Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum

Share Your Experiences, Read About Other Experiences. Please keep posts organized by school and expected year of graduation.
Post Reply
seanPtheB

Bronze
Posts: 276
Joined: Tue Jan 25, 2011 11:06 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by seanPtheB » Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:01 pm

Submitted, good luck everyone!
Top
User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:39 pm

seanPtheB wrote:Submitted, good luck everyone!
your gpa. I want it
Top
roguewave19

New
Posts: 71
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 9:25 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by roguewave19 » Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:29 pm

For those with unsolicited merit-based fee waivers.. did you get them via email or mail? And it's all just automatically waived at the end, with codes only being for those who solicited right?
Top
User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:47 pm

Does Chi want an LSAT addendum for a 10 pt jump if the reason is only that you studied more?
Top
User avatar
Xifeng

Gold
Posts: 2553
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Xifeng » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:54 pm

JamMasterJ wrote:Does Chi want an LSAT addendum for a 10 pt jump if the reason is only that you studied more?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=lsat+addendum+chicago+law&l=1
Top
User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:58 pm

Xifeng wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:Does Chi want an LSAT addendum for a 10 pt jump if the reason is only that you studied more?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=lsat+addendum+chicago+law&l=1
:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops:
Top
User avatar
UnamSanctam

Platinum
Posts: 7342
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by UnamSanctam » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:59 pm

TBF, he is terrible with technology.
Top
User avatar
tmon

Silver
Posts: 1234
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2011 10:52 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by tmon » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:02 pm

UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.
This :lol: :lol: :lol:
Top
User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:02 pm

UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.
I am currently looking at my keyboard while typing this. If the LSAT was electronic, I would get a 145
Top
User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:03 pm

By the way, I found it. They said to explain any big jumps in scores 8)
Top
User avatar
Xifeng

Gold
Posts: 2553
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Xifeng » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:03 pm

UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.
I didn't realize Google counted as technology XD
Top
User avatar
UnamSanctam

Platinum
Posts: 7342
Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2011 3:17 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by UnamSanctam » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:03 pm

Xifeng wrote:
UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.
I didn't realize Google counted as technology XD
He's still trying to get the hang of that VCR contraption.
Top
User avatar
soj

Platinum
Posts: 7888
Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 11:10 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by soj » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:46 pm

UnamSanctam wrote:
Xifeng wrote:
UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.
I didn't realize Google counted as technology XD
He's still trying to get the hang of that VCR contraption.
At first I thought you said contraception and was confused.
Top
User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:03 pm

soj wrote:
UnamSanctam wrote:
Xifeng wrote:
UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.
I didn't realize Google counted as technology XD
He's still trying to get the hang of that VCR contraption.
At first I thought you said contraception and was confused.
that would be Unam

This conversation brought to you by: lolCatholic
Top
User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:52 pm

submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous
Top
User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Tiago Splitter » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:52 pm

JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous
Congrats dude. Good luck!
Top
User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by JamMasterJ » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:55 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous
Congrats dude. Good luck!
Now I can stop annoying everyone in NH :P


Did you decide to RD everywhere?
Top
User avatar
Tiago Splitter

Diamond
Posts: 17148
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Tiago Splitter » Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:01 am

JamMasterJ wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous
Congrats dude. Good luck!
Now I can stop annoying everyone in NH :P


Did you decide to RD everywhere?
Yah unless something crazy goes down next month. Looks like 100% RD for me.
Top
User avatar
Xifeng

Gold
Posts: 2553
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:59 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Xifeng » Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:22 am

JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous
Congrats! Hope to see you here next year :)
Top
User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by JamMasterJ » Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:05 am

Xifeng wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous
Congrats! Hope to see you here next year :)
thanks, maybe I'll learn about computers before LS
Top
User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by JamMasterJ » Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:53 pm

Hey, current students: If I end up getting accepted ED, I want to come up over my fiancee's Christmas (basically Dec 20 - Jan 10 or so). It looks like you get back for winter quarter on Jan 3. Would that be a good time to come up?
Top
User avatar
Perdevise

Bronze
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Perdevise » Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:38 pm

Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.
Top
User avatar
MiamiOxford

Bronze
Posts: 254
Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 12:50 am

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by MiamiOxford » Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:59 pm

Perdevise wrote:Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.
Do explain... Reverse splitters looked at more favorably now possibly? That would be sweet.
Top
User avatar
Perdevise

Bronze
Posts: 367
Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 7:45 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by Perdevise » Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:16 pm

MiamiOxford wrote:
Perdevise wrote:Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.
Do explain... Reverse splitters looked at more favorably now possibly? That would be sweet.
I meant that the GPA scores skyrocketed while LSAT sat at the same place. My LSAT is below median but my GPA still holds up.
Top
User avatar
JamMasterJ

Platinum
Posts: 6649
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 7:17 pm

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Post by JamMasterJ » Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:20 pm

Perdevise wrote:
MiamiOxford wrote:
Perdevise wrote:Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.
Do explain... Reverse splitters looked at more favorably now possibly? That would be sweet.
I meant that the GPA scores skyrocketed while LSAT sat at the same place. My LSAT is below median but my GPA still holds up.
meaning that if people are still above the gpa median, there is less competition for reverse splitter "spots" than there was before, al least hypothetically.
This would be easier to determine if it was the LSAT score that we were talking about b/c it's easier to predict how my traditional splitters will exist at each value, but yes, it does probably bode well for you guys :cry:
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Law School Acceptances, Denials, and Waitlists”