I'm not sub-25th for GPA, but I am right at 3.8 and got a call with a mid-170s LSAT.GargamelITT wrote:hmm, yeah it seems like this is actually still going on, interestingly enough. how many confirmed cases have we seen of sub-3.8 JR1s? just two, to my recollection - there was a 3.69/179 someone pointed out on LSN and msoftceo in this thread, who reported being a traditional splitter. it seems like the strong majority of the JR1s we have seen have had GPAs above median, but LSATs have spanned the full range from 25 to 75 and aboveemptybee wrote:Especially given the relative shift in early JR1's (i.e. high GPA/strong softs/~25th LSAT (like me)). I can't imagine HLS making a quasi-significant paradigm shift in who they accept.
Harvard 2010! Forum
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 2:54 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
- NancyBotwin
- Posts: 1084
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 5:43 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Submitted over the weekend, but I don't really stand a chance. We'll see...maybe they'll just really really like me. 

-
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:49 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
i think we should also note that given the intimidating stats of many people on TLS, people with lower stats who get the interview may be more hesitant to share, for fear of later embarrassment in the case they become part of the 300 WL'd/rejected post-interview. sure, this applies to people all around but probably moreso for the low gpa people (traditional splitters being less common than reverse splitters). so, there have probably been many more than 2, sadly.GargamelITT wrote: hmm, yeah it seems like this is actually still going on, interestingly enough. how many confirmed cases have we seen of sub-3.8 JR1s? just two, to my recollection - there was a 3.69/179 someone pointed out on LSN and msoftceo in this thread, who reported being a traditional splitter. it seems like the strong majority of the JR1s we have seen have had GPAs above median, but LSATs have spanned the full range from 25 to 75 and above
but you shouldn't throw in the towel. don't lose hope!
- soullesswonder
- Posts: 552
- Joined: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:36 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Is there anyone lurking around here whose stats are above both 75ths? What is your status right now?
- capitalacq
- Posts: 639
- Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 2:42 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
YPs lolsoullesswonder wrote:Is there anyone lurking around here whose stats are above both 75ths? What is your status right now?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Oct 03, 2009 2:54 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Just had my JR1! As everyone said, pretty straightforward. He asked what I've been up to, why law school, and why Harvard. I asked him a question about PI opportunities post-Harvard, and he had a great story about a grad who pursued some amazing opportunities.
All told, the call lasted 9 min. I felt nervous, but think it went well!
All told, the call lasted 9 min. I felt nervous, but think it went well!
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 10:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
soullesswonder wrote:Is there anyone lurking around here whose stats are above both 75ths? What is your status right now?
Above 75th for both here. Got my complete email today but no JR1. Take that for whatever its worth...
- Nom Sawyer
- Posts: 913
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:28 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Cool...I'll take it as a sign of hope, i'm at/above both medians so not as likely as you but yeah complete today, no JR1 email yetReverethong wrote:soullesswonder wrote:Is there anyone lurking around here whose stats are above both 75ths? What is your status right now?
Above 75th for both here. Got my complete email today but no JR1. Take that for whatever its worth...
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
though possible, the impression KB gave me in her info session was that the interview process would NOT be changing significantly for this cycle.emptybee wrote:I'd be careful about jumping to conclusions about early JR1 = near admit, at least to the same degree as it did last year. With a new dean, maybe he's interviewing more people than they're going to accept. Especially given the relative shift in early JR1's (i.e. high GPA/strong softs/~25th LSAT (like me)). I can't imagine HLS making a quasi-significant paradigm shift in who they accept.
- catwoman
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:33 pm
-
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 8:52 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
submitted app 10/21, under review 11/02, no complete email, no JR1 email, ~at LSAT median, above 75th for GPA.
-
- Posts: 276
- Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 12:06 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
submitted 10/26, under review 11/1, no complete email, no JR1, just above 25th for GPA and above 75th for LSAT.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:37 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
I just had my interview and then read this entire thread. My interview was SO short! Probably because I spoke so quickly. Other than its length, I don't think I said anything too stupid or too brilliant--does that mean it probably won't have any effect on my chances either way?
At the last minute, I asked him a question about whether the budget cuts have had any substantial effects beyond free coffee. He said there haven't been any.
For the record, I have a low-ish GPA, around the 3.8 mark, and am at 75%ile for LSAT.
At the last minute, I asked him a question about whether the budget cuts have had any substantial effects beyond free coffee. He said there haven't been any.
