Are you also a prescriptive grammarian?canafsa wrote:Yes, but it's degradation and is objectively undesirable if we want language to be nuanced and able to express complex ideas. It's limiting our vocabulary, even in news media and the arts. I actually get really worked up by this topic.Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:I don't think it's the "fault" of anything, just a new way that people speak. There were many vocal patterns we find odd that took route throughout history in all languages, it's just the nature of a memeAssasindowntheavenue wrote:I get you. It sort of starts off as a fast and easy way to qualify something, but can get addicting. You would loathe Southern California where many say "like" after every other word lol. I had to consciously make an effort to not get it stuck in my vocabulary. But I don't see it as ppl's faults so much as the American education system + easy access to social media.canafsa wrote:Assasindowntheavenue wrote: Ppl actually say "AF" instead of "as fuck" in real life??? Lol
Forget talking in short-hand. I loathe how people say "as fuck" or "pretty" to qualify every fucking statement for the past few years. Same with using the word "trash" or saying "literally me" or "this". It's not clever or charming or informative, just patronizing and obnoxious.
TLS c/o 2020 - In #Squad We Trust Forum
- 88234

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 5:02 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 5:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
courtneyleigh_1

- Posts: 17
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 7:35 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Kronk at his finest.Bourbon Democrat wrote:Squeak squikity Squeak skquecumRigo wrote:I say Elle Oh Elle sometimes but never when something is funny.
But my best friend and I speak the same squirrel language so that's the least of our dialect.
-
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I feel this hard, two years ago I had almost the same thing happen to me. It's tough to see the MyLSN output and not get a little bit presumptuous about results. The good thing is that WL are not final, you could definitely get in off of it if you really commit. Or you could take some time off to reevaluate and probably put forward a stronger application now humbled (the fact that I'm still in these boards should indicate I support this choice)Nightwing wrote:I could really use a hug right about now. I just got my third waitlist in a row... from my top choice (Cornell). No acceptances yet. I can count the number of law schools in the entire country whose 75th percentile LSATs I do not match/beat on one hand... and I've been met by nothing but a combination of unwavering silence and these soft rejections... from the lower T14 and even a non-T14 safety.
MyLSN made me feel much more special than reality has. Someone please tell me it'll be okay. I don't have the optimism left in me to do it myself.
I know it hurts to look forward and possibly make the decision to delay law school, the good news is your LSAT is done and if you are a KJD you'll be applying with probably a stronger GPA and at the very least a finalized one.
I would take some time to think, commit to trying to get off just Cornell's WL, and if it doesn't work out this year know that as long as you know where you'll live for 1 year things won't really change much in the grand scheme of your life if you apply next cycle
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
It starts out with an innocent lol and it ends with a clementine wth a toupee in the ovaltine office.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Emperor's New Groove is HYS Disney.courtneyleigh_1 wrote:Kronk at his finest.Bourbon Democrat wrote:Squeak squikity Squeak skquecumRigo wrote:I say Elle Oh Elle sometimes but never when something is funny.
But my best friend and I speak the same squirrel language so that's the least of our dialect.
- 88234

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 5:02 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Haha as a descriptive grammarian going to law school, I say "blah blah natural evolution of language blah blah this has all happened before blah blah measure what is not what you think language should be blah"canafsa wrote:I'm going to law school, so I better be! Don't get me started on emojis.88234 wrote:Are you also a prescriptive grammarian?canafsa wrote:Yes, but it's degradation and is objectively undesirable if we want language to be nuanced and able to express complex ideas. It's limiting our vocabulary, even in news media and the arts. I actually get really worked up by this topic.Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:I don't think it's the "fault" of anything, just a new way that people speak. There were many vocal patterns we find odd that took route throughout history in all languages, it's just the nature of a memeAssasindowntheavenue wrote:I get you. It sort of starts off as a fast and easy way to qualify something, but can get addicting. You would loathe Southern California where many say "like" after every other word lol. I had to consciously make an effort to not get it stuck in my vocabulary. But I don't see it as ppl's faults so much as the American education system + easy access to social media.canafsa wrote:Assasindowntheavenue wrote: Ppl actually say "AF" instead of "as fuck" in real life??? Lol
Forget talking in short-hand. I loathe how people say "as fuck" or "pretty" to qualify every fucking statement for the past few years. Same with using the word "trash" or saying "literally me" or "this". It's not clever or charming or informative, just patronizing and obnoxious.
- Thelaw23

