Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:04 pm

neprep wrote:Hmm, these JSW types are an unscrupulous bunch. I bet if there's a runoff there will be a slew of fake accounts that adulterate the poll and upturn the voice of the people.

wtrc · Post by **wtrc** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:04 pm

Poll open for 3 days. Final round. The votes were 61-58 at the end, so, this is really up to what the JSMaybe voters want (and ensuring everyone votes again - and people that got bad news today might not see it).

ETA: Looks like the poll is only open for a day, I'm not sure why, but so be it. POLL OPEN FOR A DAY, APPARENTLY!

wtrc · Post by **wtrc** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:04 pm

neprep wrote:Hmm, these JSW types are an unscrupulous bunch. I bet if there's a runoff there will be a slew of fake accounts that adulterate the poll and upturn the voice of the people.

MODS PLEASE KEEP AN EYE OUT FOR ANY CHEATERS AND BAN THEM FOR LIFE FROM THE INTERNET

musharraf · Post by **musharraf** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:05 pm

I'm too junior to post images, but the paranoia lurking within me makes me wholeheartedly pro-JSJK, rigged polling or no: http://i.imgur.com/NOiG37Z.jpg

wtrc · Post by **wtrc** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:06 pm

musharraf wrote:I'm too junior to post images, but the paranoia lurking within me makes me wholeheartedly pro-JSJK, rigged polling or no: http://i.imgur.com/NOiG37Z.jpg

lol

neprep · Post by **neprep** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:06 pm

I've not had so much fun in a thread since my days of white knigting LSAC.

05062014 · Post by **05062014** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:06 pm

I think my jsjk= mean girls post has woken up some jsjk advocates to the truth that is jsw

t14splitter · Post by **t14splitter** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:07 pm

According to LSN, rejections have continued to trickle out.

neprep · Post by **neprep** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:08 pm

abdistotle wrote:I think my jsjk= mean girls post has woken up some jsjk advocates to the truth that is jsw

Actually that comment might have had the opposite effect, though perhaps not enough to countervail the vitriol from Specs and LS22.

edwardt1988 · Post by **edwardt1988** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:09 pm

This is rigged. JSJk has clearly won. Even if JSW wins, they will not be a legitimate winner. I call on my fellow JSJk to boycott this election( after voting, we're boycotting a JSW victory) and use the rightful term, JSJk

05062014 · Post by **05062014** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:10 pm

neprep wrote:
abdistotle wrote:I think my jsjk= mean girls post has woken up some jsjk advocates to the truth that is jsw
Actually that comment might have had the opposite effect, though perhaps not enough to countervail the vitriol from Specs and LS22.

Someone aspires to be able to bully Lindsay Lohan in his dreams

Gary · Post by **Gary** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:10 pm

abdistotle wrote:I think my jsjk= mean girls post has woken up some jsjk advocates to the truth that is jsw

lol this convinced me

blackbirdfly · Post by **blackbirdfly** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:10 pm

SplitMyPants · Post by **SplitMyPants** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:11 pm

edwardt1988 wrote:The great schism of 2014. JSJk vs JSW. I personally cannot trust nor befriend anyone who chooses JSW

We may as well just end this thread and start two new ones, one for each camp. JSW FTW

andapieceoftoast · Post by **andapieceoftoast** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:11 pm

Is it bad that I just want them to start WLing JS1s?
I JUST WANT TO KNOW IF I'M IN THIS FOR THE LONG HAUL.

I mean, to be fair, I would wait until the day before classes started before I gave on up this, my holy grail of all holy grails, BUT FOR PETE'S SAKE JUST TELL ME WHERE I STAND.

JS, if you're taking requests, please hold me. I promise I'll still be here waiting for you -- we don't have to make it official by putting me on some type of list!

^^ That "please hold me" part sounded a lot less creepy in my head.

neprep · Post by **neprep** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:11 pm

abdistotle wrote:
neprep wrote:
abdistotle wrote:I think my jsjk= mean girls post has woken up some jsjk advocates to the truth that is jsw
Actually that comment might have had the opposite effect, though perhaps not enough to countervail the vitriol from Specs and LS22.
Someone aspires to be able to bully Lindsay Lohan in his dreams

The-Specs · Post by **The-Specs** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:11 pm

neprep wrote:Hmm, these JSW types are an unscrupulous bunch. I bet if there's a runoff there will be a slew of fake accounts that adulterate the poll and upturn the voice of the people.

To be honest, I thought about it but I believe in the process and I respect you too much Nep. May the best acronym win!

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:11 pm

edwardt1988 wrote:This is rigged. JSJk has clearly won. Even if JSW wins, they will not be a legitimate winner. I call on my fellow JSJk to boycott this election( after voting, we're boycotting a JSW victory) and use the rightful term, JSJk

The first round was like approving the Article of Confederation. This is the Constitutional Convention, where we get it right.

The-Specs · Post by **The-Specs** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:12 pm

neprep wrote:
abdistotle wrote:I think my jsjk= mean girls post has woken up some jsjk advocates to the truth that is jsw
Actually that comment might have had the opposite effect, though perhaps not enough to countervail the vitriol from Specs and LS22.

Vitriol?? Nep, I thought we were making such progress!

drawstring · Post by **drawstring** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:13 pm

Damn, maybe JSW was getting Nader'd.

koalacity · Post by **koalacity** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:13 pm

lawschool22 wrote:
edwardt1988 wrote:This is rigged. JSJk has clearly won. Even if JSW wins, they will not be a legitimate winner. I call on my fellow JSJk to boycott this election( after voting, we're boycotting a JSW victory) and use the rightful term, JSJk
The first round was like approving the Article of Confederation. This is the Constitutional Convention, where we get it right.

looooool

blackbirdfly · Post by **blackbirdfly** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:13 pm

The-Specs · Post by **The-Specs** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:14 pm

neprep wrote:I've not had so much fun in a thread since my days of white knigting LSAC.

+1

I havn't laughed so hard in a long while.

lawschool22 · Post by **lawschool22** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:14 pm

Post 1600:

JSW FTW

Gary · Post by **Gary** » Fri Jan 17, 2014 4:15 pm

lawschool22 wrote:Post 1600:

JSW FTW

lol i thought this meant you were waitlisted and i had a panic attack...

Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014) Forum

Where are you in the Harvard application process?

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)

Re: Harvard, C/O 2017, Applicants Thread (2013-2014)