Berkeley 2010 Forum
- Curare
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 6:18 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
how was it a miserable experience if you were accepted to a top 5 undergrad (according to your lsn)? this is a serious question.managamy wrote:Not really, I guess. It's just that it would be nice to keep my winning streak going. As I mentioned in some other thread, I had a miserable experience in undergraduate admissions, so I relish each of these acceptances more than one might think.
I realize that this behavior is selfish though; sorry.
Last edited by Curare on Tue Nov 24, 2009 2:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:11 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
To divert attention from the hate-fest, are we looking for phone calls tomorrow? A change in the status checker? An email? A combination?
I would hate for it to be phone call only. I can't get phone calls. Someone want to ask the dean if i got in when he calls you?
EDIT: I was kidding about asking Dean Tom.
I would hate for it to be phone call only. I can't get phone calls. Someone want to ask the dean if i got in when he calls you?
EDIT: I was kidding about asking Dean Tom.
- bighead715
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:02 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
he hasnt called me yet, but i was going to call him in the morning on your behalf...too badsouthxii wrote:To divert attention from the hate-fest, are we looking for phone calls tomorrow? A change in the status checker? An email? A combination?
I would hate for it to be phone call only. I can't get phone calls. Someone want to ask the dean if i got in when he calls you?
EDIT: I was kidding about asking Dean Tom.
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
I think it's phone call with an email that follows afterwards. Zai says the status checker never changed, so I wouldn't put much stock in that.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- tintin
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:26 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
thats kind of annoying, why bother with the status checker at all.......on the other hand, im glad i won't have to be checking it compulsively.VoidSix wrote:I think it's phone call with an email that follows afterwards. Zai says the status checker never changed, so I wouldn't put much stock in that.
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
So, overanalysis because I'm not tired whatsoever:
All of the first batch on LSN were admitted on 11-25-09 last year. I'm going to call the one 11-24-09 and the one 11-26-09 mistakes in reporting, because there's only one of each. So, potentially if the decisions came out on the 25th again it would be Wednesday. However, the 25th last year was a Tuesday, so it looks like tomorrow is more likely to be D-Day. However, if you don't get in on the 25th, you have a really good shot at getting in one or two weeks later, even if you applied before many of the people who were accepted the first day.
All of the first batch on LSN were admitted on 11-25-09 last year. I'm going to call the one 11-24-09 and the one 11-26-09 mistakes in reporting, because there's only one of each. So, potentially if the decisions came out on the 25th again it would be Wednesday. However, the 25th last year was a Tuesday, so it looks like tomorrow is more likely to be D-Day. However, if you don't get in on the 25th, you have a really good shot at getting in one or two weeks later, even if you applied before many of the people who were accepted the first day.
- booby87
- Posts: 240
- Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 11:11 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
you're making me so anxious for tomorrow...I really hope you're rightVoidSix wrote:So, overanalysis because I'm not tired whatsoever:
All of the first batch on LSN were admitted on 11-25-09 last year. I'm going to call the one 11-24-09 and the one 11-26-09 mistakes in reporting, because there's only one of each. So, potentially if the decisions came out on the 25th again it would be Wednesday. However, the 25th last year was a Tuesday, so it looks like tomorrow is more likely to be D-Day. However, if you don't get in on the 25th, you have a really good shot at getting in one or two weeks later, even if you applied before many of the people who were accepted the first day.

- 5ky
- Posts: 10835
- Joined: Mon Oct 05, 2009 4:10 pm
- nixxers
- Posts: 393
- Joined: Tue Oct 20, 2009 10:47 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
Just withdrew in the face of insane tuition hikes + JR2. Good luck everyone... bye berkeley.
- tintin
- Posts: 952
- Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2008 12:26 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
i appreciate you giving the rest of a us a better shot!nixxers wrote:Just withdrew in the face of insane tuition hikes + JR2. Good luck everyone... bye berkeley.