- Posts: 794
- Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2015 8:23 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Nightwing wrote:I could really use a hug right about now. I just got my third waitlist in a row... from my top choice (Cornell). No acceptances yet. I can count the number of law schools in the entire country whose 75th percentile LSATs I do not match/beat on one hand... and I've been met by nothing but a combination of unwavering silence and these soft rejections... from the lower T14 and even a non-T14 safety.
MyLSN made me feel much more special than reality has. Someone please tell me it'll be okay. I don't have the optimism left in me to do it myself.
I got about 6 WL (Duke, UVA, Cornell, Upenn, Michigan) before I was accepted into Columbia. Have hope, but don't sit there twiddling your thumbs either. Send material into both, schools you haven't heard from in a while and schools you have been waitlisted at. Hope dies last, and I wish you so much luck!! Message me if you ever need to get your mood up or are feeling down about it. Don't let it overwhelm you and keep fighting, if you have the numbers and you didn't write your PS or statements in crayon your cycle should shake out at least a bit!
-
canafsa

- Posts: 346
- Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2016 2:50 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
.
Last edited by canafsa on Sat Apr 15, 2017 5:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Kopetz

- Posts: 338
- Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2016 11:06 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
yeah, vernaculars have always existed and have necessarily been less complex than formalized registers of the same language (and have probably always been annoying to some degree to formally educated speakers)88234 wrote:
Haha as a descriptive grammarian going to law school, I say "blah blah natural evolution of language blah blah this has all happened before blah blah measure what is not what you think language should be blah"
- 88234

- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 5:02 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
You're probably a constructionist too, huh? It's okay, constructionism happens to good people too.canafsa wrote:Oh god. I hope to god we aren't in the same conlaw class. You gave me hives just now.88234 wrote: Haha as a descriptive grammarian going to law school, I say "blah blah natural evolution of language blah blah this has all happened before blah blah measure what is not what you think language should be blah"
Taking an objective, scientific approach to the evolution of language? Sorry not sorry bro/brah.
-
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I'm not really sure the addition of like as a filler word objectively degrades language or makes us less able to convey complex ideas. I will agree that a general decrease in vocabulary makes us unable to convey complex yet different concepts, but I think that is a separate issue than a vocal habit. Also, in some instances I'm sure a more accurate response than YASS could be used, but it's not as though these response are used in particular thought provoking situations, there have always been formal and informal languages, and both serve their respective purposes.canafsa wrote:I'm going to law school, so I better be! Don't get me started on emojis.88234 wrote:Are you also a prescriptive grammarian?canafsa wrote:Yes, but it's degradation and is objectively undesirable if we want language to be nuanced and able to express complex ideas. It's limiting our vocabulary, even in news media and the arts. I actually get really worked up by this topic.Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:I don't think it's the "fault" of anything, just a new way that people speak. There were many vocal patterns we find odd that took route throughout history in all languages, it's just the nature of a memeAssasindowntheavenue wrote:I get you. It sort of starts off as a fast and easy way to qualify something, but can get addicting. You would loathe Southern California where many say "like" after every other word lol. I had to consciously make an effort to not get it stuck in my vocabulary. But I don't see it as ppl's faults so much as the American education system + easy access to social media.canafsa wrote:Assasindowntheavenue wrote: Ppl actually say "AF" instead of "as fuck" in real life??? Lol
Forget talking in short-hand. I loathe how people say "as fuck" or "pretty" to qualify every fucking statement for the past few years. Same with using the word "trash" or saying "literally me" or "this". It's not clever or charming or informative, just patronizing and obnoxious.
It's no better to argue we should always speak like we're writing a legal document than it is to say we should use AF in formal communication.
- Mr_Chukes

