold -- just UR 1/21 ...
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- invisiblesun

- Posts: 329
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:01 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Maybe HLS is going to hold onto a lot of people to make sure they're not glossing over someone just because they applied late, etc., and going to make a "final cut" in which a huge batch of WLs, denys, and a considerable amount of acceptances will be given out. Kind of like what Stanford seems to do in April (if you look at SLS LSN profile this cycle as opposed to last cycle they've only accepted slightly over half of how many people they accepted last year.) It's probably not going to be of that scale, I'd say Harvard has no more than 100 acceptances to go. This is all speculation, of course, they could be still planning to accept 150 or 20 more... no one here knows.NightHooded wrote:So if they're STILL holding people, why not WL them immediately? Is this a sign that some, maybe even a considerable portion of the Holds, will get admitted and not WLed?
Last edited by invisiblesun on Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
BenJ

- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Weird. I was UR later than that (1/27).
Last edited by BenJ on Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- invisiblesun

- Posts: 329
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:01 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Mine's the same as my hold date, which is 1/27.BenJ wrote:Weird. I was UR later than that (1/26).
-
BenJ

- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:58 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Corrected the date to 1/27 for my UR. That was my original UR date. My new UR date is 3/23, same as the hold.invisiblesun wrote:Mine's the same as my hold date, which is 1/27.BenJ wrote:Weird. I was UR later than that (1/26).
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Is the hold notification automated? As in, if you haven't gotten a firm decision by a certain point in the cycle, does their system send out hold notifications to everyone whose app is still open? In that case, it wouldn't really signify whether there are any spots open, or if any of the held applicants will be anything other than WL or dinged. (I know there are people still in contention w/o a hold notification, but maybe they will be getting theirs today or in the next couple days.)
Last edited by blue5385 on Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
mh7777

- Posts: 63
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 12:20 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
UR 1/6 and nothing else here. Numbers aren't up to par, though, so I guess I'm using a loose definition of "in contention".blue5385 wrote:One of the posters above, jgolimow, gives the impression he/she has not been held, but has a later UR date (1/21) than most people I've seen in the Harvard threads.BenJ wrote:(Is there anyone still in contention who has not been held? I was under the impression that I was one of the last not-held, not-rejected, not-admitted people.)
- clintonius

- Posts: 1239
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:50 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Yeah, I've only been UR since 2/24, but am without so much as a hold.
- Lmao Zedong

- Posts: 381
- Joined: Sat Feb 28, 2009 12:10 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
don't think it works this way. i think people have gone substantially varying amounts of time under review before getting heldblue5385 wrote:Is the hold notification automated? As in, if you haven't gotten a firm decision by a certain point in the cycle, does their system send out hold notifications to everyone whose app is still open? In that case, it wouldn't really signify whether there are any spots open, or if any of the held applicants will be anything other than WL or dinged. (I know there are people still in contention w/o a hold notification, but maybe they will be getting theirs today or in the next couple days.)
edit: still, i'm also at a loss as to why to hold people in late march. if i had to guess, maybe it's just a way of saying "anything else you want us to know before we make a final decision?" of course, being waitlisted would essentially serve that same purpose, but doing it earlier with holds instead would, i presume, expedite that process
Last edited by Lmao Zedong on Wed Mar 24, 2010 2:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
blue5385

- Posts: 895
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:23 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
I don't really think it does either, I was just throwing it out there. To clarify one thing, I didn't mean hold notifications would be sent out at a certain point in each individual's cycle if his/her app was still open, because you're right that there has been a wide variety of time UR between held applicants, but a certain point in the overall admissions cycle (i.e., the last week of March).Lmao Zedong wrote:don't think it works this way. i think people have gone substantially varying amounts of time under review before getting heldblue5385 wrote:Is the hold notification automated? As in, if you haven't gotten a firm decision by a certain point in the cycle, does their system send out hold notifications to everyone whose app is still open? In that case, it wouldn't really signify whether there are any spots open, or if any of the held applicants will be anything other than WL or dinged. (I know there are people still in contention w/o a hold notification, but maybe they will be getting theirs today or in the next couple days.)
- >insert witty name<

- Posts: 76
- Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 11:32 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
mh7777 wrote:UR 1/6 and nothing else here. Numbers aren't up to par, though, so I guess I'm using a loose definition of "in contention".blue5385 wrote:One of the posters above, jgolimow, gives the impression he/she has not been held, but has a later UR date (1/21) than most people I've seen in the Harvard threads.BenJ wrote:(Is there anyone still in contention who has not been held? I was under the impression that I was one of the last not-held, not-rejected, not-admitted people.)
i'm in the not held/not rejected/not admitted group. UR 12/24, Complete email 1/8, nothing since.,
- Sogui

- Posts: 621
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:32 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Samejgolimow wrote:Yep, no hold -- just UR 1/21 ...
- adameus

- Posts: 719
- Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 2:07 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Sogui, I really hope you get in. No one here seems to want it as badly as you do.Sogui wrote:Samejgolimow wrote:Yep, no hold -- just UR 1/21 ...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- englawyer

- Posts: 1271
- Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 10:57 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
+1adameus wrote:Sogui, I really hope you get in. No one here seems to want it as badly as you do.Sogui wrote:Samejgolimow wrote:Yep, no hold -- just UR 1/21 ...
- thestalkmore

- Posts: 96
- Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:11 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
That you're not in with a 3.9/176 is scary. When did you apply?
-
RealTalk

- Posts: 49
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 8:55 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
is there any hope for a URM who still hasn't got JR1 yet?
HLS was always gonna be a long shot but I kinda wanna get a response already rather than being in limbo
HLS was always gonna be a long shot but I kinda wanna get a response already rather than being in limbo
- Herb Watchfell

- Posts: 228
- Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:48 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Yes, but not for you.RealTalk wrote:is there any hope for a URM who still hasn't got JR1 yet?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- invisiblesun

- Posts: 329
- Joined: Sun Nov 01, 2009 6:01 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I'm right around there (but with a higher LSAT) and I'm still on hold, but I originally applied with a lower score, which might have something to do with it. Hope it doesn't keep me out...thestalkmore wrote:That you're not in with a 3.9/176 is scary. When did you apply?
- Sogui

- Posts: 621
- Joined: Mon Feb 23, 2009 12:32 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
There are people here with even scarier numbers (178+) who haven't heard anything either. I know a girl who got a Hamilton from Columbia who hasn't heard a peep from Harvard.thestalkmore wrote:That you're not in with a 3.9/176 is scary. When did you apply?
I applied in late December
With a little over a month until deposit deadline I really wonder what's going to happen.
- crackberry

- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Carterth (180, 4.0) was held.
-
amolson04

- Posts: 74
- Joined: Sun Jan 03, 2010 1:03 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
yeah me too, but my UR was a little later.>insert witty name< wrote:mh7777 wrote:UR 1/6 and nothing else here. Numbers aren't up to par, though, so I guess I'm using a loose definition of "in contention".blue5385 wrote:One of the posters above, jgolimow, gives the impression he/she has not been held, but has a later UR date (1/21) than most people I've seen in the Harvard threads.BenJ wrote:(Is there anyone still in contention who has not been held? I was under the impression that I was one of the last not-held, not-rejected, not-admitted people.)
i'm in the not held/not rejected/not admitted group. UR 12/24, Complete email 1/8, nothing since.,
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login