1 day for meAlanShore wrote:sameletitloose wrote:2 days for me.akatt1013 wrote:around how long did it take for scholly info after acceptance?
Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle) Forum
- hhockberger

- Posts: 174
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2012 3:28 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
- venus

- Posts: 312
- Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:48 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Less than an hour for me.akatt1013 wrote:around how long did it take for scholly info after acceptance?
-
WhatOurBodiesAreFor

- Posts: 369
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:23 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
25K a year
- kaf5250

- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2012 6:27 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
30K a year 
- Easy-E

- Posts: 6487
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 1:46 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
WhatOurBodiesAreFor wrote:25K a year
Nice! Mind if I ask your numbers?kaf5250 wrote:30K a year
- Easy-E

- Posts: 6487
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 1:46 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Same story here. Pack fan in Giant's country.teachmehowtoraji wrote: Ouch. Been a big fan ever since they '96 Super Bowl with Favre through. Would love nothing more than a Packers-Seahawks rematch in the playoffs to get revenge for the replacement refs game.
/threadhijack
-
djlmjs22

- Posts: 68
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 1:12 am
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Deleted
Last edited by djlmjs22 on Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
- teiswei

- Posts: 695
- Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 3:50 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Rough... Giants have their numberemarxnj wrote:Same story here. Pack fan in Giant's country.teachmehowtoraji wrote: Ouch. Been a big fan ever since they '96 Super Bowl with Favre through. Would love nothing more than a Packers-Seahawks rematch in the playoffs to get revenge for the replacement refs game.
/threadhijack
-
edwardt1988

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Same heredjlmjs22 wrote:Status date changed to 12/13, went from first complete at 11/19 (I think) to 12/7 now 12/13
- DaRascal

- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Hmmm... status is still incomplete with the 11/5 date.
Is this normal? I'm pretty sure I sent in everything.
Is this normal? I'm pretty sure I sent in everything.
-
skri65

- Posts: 484
- Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:07 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Call them.DaRascal wrote:Hmmm... status is still incomplete with the 11/5 date.
Is this normal? I'm pretty sure I sent in everything.
- DaRascal

- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Yeah... I sent them an e-mail for now. Will call them up tomorrow after I get done with a final. This is really strange. I feel kinda forgotten here.skri65 wrote:Call them.DaRascal wrote:Hmmm... status is still incomplete with the 11/5 date.
Is this normal? I'm pretty sure I sent in everything.
- dingbat

- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Did you take the december LSAT?DaRascal wrote:Yeah... I sent them an e-mail for now. Will call them up tomorrow after I get done with a final. This is really strange. I feel kinda forgotten here.skri65 wrote:Call them.DaRascal wrote:Hmmm... status is still incomplete with the 11/5 date.
Is this normal? I'm pretty sure I sent in everything.
- DaRascal

- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
No. I had been registered for it but I cancelled my registration the first week of November. Do you think that's the problem?dingbat wrote:Did you take the december LSAT?DaRascal wrote:Yeah... I sent them an e-mail for now. Will call them up tomorrow after I get done with a final. This is really strange. I feel kinda forgotten here.skri65 wrote:Call them.DaRascal wrote:Hmmm... status is still incomplete with the 11/5 date.
Is this normal? I'm pretty sure I sent in everything.
- dingbat

- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Maybe. I believe policy is that if you have an LSAT pending, your app will be considered incomplete.DaRascal wrote:No. I had been registered for it but I cancelled my registration the first week of November. Do you think that's the problem?dingbat wrote: Did you take the december LSAT?
Perhaps your app got put in the pile awaiting december scores and was never taken off of it.
- DaRascal

- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Yeah I'm starting to think that happened... Well that really sucks...dingbat wrote:Maybe. I believe policy is that if you have an LSAT pending, your app will be considered incomplete.DaRascal wrote:No. I had been registered for it but I cancelled my registration the first week of November. Do you think that's the problem?dingbat wrote: Did you take the december LSAT?
Perhaps your app got put in the pile awaiting december scores and was never taken off of it.
- dingbat

- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
It's still early, don't sweat itDaRascal wrote:Yeah I'm starting to think that happened... Well that really sucks...dingbat wrote:Maybe. I believe policy is that if you have an LSAT pending, your app will be considered incomplete.DaRascal wrote:No. I had been registered for it but I cancelled my registration the first week of November. Do you think that's the problem?dingbat wrote: Did you take the december LSAT?
Perhaps your app got put in the pile awaiting december scores and was never taken off of it.
- teachmehowtoraji

- Posts: 198
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2012 6:25 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
teiswei wrote:Rough... Giants have their numberemarxnj wrote:Same story here. Pack fan in Giant's country.teachmehowtoraji wrote: Ouch. Been a big fan ever since they '96 Super Bowl with Favre through. Would love nothing more than a Packers-Seahawks rematch in the playoffs to get revenge for the replacement refs game.
/threadhijack
Yeah I'm surrounded by Giants fans too...it's a shame Eli decides to play one of his few good games against the Pack every year
-
edwardt1988

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Giants are the worst
-
deffoe

- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2010 9:58 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Rejected.
Oh well, after my Mich acceptance I could give a **** about fordy
Oh well, after my Mich acceptance I could give a **** about fordy
-
Anonymous4444

- Posts: 631
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:41 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Ha poor Fordham.... I was gonna apply but didn't get the waiver so didn't....deffoe wrote:Rejected.
Oh well, after my Mich acceptance I could give a **** about fordy
- DaRascal

- Posts: 1853
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 11:27 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Hope you're right. I reallly really hope this doesn't impact my decision or $ if accepted.dingbat wrote: It's still early, don't sweat it
- Easy-E

- Posts: 6487
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 1:46 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Tell me about it. I was at the gameteiswei wrote:Rough... Giants have their numberemarxnj wrote:Same story here. Pack fan in Giant's country.teachmehowtoraji wrote: Ouch. Been a big fan ever since they '96 Super Bowl with Favre through. Would love nothing more than a Packers-Seahawks rematch in the playoffs to get revenge for the replacement refs game.
/threadhijack
- Easy-E

- Posts: 6487
- Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2011 1:46 pm
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
Damn, well congrats on Michigan man. I applied there as well, but probably a bit too late. You can PM if you want, but I'm curious what your #s were that got you in at Michigan and out at Fordham.deffoe wrote:Rejected.
Oh well, after my Mich acceptance I could give a **** about fordy
- anteater1

- Posts: 608
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2010 1:37 am
Re: Fordham c/o 2016/17 (2012-2013 Cycle)
emarxnj wrote:Damn, well congrats on Michigan man. I applied there as well, but probably a bit too late. You can PM if you want, but I'm curious what your #s were that got you in at Michigan and out at Fordham.deffoe wrote:Rejected.
Oh well, after my Mich acceptance I could give a **** about fordy