Dude, I hear you. My 2 WL are from schools I had a 90+% chance at. Got into 3 schools ranked higher than both, and an interview from Chicago where I only have a 20 something percent chance at. Super weirdRParadela wrote:Another fucking waitlist.
3 in one week. The latest one (Gtown) had me at an 82% chance of getting in as well.
Fuck this lol
TLS c/o 2020 - In #Squad We Trust Forum
- chargers21

- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I'm beginning to second guess if my safeties are even safeties anymore and I'm worried I'll have nothing to negotiate with.
- brinicolec

- Posts: 4479
- Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2016 7:09 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I'm sure you'll be fine!Rigo wrote:I'm beginning to second guess if my safeties are even safeties anymore and I'm worried I'll have nothing to negotiate with.
- S.Picquery

- Posts: 598
- Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2016 9:39 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I feel this, though. i wish I'd applied more broadly, if only for negotiating $$. :/brinicolec wrote:I'm sure you'll be fine!Rigo wrote:I'm beginning to second guess if my safeties are even safeties anymore and I'm worried I'll have nothing to negotiate with.
- ashrice13

- Posts: 1793
- Joined: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:30 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I was just saying this yesterday. I had to apply locally so I didn't send in a lot of applications but I really should have applied to more lower T14 for negotiations.S.Picquery wrote:I feel this, though. i wish I'd applied more broadly, if only for negotiating $$. :/brinicolec wrote:I'm sure you'll be fine!Rigo wrote:I'm beginning to second guess if my safeties are even safeties anymore and I'm worried I'll have nothing to negotiate with.
You live and you learn.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TexasENG

- Posts: 1075
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2015 5:31 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
.
Last edited by TexasENG on Mon Feb 27, 2017 7:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- RParadela

- Posts: 858
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2016 1:04 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Bringing this topic up again, but it seems to me that schools are waitlisting at a much higher frequency than normal this cycle. Anyone else feel the same or am I trying to explain away my own waitlists?
- Mr_Chukes

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
It may be a mix of both. I keep seeing a lot of people getting waitlisted though at schools that they had 80℅ chances of getting in.RParadela wrote:Bringing this topic up again, but it seems to me that schools are waitlisting at a much higher frequency than normal this cycle. Anyone else feel the same or am I trying to explain away my own waitlists?
- chargers21

- Posts: 3760
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 10:54 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
My 2 WL were at schools with 90%+ chancesMr_Chukes wrote:It may be a mix of both. I keep seeing a lot of people getting waitlisted though at schools that they had 80℅ chances of getting in.RParadela wrote:Bringing this topic up again, but it seems to me that schools are waitlisting at a much higher frequency than normal this cycle. Anyone else feel the same or am I trying to explain away my own waitlists?
-
somedeadman

- Posts: 436
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 5:42 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
ThisRigo wrote:I'm beginning to second guess if my safeties are even safeties anymore and I'm worried I'll have nothing to negotiate with.
- Mr_Chukes

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Yeah I've been seeing this a lot. I actually got lucky that I got into my safeties. I got waitlisted at super reaches but I'm not holding my breath on getting in lol.chargers21 wrote:My 2 WL were at schools with 90%+ chancesMr_Chukes wrote:It may be a mix of both. I keep seeing a lot of people getting waitlisted though at schools that they had 80℅ chances of getting in.RParadela wrote:Bringing this topic up again, but it seems to me that schools are waitlisting at a much higher frequency than normal this cycle. Anyone else feel the same or am I trying to explain away my own waitlists?
-
somedeadman

- Posts: 436
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 5:42 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
T14 sticker vs. WashU/USC with significant money is one hell of a decision to make....I also was waitlisted at most of the t14
- Mr_Chukes

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
What T14?somedeadman wrote:T14 sticker vs. WashU/USC with significant money is one hell of a decision to make....I also was waitlisted at most of the t14
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
somedeadman

- Posts: 436
- Joined: Wed Nov 16, 2016 5:42 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
.Mr_Chukes wrote:What T14?somedeadman wrote:T14 sticker vs. WashU/USC with significant money is one hell of a decision to make....I also was waitlisted at most of the t14
- jb111

- Posts: 51
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2015 3:35 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Just want to add my voice to the piteous throngs of the many waitlisted.
In at Columbia, NYU, and getting waitlisted at pretty much every other T14. Was hoping to be able to negotiate, weigh various bundles of money + opportunity, etc... But just getting WL after WL.
Still haven't heard from H/Y/S and am hoping that the waitlists are because my chances are better than usual at the very top this year because of the drop in high LSATs (I'm a 178/3.6x splitter). But maybe that's just wistful thinking.
The other option is that I have horrific softs, a PS riddled with mistakes I can't see, or viciously undermining LORs. Or schools have suddenly decided (realized?) that they should care less about the LSAT.
I vacillate between irrationally hopeful and totally pessimistic about thirty times a day.
I would feel much better if I at least had a JS1 by now...
Is the best theory right now that the drop in top LSATs is actually hurting people with top LSATs throughout most of the T14, as they have decided to YP more aggressively and punt on LSAT in order to at least keep/raise their GPA medians? And that this should hopefully (eventually) bleed into having a better chance at H/Y/S?
In at Columbia, NYU, and getting waitlisted at pretty much every other T14. Was hoping to be able to negotiate, weigh various bundles of money + opportunity, etc... But just getting WL after WL.
Still haven't heard from H/Y/S and am hoping that the waitlists are because my chances are better than usual at the very top this year because of the drop in high LSATs (I'm a 178/3.6x splitter). But maybe that's just wistful thinking.
The other option is that I have horrific softs, a PS riddled with mistakes I can't see, or viciously undermining LORs. Or schools have suddenly decided (realized?) that they should care less about the LSAT.
I vacillate between irrationally hopeful and totally pessimistic about thirty times a day.
I would feel much better if I at least had a JS1 by now...
Is the best theory right now that the drop in top LSATs is actually hurting people with top LSATs throughout most of the T14, as they have decided to YP more aggressively and punt on LSAT in order to at least keep/raise their GPA medians? And that this should hopefully (eventually) bleed into having a better chance at H/Y/S?
- dasq5511