For the record, I have a low-ish GPA, around the 3.8 mark, and am at 75%ile for LSAT.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 11:51 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
+1. I read this post and wondered if I had managed to unknowingly post under a different screen name since this exact same thing happened to me (minus the budget cut question). From what I've read, the interview doesn't seem to have much of an impact on the admissions decision...at least that's what I'm telling myselfracklebelize wrote:I just had my interview and then read this entire thread. My interview was SO short! Probably because I spoke so quickly. Other than its length, I don't think I said anything too stupid or too brilliant--does that mean it probably won't have any effect on my chances either way?
At the last minute, I asked him a question about whether the budget cuts have had any substantial effects beyond free coffee. He said there haven't been any.
For the record, I have a low-ish GPA, around the 3.8 mark, and am at 75%ile for LSAT.

- tomhobbes
- Posts: 455
- Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:20 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Application received 10/26, under review 11/2, no complete email or JR1 yet.soullesswonder wrote:Is there anyone lurking around here whose stats are above both 75ths? What is your status right now?
- jdcballer
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
at ~25% LSAT, above 75% GPA submitted 10/27 under review 11/2...no email yet
- humdrum
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 9:30 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
a friend of mine told me that her friend got a phone acceptance from Harvard today. i know, too early wtf right? the girl who got accepted isn't my friend, though she wouldn't have reason to lie. don't know her stats, only that she went to an Ivy undergrad (not HYP).
hope some of you guys start hearing back soon...
hope some of you guys start hearing back soon...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Oh boy.humdrum wrote:a friend of mine told me that her friend got a phone acceptance from Harvard today. i know, too early wtf right? the girl who got accepted isn't my friend, though she wouldn't have reason to lie. don't know her stats, only that she went to an Ivy undergrad (not HYP).
hope some of you guys start hearing back soon...
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
LOL hard to believe, especially since that would be >2 months turn-around time, and for the past...so many cycles, was always around thanksgiving. this is a bit too early, they arent even done w/ first wave interviews yet! hahahumdrum wrote:a friend of mine told me that her friend got a phone acceptance from Harvard today. i know, too early wtf right? the girl who got accepted isn't my friend, though she wouldn't have reason to lie. don't know her stats, only that she went to an Ivy undergrad (not HYP).
hope some of you guys start hearing back soon...
and people have all sorts of reasons to lie, some are just pathological liars.
-
- Posts: 43
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
Are early JR1's any more like to get JR2's than later JR1's? Also, from what I can gather, the overall rate of JR1-->JR2 is about 75%, no?
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
We have established that in past years, yes about 75 percent of JR1 recipients receive a JR2. If Harvard has indeed changed its policy to try to get back to people within 2 months of applying, however, I don't think an early JR1 is any more likely to get a JR2 than a late JR1 is. I hope your theory holds though since I am an early JR1 recipient.emptybee wrote:Are early JR1's any more like to get JR2's than later JR1's? Also, from what I can gather, the overall rate of JR1-->JR2 is about 75%, no?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:00 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
This is the debate that I've been having too. I think early/late might matter within your wave--like whether you get early or late based upon the week/time you apply--but it's all really impossible to determine.crackberry wrote:We have established that in past years, yes about 75 percent of JR1 recipients receive a JR2. If Harvard has indeed changed its policy to try to get back to people within 2 months of applying, however, I don't think an early JR1 is any more likely to get a JR2 than a late JR1 is. I hope your theory holds though since I am an early JR1 recipient.emptybee wrote:Are early JR1's any more like to get JR2's than later JR1's? Also, from what I can gather, the overall rate of JR1-->JR2 is about 75%, no?
Very frustrating.
Also, my JR1 is in 8 hrs...why can't I sleep?
- Kên
- Posts: 13
- Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:53 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
because the fate of the remainder of your life depends partly on your performance during this interview tomorrow.picaresco wrote:
Also, my JR1 is in 8 hrs...why can't I sleep?
- DallasCowboy
- Posts: 650
- Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2009 9:47 am
Re: Harvard 2010!
Just moved to under review. Make this quick and painless, although I don't really feel I am going to get my $85 worth of status-checking fun.
- crackberry
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Thu Sep 17, 2009 3:23 pm
Re: Harvard 2010!
That's hyperbole if I've ever seen it.Kên wrote:because the fate of the remainder of your life depends partly on your performance during this interview tomorrow.picaresco wrote:
Also, my JR1 is in 8 hrs...why can't I sleep?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login