I'm pretty sure grey is the British one, but it reminds me too much of a certain book series that I may or may not have sent Cal Trask for the holidays this year.lawschool22 wrote:Lol I think I've written it both ways this past week without thinking. You guys have confused me. Let me search for it. I'm curious how I really type it. Which one is the British one?scoobers wrote:lawschool22 wrote:I agree withscoobers wrote: text.jpeggreygray bubble
Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Just found it. On Thursday I said, without consciously thinking about it:scoobers wrote:
I'm pretty sure grey is the British one, but it reminds me too much of a certain book series that I may or may not have sent Cal Trask for the holidays this year.
I must be British. The Irish and English side of my family will be happy. The German side, not so much.This is hard just because you never know when something will happen. It's almost like every day is grey day.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by lawschool22 on Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
-
Workingtitle

- Posts: 87
- Joined: Tue Nov 12, 2013 6:05 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I'm a little worried about this too. When I was signing up for TLS (which I did because I got a JS1) I entered all the profile information you could, including my undergrad institution. Horrible reading comp skills, I know, but I didnt realize that that profile was public information until like a week laterkoalacity wrote:Apparently there was at least one TLSer who was ID'd by JS this cycle (and that was with fake stats in their profile).anonanonanon123 wrote:You really think they would comb through TLS like that? That would be a ton of extra work, and it doesn't seem like it would be that fruitful in most cases.drawstring wrote:I still wonder if they matched my username to my application and for some reason didn't JS2 me for that. I was a bit too open about my info in the beginning........
Once I did, I removed what could identify me super quick, but.... if anyone happened to look at my profile during that time they would absolutely know who I am. I don't think I've said anything on the forums that would make anyone angry...... but it still does worry me a bit.
-
Kimikho

- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I'm 99% sure you look like Michael Scott.lawschool22 wrote:Who wants to PW? Probably a bad idea but I've had some dinner so it currently makes perfect sense.
Last edited by Kimikho on Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
scoobers wrote: I'm 99% sure you look like Michael Scott.
Last edited by koalacity on Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by lawschool22 on Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- lawschool22

- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
And I'm 99% sure you look like Julie Andrews lol 
Last edited by lawschool22 on Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- koalacity

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
And I look like...a koala? Apparently a male koala, too.lawschool22 wrote:And I'm 99% sure you look like Julie Andrews lolscoobers wrote:
I'm 99% sure you look like Michael Scott.
Last edited by koalacity on Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
edwardt1988

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by edwardt1988 on Mon Jan 20, 2014 1:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
- midwest17

- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Clearly.koalacity wrote:And I look like...a koala? Apparently a male koala, too.
Last edited by midwest17 on Sun Jan 19, 2014 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- The-Specs

- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
-
edwardt1988

- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I agreeThe-Specs wrote:.
- drawstring

- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Predictions for Tuesday?
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Sat Jan 18, 2014 4:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
- TheMostDangerousLG

- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Okay, I'm going to resolve the JSW / JSJk debate once and for all.
Here is the problem with JSJk: It implies that you open your email, and what you think is an acceptance offer is a joke. It implies that being waitlisted by Harvard is the same as Lucy pulling the football out from under your Harvard dreams. "JsJk" seems to indicate that you're done, that your hopes should be dashed and that you should acknowledge that even the consideration of your application was a farce.
JSW is dry, it is neutral, it is boring. And that's why it's perfect. Because it acknowledges that the JSW is just another step in the process towards your (hopeful) acceptance, not the end of the line, and certainly not a joke.
JSW is waiting at a boring stop on your way to Cambridge. JSJk is thinking the stop is the last station.
Here is the problem with JSJk: It implies that you open your email, and what you think is an acceptance offer is a joke. It implies that being waitlisted by Harvard is the same as Lucy pulling the football out from under your Harvard dreams. "JsJk" seems to indicate that you're done, that your hopes should be dashed and that you should acknowledge that even the consideration of your application was a farce.
JSW is dry, it is neutral, it is boring. And that's why it's perfect. Because it acknowledges that the JSW is just another step in the process towards your (hopeful) acceptance, not the end of the line, and certainly not a joke.
JSW is waiting at a boring stop on your way to Cambridge. JSJk is thinking the stop is the last station.
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Sat Jan 18, 2014 4:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
- phillywc

- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
yah he's smartlawschool22 wrote:I agree with grey bubblescoobers wrote:text.jpg
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
- TheMostDangerousLG

- Posts: 1545
- Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2012 4:25 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Do I count as "in the know"? That'd be a first..FuriousDuck wrote:You're right, JSW does make a lot more sense. I guess I just like it when terms of art are mildly amusing and don't make sense without a paragraph of explanation from someone "in the know."
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
- China Spy

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
- China Spy

- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Don't adcomms prowl these boards?FuriousDuck wrote:I'm not sure, but based on the context I think it stands for "picture whoring," i.e. posting pictures of yourself on the Internet for attention.China Spy wrote:whats pw?
- FuriousDuck

- Posts: 507
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 7:33 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
...
Last edited by FuriousDuck on Thu Jan 23, 2014 3:34 am, edited 1 time in total.