Right, I have to keep reminding myself that approximately 860/1200 JS1's will be accepted eventually. And while I know the odds of acceptance are not equally distributed within that 1200, we made it into a fairly small group. Anyone who got a JS1 has a real shot, and if they liked your interview, and you put together a solid app, the odds are not bad at all. We need to remain optimistic.neprep wrote:I know KB said in her thread that if you get a JS1 they "like something in your application," but I can't help but feel that my JS1 is more of a "Oh let's just see if this GPA pleb has anything to offer" interview rather than a "oh wow let's let's admit him but make sure he's not a psychopath first" interview.lawschool22 wrote:I just skimmed the held at HLS thread from last year, and you have a good point. The majority of those people did not have JS1slawschool22 wrote:Good point. And yeah, I'm banking on my interview, WE, PS, etc. to push me across and make up for that GPA lol.neprep wrote:
Perhaps, but did people who were held get JS1s?
And I know that I'm not helping them with their GPA median, so I better hope they liked the interview.
TL;DR Not all JS1s are created equal. It's quite sad.
Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I still wonder if they matched my username to my application and for some reason didn't JS2 me for that. I was a bit too open about my info in the beginning........
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
You make a pretty good Mort substitute, LS.lawschool22 wrote:
Right, I have to keep reminding myself that approximately 860/1200 JS1's will be accepted eventually. And while I know the odds of acceptance are not equally distributed within that 1200, we made it into a fairly small group. Anyone who got a JS1 has a real shot, and if they liked your interview, and you put together a solid app, the odds are not bad at all. We need to remain optimistic.

- phillywc
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
neprep wrote:WHAT A TWIST
phillywc wrote:Anyone who likes jsjk is wrong. Honestly, we shouldn't even be speaking to them.
JSW! JSW!Seriously though, when are the WL notifications even arriving?scoobers wrote:This just in: a relationship hangs in the balance over the jk/w divide.


-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
And furthermore, Mr, Specs, a strong advocate of JSW, will never experience the sting of the Harvard waitlist. But for the rest of us, it is a very real possibility. So why does he wish to deprive us of a little humor in an otherwise dark moment? Why does he, one of the 14%s, get to decide for us, the majority? What are his motives? Ask yourself thatThe-Specs wrote:I see what you did there. Hit us all where it hurts.edwardt1988 wrote:Also, if you're a friend of Mort, you're a friend of JSJk. How can you appreciate the lightheartedness and positivity that he brings to this thread, but fail to understand the levity that JSJk would introduce in an otherwise depressing situation. JSJk is the only way.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- musharraf
- Posts: 83
- Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2013 5:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
This is super depressing for those of us still crossing our fingers for a JS1 - we're worthless! This only underscores the dire necessity for levity around here - JSJK is the only way!neprep wrote:I know KB said in her thread that if you get a JS1 they "like something in your application," but I can't help but feel that my JS1 is more of a "Oh let's just see if this GPA pleb has anything to offer" interview rather than a "oh wow let's let's admit him but make sure he's not a psychopath first" interview.lawschool22 wrote:I just skimmed the held at HLS thread from last year, and you have a good point. The majority of those people did not have JS1slawschool22 wrote:Good point. And yeah, I'm banking on my interview, WE, PS, etc. to push me across and make up for that GPA lol.neprep wrote:
Perhaps, but did people who were held get JS1s?
And I know that I'm not helping them with their GPA median, so I better hope they liked the interview.
TL;DR Not all JS1s are created equal. It's quite sad.
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
James Carville and Mary Matalin have made a divided relationship work for 25 years. I think you guys will pull through this.scoobers wrote:This just in: a relationship hangs in the balance over the jk/w divide.
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Stay tuned for updates, humor-hating plebesneprep wrote:WHAT A TWIST
phillywc wrote:Anyone who likes jsjk is wrong. Honestly, we shouldn't even be speaking to them.
JSW! JSW!scoobers wrote:This just in: a relationship hangs in the balance over the jk/w divide.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
But but but, I will probably get WL'd, and I'm a JSW advocate. Argument neutralized.edwardt1988 wrote:And furthermore, Mr, Specs, a strong advocate of JSW, will never experience the sting of the Harvard waitlist. But for the rest of us, it is a very real possibility. So why does he wish to deprive us of a little humor in an otherwise dark moment? Why does he, one of the 14%s, get to decide for us, the majority? What are his motives? Ask yourself thatThe-Specs wrote:I see what you did there. Hit us all where it hurts.edwardt1988 wrote:Also, if you're a friend of Mort, you're a friend of JSJk. How can you appreciate the lightheartedness and positivity that he brings to this thread, but fail to understand the levity that JSJk would introduce in an otherwise depressing situation. JSJk is the only way.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Love you edwardt. This argument is just too air tight.edwardt1988 wrote:And furthermore, Mr, Specs, a strong advocate of JSW, will never experience the sting of the Harvard waitlist. But for the rest of us, it is a very real possibility. So why does he wish to deprive us of a little humor in an otherwise dark moment? Why does he, one of the 14%s, get to decide for us, the majority? What are his motives? Ask yourself thatThe-Specs wrote:I see what you did there. Hit us all where it hurts.edwardt1988 wrote:Also, if you're a friend of Mort, you're a friend of JSJk. How can you appreciate the lightheartedness and positivity that he brings to this thread, but fail to understand the levity that JSJk would introduce in an otherwise depressing situation. JSJk is the only way.