- Posts: 195
- Joined: Thu May 19, 2016 3:52 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
My 3 WLs were: Cornell (100% chance), Berkeley (75%), and Columbia (79%).chargers21 wrote:My 2 WL were at schools with 90%+ chancesMr_Chukes wrote:It may be a mix of both. I keep seeing a lot of people getting waitlisted though at schools that they had 80℅ chances of getting in.RParadela wrote:Bringing this topic up again, but it seems to me that schools are waitlisting at a much higher frequency than normal this cycle. Anyone else feel the same or am I trying to explain away my own waitlists?
- Mr_Chukes

- Posts: 1162
- Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 5:01 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Yeah they could assume you have better at better schools because your LSAT is great. It could be personal statement as well. My friend had better stats than me, he is also a URM. His personal statement talked about someone else and never really said anything about him. He is at Whittier now.jb111 wrote:Just want to add my voice to the piteous throngs of the many waitlisted.
In at Columbia, NYU, and getting waitlisted at pretty much every other T14. Was hoping to be able to negotiate, weigh various bundles of money + opportunity, etc... But just getting WL after WL.
Still haven't heard from H/Y/S and am hoping that the waitlists are because my chances are better than usual at the very top this year because of the drop in high LSATs (I'm a 178/3.6x splitter). But maybe that's just wistful thinking.
The other option is that I have horrific softs, a PS riddled with mistakes I can't see, or viciously undermining LORs. Or schools have suddenly decided (realized?) that they should care less about the LSAT.
I vacillate between irrationally hopeful and totally pessimistic about thirty times a day.
I would feel much better if I at least had a JS1 by now...
Is the best theory right now that the drop in top LSATs is actually hurting people with top LSATs throughout most of the T14, as they have decided to YP more aggressively and punt on LSAT in order to at least keep/raise their GPA medians? And that this should hopefully (eventually) bleed into having a better chance at H/Y/S?
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- RParadela

- Posts: 858
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2016 1:04 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I've flirted with the idea that my softs are just really bad, but it seems like people who have great softs are suffering the same fate I am.
The splitter thing could be a decent theory. It's possible that schools are taking a much tougher stance on splitters, but I'm not sure why they would do that.
The splitter thing could be a decent theory. It's possible that schools are taking a much tougher stance on splitters, but I'm not sure why they would do that.
- Nightwing

- Posts: 281
- Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2017 4:44 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I think it may just be YP across the board. This cycle's been full of WL decisions. They're WLs and not predominantly rejections for good reason, in my opinion. That reason being that these schools are still very interested in splitters (not like the LSAT can just be relegated to meaning little; it is still the only standardized part of the admissions process and is a crucial part of school rankings).RParadela wrote:I've flirted with the idea that my softs are just really bad, but it seems like people who have great softs are suffering the same fate I am.
The splitter thing could be a decent theory. It's possible that schools are taking a much tougher stance on splitters, but I'm not sure why they would do that.
However, they seem afraid that splitters aren't interested enough in them (as opposed to <insert higher ranked school here> where a high LSAT is more likely to carry a person than just a high GPA). I'm thinking that their plan is to wait for HYS to get first pick at high-scoring splitters, then CCN, and then take an uncharacteristically high number of people off of the waitlists if they continue showing interest at that point.
Even if that does occur, however, it introduces a few problems for us applicants:
1) It provides relatively little time for us to plan our upcoming lives. It turns what should have been the relaxing and exciting final year/few months before law school into an anxious well of disappointment. We'll be scrambling to find housing and feel more pressured to just "settle" for whoever already accepted us.
2) Are they saving any scholarship money for us?
3) We won't have enough lucrative offers or time to negotiate as effectively as in past cycles.
TLDR: Even T14s are being insecure over the LSAT drops and we (splitters) are paying the price for it rather than being rewarded for our interest and high scores since schools are more worried about taking a chance on us (as opposed to reverse-splitters who are less likely to hit HYSCCN level and applicants with both high LSATs and high GPAs who are simply more desirable). Just thinking out loud here.
- PrezRand

- Posts: 1608
- Joined: Sat Jun 13, 2015 4:31 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I fear this will happen again next cycle
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Do adcoms have the day off?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Fix it JesusMr_Chukes wrote:My friend had better stats than me, he is also a URM. His personal statement talked about someone else and never really said anything about him. He is at Whittier now.
-
SmallK

- Posts: 186
- Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2016 10:09 am
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I spot-checked a few academic calendars -- it's all over the place who does and doesn't have the day off, but only HLS mentioned admin offices (they're off).Rigo wrote:Do adcoms have the day off?
- jstans

- Posts: 253
- Joined: Fri Dec 09, 2016 12:12 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
Came to this same realization yesterday and drafted a bunch of negotiation emails out of sheer panic.somedeadman wrote:ThisRigo wrote:I'm beginning to second guess if my safeties are even safeties anymore and I'm worried I'll have nothing to negotiate with.
-
Rigo

- Posts: 16639
- Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm
Re: TLS c/o 2020 Applicants (hotdog pole)
I thought about it and I'm gonna go hard on the negotiation. Since I'm willing to sit out the cycle at the end of the day, I can really play chicken.
I'm such a neverL at this point I may just sit out anyways.
I'm such a neverL at this point I may just sit out anyways.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login