Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014) Forum
-
anubis1911

- Posts: 150
- Joined: Sat May 04, 2013 12:41 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
It depends on how badly you want to be accepted. This interview coul very well be life-changing. I would make it work. Whatever you have on the 18th can be put off. I would sell my soul if it made sure making the interview.
- rigoding

- Posts: 118
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2013 1:45 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I think I might ditch work. It just seems unfair that they only give me two days to schedule. What do you think it means?anubis1911 wrote:It depends on how badly you want to be accepted. This interview coul very well be life-changing. I would make it work. Whatever you have on the 18th can be put off. I would sell my soul if it made sure making the interview.
- Happy Gilmore

- Posts: 314
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:24 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
What is more depressing is that this "son of a famous politician" got in with 166/3.2BentleyLittle wrote:It looks like ED heard back Thursday 12/20 last year. Is it safe to assume that there is a good chance ED decisions will come out at the end of the week? Also, LOL'd at "son of famous politician under softs.
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
just went recently and I was around Thanksgiving.midwest17 wrote:Has anyone with a complete date in December gone under review yet?
-
20141023

- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Happy Gilmore

- Posts: 314
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 4:24 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Your probably right. I bet rubenstein's second cousin could get in with a 140 though.Regulus wrote:Hahaha that was probably some more trolling by this guy. I doubt a non-URM got into UChicago with a 166/3.2 no matter how famous their parents are.Happy Gilmore wrote:What is more depressing is that this "son of a famous politician" got in with 166/3.2BentleyLittle wrote:It looks like ED heard back Thursday 12/20 last year. Is it safe to assume that there is a good chance ED decisions will come out at the end of the week? Also, LOL'd at "son of famous politician under softs.
- andapieceoftoast

- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I would call the admissions office. I have a feeling this computer glich/mistake. I don't see any reason why they would give everyone else 2 weeks and you 2 days. This is definitely not a case of you bugging them, but really a legitimate question.rigoding wrote:I think I might ditch work. It just seems unfair that they only give me two days to schedule. What do you think it means?anubis1911 wrote:It depends on how badly you want to be accepted. This interview coul very well be life-changing. I would make it work. Whatever you have on the 18th can be put off. I would sell my soul if it made sure making the interview.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Yeah, it can't hurt to call; two day notice is fairly unreasonable. Although if I were you I would be trying to do it ASAP anyway. The sooner you do the interview the sooner they can make a decision while there are more seats available.andapieceoftoast wrote:I would call the admissions office. I have a feeling this computer glich/mistake. I don't see any reason why they would give everyone else 2 weeks and you 2 days. This is definitely not a case of you bugging them, but really a legitimate question.rigoding wrote:I think I might ditch work. It just seems unfair that they only give me two days to schedule. What do you think it means?anubis1911 wrote:It depends on how badly you want to be accepted. This interview coul very well be life-changing. I would make it work. Whatever you have on the 18th can be put off. I would sell my soul if it made sure making the interview.
-
jdapplicant

- Posts: 251
- Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 2:05 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Have RD applicants been getting interviews as well, or has it only been ED applicants? I applied RD in September so I'm not sure if the silent treatment I've been getting is something I should be really worried about. Sorry if that has already been covered, I haven't been able to keep up with TLS while traveling.
-
NapoleonXV

- Posts: 217
- Joined: Sun Jul 08, 2012 8:29 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I am RD applied mid-Sept and got an interview invite a couple of weeks agojdapplicant wrote:Have RD applicants been getting interviews as well, or has it only been ED applicants? I applied RD in September so I'm not sure if the silent treatment I've been getting is something I should be really worried about. Sorry if that has already been covered, I haven't been able to keep up with TLS while traveling.
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Applied RD late October and got an interview invite a few days ago.
-
orangec90

- Posts: 159
- Joined: Thu Oct 10, 2013 10:57 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
holy moly how has this not been discovered yet? i'm a creeper. uchicago admissions twitter, which says when it's going to release interview invites, etc. --> https://twitter.com/UChicagoLawApps
-
JDeezy

- Posts: 110
- Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:45 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
ED Applicant here.
Let's all provide some healthy rampant speculation on whether or not we will hear today.
As an optimist, I say yes.
Let's all provide some healthy rampant speculation on whether or not we will hear today.
As an optimist, I say yes.
- BentleyLittle

- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Did you interview? This is about when EDers heard back last year according to last years thread.JDeezy wrote:ED Applicant here.
Let's all provide some healthy rampant speculation on whether or not we will hear today.
As an optimist, I say yes.
-
0913djp

- Posts: 206
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:26 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
As a pessimist, I believe it will be Monday.JDeezy wrote:ED Applicant here.
Let's all provide some healthy rampant speculation on whether or not we will hear today.
As an optimist, I say yes.
- UnicornHunter

- Posts: 13507
- Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 9:16 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Last year, they pre-announced ED decisions on twitter... I see no tweet, so I think no decision. For what it's worth, they've been tweeting once a week- on Friday- so far this month. If I were a betting man, I'd go all in on decisions tomorrow.JDeezy wrote:ED Applicant here.
Let's all provide some healthy rampant speculation on whether or not we will hear today.
As an optimist, I say yes.
-
captainamerica18

- Posts: 15
- Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:43 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I'm still holding on to hope for today. Last year, the twitter handle did not tweet that they would be rolling out ED decisions until 3:40pm.
- Nonconsecutive

- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
I was starting to get worried about my lack-of interview request, but from the looks of the spreadsheet I'm still good based on my timeline.
-
EJL123

- Posts: 43
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 7:17 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Hoping for some ED closure by the end of the week (or at least by Monday).
At least with the outcome of the decision known (aka anticipated rejection), I can finally switch gears onto other schools.
At least with the outcome of the decision known (aka anticipated rejection), I can finally switch gears onto other schools.
- eliminatorjr

- Posts: 216
- Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2013 10:55 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Real talk.EJL123 wrote:Hoping for some ED closure by the end of the week (or at least by Monday).
At least with the outcome of the decision known (aka anticipated rejection), I can finally switch gears onto other schools.
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Still no interview request yet, but I shall remain optimistic.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
When did you go under review?applelover wrote:Still no interview request yet, but I shall remain optimistic.
- applelover

- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
12/6lawschool22 wrote:When did you go under review?applelover wrote:Still no interview request yet, but I shall remain optimistic.
- BentleyLittle

- Posts: 483
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2012 9:25 pm
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Has anyone e-mailed the office this cycle? I have a question and am trying to figure out if its better to e-mail or call them.
-
0913djp

- Posts: 206
- Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2012 10:26 am
Re: Chicago c/o 2017 Applicants (2013-2014)
Status updated to today. Let the waiting begin.