- phillywc
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
We need to talk...scoobers wrote: Stay tuned for updates, humor-hating plebes
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Ha, when I get waitlisted, obv I'll send that argument as a LOCI. That will convince themThe-Specs wrote:Love you edwardt. This argument is just too air tight.edwardt1988 wrote:And furthermore, Mr, Specs, a strong advocate of JSW, will never experience the sting of the Harvard waitlist. But for the rest of us, it is a very real possibility. So why does he wish to deprive us of a little humor in an otherwise dark moment? Why does he, one of the 14%s, get to decide for us, the majority? What are his motives? Ask yourself thatThe-Specs wrote:I see what you did there. Hit us all where it hurts.edwardt1988 wrote:Also, if you're a friend of Mort, you're a friend of JSJk. How can you appreciate the lightheartedness and positivity that he brings to this thread, but fail to understand the levity that JSJk would introduce in an otherwise depressing situation. JSJk is the only way.
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Walk me through something, Specs. After getting JS2s, why are HLS admits still eager to hear back from N, MVP, and so on? Is it just to compare scholarships?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LEPWU
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 7:19 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Dinged. Just now. Email sent at 4:00EST.
- midwest17
- Posts: 1685
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:27 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I don't think it's unreasonable to take Darrow over H, for instance.neprep wrote:Walk me through something, Specs. After getting JS2s, why are HLS admits still eager to hear back from N, MVP, and so on? Is it just to compare scholarships?
It continues.LEPWU wrote:Dinged. Just now. Email sent at 4:00EST.

- Nonconsecutive
- Posts: 2398
- Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2012 4:58 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Sorry to hear that.LEPWU wrote:Dinged. Just now. Email sent at 4:00EST.
Looks like its not over yet.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Not speaking for Specs, but I think that for a lot of people it's also a pride/esteem thing, in addition to the scholarships. People don't like being rejected from things, especially type-A's who want to control their own destiny, etc.neprep wrote:Walk me through something, Specs. After getting JS2s, why are HLS admits still eager to hear back from N, MVP, and so on? Is it just to compare scholarships?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 1473
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:34 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by NoDayButToday on Fri Apr 15, 2016 9:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- t-14orbust
- Posts: 2130
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 4:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I'm not sure why I'm anxiously awaiting decisions from PV. I think it's because I applied and I won't feel validated as an applicant until I get a response. Also, a full ride at Penn or UVA does sound pretty awesome.neprep wrote:Walk me through something, Specs. After getting JS2s, why are HLS admits still eager to hear back from N, MVP, and so on? Is it just to compare scholarships?
- China Spy
- Posts: 209
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2014 1:10 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Checking in, just submitted this week 

- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
LEPWU wrote:Dinged. Just now. Email sent at 4:00EST.

Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- applelover
- Posts: 1921
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 12:43 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I would attend NYU and maybe a few others, if they awarded me a scholarship, over HLS.neprep wrote:Walk me through something, Specs. After getting JS2s, why are HLS admits still eager to hear back from N, MVP, and so on? Is it just to compare scholarships?
EDIT: removed some schools.
Last edited by applelover on Fri Jan 17, 2014 5:15 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- Gary
- Posts: 338
- Joined: Wed May 22, 2013 8:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
welp. next week guys!
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
For me it is three fold:neprep wrote:Walk me through something, Specs. After getting JS2s, why are HLS admits still eager to hear back from N, MVP, and so on? Is it just to compare scholarships?
1. Everyone likes to be wanted/praised. Getting accepted is like someone picking you first for their team, it feels good.
2. Pride, not getting in hurts even with great options. Also, last year the best school I got into was Notre Dame and that was off the waitlist. This is a redemption year for me in a lot of ways.
3. Application Triage: Getting into some schools helps me to get a better idea of how well rounded my application is and what my chances are at schools like Stanford and Yale. There were some slight variations throughout my applications and how one school responds could tip me off to how others may respond.
Great question. HTH

- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I guess we should be thankful to still be standing after today.Gary wrote:welp. next week guys!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login