Reading comp fail here, but do you mean to say there have been JS2s today, and they were around the 75th? Or do you mean all the JS2s since they started going out?lawschool22 wrote:A bit of actual factual information for a second. I noticed that on LSN, all the JSNo's had below median LSATs. There were no 173+ LSATs rejected today.
So far all the JS2's have been around 75th or higher LSAT, all/most the of the JSNo's have been below median LSAT. Where are those decisions for us 173 folks? Only 5 so far per LSN.
Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum
- drawstring
- Posts: 1933
- Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:52 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
- 05062014
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:05 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
You got me thereneprep wrote:Perhaps, but not a mean girl from Mean Girls. Regina George doesn't make her criteria for selecting friends and foes (a) public and (b) easy.abdistotle wrote:Does this not sound like a mean girl ? I rest my casescoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend

- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Since they started going out.drawstring wrote:Reading comp fail here, but do you mean to say there have been JS2s today, and they were around the 75th? Or do you mean all the JS2s since they started going out?lawschool22 wrote:A bit of actual factual information for a second. I noticed that on LSN, all the JSNo's had below median LSATs. There were no 173+ LSATs rejected today.
So far all the JS2's have been around 75th or higher LSAT, all/most the of the JSNo's have been below median LSAT. Where are those decisions for us 173 folks? Only 5 so far per LSN.
Caveat I just skimmed the list, so I may have missed some.
Last edited by lawschool22 on Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Also looking for 173 love here.scoobers wrote:We are so friends againlawschool22 wrote:A bit of actual factual information for a second. I noticed that on LSN, all the JSNo's had below median LSATs. There were no 173+ LSATs rejected today.
So far all the JS2's have been around 75th or higher LSAT, all/most the of the JSNo's have been below median LSAT. Where are those decisions for us 173 folks? Only 5 so far per LSN.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I wonder if we're in what last year would have been the "held" category? I totally could have seen being in that group last year personally.neprep wrote:Also looking for 173 love here.scoobers wrote:We are so friends againlawschool22 wrote:A bit of actual factual information for a second. I noticed that on LSN, all the JSNo's had below median LSATs. There were no 173+ LSATs rejected today.
So far all the JS2's have been around 75th or higher LSAT, all/most the of the JSNo's have been below median LSAT. Where are those decisions for us 173 folks? Only 5 so far per LSN.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- koalacity
- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Aug 07, 2013 9:56 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I'm quite certain there have been below-median LSAT JS2s (kershka, for example).lawschool22 wrote:A bit of actual factual information for a second. I noticed that on LSN, all the JSNo's had below median LSATs. There were no 173+ LSATs rejected today.
So far all the JS2's have been around 75th or higher LSAT, all/most the of the JSNo's have been below median LSAT. Where are those decisions for us 173 folks? Only 5 so far per LSN.
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Perhaps, but did people who were held get JS1s?lawschool22 wrote:I wonder if we're in what last year would have been the "held" category? I totally could have seen being in that group last year personally.neprep wrote:Also looking for 173 love here.scoobers wrote:We are so friends againlawschool22 wrote:A bit of actual factual information for a second. I noticed that on LSN, all the JSNo's had below median LSATs. There were no 173+ LSATs rejected today.
So far all the JS2's have been around 75th or higher LSAT, all/most the of the JSNo's have been below median LSAT. Where are those decisions for us 173 folks? Only 5 so far per LSN.
And I know that I'm not helping them with their GPA median, so I better hope they liked the interview.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I know. I'm not say there haven't been, just not many. The majority have been 174+, excluding URM.koalacity wrote:I'm quite certain there have been below-median LSAT JS2s (kershka, for example).lawschool22 wrote:A bit of actual factual information for a second. I noticed that on LSN, all the JSNo's had below median LSATs. There were no 173+ LSATs rejected today.
So far all the JS2's have been around 75th or higher LSAT, all/most the of the JSNo's have been below median LSAT. Where are those decisions for us 173 folks? Only 5 so far per LSN.
-
- Posts: 1473
- Joined: Fri Nov 22, 2013 9:34 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
.
Last edited by NoDayButToday on Sat Apr 16, 2016 5:10 pm, edited 2 times in total.
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Good point. And yeah, I'm banking on my interview, WE, PS, etc. to push me across and make up for that GPA lol.neprep wrote:
Perhaps, but did people who were held get JS1s?
