GO.sabanist wrote:(fist pump)lak90 wrote:I'm still playing with http://www.cat-bounce.com
Hang in there, guys. This wait is brutal. I can tell a Harvard-related story of me embarrassing myself if it will keep you entertained!
Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013) Forum
-
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yes plzsabanist wrote:(fist pump)lak90 wrote:I'm still playing with http://www.cat-bounce.com
Hang in there, guys. This wait is brutal. I can tell a Harvard-related story of me embarrassing myself if it will keep you entertained!
- sabanist
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
keep the dream alive MOTM.
My story isn't too terribly exciting. I just don't know many people IRL applying to the T-14, especially from my school, where the only one I knew graduated in December. (And I know he lurks TLS and knows who I am, so sup?) But anyway, I noticed a dude in my class wearing a harvard law hoodie, so my naive self is all like, "OMG NEW FRIEND!" So I ask him if he'll be going next year, probably with the same face I had when I got my first bike for Christmas. He looks at me like
and scurries out of the classroom. My professor and I are chill (he wrote one of my letters of rec and advises my student org), so he didn't even try to stop himself from laughing at me.

My story isn't too terribly exciting. I just don't know many people IRL applying to the T-14, especially from my school, where the only one I knew graduated in December. (And I know he lurks TLS and knows who I am, so sup?) But anyway, I noticed a dude in my class wearing a harvard law hoodie, so my naive self is all like, "OMG NEW FRIEND!" So I ask him if he'll be going next year, probably with the same face I had when I got my first bike for Christmas. He looks at me like


-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Hey but mode is 5:30, so T-1 hour before my prediction comes true and I prove that I'm psychicManOfTheMinute wrote:A brief history of 2013 JS2s
2/20 - 5:30 EST
2/14 - 4:15 EST
2/5 - 1:30 EST
2/4 - 5:30 EST
1/29 - 12:30 EST
1/22 - 7:20 EST
1/14 - 3:30 EST
Average: 4:00 EST
Median: 4:15 EST
Conclusion
As it is 4:15 EST, not happening today![]()
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
And aren't they doing JS1s today, too? It'd make sense that on JS1 days, they won't start making calls for JS2 until later in the evening. (Or at least that's what I'm telling myself to maintain sanity and optimism.)
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Sounds more embarrassing for that other kid than for you! If being overly eager were a crime, we'd all be locked up fo' life.sabanist wrote:keep the dream alive MOTM.
My story isn't too terribly exciting. I just don't know many people IRL applying to the T-14, especially from my school, where the only one I knew graduated in December. (And I know he lurks TLS and knows who I am, so sup?) But anyway, I noticed a dude in my class wearing a harvard law hoodie, so my naive self is all like, "OMG NEW FRIEND!" So I ask him if he'll be going next year, probably with the same face I had when I got my first bike for Christmas. He looks at me likeand scurries out of the classroom. My professor and I are chill (he wrote one of my letters of rec and advises my student org), so he didn't even try to stop himself from laughing at me.

- wert3813
- Posts: 1409
- Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 6:29 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
vzapana wrote:Hey but mode is 5:30, so T-1 hour before my prediction comes true and I prove that I'm psychicManOfTheMinute wrote:A brief history of 2013 JS2s
2/20 - 5:30 EST
2/14 - 4:15 EST
2/5 - 1:30 EST
2/4 - 5:30 EST
1/29 - 12:30 EST
1/22 - 7:20 EST
1/14 - 3:30 EST
Average: 4:00 EST
Median: 4:15 EST
Conclusion
As it is 4:15 EST, not happening today![]()
Who turned off the faucet guys?
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Carbon, with all her talk of alcohol.wert3813 wrote:vzapana wrote:Hey but mode is 5:30, so T-1 hour before my prediction comes true and I prove that I'm psychicManOfTheMinute wrote:A brief history of 2013 JS2s
2/20 - 5:30 EST
2/14 - 4:15 EST
2/5 - 1:30 EST
2/4 - 5:30 EST
1/29 - 12:30 EST
1/22 - 7:20 EST
1/14 - 3:30 EST
Average: 4:00 EST
Median: 4:15 EST
Conclusion
As it is 4:15 EST, not happening today![]()
Who turned off the faucet guys?
- carboncopyx
- Posts: 565
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 10:30 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
ManOfTheMinute wrote:Carbon, with all her talk of alcohol.


- pedestrian
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So... has anyone ever had a technical glitch, had to reschedule, and still gotten in? Like, someone who shouldn't have had a shot at a JS1 to begin with?
Asking for a friend.
Asking for a friend.
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I think technical glitches are too rare to be able to deduce anything from... I wonder what happened to that one guy who missed his interview because the time zone was ridiculouspedestrian wrote:So... has anyone ever had a technical glitch, had to reschedule, and still gotten in? Like, someone who shouldn't have had a shot at a JS1 to begin with?
Asking for a friend.
- sabanist
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
haha, I'm just pretty shy, so when I finally work up the confidence to approach someone, getting shut down is the Actual Worst.MacB wrote: Sounds more embarrassing for that other kid than for you! If being overly eager were a crime, we'd all be locked up fo' life.
99% sure this happened to our beloved wormfather. could be remembering wrong.pedestrian wrote:So... has anyone ever had a technical glitch, had to reschedule, and still gotten in? Like, someone who shouldn't have had a shot at a JS1 to begin with?
Asking for a friend.
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
It did happen to wormfather. Honestly, shit happens, and no one is going to fault you for a tech glitch. It took 5 minutes for my Chicago interview to start because we couldn't see each other on Skype. Things worked out there, and I'm sure things would work out here.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 341
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2013 12:26 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Subtle... very subtle. Haha, kidding.pedestrian wrote:So... has anyone ever had a technical glitch, had to reschedule, and still gotten in? Like, someone who shouldn't have had a shot at a JS1 to begin with?
Asking for a friend.