looking at LSN, I'm getting edgy because it looks like a LOT of people who submitted 10/1 and went complete 10/22 (which is when I did) got the call on tues/wed before thanksgiving. I can dream...
- parker09
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 5:15 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
That's really big of you. Thanks!nixxers wrote:Just withdrew in the face of insane tuition hikes + JR2. Good luck everyone... bye berkeley.
Oh, and CONGRATS on Harvard!
- Eigenvalue A
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:35 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
I'm really kicking myself about applying to schools so much later than I had originally planned. If I miss the submittal date cut-off for getting into Berkeley during the first wave (or, if I don't get into Berkeley) I'm going to kick myself even harder.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
A serious and fair question. I applied to several top schools during my senior year in high school (although not the school that I currently attend), and all of them rejected me. Consequently, I had to scramble for contingency plans to fill the following year while I re-applied. It's true that I ended up in a wonderful university, but the route there was extremely convoluted and stressful.Curare wrote:how was it a miserable experience if you were accepted to a top 5 undergrad (according to your lsn)? this is a serious question.managamy wrote:Not really, I guess. It's just that it would be nice to keep my winning streak going. As I mentioned in some other thread, I had a miserable experience in undergraduate admissions, so I relish each of these acceptances more than one might think.
I realize that this behavior is selfish though; sorry.
I hope that this description explains why I am especially happy that my cycle is proceeding successfully so far.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
so, you'd attend berkeley over harvard despite berkeley's skyrocketing tuition? i find that hard to believe...[/quote]
Only because I really like the Bay Area and hope to practice in California eventually.
I was not saying "attend" but rather "consider attending"; in other words, I wouldn't toss out the possibility immediately.
Only because I really like the Bay Area and hope to practice in California eventually.
I was not saying "attend" but rather "consider attending"; in other words, I wouldn't toss out the possibility immediately.
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
5ky wrote:What do you think my chances of being in the first wave would be? Sent 10/27, Complete 10/28, UR 11/02.VoidSix wrote:So, overanalysis because I'm not tired whatsoever:
All of the first batch on LSN were admitted on 11-25-09 last year. I'm going to call the one 11-24-09 and the one 11-26-09 mistakes in reporting, because there's only one of each. So, potentially if the decisions came out on the 25th again it would be Wednesday. However, the 25th last year was a Tuesday, so it looks like tomorrow is more likely to be D-Day. However, if you don't get in on the 25th, you have a really good shot at getting in one or two weeks later, even if you applied before many of the people who were accepted the first day.
Hell if I know. It's Berkeley. Judging from your stats, I'd say if Berkeley was sane and normal, you'd be in. Unfortunately, the school's admissions patterns more closely resemble a flock of seagulls copulating in a vat of peanut butter.
- bilbobaggins
- Posts: 686
- Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 3:41 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
I don't get that from this graph:VoidSix wrote:5ky wrote:What do you think my chances of being in the first wave would be? Sent 10/27, Complete 10/28, UR 11/02.VoidSix wrote:So, overanalysis because I'm not tired whatsoever:
All of the first batch on LSN were admitted on 11-25-09 last year. I'm going to call the one 11-24-09 and the one 11-26-09 mistakes in reporting, because there's only one of each. So, potentially if the decisions came out on the 25th again it would be Wednesday. However, the 25th last year was a Tuesday, so it looks like tomorrow is more likely to be D-Day. However, if you don't get in on the 25th, you have a really good shot at getting in one or two weeks later, even if you applied before many of the people who were accepted the first day.
Hell if I know. It's Berkeley. Judging from your stats, I'd say if Berkeley was sane and normal, you'd be in. Unfortunately, the school's admissions patterns more closely resemble a flock of seagulls copulating in a vat of peanut butter.
http://berkeley.lawschoolnumbers.com/st ... Cycle=0809
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 32987
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2008 9:18 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
You just enjoy arguing. Berkeley's graph is by far the biggest clusterfuck outside of Stanford and Yale.
For a breath of fresh air, check out this one:
http://nyu.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0809/
For a breath of fresh air, check out this one:
http://nyu.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0809/
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
Hell if I know. It's Berkeley. Judging from your stats, I'd say if Berkeley was sane and normal, you'd be in. Unfortunately, the school's admissions patterns more closely resemble a flock of seagulls copulating in a vat of peanut butter.[/quote]
I don't get that from this graph:
http://berkeley.lawschoolnumbers.com/st ... Cycle=0809[/quote]
I do see a pattern, but it's not as overwhelming as some schools. If it makes my critics feel any better, I don't have a terribly strong chance of admission here anyway. I submitted only a generic, 2-page PS, and I don't particularly fit the Dean's ideal-student profile according to his TLS interview.
I don't get that from this graph:
http://berkeley.lawschoolnumbers.com/st ... Cycle=0809[/quote]
I do see a pattern, but it's not as overwhelming as some schools. If it makes my critics feel any better, I don't have a terribly strong chance of admission here anyway. I submitted only a generic, 2-page PS, and I don't particularly fit the Dean's ideal-student profile according to his TLS interview.
- CardinalRules
- Posts: 2332
- Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 5:20 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
That's a very pretty graph!VoidSix wrote:You just enjoy arguing. Berkeley's graph is by far the biggest clusterfuck outside of Stanford and Yale.
For a breath of fresh air, check out this one:
http://nyu.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/0809/

-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 7:11 am
Re: Berkeley 2010
Screw the graphs!!! I was promised a vat of peanut butter!!! Show me that!
For serious though, it'll be a good day for some residing in this thread tomorrow. Or today. Whatever. I'm hours ahead of y'all.
For serious though, it'll be a good day for some residing in this thread tomorrow. Or today. Whatever. I'm hours ahead of y'all.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rowlf
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:55 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
Do you get your money back if you withdraw?nixxers wrote:Just withdrew in the face of insane tuition hikes + JR2. Good luck everyone... bye berkeley.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sun Jan 20, 2008 11:42 am
- rowlf
- Posts: 111
- Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 3:55 pm
Re: Berkeley 2010
Yeah, money aside, I think it's the classy thing to do.rm21 wrote:No, I don't think so -- but, if I don't get in today, I'll be withdrawing for the same reasons.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login