And I know that I'm not helping them with their GPA median, so I better hope they liked the interview.
- 05062014
- Posts: 432
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 11:05 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Patfeeney reported a ding on upenm thread, and he reportedly has a 174 in the books
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
This is rude (read it in Angie from 30 Rock's voice -- like scoobs' old tar [see how I did that]), but I love it and you!The-Specs wrote:Logic fail pieceoftoast, all we can know for certainty is that if you do NOT like JSJK that you canNOT befriends. We can't be certain that you will be friends with Scoobs just because you like JSJK. hthandapieceoftoast wrote:Phew --- FRIENDSscoobers wrote:Team jsjk ftw anyone who says otherwise is not my friend
I love you though!
I say againscoobers wrote:
Logic fail anyone who likes toast is my friend

Cruisin' with the scoobs crew. It's a good place to be (on wednesdays we wear pink)
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I just skimmed the held at HLS thread from last year, and you have a good point. The majority of those people did not have JS1slawschool22 wrote:Good point. And yeah, I'm banking on my interview, WE, PS, etc. to push me across and make up for that GPA lol.neprep wrote:
Perhaps, but did people who were held get JS1s?
And I know that I'm not helping them with their GPA median, so I better hope they liked the interview.
- andapieceoftoast
- Posts: 439
- Joined: Wed Aug 14, 2013 11:18 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
+1neprep wrote:
And I know that I'm not helping them with their GPA median, so I better hope they liked the interview.
-
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Tue May 14, 2013 12:18 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
3.33 GPAedwardt1988 wrote:http://lawschoolnumbers.com/reubenshapcott 174 LSAT
- lawschool22
- Posts: 3875
- Joined: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:47 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I may be mistaken but I think he reported that in here earlier alsoabdistotle wrote:Patfeeney reported a ding on upenm thread, and he reportedly has a 174 in the books
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 378
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:59 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Also, if you're a friend of Mort, you're a friend of JSJk. How can you appreciate the lightheartedness and positivity that he brings to this thread, but fail to understand the levity that JSJk would introduce in an otherwise depressing situation. JSJk is the only way.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I see what you did there. Hit us all where it hurts.edwardt1988 wrote:Also, if you're a friend of Mort, you're a friend of JSJk. How can you appreciate the lightheartedness and positivity that he brings to this thread, but fail to understand the levity that JSJk would introduce in an otherwise depressing situation. JSJk is the only way.
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I know KB said in her thread that if you get a JS1 they "like something in your application," but I can't help but feel that my JS1 is more of a "Oh let's just see if this GPA pleb has anything to offer" interview rather than a "oh wow let's let's admit him but make sure he's not a psychopath first" interview.lawschool22 wrote:I just skimmed the held at HLS thread from last year, and you have a good point. The majority of those people did not have JS1slawschool22 wrote:Good point. And yeah, I'm banking on my interview, WE, PS, etc. to push me across and make up for that GPA lol.neprep wrote:
Perhaps, but did people who were held get JS1s?
And I know that I'm not helping them with their GPA median, so I better hope they liked the interview.
TL;DR Not all JS1s are created equal. It's quite sad.
- phillywc
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Anyone who likes jsjk is wrong. Honestly, we shouldn't even be speaking to them.
JSW! JSW!
JSW! JSW!
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 3971
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:01 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
This just in: a relationship hangs in the balance over the jk/w divide.
- phillywc
- Posts: 3448
- Joined: Tue Feb 19, 2013 12:17 am
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
I really hope TLS takes this out of our hands.scoobers wrote:This just in: a relationship hangs in the balance over the jk/w divide.
- The-Specs
- Posts: 1039
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 12:55 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
Two reported JSNo's on LSN in the last 10 min but this could be delayed reporting.NoDayButToday wrote:Today's JS-ding-storm
........is it over?
- neprep
- Posts: 1066
- Joined: Fri Jul 26, 2013 11:16 pm
Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)
WHAT A TWIST
phillywc wrote:Anyone who likes jsjk is wrong. Honestly, we shouldn't even be speaking to them.
JSW! JSW!
Seriously though, when are the WL notifications even arriving?scoobers wrote:This just in: a relationship hangs in the balance over the jk/w divide.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login