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
One of the dudes on a website I go on mastered that shit lmao. I gotta find one of his post. Shit was gold.CHyde wrote:SO to when da real OGz tYpEd LiKe ThIsMr_Chukes wrote:Ri I mean fo real shawty wuh livin da lifePozzo wrote:Yes, as in,Assasindowntheavenue wrote:
Ppl actually say "AF" instead of "as fuck" in real life??? Lol
"Oh Em Gee. I'm literally lolling. That is funny AF. I literally cannot even right now," said the insufferable little brat as she Snapchatted her life away.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Anon.y.mousse.

- Posts: 599
- Joined: Thu Dec 01, 2016 5:35 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I use af, p, emojis, or even better bitmojis, semi-ironically over text or when i'm hanging out with my roommates shooting the shit, watching dance moms/the bachelor and laughing about memes or what have you. we also joke that I keep the rest of the house young because at 23, i'm the youngest.
but I am also certainly capable of having serious intellectual conversations or writing legal briefs or other formal writing documents and use language to express nuance and communicate clearly.
i'd find it incredibly boring to speak in the same tone as a legal brief 24/7. nothing "objectively undesirable" about it.
but I am also certainly capable of having serious intellectual conversations or writing legal briefs or other formal writing documents and use language to express nuance and communicate clearly.
i'd find it incredibly boring to speak in the same tone as a legal brief 24/7. nothing "objectively undesirable" about it.
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
yeah watching suits is like listening to migosRigo wrote:I enjoy Suits but I still recognize its p trash.
-
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
+180 famAnon.y.mousse. wrote:I use af, p, emojis, or even better bitmojis, semi-ironically over text or when i'm hanging out with my roommates shooting the shit, watching dance moms/the bachelor and laughing about memes or what have you. we also joke that I keep the rest of the house young because at 23, i'm the youngest.
but I am also certainly capable of having serious intellectual conversations or writing legal briefs or other formal writing documents and use language to express nuance and communicate clearly.
i'd find it incredibly boring to speak in the same tone as a legal brief 24/7. nothing "objectively undesirable" about it.
- Assasindowntheavenue

- Posts: 818
- Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2016 6:45 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
I don't think it's the "fault" of anything, just a new way that people speak. There were many vocal patterns we find odd that took route throughout history in all languages, it's just the nature of a meme
Can't really get into it since I'm at work and can't type long blocks of text, but I generally agree with your posts. Also, if this is the TLS rant hour, just wanted to say that I fucking hate "YASSS" and "Slay" and all those words that usually find their way back to Beyoncé for some reason. Maybe random but whatever lol.Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote: I'm not really sure the addition of like as a filler word objectively degrades language or makes us less able to convey complex ideas. I will agree that a general decrease in vocabulary makes us unable to convey complex yet different concepts, but I think that is a separate issue than a vocal habit. Also, in some instances I'm sure a more accurate response than YASS could be used, but it's not as though these response are used in particular thought provoking situations, there have always been formal and informal languages, and both serve their respective purposes.
It's no better to argue we should always speak like we're writing a legal document than it is to say we should use AF in formal communication.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- R. Jeeves

