Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum

seanPtheB · Post by **seanPtheB** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 3:01 pm

Submitted, good luck everyone!

JamMasterJ · Post by **JamMasterJ** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 5:39 pm

seanPtheB wrote:Submitted, good luck everyone!

your gpa. I want it

roguewave19 · Post by **roguewave19** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 7:29 pm

For those with unsolicited merit-based fee waivers.. did you get them via email or mail? And it's all just automatically waived at the end, with codes only being for those who solicited right?

JamMasterJ · Post by **JamMasterJ** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:47 pm

Does Chi want an LSAT addendum for a 10 pt jump if the reason is only that you studied more?

Xifeng · Post by **Xifeng** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:54 pm

JamMasterJ wrote:Does Chi want an LSAT addendum for a 10 pt jump if the reason is only that you studied more?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=lsat+addendum+chicago+law&l=1

JamMasterJ · Post by **JamMasterJ** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:58 pm

Xifeng wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:Does Chi want an LSAT addendum for a 10 pt jump if the reason is only that you studied more?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=lsat+addendum+chicago+law&l=1

UnamSanctam · Post by **UnamSanctam** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 8:59 pm

TBF, he is terrible with technology.

tmon · Post by **tmon** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:02 pm

UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.

This

JamMasterJ · Post by **JamMasterJ** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:02 pm

UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.

I am currently looking at my keyboard while typing this. If the LSAT was electronic, I would get a 145

JamMasterJ · Post by **JamMasterJ** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:03 pm

By the way, I found it. They said to explain any big jumps in scores

Xifeng · Post by **Xifeng** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:03 pm

UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.

I didn't realize Google counted as technology XD

UnamSanctam · Post by **UnamSanctam** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 9:03 pm

Xifeng wrote:
UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.
I didn't realize Google counted as technology XD

He's still trying to get the hang of that VCR contraption.

soj · Post by **soj** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 10:46 pm

UnamSanctam wrote:
Xifeng wrote:
UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.
I didn't realize Google counted as technology XD
He's still trying to get the hang of that VCR contraption.

At first I thought you said contraception and was confused.

JamMasterJ · Post by **JamMasterJ** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:03 pm

soj wrote:
UnamSanctam wrote:
Xifeng wrote:
UnamSanctam wrote:TBF, he is terrible with technology.
I didn't realize Google counted as technology XD
He's still trying to get the hang of that VCR contraption.
At first I thought you said contraception and was confused.

that would be Unam

This conversation brought to you by: lolCatholic

JamMasterJ · Post by **JamMasterJ** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:52 pm

submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous

Tiago Splitter · Post by **Tiago Splitter** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:52 pm

JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous

Congrats dude. Good luck!

JamMasterJ · Post by **JamMasterJ** » Mon Oct 31, 2011 11:55 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous
Congrats dude. Good luck!

Now I can stop annoying everyone in NH

Did you decide to RD everywhere?

Tiago Splitter · Post by **Tiago Splitter** » Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:01 am

JamMasterJ wrote:
Tiago Splitter wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous
Congrats dude. Good luck!
Now I can stop annoying everyone in NH

Did you decide to RD everywhere?

Yah unless something crazy goes down next month. Looks like 100% RD for me.

Xifeng · Post by **Xifeng** » Tue Nov 01, 2011 12:22 am

JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous

Congrats! Hope to see you here next year

JamMasterJ · Post by **JamMasterJ** » Tue Nov 01, 2011 1:05 am

Xifeng wrote:
JamMasterJ wrote:submitted ED about 20 minutes ago. So nervous
Congrats! Hope to see you here next year

thanks, maybe I'll learn about computers before LS

JamMasterJ · Post by **JamMasterJ** » Wed Nov 02, 2011 2:53 pm

Hey, current students: If I end up getting accepted ED, I want to come up over my fiancee's Christmas (basically Dec 20 - Jan 10 or so). It looks like you get back for winter quarter on Jan 3. Would that be a good time to come up?

Perdevise · Post by **Perdevise** » Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:38 pm

Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.

MiamiOxford · Post by **MiamiOxford** » Wed Nov 02, 2011 3:59 pm

Perdevise wrote:Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.

Do explain... Reverse splitters looked at more favorably now possibly? That would be sweet.

Perdevise · Post by **Perdevise** » Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:16 pm

MiamiOxford wrote:
Perdevise wrote:Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.
Do explain... Reverse splitters looked at more favorably now possibly? That would be sweet.

I meant that the GPA scores skyrocketed while LSAT sat at the same place. My LSAT is below median but my GPA still holds up.

JamMasterJ · Post by **JamMasterJ** » Wed Nov 02, 2011 4:20 pm

Perdevise wrote:
MiamiOxford wrote:
Perdevise wrote:Submitted a while ago (Oct. 15) but wanted to share. Chicago is still my top choice. The new GPA data makes me feel a bit better about my reverse-splitter status.
Do explain... Reverse splitters looked at more favorably now possibly? That would be sweet.
I meant that the GPA scores skyrocketed while LSAT sat at the same place. My LSAT is below median but my GPA still holds up.

meaning that if people are still above the gpa median, there is less competition for reverse splitter "spots" than there was before, al least hypothetically.
This would be easier to determine if it was the LSAT score that we were talking about b/c it's easier to predict how my traditional splitters will exist at each value, but yes, it does probably bode well for you guys

Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle) Forum

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Register for access!

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Register now!

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Register now, it's still FREE!

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Re: Chicago c/o 2015 Applicants (2011-2012 cycle)

Seriously? What are you waiting for?