KB was 8 minutes late for my interview. I want some sort of a makeup admit for that... I mean, COMEON.
- pedestrian
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
That makes me feel better, thanks. The crazy thing is that I was so careful to download the latest version, run test calls with friends, etc. I even bought a new external mic! Now I wish that I'd had a second computer ready to go just in case.vzapana wrote:It did happen to wormfather. Honestly, shit happens, and no one is going to fault you for a tech glitch. It took 5 minutes for my Chicago interview to start because we couldn't see each other on Skype. Things worked out there, and I'm sure things would work out here.
She was very nice about it, so I'm trying to keep positive.
- sabanist
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2012 12:48 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
<-- Had 3 computers at the readypedestrian wrote:
That makes me feel better, thanks. The crazy thing is that I was so careful to download the latest version, run test calls with friends, etc. I even bought a new external mic! Now I wish that I'd had a second computer ready to go just in case.
She was very nice about it, so I'm trying to keep positive.

Only because I work in an IT office.
I'm sure it's going to be fine. You're definitely not the first person, and you won't be the last. It comes with the territory when using technology like that.
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
They hate us all ...
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- rehsalt
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:32 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yup.jselson wrote:They hate us all ...
- Audeamus
- Posts: 430
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 10:28 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I think with interviews it's more about how you handle yourself when something goes wrong than it is about the fact that something went wrong. I'm 99.9% sure they won't hold a technical glitch against you. Now, if you started sobbing uncontrollably when the glitch happened they might hold that reaction against you. Alternatively, if you were calm, collected, and professional, that might actually benefit you. When I was in college I was fortunate to be one of 5 applicants out of over 300 invited to have a phone interview for an internship. Less than 10 minutes into my interview, the fire alarm in my dorm went off. I ended up getting the internship. my boss, who conducted the interview, later told me that one of the reasons I got the position was because of how I handled the fire alarm going off. So, long story short, I wouldn't worry about it too much. I bet you handled yourself well and will end up with a rescheduled JS1 --> JS2 soon!pedestrian wrote:That makes me feel better, thanks. The crazy thing is that I was so careful to download the latest version, run test calls with friends, etc. I even bought a new external mic! Now I wish that I'd had a second computer ready to go just in case.vzapana wrote:It did happen to wormfather. Honestly, shit happens, and no one is going to fault you for a tech glitch. It took 5 minutes for my Chicago interview to start because we couldn't see each other on Skype. Things worked out there, and I'm sure things would work out here.
She was very nice about it, so I'm trying to keep positive.
- pedestrian
- Posts: 461
- Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:38 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Thank you! I was remarkably calm and collected for the worst moment of my life, if I do say soAudeamus wrote:I think with interviews it's more about how you handle yourself when something goes wrong than it is about the fact that something went wrong. I'm 99.9% sure they won't hold a technical glitch against you. Now, if you started sobbing uncontrollably when the glitch happened they might hold that reaction against you. Alternatively, if you were calm, collected, and professional, that might actually benefit you. When I was in college I was fortunate to be one of 5 applicants out of over 300 invited to have a phone interview for an internship. Less than 10 minutes into my interview, the fire alarm in my dorm went off. I ended up getting the internship. my boss, who conducted the interview, later told me that one of the reasons I got the position was because of how I handled the fire alarm going off. So, long story short, I wouldn't worry about it too much. I bet you handled yourself well and will end up with a rescheduled JS1 --> JS2 soon!pedestrian wrote:That makes me feel better, thanks. The crazy thing is that I was so careful to download the latest version, run test calls with friends, etc. I even bought a new external mic! Now I wish that I'd had a second computer ready to go just in case.vzapana wrote:It did happen to wormfather. Honestly, shit happens, and no one is going to fault you for a tech glitch. It took 5 minutes for my Chicago interview to start because we couldn't see each other on Skype. Things worked out there, and I'm sure things would work out here.
She was very nice about it, so I'm trying to keep positive.

- rehsalt
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:32 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So vzapana wins. Did anyone bet against him?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 530
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:54 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Yep two: motm and carboncopyx. Pay up peeps.rehsalt wrote:So vzapana wins. Did anyone bet against him?
Also I've proven I'm psychic. Now will you take me, JS?
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
I did... I'll just tack it onto my law school loansrehsalt wrote:So vzapana wins. Did anyone bet against him?
-
- Posts: 78
- Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2013 1:56 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
So no action today..





- broadstreet11
- Posts: 175
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 7:34 pm
Re: Harvard c/o 2016 Applicants (2012-2013)
Don't worry! Only great things happen on Friday, right guys?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login