- Posts: 1980
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 7:54 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
suits was actually good for two seasons. then it was at least tolerable for the third because being invested in the characters allowed you to still enjoy it despite the kinda crappy writing at that point. but after that it kinda blewRigo wrote:It's run its course.Thelaw23 wrote:Wot did you just sayRigo wrote:I enjoy Suits but I still recognize its p trash.
Edit: I literally couldn't watch the latest season
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
R. Jeeves wrote:suits was actually good for two seasons. then it was at least tolerable for the third because being invested in the characters allowed you to still enjoy it despite the kinda crappy writing at that point. but after that it kinda blewRigo wrote:It's run its course.Thelaw23 wrote:Wot did you just sayRigo wrote:I enjoy Suits but I still recognize its p trash.
Edit: I literally couldn't watch the latest season
NO SUITS SLANDER SHALL PROSPER (although I'm completely behind on this season)
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Okay, y'all clearly just haven't had friends that hype you up/hyped up your friends enough because those two words are essential to the "GLO SIS" package.Assasindowntheavenue wrote:Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote:
I don't think it's the "fault" of anything, just a new way that people speak. There were many vocal patterns we find odd that took route throughout history in all languages, it's just the nature of a memeCan't really get into it since I'm at work and can't type long blocks of text, but I generally agree with your posts. Also, if this is the TLS rant hour, just wanted to say that I fucking hate "YASSS" and "Slay" and all those words that usually find their way back to Beyoncé for some reason. Maybe random but whatever lol.Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash wrote: I'm not really sure the addition of like as a filler word objectively degrades language or makes us less able to convey complex ideas. I will agree that a general decrease in vocabulary makes us unable to convey complex yet different concepts, but I think that is a separate issue than a vocal habit. Also, in some instances I'm sure a more accurate response than YASS could be used, but it's not as though these response are used in particular thought provoking situations, there have always been formal and informal languages, and both serve their respective purposes.
It's no better to argue we should always speak like we're writing a legal document than it is to say we should use AF in formal communication.
- forum_user

- Posts: 844
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2015 9:40 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
+1 gets me so irrationally angry/annoyed. just say "yes." you don't actually pronounce an "ah" sound in the middle of that wordAssasindowntheavenue wrote: I fucking hate "YASSS" and "Slay"
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Yas and yes are not the same thing.forum_user wrote:+1 gets me so irrationally angry/annoyed. just say "yes." you don't actually pronounce an "ah" sound in the middle of that wordAssasindowntheavenue wrote: I fucking hate "YASSS" and "Slay"
- Leliana

- Posts: 464
- Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2016 12:23 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
+180 to all of thisKopetz wrote:yeah, vernaculars have always existed and have necessarily been less complex than formalized registers of the same language (and have probably always been annoying to some degree to formally educated speakers)88234 wrote:
Haha as a descriptive grammarian going to law school, I say "blah blah natural evolution of language blah blah this has all happened before blah blah measure what is not what you think language should be blah"
EDIT: canafsa, your 'tar has some good words to say on the subject, look up De vulgari eloquentia
Last edited by Leliana on Thu Feb 23, 2017 2:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
R. Jeeves wrote:suits was actually good for two seasons. then it was at least tolerable for the third because being invested in the characters allowed you to still enjoy it despite the kinda crappy writing at that point. but after that it kinda blewRigo wrote:It's run its course.Thelaw23 wrote:Wot did you just sayRigo wrote:I enjoy Suits but I still recognize its p trash.
Edit: I literally couldn't watch the latest season
YASSS, I legit enjoyed it until
Then it just got bad
-
Dr.Degrees_Cr.Cash

- Posts: 1296
- Joined: Sat Feb 20, 2016 1:27 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Since we're back to TV shows:
Anybody else watch the terrible show called "the deep end"? throughout the entire 6 episode series I couldn't tell if it was so bad it was good or if it was so bad it went back to being bad again.
I will say though the thing that kept me coming back were the ever changing accents of Kevin Rayburn
Anybody else watch the terrible show called "the deep end"? throughout the entire 6 episode series I couldn't tell if it was so bad it was good or if it was so bad it went back to being bad again.
I will say though the thing that kept me coming back were the ever changing accents of Kevin Rayburn
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login